Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

2014-08-14 Thread alnilam
Sorry. s/Tom/Ton/  Apologies, Ton. Apparently I can't read good.

On Friday, August 15, 2014 12:55:17 AM UTC-4, aln...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hey, thanks for all the responses. 
>
> Yes,  is deprecated. The other, more semantically correct examples 
> Daniel mentioned would have been a better example.  is probably the 
> closest to what I was looking for. 
>
> Tom's solution or something like it involving a macro that wraps the text 
> with  tags will probably fit the bill.
>
> - A
>
> On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:57:40 AM UTC-4, Ton Gerner wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alnilam,
>>
>> You can create a monospace style:
>>
>> /* MONOSPACED TEXT */
>> .monospace {
>> font-family: Inconsolata, Consolas, monospace, serif;
>> }
>>
>> and a macro:
>>
>> \define mono(text)
>> @@.monospace $text$@@
>> \end
>>
>> Then you can create monospaced text by:
>>
>> <>
>>
>> If you make a bookmarklet for it, it will be easy to get monospace text.
>>
>> For making bookmarklets the easy way (for non-programmers), see [1] (I 
>> made a 'monospace' bookmarklet as well).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ton
>>
>> [1] http://tw5bookmarklets.tiddlyspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:16:41 AM UTC+2, Daniel Baird wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not a solution to your problem, but I'm interested to know what you 
>>> using mono to represent, semantically?  Not source code, obviously.  I'm 
>>> wondering if it is covered by a html semantic element at all (like var, 
>>> kbd, samp, code, etc).
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> ;Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 August 2014 12:21,  wrote:
>>>
 The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the 
 transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem 
 is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_ 
 monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just 
 inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block 
 syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for 
 that like some other wikitext  
 variants?


 On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:

> Hi Jack
>
> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work 
> differently in TW5
>
> The new syntax is described here:
>
> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%
> 5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%
> 20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>
> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" 
> and TW5 are?
>
> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>
> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>
> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax 
> differences - contributions welcome :)
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:
>
>> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was 
>> the difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some 
>> topics 
>> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding 
>> topic on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would 
>> be monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not 
>> quite sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between 
>> "Classic" and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jack
>>>
>>> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at 
>>> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of 
>>> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully 
>>> backwards compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext 
>>> syntax. The documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new 
>>> version.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:
>>>
 I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the 
 one found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some 
 points, and the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem 
 complete yet. Is there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?

 Thanks,
 Jack

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.

 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation


Hey, thanks for all the responses. 

Yes,  is deprecated. The other, more semantically correct examples 
Daniel mentioned would have been a better example.  is probably the 
closest to what I was looking for. 

Tom's solution or something like it involving a macro that wraps the text 
with  tags will probably fit the bill.

- A

On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:57:40 AM UTC-4, Ton Gerner wrote:
>
> Hi Alnilam,
>
> You can create a monospace style:
>
> /* MONOSPACED TEXT */
> .monospace {
> font-family: Inconsolata, Consolas, monospace, serif;
> }
>
> and a macro:
>
> \define mono(text)
> @@.monospace $text$@@
> \end
>
> Then you can create monospaced text by:
>
> <>
>
> If you make a bookmarklet for it, it will be easy to get monospace text.
>
> For making bookmarklets the easy way (for non-programmers), see [1] (I 
> made a 'monospace' bookmarklet as well).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ton
>
> [1] http://tw5bookmarklets.tiddlyspot.com/
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:16:41 AM UTC+2, Daniel Baird wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's not a solution to your problem, but I'm interested to know what you 
>> using mono to represent, semantically?  Not source code, obviously.  I'm 
>> wondering if it is covered by a html semantic element at all (like var, 
>> kbd, samp, code, etc).
>>
>> Cheers
>> ;Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 10 August 2014 12:21,  wrote:
>>
>>> The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the 
>>> transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem 
>>> is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_ 
>>> monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just 
>>> inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block 
>>> syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for 
>>> that like some other wikitext  
>>> variants?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jack

 > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work 
 differently in TW5

 The new syntax is described here:

 http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%
 5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%
 20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D

 > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and 
 TW5 are?

 Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:

 http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com

 I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax 
 differences - contributions welcome :)

 Best wishes

 Jeremy




 On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:

> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was 
> the difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some 
> topics 
> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding 
> topic on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be 
> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not 
> quite 
> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between 
> "Classic" 
> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack
>>
>> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at 
>> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of 
>> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully 
>> backwards compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext 
>> syntax. The documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new 
>> version.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one 
>>> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, 
>>> and the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. 
>>> Is there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jeremy Ruston
>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>  
>


 -- 
 Jeremy Ruston
 mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
  
>>>  -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>> To unsubsc

Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Hi Alnilam,

You can create a monospace style:

/* MONOSPACED TEXT */
.monospace {
font-family: Inconsolata, Consolas, monospace, serif;
}

and a macro:

\define mono(text)
@@.monospace $text$@@
\end

Then you can create monospaced text by:

<>

If you make a bookmarklet for it, it will be easy to get monospace text.

