Re: [tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
In question of notability. I can't accept the statement that TW is not a notable management software. It's like mentioning that TW is not existing. Anything that happened should exist and mentioned in Wikipedia. On another wikipedia submission, I was flagged about a source camp that did exist, however not much mentioned by third party sources other than the organizers. So it's the same meaning as not notable event but it did exist. There is some discussion list about this arguing the fairness of those people who run Wikipedia and criteria based on sorting out articles. So other sources citation should not come from associated TW developers or even this list but another, I don't know:( How much notability is required? Handoko - Julian Knight wrote: Maybe it's use in BT could be highlighted. I'm sure there must be some references. Perhaps we could all start adding to a references section at the end of the article - or maybe in the comments page for now so that things can be kept tidy? We should also link back to the TW Google groups and to related software such as the TWMobile/TWEdit iOS apps. I'll take a look as well and see if there is anything that I can add or tidy. Regards, Julian. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
I added a comment on the activity of development and this group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWiki which seems to have triggered the result Keep from an admin, and removal of the banner: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWikiaction=history I'll put some effort into restructuring the page as suggested, and flag back here, but it would be helpful if others could also edit and improve the page, adding whatever citations they can find. -- Paul (psd) http://blog.whatfettle.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
Re: [tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
A while ago -- if i remember right -- there were some researchers from a French University looking for TiddlyWiki user stories. (Where they from INSEAD?) . Does anyone know if they published anything, or are planning to? In my experience, a academic refs please the Wikipedians. Alex On 20 January 2011 12:04, Paul Downey (psd) paul.s.dow...@gmail.com wrote: I added a comment on the activity of development and this group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWiki which seems to have triggered the result Keep from an admin, and removal of the banner: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWikiaction=history I'll put some effort into restructuring the page as suggested, and flag back here, but it would be helpful if others could also edit and improve the page, adding whatever citations they can find. -- Paul (psd) http://blog.whatfettle.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comtiddlywiki%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
Re: [tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
Maybe it's use in BT could be highlighted. I'm sure there must be some references. Perhaps we could all start adding to a references section at the end of the article - or maybe in the comments page for now so that things can be kept tidy? We should also link back to the TW Google groups and to related software such as the TWMobile/TWEdit iOS apps. I'll take a look as well and see if there is anything that I can add or tidy. Regards, Julian. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
Anyone an active Wikipedia contributor. I would jump in except the problems appears to be it is not high quality post. Since I see no problem with it, it needs someone with experience This is important for our profile. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: wikipedia is planning to delete tiddlywiki article?
The reason for marking for deletion is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TiddlyWiki The reason cited is : Non notable management software. No reliable sources provided, none found besides download links and promo material. I do not know what kind of sources wikipedia needs in software cases, but I can see a problem with the article structure. There is no breakup of article into sections like introduction, development and ending. Here is a list of sections which might be considered. # Philosophy of TW # Features # Special mention of Tags # Plugins # Adaptations # Tiddlyspot and Tiddlyspace # History # VariousTranslations # Technical info like security issues # Use cases # Comparison with other similar software solutions? What do you guys think? All this can be done,but what about the objection regarding 'sources'. What source can we provide besides direct knowledge had from first hand experience? Isn't first hand experience the best form of knowledge source? Can this be somehow cited in wikipedia articles? Can this google group be cited as a source? On Jan 20, 7:25 am, TonyM anthony.mus...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone an active Wikipedia contributor. I would jump in except the problems appears to be it is not high quality post. Since I see no problem with it, it needs someone with experience This is important for our profile. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TiddlyWiki group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
