Re: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-27 Thread speleosteele
Charles,

Thank you very much for taking care of this chore.  

Bill 

-- Original message -- 
From: Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org 

 Just a small update from the list-owner around here. 2006 was a very 
 good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing list. 
 Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no major problems 
 around here. 
 
 A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found my very 
 first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our previous 
 home of this wonderful mailing list. It got me to thinking and I went 
 to see if the domain was available, and low and behold, cavetex.net was 
 unowned. I snatched up quickly, then put it in my notes of things to 
 do. Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my notes, dog ate them, you 
 know the story. Anyways, it struck me tonight to go looking for that 
 domain, and realized I already owned the rights to it :) 
 
 Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it points 
 to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that gives a 
 description and why it's there. Nothing special, just thought I would 
 let everyone know that our old home lives. Any old emails sent to that 
 domain will get forwarded to the new one. 
 
 This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries to find 
 the new list. Something that should have been done much sooner, but 
 that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the interweb :) 
 
 Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a 
 great year! 
 Charles 
 
 
 - 
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com 
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com 
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com 
 

RE: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-27 Thread Johnson, Russ
 Charles,
I think this is very cool news.  I thought you might enjoy the post
below from the previous century, when, as I vaguely recall, flaming
arguments and mass unsubscribing roughly coincided with the moving the
cavetex email server.  And when, apparently, I was in the mood to wax
poetic.

Take care,
Russ K. Johnson
1207 Ford St.
Llano, TX 78643


-Original Message-
From: Johnson, Russ [mailto:johns...@mail.rfweston.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 2:39 PM
To: cave...@mailing-list.net
Subject: CaveTex: Eulogy

Some will say that Cavetex is better off now.
  
We needed only accept Cavetex and we would be served.  It was out there
for us.  For each of us. -- Texas Caver

Cavetex suffered a brutal bought with self destructivism several weeks
ago.  Self doubt and noisy confidence took up arms, heaping insult upon
injury.  Everyone could see.  Everyone knew.  By Cavetex' own nature,
our friend did not hide the intensifying conflict.   This must certainly
have put the caretakers of our soon forgotten patron on alert.  And to
be sure they took steps to stop the hemorrhaging.  But our precious
friend never did recover, choosing instead to die nobly.  

It is as painful as it is plain, to those who knew and loved Cavetex,
that too much was lost.  In the silent vacuum of the calm after the
storm, our companion had no choice but to withdraw...there was nothing
left to show, nothing more to share.  Who in our community can say that
they do not notice; the once fertile fields of discussion now lay
barren.  The cure worse than the disease...Cavetex knew this.  And
rather than be subject to such treatment from those it lived to serve,
Cavetex has chosen not to live.

And it will be our loss.  We will all miss Cavetex and reminisce about
the long gone days when we all were part of the Golden Age of Cavetex.
We will delude ourselves into believing that it was not our fault.  We
will inevitably forget our shame.  

Cavetex would not want us to mourn.  Not having such a collection of
eccentrics to deal with will be a peaceful and welcome change I'm sure.
I'll bet Cavetex sensed the fast approaching rapture, and faithfully
laid down everything, I say to you, acquiesced to the pulling of the
plug, for our sake...but who am I to eulogize...

And be forewarned...my fellow cavers and friends, I submit that any
reinvention or supposed reincarnation of the old is not the same.
Cavetex is dead.  A new server should be called by another name.
Perhaps comfortless substitute is appropriate, or maybe Empty
Holetex.  But I condemn any attempt to name an imposter Cavetex as
tasteless at best, and at worst...sacrilegious.

 
Russ Johnson
UT Grotto Caver, amateur satirist, and future evangelical magnate
NSS43751


-Original Message-
From: Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:54 PM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative update

Just a small update from the list-owner around here.  2006 was a very
good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing list.  
Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no major problems
around here.

A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found my very
first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our previous
home of this wonderful mailing list.  It got me to thinking and I went
to see if the domain was available, and low and behold, cavetex.net was
unowned.  I snatched up quickly, then put it in my notes of things to
do.  Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my notes, dog ate them, you
know the story.  Anyways, it struck me tonight to go looking for that
domain, and realized I already owned the rights to it :)

Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it points
to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that gives a
description and why it's there.  Nothing special, just thought I would
let everyone know that our old home lives.  Any old emails sent to that
domain will get forwarded to the new one.

