[tw] Re: [TW5] Changing an Image from Embedded to _canonical_uri
A very interesting link – thank you, Mario. – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
I guess it was not intended to operate on a list of tiddlers. It's implemented like any other filter operator, taking an input list and producing an output list. I think it should rather be *[has[type]each[type]get[type]*... not returning blanks. But *get* never returns blanks, although *each* does return tiddlers in which the field in question is blank. So on tiddlywiki.com at present, *[each[color]]* returns six titles, whereas *[get[color]]* and *[each[get[color]]* return five. But perhaps there is a case where you do want specifically declared blanks, rather than undefined. In exploring the *title* operator today, I've discovered that it supports negation (previously undocumented). *title[x]* is absolute, ignoring its input. But *!title[x]* is relative, and serves to filter out *x* from the input. Oddly, though, it doesn't filter out *x* if *x* doesn't exist as a tiddler. So we can't use *!title[]* to filter out blanks from other lists. I was about to extend *each*, so it does handle list fields So that, given one tiddler with list *A B C* and another with list *A C E G*, it would return *A B C E G*? That sounds like a relative form of the *list* operator: *[tag[foo]list:relative[]]*. Or an absolute form of it that somehow took a *list* of text references as its parameter. Perhaps it should rather be: *[tag[foo]get:list[]]* or *[**tag[foo]* *get:list[my-list-field]]* with the behaviour you describe That would also be logical. In fact, the concept of unpacking a list into an array is so useful that maybe it deserves its own unsuffixed operator. – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
One othe related oddity of the *list* operator is that it behaves very differently when negated: * *[list[t!!f]]* is absolute, and outputs the titles listed in field *f* of tiddler *t* * *[tag[foo]!list[t!!f]]* is relative, and outputs any foo-tagged titles that are not listed in field *f* of tiddler *t* – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] [TW5] Static sites - sitemap and ATOM plugins updated...
*ATOM feed *- https://github.com/dullroar/TW5-atomfeed *Sitemap *- https://github.com/dullroar/TW5-sitemap Both contain the following bug fixes: 1. Use the approved TW date formatting (/$tw.utils.formatDateString()/), per Mario's suggestion on 1/18 (thanks, Mario). 2. Gracefully handle tiddlers that do not have a modified field, per the bug sini-Kit reported on 1/18 (thanks, sini-Kit). 3. Use their respective /atomserver///sitemapserver/ tiddlers to specify the server URL to use throughout the output files (I was using them in some places but not others). I hadn't forgotten about these, just life with work, running, a wife and daughter in college, and two teens still in high school and both involved in extracurricular activities plays havoc with trying to get any fun work done. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Punjabi Translation
I did the same thing in the danish translation. To be honest I do not know a danish word for some of the words, never heard it. A lot of english words are mixed into danish in normal talk and articles. Birthe On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 8:11:16 PM UTC+1, Atul Grover wrote: Thanks Tobias, You are right... a few words need to remain in Internationally recognized notation. As regards 'parser and other such words, one can decide only after using the wiki. I guess a translation goes through a draft or two before it becomes usable in the true sense. I shall use the translated version for a while and submit another version (with better acceptability). Regards Atul On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 1:02:55 PM UTC+5:30, Atul Grover wrote: Hi Jeremy, Here is my first translation for North Indian audience. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Example... each of type @ filters http://filters.tiddlyspot.com/#each%20of%20type One pedantic footnote about the each approach, from experience: obviously if only one tiddler in your file contains a particular field value, e.g., [myfieldname[fieldvalue*1*]], if you use your radio button to change that tiddler's field value to [myfieldname[fieldvalue*2*]], then fieldvalue*1 *will no longer appear as an option in the radio button list. For my use case, I found I still needed to create placeholder tiddlers containing the fieldvalues that I wanted to be always available for selection. cmari On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 7:41:37 AM UTC-8, Tobias Beer wrote: Why is *get* special, such that *[get[type]]* doesn't mean *[each[type]get[type]*? I think it boils down to a matter of implementation. Possibly *get *came after *each *and was designed for the purpose of fetching a single tiddler's field, e.g. to set a variable. I guess it was not intended to operate on a list of tiddlers. But the behaviour you sugest sounds like a meaningful expectation because those duplicates really are undesired. Otherwise, we'd need another *unique* filter operand to get rid of the duplicates. So, theoretically, I think it could operate like *each*, but then I think it should rather be *[has[type]each[type]get[type]*... not returning blanks. But perhaps there is a case where you do want specifically declared blanks, rather than undefined. I was about to extend *each*, so it does handle list fields, e.g. *[each:list[]]* or *[each:list[my-list-field]*. But now I am thinking that this isn't consistent with the way *each* actually works right now. Perhaps it should rather be: *[tag[foo]get:list[]]* or *[**tag[foo]* *get:list[my-list-field]]* with the behaviour you describe, thus returning individual tiddler references of list fields, not those distinct combinations or values thereof that would be returned now. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
In fact, the concept of unpacking a list into an array is so useful that maybe it deserves its own unsuffixed operator. And come to think of it, that operator already exists: it's *list[tiddler!!field]*. What's needed is the reverse of that, so that the parameter (*tiddler!!field*) can be specified as the input instead. – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] Strange duplicate display of tiddlywiki in browser window
