Re: [time-nuts] HP5334A Opt 010

2005-06-27 Thread Javier

Thanks, Flemming!

Best regards,

Javier, EA1CRB

Flemming Larsen wrote:


Hello Javier,


From the HP5334A Manual Parts List:


 05334-60001 (Standard) and 05334-6006
 (Option 10) A1 Main Board Assemblies are
 identical except for C8, C100 and Y1.

The Field Installation Procedure for Option 010
includes the following:

 Remove A1C8 and install A1C100 using the soldering
 iron.

Nothing is mentioned about A1Y1 in this section, so
it may be OK to leave this in place.

Looking through the parts list, I notice that C8 and
C100 (.01 uF +- 20% 50VDC CER) have the same part
number, 0160-4554, so all that should be necessary
is to move C8 to the C100 position on the main board.

If you don't have the Option 010 Oven Oscillator
Support Board, you could also "borrow" the needed
supply voltages from the 6-pin connector on the main
board, feed them through the rear panel, then make
your own interface board, and mount this board and
the HP10811 oscillator in a separate enclosure. You
could then feed the 10 MHz signal from the HP10811
back through the Time Base In/Out connector on the
rear panel.

In this case you would not need to make any
modifications to the main board.

You could also make your own power supply for the
external oscillator to have a complete, stand-alone
10 MHZ source, which you could use for other
applications.

Sorry to bother the list, but this is NOT off-topic,
and may be of interest to other members on the list.

Regards,

-- Flemming Larsen,   KB6ADS, OZ6OI



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


 




___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] HP5334A Opt 010

2005-06-27 Thread Flemming Larsen
Hello Javier,

>From the HP5334A Manual Parts List:

  05334-60001 (Standard) and 05334-6006
  (Option 10) A1 Main Board Assemblies are
  identical except for C8, C100 and Y1.

The Field Installation Procedure for Option 010
includes the following:

  Remove A1C8 and install A1C100 using the soldering
  iron.

Nothing is mentioned about A1Y1 in this section, so
it may be OK to leave this in place.

Looking through the parts list, I notice that C8 and
C100 (.01 uF +- 20% 50VDC CER) have the same part
number, 0160-4554, so all that should be necessary
is to move C8 to the C100 position on the main board.

If you don't have the Option 010 Oven Oscillator
Support Board, you could also "borrow" the needed
supply voltages from the 6-pin connector on the main
board, feed them through the rear panel, then make
your own interface board, and mount this board and
the HP10811 oscillator in a separate enclosure. You
could then feed the 10 MHz signal from the HP10811
back through the Time Base In/Out connector on the
rear panel.

In this case you would not need to make any
modifications to the main board.

You could also make your own power supply for the
external oscillator to have a complete, stand-alone
10 MHZ source, which you could use for other
applications.

Sorry to bother the list, but this is NOT off-topic,
and may be of interest to other members on the list.

Regards,

-- Flemming Larsen,   KB6ADS, OZ6OI



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Hi Matt --

I have a perl script, based on some code from Tom Van Baak, that does
basic AVAR stuff.  Poul-Henning Kemp has posted some C code to do the
same thing -- you might take a look at the list archive to find that
(https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts).

John


Matt Ettus wrote:

>Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
>stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?
>
>Thanks,
>Matt
>
>P.S.  I was forwarded a message from the list about the USRP.  The
>USRP does have an input for an external clock source, so feel free to
>feed it from your Hydrogen Maser or whatever else you have laying
>around :)
>
>The reference needs to be at 64 MHz or lower.  You ADC sample rate can
>be 1/4*fref, 1/2*fref, fref, or 2*fref, as long as the final rate is
><= 64 MHz.
>
>The DAC sample rate will always be 2*fref.
>
>Matt
>
>___
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts@febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>
>  
>


___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Ettus writes:

>>
>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/Allan.tgz
>>
>> will do allan, modified allan and FFT.
>
>Thanks!
>
>I tried to compile on Linux, got this:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allan]$ make
>Makefile:9: *** missing separator.  Stop.

Yes, sorry, the thing is written on FreeBSD for my private use so
portability was not a major issue.