This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries to find
the new list.  Something that should have been done much sooner, but
that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the interweb :)

Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a
great year!
Charles


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





RE: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-27 Thread Rick Corbell



Charles,
Thanks for all your work on behalf of keeping us cavers connected. I have profound respect for you folks who have charged into the inner workings of the web. I have just started an online HTML course. This week's first lesson is really scary. I'll be interested in checking what I can learn from the source code on cavetex and maybe help Randy Baker with our Bexar Grotto site.
Where did you learn html??
Rick Corbell




From:Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.orgTo:texascavers@texascavers.comSubject:[Texascavers] Administrative updateDate:Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:41 -0600Just a small update from the list-owner around here.2006 was a very good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing list.Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no major problems around here.A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found my very first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our previous home of this wonderful mailing list.It got me to thinking and I went to see if the domain was available, and low and behold, cavetex.net was 
unowned.I snatched up quickly, then put it in my notes of things to do.Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my notes, dog ate them, you know the story.Anyways, it struck me tonight to go looking for that domain, and realized I already owned the rights to it :)Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it points to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that gives a description and why it's there.Nothing special, just thought I would let everyone know that our old home lives.Any old emails sent to that domain will get forwarded to the new one.This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries to find the new list.Something that should have been done much sooner, 
but that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the interweb :)Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a great year!Charles-Visit our website: http://texascavers.comTo unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.comFor additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com Fixing up the home? Live Search can help 



Re: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-26 Thread Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith
Hey Bill, long time no chatter.  It's my small way of contributing.  
It's easier to contribute when its something we do for our jobs anyway 
and already have the resources available to get the task accomplished. 

I typically only get one or two emails a month about he mailing list, 
usually just a question or asking for digest access.  It literaly only 
takes me minutes to maintain the list over the month, so its no work.  I 
initally invested very little money and only a few hours to move and 
setup the mailing list from Bill Bentley.


No muss and no fuss, and everyone is happy.
See you underground!

speleoste...@comcast.net wrote:

Charles,
 
Thank you very much for taking care of this chore. 
 
Bill
 


-- Original message --
From: Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org

 Just a small update from the list-owner around here. 2006 was a
very
 good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing list.
 Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no major
problems
 around here.

 A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found
my very
 first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our
previous
 home of this wonderful mailing list. It got me to thinking and I
went
 to see if the domain was available, and low and behold,
cavetex.net was
 unowned. I snatched up quickly, then put it in my notes of
things to
 do. Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my notes, dog ate
them, you
 know the story. Anyways, it struck me ton ight to go looking for
that
 domain, and realized I already owned the rights to it :)

 Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it
points
 to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that gives a
 description and why it's there. Nothing special, just thought I
would
 let everyone know that our old home lives. Any old emails sent
to that
 domain will get forwarded to the new one.

 This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries
to find
 the new list. Something that should have been done much sooner, but
 that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the interweb :)

 Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a
 great year!
 Charles



-
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 T o unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 







Re: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-26 Thread Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith

Thanks Russ, I didn't get a chance to see that writeup.  Very poetic!

Johnson, Russ wrote:

 Charles,
I think this is very cool news.  I thought you might enjoy the post
below from the previous century, when, as I vaguely recall, flaming
arguments and mass unsubscribing roughly coincided with the moving the
cavetex email server.  And when, apparently, I was in the mood to wax
poetic.

Take care,
Russ K. Johnson
1207 Ford St.
Llano, TX 78643


-Original Message-
From: Johnson, Russ [mailto:johns...@mail.rfweston.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 2:39 PM

To: cave...@mailing-list.net
Subject: CaveTex: Eulogy

Some will say that Cavetex is better off now.
  
We needed only accept Cavetex and we would be served.  It was out there

for us.  For each of us. -- Texas Caver

Cavetex suffered a brutal bought with self destructivism several weeks
ago.  Self doubt and noisy confidence took up arms, heaping insult upon
injury.  Everyone could see.  Everyone knew.  By Cavetex' own nature,
our friend did not hide the intensifying conflict.   This must certainly
have put the caretakers of our soon forgotten patron on alert.  And to
be sure they took steps to stop the hemorrhaging.  But our precious
friend never did recover, choosing instead to die nobly.  


It is as painful as it is plain, to those who knew and loved Cavetex,
that too much was lost.  In the silent vacuum of the calm after the
storm, our companion had no choice but to withdraw...there was nothing
left to show, nothing more to share.  Who in our community can say that
they do not notice; the once fertile fields of discussion now lay
barren.  The cure worse than the disease...Cavetex knew this.  And
rather than be subject to such treatment from those it lived to serve,
Cavetex has chosen not to live.

And it will be our loss.  We will all miss Cavetex and reminisce about
the long gone days when we all were part of the Golden Age of Cavetex.
We will delude ourselves into believing that it was not our fault.  We
will inevitably forget our shame.  


Cavetex would not want us to mourn.  Not having such a collection of
eccentrics to deal with will be a peaceful and welcome change I'm sure.
I'll bet Cavetex sensed the fast approaching rapture, and faithfully
laid down everything, I say to you, acquiesced to the pulling of the
plug, for our sake...but who am I to eulogize...