This TW is definitely broken. An empty.html file is at least 1.2 MByte in size. You file is smaller, so you may have downloaded it with File: Save as dialog, which doesn't work. Click the big green button download empty or download full and try again. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] TED Talks TW - Learning Stuff by building stuff
Alberto, I just searched and didn't find Jeremy's name. That doesn't mean he didn't do a talk as they don't post all talks. If anyone knows any TED Talks that might mention TiddlyWiki let me know. Thanks. Rich Shumaker -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
obviously if only one tiddler in your file contains a particular field value, e.g., [myfieldname[fieldvalue*1*]], if you use your radio button to change that tiddler's field value to [myfieldname[fieldvalue*2*]], then fieldvalue*1 *will no longer appear as an option in the radio button list. Yes, that is true... at which point your ui should also provide a way to add a yet undefined new type. For my use case, I found I still needed to create placeholder tiddlers containing the fieldvalues that I wanted to be always available for selection. I would think for most usecases it is the best approach to define the options in a precise spot, rather than take them from existing values. However, selecting anything via radio-buttons does not necessarily mean to change any of the tiddlers from which the options were constructed. It only means to make a selection, perhaps for some dependent ui that generates desired output. So, the radio button would actually set some state or temporary tiddler. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [tw] Re: Using TiddlyWiki in Node WebKit
Not to confuse things, but here is a simpler way of running the github files which does not require any modifications to package.json, and only uses index.htm. https://gist.github.com/Arlen22/45f1a460c9e348fa50ad On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Arlen Beiler arlen...@gmail.com wrote: You can have multiple wikis if you use different editions. Each edition folder is a wiki. In nodewebkit.js, that's what $tw.boot.argv = ['./editions/server']; is. You could possibly add a command line argument. That'd be something to explore on the node-webkit side. Running at the same time? Not right now I don't think. Well, maybe. You'd still have to run it as a second instance. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Danielo Rodríguez rdani...@gmail.com wrote: El sábado, 24 de enero de 2015, 0:56:31 (UTC+1), Arlen Beiler escribió: Actually, I just read over your emails again, and finally saw the second line that you posted ( Not allowed to load local resource: ). Definitely check that index.htm is set right in package.json. I just tried changing the name to something wrong, and that is the error I get. Hope that helps. :) -Arlen I feel so dumb!!! Stupid, stupid boy! That was the problem. In this case, the lack of L at the end of the extension. After that, it worked like a charm. I have very bad eye for details like this. Thank you so much, for both, helping my making this working AND creating the instructions for using the NODE.JS version of TW as a single application. Now it's time to see how can we have multiple wikis without having multiple copies of the TW5 repo or node-webkit. THANK YOU! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Title vs Caption. Why should titles be unique? Is there an internal ID for each tiddler?
Maybe this discussion is worth reading: preventing tiddler-links to break by using ids as reference that translate into titles. https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/tiddlywiki/id$20field%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/Y1V7oyBLpSs/zQb6grcJcPIJ https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/Y1V7oyBLpSs/discussion And a related issue... https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1342 Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Why is *get* special, such that *[get[type]]* doesn't mean *[each[type]get[type]*? I think it boils down to a matter of implementation. Possibly *get *came after *each *and was designed for the purpose of fetching a single tiddler's field, e.g. to set a variable. I guess it was not intended to operate on a list of tiddlers. But the behaviour you sugest sounds like a meaningful expectation because those duplicates really are undesired. Otherwise, we'd need another *unique* filter operand to get rid of the duplicates. So, theoretically, I think it could operate like *each*, but then I think it should rather be *[has[type]each[type]get[type]*... not returning blanks. But perhaps there is a case where you do want specifically declared blanks, rather than undefined. I was about to extend *each*, so it does handle list fields, e.g. *[each:list[]]* or *[each:list[my-list-field]*. But now I am thinking that this isn't consistent with the way *each* actually works right now. Perhaps it should rather be: *[tag[foo]get:list[]]* or *[**tag[foo]* *get:list[my-list-field]]* with the behaviour you describe, thus returning individual tiddler references of list fields, not those distinct combinations or values thereof that would be returned now. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] Changing an Image from Embedded to _canonical_uri
Probably this: From hangout #38 11.March.2014 1:03:54 Jeremy- proposal: .. hiding internal tiddler fields, because they are immutable ... discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688v=6obIvP5NiQ4x-yt-cl=84503534feature=player_detailpage#t=3834 about 10 minutes This was the initial proposal of making tiddlers immutable, so plugin authors have to use the provided functions to manipulate the tw store. Thanks Mario! Will definitely take a look. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Hi Alan, It's interesting you mention this, because I was on the verge of posting something to the Dev group about this yesterday. The *get* operator will output a list of the values in a specified field in its input tiddlers: *[tag[Example]get[my-field]]*. But the output can contain duplicates. This is odd, because every other filter operator takes care to avoid outputting duplicates. I wonder if *get* is *intended* to be different. Or is this an oversight that ought to be fixed? – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] TED Talks TW - Learning Stuff by building stuff