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allan]$ make
>cc -g -Wall -staticallan.c   -o allan
>allan.c:19:27: floatingpoint.h: No such file or directory
>allan.c: In function `main':
>allan.c:722: warning: implicit declaration of function `fpsetmask'
>allan.c:722: error: `FP_X_UFL' undeclared (first use in this function)
>allan.c:722: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>allan.c:722: error: for each function it appears in.)
>make: *** [allan] Error 1
>
>
>Looks like I'm missing floatingpoint.h.  A BSD thing?

Try substituing  instead.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Magnus Danielson write
s:
>> Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
>> stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?
>
>I guess you could do it that way, but really, it would be alot of data at a
>high sampling rate to make any usefullness.

You're wrong Magnus :-)

You overlook that the A/D converter gives you much more information
about the timing of a zero-crossing than just the sample number:
You can interpolate the zero-crossing to subsample accuracy and
that way get far *better* resolution than the HP5370 which otherwise
holds the single-shot crown.

I have played a lot with this with a 12bit 20MHz ADC card I have, and
the USRP does 64MHz sampling which is a lot better.

If your signal is relatively noise-free and of good amplitude I
would not at all be surprised to see single-shot timings well into
the pico-second regime, (compared to the 15nsec a digital use of
64MHz would give).

And as I suggested in an email a couple of days ago: It would be
almost perfect for phase-noise measurements as well, thanks to
the dual inputs.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Matt Ettus
On 6/27/05, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Ettus writes:
> 
> >Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
> >stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?
> 
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/Allan.tgz
> 
> will do allan, modified allan and FFT.


Thanks!

I tried to compile on Linux, got this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allan]$ make
Makefile:9: *** missing separator.  Stop.


I removed the last line in the Make file and got this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allan]$ make
cc -g -Wall -staticallan.c   -o allan
allan.c:19:27: floatingpoint.h: No such file or directory
allan.c: In function `main':
allan.c:722: warning: implicit declaration of function `fpsetmask'
allan.c:722: error: `FP_X_UFL' undeclared (first use in this function)
allan.c:722: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
allan.c:722: error: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [allan] Error 1


Looks like I'm missing floatingpoint.h.  A BSD thing?

Matt

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Matt Ettus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:22:25 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Matt,

> Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
> stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?

I guess you could do it that way, but really, it would be alot of data at a
high sampling rate to make any usefullness. The single-shot resolution is just
one of the limiting parameters and a sampled system has a bandwidth limitation
(good old Nyquist) which also puts a limitation on single-shot resolution.
I would say that slope estimation would make a poor indicator.

Allen variance is calculated from accurate time samples rather than amplitude
samples. Time interval counting is really the best way to reduce data, and it
must be back-to-back (which is possible with sampled data, but much of the
data is just waste of time and storage). Much of the pre-processing would be
to convert the sampled stream into time interval counts anyway. Basically doing
the trigger point detection and time estimates in software.

Lets just say that I'm sceptical. Time Interval Counters isn't rocket science
and nor is ADCs, but they are very different animals for very different needs.

However, performing very accurate timed ADC is in itself a very interesting
thing.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Ettus writes:

>Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
>stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?

http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/Allan.tgz

will do allan, modified allan and FFT.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


[time-nuts] Code for phase noise and allan variance

2005-06-27 Thread Matt Ettus
Does anyone have code which will take an amplitude vs. time input
stream and output phase noise and/or allan variance?

Thanks,
Matt

P.S.  I was forwarded a message from the list about the USRP.  The
USRP does have an input for an external clock source, so feel free to
feed it from your Hydrogen Maser or whatever else you have laying
around :)

The reference needs to be at 64 MHz or lower.  You ADC sample rate can
be 1/4*fref, 1/2*fref, fref, or 2*fref, as long as the final rate is
<= 64 MHz.

The DAC sample rate will always be 2*fref.

Matt

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom 5071A

2005-06-27 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: "Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist \(N6RK\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Symmetricom 5071A 
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:42:40 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Rick,

> > Never has Symmetricom or any other CBT manufacturer made CBTs for HP or
> > Agilent. HP/Agilent always made
> > their own.
> > 
> 
> I thought the CBT's were originally made by Varian for HP.