And be forewarned...my fellow cavers and friends, I submit that any
reinvention or supposed reincarnation of the old is not the same.
Cavetex is dead.  A new server should be called by another name.
Perhaps comfortless substitute is appropriate, or maybe Empty
Holetex.  But I condemn any attempt to name an imposter Cavetex as
tasteless at best, and at worst...sacrilegious.

 
Russ Johnson

UT Grotto Caver, amateur satirist, and future evangelical magnate
NSS43751


-Original Message-
From: Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:54 PM

To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative update

Just a small update from the list-owner around here.  2006 was a very
good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing list.  
Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no major problems

around here.

A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found my very
first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our previous
home of this wonderful mailing list.  It got me to thinking and I went
to see if the domain was available, and low and behold, cavetex.net was
unowned.  I snatched up quickly, then put it in my notes of things to
do.  Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my notes, dog ate them, you
know the story.  Anyways, it struck me tonight to go looking for that
domain, and realized I already owned the rights to it :)

Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it points
to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that gives a
description and why it's there.  Nothing special, just thought I would
let everyone know that our old home lives.  Any old emails sent to that
domain will get forwarded to the new one.

This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries to find
the new list.  Something that should have been done much sooner, but
that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the interweb :)

Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a
great year!
Charles


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



  






Re: [Texascavers] Administrative update

2007-03-26 Thread Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith
Unfortunately cavetex is not a good place for example code.  What I know 
is all self taught, and most of my computer training is all self taught 
as well.  I didn't design http://texascavers.com, I aquired the website 
when I took over the mailing list and I've only done minor updates, 
never going back and cleaning up the code to make it fully compliant and 
correct, that takes time and hobbies get limited amounts of my time :)


I'll be happy to answer questions though, if you see something, and want 
to know how I did it, or why, I'll do the best I can to answer.


Good luck!
Charles

Rick Corbell wrote:




Charles,

Thanks for all your work on behalf of keeping us cavers connected.  I 
have profound respect for you folks who have charged into the inner 
workings of the web.  I have just started an online HTML course.  This 
week's first lesson is really scary.  I'll be interested in checking 
what I can learn from the source code on cavetex and maybe help Randy 
Baker with our Bexar Grotto site.


Where did you learn html??

Rick Corbell


From:  /Charles 'wokka' Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org/
To:  /texascavers@texascavers.com/
Subject:  /[Texascavers] Administrative update/
Date:  /Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:41 -0600/
Just a small update from the list-owner around here.  2006 was a
very good and successful year for Texascavers.com and our mailing
list.  Things are stable, everyone is having a good time and no
major problems around here.

A few months ago I was browsing around some old email and found my
very first email from the original cavetex.net mailing list, our
previous home of this wonderful mailing list.  It got me to thinking
and I went to see if the domain was available, and low and behold,
cavetex.net was unowned.  I snatched up quickly, then put it in my
notes of things to do.  Well, I totally forgot about it, lost my
notes, dog ate them, you know the story.  Anyways, it struck me
tonight to go looking for that domain, and realized I already owned
the rights to it :)

Anyways, long story made short, http://cavetex.net is alive, it
points to a quick and dirty webpage on http://texascavers.com that
gives a description and why it's there.  Nothing special, just
thought I would let everyone know that our old home lives.  Any old
emails sent to that domain will get forwarded to the new one.

This is just in case someone has a really old bookmark and tries to
find the new list.  Something that should have been done much
sooner, but that's the life of a hobbyist in the wide world of the
interweb :)

Now, back to your regularly scheduled chitchat about caving, have a
great year!
Charles


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Fixing up the home? Live Search can help 
http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2731??PS=47575 






Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Bentley
Better you than me!
HAHAHAH!

Just kidding

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2


 Just a quick note to say that all seems to be running smoothly.  
 However, I've had a couple people contact me with problems pertaining to 
 delivery of the mail, so if you are seeing anything out of the ordinary, 
 please let me know.
 
 If anyone needs to contact me, please email me at this address: 
 wo...@justfamily.org and if you don't get a response within 24 hours, 
 use wok...@gmail.com
 
 I have the 2nd address in case the mail server isn't routing you 
 properly for any reason and its separate (justfamily.org is operated 
 from the same server as texascavers.com).
 
 Your discussions will resume at the regular scheduled time :)
 
 Questions, comments or complaints are always welcome
 Charles
 
 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 


Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith
Heh, so far two people have mentioned double postings...  either they 
have two addresses subscribed or something funky in their filter/rule setup.


I know that you worked with one of them, Paul Unger, and according to 
the email headers, his mail server is duplicating them or the client.  
Both of his emails had the same SMTP id on them, which tells me that 
it's probably his client ruleset.


Not sure about the other, Dave Belski.

Any history you can give about either would be appreciated.
Charles

Bill Bentley wrote:

Better you than me!
HAHAHAH!

Just kidding

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org

To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2


  
Just a quick note to say that all seems to be running smoothly.  
However, I've had a couple people contact me with problems pertaining to 
delivery of the mail, so if you are seeing anything out of the ordinary, 
please let me know.


If anyone needs to contact me, please email me at this address: 
wo...@justfamily.org and if you don't get a response within 24 hours, 
use wok...@gmail.com


I have the 2nd address in case the mail server isn't routing you 
properly for any reason and its separate (justfamily.org is operated 
from the same server as texascavers.com).


Your discussions will resume at the regular scheduled time :)

Questions, comments or complaints are always welcome
Charles

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com








Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Bentley
Your right
But Dave Belski is subscribed from 2 different addresses...

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
To: Bill Bentley cave...@cox.net
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2


 Heh, so far two people have mentioned double postings...  either they
 have two addresses subscribed or something funky in their filter/rule
setup.

 I know that you worked with one of them, Paul Unger, and according to
 the email headers, his mail server is duplicating them or the client.
 Both of his emails had the same SMTP id on them, which tells me that
 it's probably his client ruleset.

 Not sure about the other, Dave Belski.

 Any history you can give about either would be appreciated.
 Charles

 Bill Bentley wrote:
  Better you than me!
  HAHAHAH!
 
  Just kidding
 
  Bill
  - Original Message - 
  From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org
  To: texascavers@texascavers.com
  Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM
  Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2
 
 
 
  Just a quick note to say that all seems to be running smoothly.
  However, I've had a couple people contact me with problems pertaining
to
  delivery of the mail, so if you are seeing anything out of the
ordinary,
  please let me know.
 
  If anyone needs to contact me, please email me at this address:
  wo...@justfamily.org and if you don't get a response within 24 hours,
  use wok...@gmail.com
 
  I have the 2nd address in case the mail server isn't routing you
  properly for any reason and its separate (justfamily.org is operated
  from the same server as texascavers.com).
 
  Your discussions will resume at the regular scheduled time :)
 
  Questions, comments or complaints are always welcome
  Charles
 
  -
  Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 
 




Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith

Actually 3... just figured that out with Dave a bit ago.  Easy fix :)

Thanks!

Bill Bentley wrote:

Your right
But Dave Belski is subscribed from 2 different addresses...

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org

To: Bill Bentley cave...@cox.net
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2


  

Heh, so far two people have mentioned double postings...  either they
have two addresses subscribed or something funky in their filter/rule


setup.
  

I know that you worked with one of them, Paul Unger, and according to
the email headers, his mail server is duplicating them or the client.
Both of his emails had the same SMTP id on them, which tells me that
it's probably his client ruleset.

Not sure about the other, Dave Belski.

Any history you can give about either would be appreciated.
Charles

Bill Bentley wrote:


Better you than me!
HAHAHAH!

Just kidding

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Charles wokka Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org

To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2



  

Just a quick note to say that all seems to be running smoothly.
However, I've had a couple people contact me with problems pertaining


to
  

delivery of the mail, so if you are seeing anything out of the


ordinary,
  

please let me know.

If anyone needs to contact me, please email me at this address:
wo...@justfamily.org and if you don't get a response within 24 hours,
use wok...@gmail.com

I have the 2nd address in case the mail server isn't routing you
properly for any reason and its separate (justfamily.org is operated
from the same server as texascavers.com).

Your discussions will resume at the regular scheduled time :)

Questions, comments or complaints are always welcome
Charles

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





  






Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Bill Mixon
Charles -- Right now, texascavers messages come with the reply to field
set to texascavers, which is why we're seeing things that ought to have been
sent to the originator of a message, but instead went to everybody. Figure
out how to make the reply to field echo the source of the message.
Right now the from field shows the original source, but the reply to
field does not.
I'm getting two copies of many, but not all, of the messages.
Mysterious. -- Bill Mixon

---
You may Reply to the address from which this message was sent,
but note the following permanent addresses for long-term use:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org, sa...@amcs-pubs.org



Re: [Texascavers] Administrative Update #2

2007-03-26 Thread Charles wokka Goldsmith
You are the second person to bring this to my attention.  I've seen a 
couple of the duplicates as well, and I have no idea what's causing 
that, I can't find a source to it, but will continue to dig.


I'll bring up the reply to with everyone in the group.

Thanks

Bill Mixon wrote:

Charles -- Right now, texascavers messages come with the reply to field
set to texascavers, which is why we're seeing things that ought to have been
sent to the originator of a message, but instead went to everybody. Figure
out how to make the reply to field echo the source of the message.
Right now the from field shows the original source, but the reply to
field does not.
I'm getting two copies of many, but not all, of the messages.
Mysterious. -- Bill Mixon

---
You may Reply to the address from which this message was sent,
but note the following permanent addresses for long-term use:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org, sa...@amcs-pubs.org