For making bookmarklets the easy way (for non-programmers), see [1] (I made 
a 'monospace' bookmarklet as well).

Cheers,

Ton

[1] http://tw5bookmarklets.tiddlyspot.com/


On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:16:41 AM UTC+2, Daniel Baird wrote:
>
>
> It's not a solution to your problem, but I'm interested to know what you 
> using mono to represent, semantically?  Not source code, obviously.  I'm 
> wondering if it is covered by a html semantic element at all (like var, 
> kbd, samp, code, etc).
>
> Cheers
> ;Daniel
>
>
> On 10 August 2014 12:21, > wrote:
>
>> The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the 
>> transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem 
>> is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_ 
>> monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just 
>> inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block 
>> syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for 
>> that like some other wikitext  
>> variants?
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jack
>>>
>>> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work differently 
>>> in TW5
>>>
>>> The new syntax is described here:
>>>
>>> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%
>>> 20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>>>
>>> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and 
>>> TW5 are?
>>>
>>> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>>>
>>> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>>>
>>> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax 
>>> differences - contributions welcome :)
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:
>>>
 I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the 
 difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics 
 covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding 
 topic on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be 
 monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not 
 quite 
 sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between 
 "Classic" 
 and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.

 Jack


 On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:

> Hi Jack
>
> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at 
> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of 
> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully 
> backwards compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext 
> syntax. The documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new 
> version.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:
>
>> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one 
>> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, 
>> and the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. 
>> Is there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jack
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>  

>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>>  
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel Baird
> objoke: I had a problem and decided to solve it with threading. Now, 
> have problems. two I
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece

Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

It's not a solution to your problem, but I'm interested to know what you
using mono to represent, semantically?  Not source code, obviously.  I'm
wondering if it is covered by a html semantic element at all (like var,
kbd, samp, code, etc).

Cheers
;Daniel


On 10 August 2014 12:21,  wrote:

> The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the
> transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem
> is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_
> monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just
> inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block
> syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for
> that like some other wikitext 
> variants?
>
>
> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack
>>
>> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work differently
>> in TW5
>>
>> The new syntax is described here:
>>
>> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%
>> 20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>>
>> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and
>> TW5 are?
>>
>> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>>
>> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>>
>> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax
>> differences - contributions welcome :)
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the
>>> difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics
>>> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding
>>> topic on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be
>>> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not quite
>>> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic"
>>> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jack

 Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at
 http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of
 TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards
 compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The
 documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.

 Best wishes

 Jeremy



 On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:

> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one
> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points,
> and the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is
> there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



 --
 Jeremy Ruston
 mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com

>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Ruston
>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Daniel Baird
objoke: I had a problem and decided to solve it with threading. Now,
have problems. two I

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Hi Alnilam


> I guess we're running out of mark-up characters.
>

Indeed, it's an ongoing struggle to choose characters that match other
implementations, are easy to type, and ideally have some semantic
relationship with the desired function.


>
> And as I search around now for examples of how this is implemented in
> MarkDown or reStructuredText, I realize that both apparently skipped over
> this and treat all instances of monospace text as code. I'm not sure if
> this was intentional or oversight. It seems to me like having  in
> addition to  is a basic markup style like , , and .
>

You could define a macro to do it:

\define mono(text)
$text$
\end

And then <>

I'm open to adding a syntax for monospaced text if we can devise one that
doesn't clash with existing syntax.

It turns out that  itself is actually deprecated.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/tt

Best wishes

Jeremy


>
>
> On Sunday, August 10, 2014 5:56:58 AM UTC-4, Andreas Hahn wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> to make Jeremy's example even more clear, I think this demonstrates what
>> he was referring to:
>>
>> http://tiddlywikiguides.org/monospace.html
>>
>> /Andreas
>>
>> Am 10.08.2014 11:22, schrieb PMario:
>>
>> On Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:31:52 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
>>>   Could you use TW5's `inline monospace` but just change the stylesheet
>>> to remove the background colour and border?
>>>
>>
>> I think it's easy to miss in Jeremy's example. The inline monospace
>> format is a "backtick" see:  `inline monospace`
>> see: http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%
>> 5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>>
>> have fun!
>> mario
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Sorry. I feel like I'm hijacking the thread. This is still tangent to the 
documentation, I think, but probably getting far into the weeds of markup 
philosophy.

I had not missed the single back-ticks. The single back-ticks are great for 
inline code. They insert  blocks into the html, which is good 
semantic markup. That's also not exactly the same thing as inline monospace 
(). 

If I change the stylesheet to remove the backgrounding from code elements, 
then I loose the ability to do nice big code blocks, or to do inline code 
when I specifically mean to. I'm a fan of big pretty code blocks and am 
using the highlight.js plugin pretty heavily so I'd rather not wipe out the 
formatting associated with . 

What I was asking for is either a return of, or an implementation of 
non-code monospace. The wikispaces  
link I posted shows an implementation where {{}} is used to insert  
tags. I understand now that the double-curly-braces are being used in TW5 
for transclusion. I guess we're running out of mark-up characters.

And as I search around now for examples of how this is implemented in 
MarkDown or reStructuredText, I realize that both apparently skipped over 
this and treat all instances of monospace text as code. I'm not sure if 
this was intentional or oversight. It seems to me like having  in 
addition to  is a basic markup style like , , and .


On Sunday, August 10, 2014 5:56:58 AM UTC-4, Andreas Hahn wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> to make Jeremy's example even more clear, I think this demonstrates what 
> he was referring to:
>
> http://tiddlywikiguides.org/monospace.html
>
> /Andreas
>
> Am 10.08.2014 11:22, schrieb PMario:
>  
> On Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:31:52 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: 
>>
>>   Could you use TW5's `inline monospace` but just change the stylesheet 
>> to remove the background colour and border?
>>   
>
> I think it's easy to miss in Jeremy's example. The inline monospace format 
> is a "backtick" see:  `inline monospace` 
> see: 
> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>
> have fun!
> mario
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com .
> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation


Hi,

to make Jeremy's example even more clear, I think this demonstrates what 
he was referring to:


http://tiddlywikiguides.org/monospace.html

/Andreas

Am 10.08.2014 11:22, schrieb PMario:

On Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:31:52 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:

Could you use TW5's `inline monospace` but just change the
stylesheet to remove the background colour and border?


I think it's easy to miss in Jeremy's example. The inline monospace 
format is a "backtick" see:  `inline monospace`
see: 
http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D


have fun!
mario
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com 
.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

On Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:31:52 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Could you use TW5's `inline monospace` but just change the stylesheet to 
> remove the background colour and border?
>

I think it's easy to miss in Jeremy's example. The inline monospace format 
is a "backtick" see:  `inline monospace` 
see: 
http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D

have fun!
mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Hi alnilam

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:21 AM,  wrote:

> The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the
> transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem
> is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_
> monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just
> inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block
> syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for
> that like some other wikitext 
> variants?
>

TW5 already uses double curly braces for transclusion.

Could you use TW5's `inline monospace` but just change the stylesheet to
remove the background colour and border?

Best wishes

Jeremy



>
>
> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack
>>
>> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work differently
>> in TW5
>>
>> The new syntax is described here:
>>
>> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%
>> 20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>>
>> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and
>> TW5 are?
>>
>> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>>
>> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>>
>> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax
>> differences - contributions welcome :)
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the
>>> difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics
>>> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding
>>> topic on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be
>>> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not quite
>>> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic"
>>> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jack

 Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at
 http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of
 TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards
 compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The
 documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.

 Best wishes

 Jeremy



 On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:

> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one
> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points,
> and the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is
> there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



 --
 Jeremy Ruston
 mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com

>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Ruston
>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>
>


-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the 
transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem 
is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_ 
monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just 
inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block 
syntax?  seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for 
that like some other wikitext  
variants?

On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Jack
>
> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work differently 
> in TW5
>
> The new syntax is described here:
>
>
> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>
> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and 
> TW5 are?
>
> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>
> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>
> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax 
> differences - contributions welcome :)
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM, > 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the 
>> difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics 
>> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding topic 
>> on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be 
>> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not quite 
>> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" 
>> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jack
>>>
>>> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at 
>>> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of 
>>> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards 
>>> compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The 
>>> documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:
>>>
 I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one 
 found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, and 
 the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is 
 there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?

 Thanks,
 Jack

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.

 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>>  
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com 
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Hi Jack

> an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work differently in
TW5

The new syntax is described here:

http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D

> Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and TW5
are?

Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:

http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com

I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax
differences - contributions welcome :)

Best wishes

Jeremy




On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM,  wrote:

> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the
> difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics
> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding topic
> on tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be
> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not quite
> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic"
> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack
>>
>> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at
>> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of
>> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards
>> compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The
>> documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one
>>> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, and
>>> the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is there
>>> a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Ruston
>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>
>


-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 -  I had guessed that was the 
difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some topics 
covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding topic on 
tiddlywiki.com  - an example would be monospacing 
text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not quite sure how. 
Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and TW5 
are? Thanks for the help.

Jack

On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Jack
>
> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at 
> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of TiddlyWiki. 
> The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards compatible, 
> and has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The documentation 
> at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM, > wrote:
>
>> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one 
>> found at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, and 
>> the one at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is there 
>> a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jack
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com 
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

Hi Jack

Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at
http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of TiddlyWiki.
The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully backwards compatible, and
has significant differences in the wikitext syntax. The documentation at
tiddlywiki.com only covers the new version.

Best wishes

Jeremy



On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM,  wrote:

> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one found
> at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, and the one
> at  http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is there a more
> comprehensive guide anywhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] [TW5] Comprehensive WikiText documentation

I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one found 
at  http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points, and the one at  
http://tiddlywiki.com/  doesn't seem complete yet. Is there a more 
comprehensive guide anywhere?

Thanks,
Jack

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.