Fixed that issue. Thanks again BJ. Rich Shumaker -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] Easy clickable images
Excellent! Thanks, Jon On Friday, 23 January 2015 23:20:06 UTC, Tobias Beer wrote: Nice, added intructions here... http://tb5.tiddlyspot.com/#SVG-Edit Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Use the each filter... $list filter=[each[type]get[type]] variable=type $radio field=type value=typetype/$radiobr /$list Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [tw] Re: Using TiddlyWiki in Node WebKit
El sábado, 24 de enero de 2015, 0:56:31 (UTC+1), Arlen Beiler escribió: Actually, I just read over your emails again, and finally saw the second line that you posted ( Not allowed to load local resource: ). Definitely check that index.htm is set right in package.json. I just tried changing the name to something wrong, and that is the error I get. Hope that helps. :) -Arlen I feel so dumb!!! Stupid, stupid boy! That was the problem. In this case, the lack of L at the end of the extension. After that, it worked like a charm. I have very bad eye for details like this. Thank you so much, for both, helping my making this working AND creating the instructions for using the NODE.JS version of TW as a single application. Now it's time to see how can we have multiple wikis without having multiple copies of the TW5 repo or node-webkit. THANK YOU! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Interesting. Why is *get* special, such that *[get[type]]* doesn't mean *[each[type]get[type]*? – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Example... each of type @ filters http://filters.tiddlyspot.com/#each%20of%20type Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] TED Talks TW - Learning Stuff by building stuff
I thought Jeremy or someone else did a TED talk about TW. Hélas ! Alberto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Title vs Caption. Why should titles be unique? Is there an internal ID for each tiddler?
Maybe this discussion is worth reading: preventing tiddler-links to break by using ids as reference that translate into titles. https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/tiddlywiki/id$20field%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/Y1V7oyBLpSs/zQb6grcJcPIJ https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/Y1V7oyBLpSs/discussion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Is it possible to get a list of unique values of a single field?
Hello, I have this exact setup for a dropdown of categories for my bookmarks. It is fairly simple with the use of the each operand: $list filter=[tag[bookmark]each[topic]] Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [tw] Re: Using TiddlyWiki in Node WebKit
You can have multiple wikis if you use different editions. Each edition folder is a wiki. In nodewebkit.js, that's what $tw.boot.argv = ['./editions/server']; is. You could possibly add a command line argument. That'd be something to explore on the node-webkit side. Running at the same time? Not right now I don't think. Well, maybe. You'd still have to run it as a second instance. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Danielo Rodríguez rdani...@gmail.com wrote: El sábado, 24 de enero de 2015, 0:56:31 (UTC+1), Arlen Beiler escribió: Actually, I just read over your emails again, and finally saw the second line that you posted ( Not allowed to load local resource: ). Definitely check that index.htm is set right in package.json. I just tried changing the name to something wrong, and that is the error I get. Hope that helps. :) -Arlen I feel so dumb!!! Stupid, stupid boy! That was the problem. In this case, the lack of L at the end of the extension. After that, it worked like a charm. I have very bad eye for details like this. Thank you so much, for both, helping my making this working AND creating the instructions for using the NODE.JS version of TW as a single application. Now it's time to see how can we have multiple wikis without having multiple copies of the TW5 repo or node-webkit. THANK YOU! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: [TW5] Changing an Image from Embedded to _canonical_uri
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 12:54:41 AM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: Presumably the reason for freezing the fields is to force all modifications to go through a single point – namely *addTiddler* – to guarantee that the display gets refreshed in response. Let's wait and see what the master will add as a rationale to all this. I sure appreciate the fact that whomever wishes to modify a tiddler is forced to think about it more thoroughly. Probably this: From hangout #38 11.March.2014 1:03:54 Jeremy- proposal: .. hiding internal tiddler fields, because they are immutable ... discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688v=6obIvP5NiQ4x-yt-cl=84503534feature=player_detailpage#t=3834 about 10 minutes This was the initial proposal of making tiddlers immutable, so plugin authors have to use the provided functions to manipulate the tw store. Like Astrid stated: Presumably the reason for freezing the fields is to force all modifications to go through a single point – namely *addTiddler* – to guarantee that the display gets refreshed in response. have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[tw] Re: Trouble importing plugins
issue opened https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1415 cheers On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 9:52:15 AM UTC-6, Pedro Lobo wrote: Sure thing BJ, I'm running OS X Yosemite, all updates installed. Browser, I tried both with Firefox (v35.0) and Safari (v8.0.2). Cheers, Pedro On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 11:33:06 AM UTC, Pedro Lobo wrote: Hi Everybody, I'm rather new to TiddlyWiki, but it looks promising so I decided to give it a try for a while. I opted to got the server route, installed it via NPM and have it up and running. However, I've stumbled upon something that could possibly be a deal breaker: I prefer to do my writing using Markdown (hate Wiki text). When trying to import the Markdown plugin, it simply fails. Rather than the expected result, I get this instead of the plugin: http://ds.lobo.li/Screen-Shot-2015-01-22-at-11.31.48/ Any help would greatly be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