Until HP aquired the whole line, and continued much of the research and
development. It becomes evident both by public sources about history (such as
those on the UFFC site) and when doing patent archeology. 

> That's why the CBT burn in fixtures (still in use today AFAIK)
> are marked "Varian Associates".

Interesting. Same shape of the tubes or have they been adapted over time?

> In any event, the 5071 CBTs have never been outsourced.

I might add that my source said the same thing, when asked.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


RE: [time-nuts] Symmetricom 5071A

2005-06-27 Thread Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist \(N6RK\)
> Never has Symmetricom or any other CBT manufacturer made CBTs for HP or
> Agilent. HP/Agilent always made
> their own.
> 

I thought the CBT's were originally made by Varian for HP.
That's why the CBT burn in fixtures (still in use today AFAIK)
are marked "Varian Associates".  In any event, the 5071 CBTs
have never been outsourced.

Rick Karlquist

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Z3801A good GPS-receiver

2005-06-27 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Z3801A good GPS-receiver
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:42:27 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Magnus Danielson wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I've noticed all the links, software and all that. Being a *nix guy I
> > naturally care to have the source and control.
> 
> You're welcome to my Perl stuff -- not sure if I have it on my website 
> under http://www.febo.com/time-freq/gps (look for the Z3801A link) but 
> if you don't see it, drop me a line and I'll get it for you.

I think I actually looked at the code the other night. ;O)

> > One of the things I have failed to find is the type of GPS receiver 
> > operation
> > in action. I assume that it is a C/A signal (it only says L1), but does it 
> > use
> > HPs brilliant solution to track both carrier and code variations to make
> > compensations similar to the L1/L2 P(Y) code-less tracking? I think I have
> > the article around here somewhere. It is not a carrier-phase type of 
> > receiver
> > as I have gathered it. Right?
> 
> The receiver is the old 6 channel Motorola Oncore, using standard L1 C/A 
> signal.

The thing is, in the article "Recovering UTC(USNO,MC) with increased accuracy
using a fixed L1-CA code, GPS receiver" by R.P. Giffard, Agilent Lab PTTI-32
(page 97 in the compendium), they apply it on a Motorola Oncore. But then I did
not recall the date, and the PTTI-32 was in 2000 which is too late for the
Z3801A I guess. Interesting article, but it was some time I read it myself.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Z3801A good GPS-receiver

2005-06-27 Thread John Ackermann N8UR

Magnus Danielson wrote:


Yes, I've noticed all the links, software and all that. Being a *nix guy I
naturally care to have the source and control.


You're welcome to my Perl stuff -- not sure if I have it on my website 
under http://www.febo.com/time-freq/gps (look for the Z3801A link) but 
if you don't see it, drop me a line and I'll get it for you.




One of the things I have failed to find is the type of GPS receiver operation
in action. I assume that it is a C/A signal (it only says L1), but does it use
HPs brilliant solution to track both carrier and code variations to make
compensations similar to the L1/L2 P(Y) code-less tracking? I think I have
the article around here somewhere. It is not a carrier-phase type of receiver
as I have gathered it. Right?


The receiver is the old 6 channel Motorola Oncore, using standard L1 C/A 
signal.


John

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom 5071A

2005-06-27 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: "Dave Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom 5071A 
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:56:36 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hello Magnus,

Hi Dave,

> Your question:
> 
> "Or, to put it in another form, do you know where the HP/Agilent tubes are
> actually made (I.he. not the total clock assembly)?"
> 
> Since the early 1970s made in Santa Clara CA, corner of Stevens Creek Blvd
> and Lawrence Expressway, at the site once owned by HP and later by Agilent.
> Before that they were made by HP in Palo Alto, Ca.
> 
> Never has Symmetricom or any other CBT manufacturer made CBTs for HP or
> Agilent. HP/Agilent always made
> their own.
> 
> Other CBT manufacturers have made a CBT that could be retrofitted into a
> 5061A/B Cesium Beam Frequency Standard, but not the 5071a.

OK. Great. Thanks for the effort.

I will talk to my friend today and ask what he has to say about it. He was
probably missinformed, but he sounded quite certain. He probably missed out on
that detail.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts