[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[Donald Coates]

SOLUTION/WORKAROUND
WARNING: this requires changing a core tiddler.  The code is there for a 
reason.  My use case is very specific in that I will only be doing this on 
a wiki that runs just to render static tiddlers.

I noticed that the rendering process for the 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[Donald Coates]

Thanks Tones I have been thinking of a way to incorporate this transclusion 
with templates along the lines of the example given where a line of text is 
run through at template: `{{Transclusion||$:/core/ui/TagTemplate}}` .  I 
have found a work around but I would rather use something like this which 
doesn't necessarily effect the entire tiddler.
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 8:10:15 PM UTC-4 TW Tones wrote:

> Donald,
>
> If you look inside $:/core/templates/static.template.html you can see how 
> the template currently does it in two ways in fact for styles;
> 
> {{$:/boot/boot.css||$:/core/templates/css-tiddler}}
> 
> 
> {{$:/core/ui/PageStylesheet||$:/core/templates/wikified-tiddler}}
> 
>
> Notice how its setting $:/boot/boot.css and $:/core/ui/PageStylesheet as 
> the current tiddler and transclude a template?
>
> In fact if you look inside $:/core/templates/css-tiddler you will see the 
> style tags in there, of note is this tiddler is unusually formatted  
>
> There should be a simple way to do this. If the style or script tags are 
> specific to a particular page ie tiddler we could make use of a field in 
> the tiddler to contain a transclusion of the style / scripts that the 
> template subsequently includes in the template, you can then choose which 
> page has which scripts.
>
> I do not have the time right now, but such a solution would possibly be 
> reusable and helpful to others.
>
> Regards
> Tony
>
>
> On Thursday, 1 October 2020 01:29:29 UTC+10, Donald Coates wrote:
>>
>> It is possible to have a tiddler with a 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[Donald Coates]

Thank you Joshua!  Though I am not sure it applies to the extremely 
specific github gist embed case, this is really useful info for the 
building of templates and will be very handy going forward.  Thank you!!

On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 7:18:10 PM UTC-4 joshua@gmail.com 
wrote:

> Tiddlywiki always "breaks" script tags rendered inside tiddlers displayed 
> in the story-river and most translcusions as a security measure.
>
> If you need the script included in the header portion of the HTML template 
> used to render the whole page, tag the tiddler with "$:/tags/RawMarkup". 
> This places the raw contents of the tiddler's text field in the header tag 
> of the template. This requires that you Save and Reload your wiki.
>
> If you use the other RawMarkupWikified tags ( $:/tags/RawMarkupWikified , 
> $:/tags/RawMarkupWikified/TopBody, etc), then tiddlywiki tries to parse the 
> text field of the tiddler so-tagged into "simple text" (stripping out HTML 
> tags, etc). In order to prevent this, use a special "pragma line" at the 
> top of the text field:
>
> `\rules only filteredtranscludeinline transcludeinline` 
>
> This restricts text-processing to only transcluded data. Also, "Note that 
> the wiki must be saved and reloaded in order for a raw markup tiddler to 
> take effect. Also note that global macros are not available by default 
> within raw markup tiddlers; you can use the ImportVariablesWidget 
>  to explicitly 
> import them."
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Best,
> Joshua Fontany
>   
>
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 8:29:29 AM UTC-7 digit...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> It is possible to have a tiddler with a 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[TW Tones]

Donald,

If you look inside $:/core/templates/static.template.html you can see how 
the template currently does it in two ways in fact for styles;

{{$:/boot/boot.css||$:/core/templates/css-tiddler}}


{{$:/core/ui/PageStylesheet||$:/core/templates/wikified-tiddler}}


Notice how its setting $:/boot/boot.css and $:/core/ui/PageStylesheet as 
the current tiddler and transclude a template?

In fact if you look inside $:/core/templates/css-tiddler you will see the 
style tags in there, of note is this tiddler is unusually formatted  

There should be a simple way to do this. If the style or script tags are 
specific to a particular page ie tiddler we could make use of a field in 
the tiddler to contain a transclusion of the style / scripts that the 
template subsequently includes in the template, you can then choose which 
page has which scripts.

I do not have the time right now, but such a solution would possibly be 
reusable and helpful to others.

Regards
Tony

On Thursday, 1 October 2020 01:29:29 UTC+10, Donald Coates wrote:
>
> It is possible to have a tiddler with a 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[Joshua Fontany]

Tiddlywiki always "breaks" script tags rendered inside tiddlers displayed 
in the story-river and most translcusions as a security measure.

If you need the script included in the header portion of the HTML template 
used to render the whole page, tag the tiddler with "$:/tags/RawMarkup". 
This places the raw contents of the tiddler's text field in the header tag 
of the template. This requires that you Save and Reload your wiki.

If you use the other RawMarkupWikified tags ( $:/tags/RawMarkupWikified , 
$:/tags/RawMarkupWikified/TopBody, etc), then tiddlywiki tries to parse the 
text field of the tiddler so-tagged into "simple text" (stripping out HTML 
tags, etc). In order to prevent this, use a special "pragma line" at the 
top of the text field:

`\rules only filteredtranscludeinline transcludeinline` 

This restricts text-processing to only transcluded data. Also, "Note that 
the wiki must be saved and reloaded in order for a raw markup tiddler to 
take effect. Also note that global macros are not available by default 
within raw markup tiddlers; you can use the ImportVariablesWidget 
 to explicitly 
import them."

I hope that helps.

Best,
Joshua Fontany
  

On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 8:29:29 AM UTC-7 digit...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> It is possible to have a tiddler with a 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[Donald Coates]

It is possible to have a tiddler with a 

[tw5] Re: Using/allowing script tags for static file rendering

[TW Tones]

Donald,

I personally see no reason why not. TiddlyWiki itself uses raw system tags 
 for 
a similar purpose. Includes insertion head/body etc... Which you could 
clone for scrips and styles.

You will need to modify the static tiddler template to accommodate it, and 
you can transclude this content from another tiddler.

However a longer lasting and sharable solution would be to provide a 
mechaisium within the static template, to accept this (and other values) 
from the source tiddler
eg a static-script field in source tiddlers could contain what is to be 
added between the script tags or a transclusion of a tiddler) thus the 
author can decide on a per-tiddler basis which static pages get custom 
scripts or styles.

This would further support the use of Tiddlywiki as a site generator.

Regards
TW Tones.

On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 11:32:28 UTC+10, Donald Coates wrote:
>
> Is it possible to have