Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion ?

2013-08-06 Thread David J Taylor

Some discussion groups and Wikis you may find useful:

Ultra cheap SDR:
 http://groups.google.com/group/ultra-cheap-sdr

FUNcube Dongle:
 http://funcubedongle.pbworks.com
 http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/Fcdproplus/

SDR# software:
 http://sdrsharp.pbworks.com
 http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/SDRSharp/

BTW: I've found it quite difficult to get people to contribute to the Wiki, 
so if you want to add something please let me know and I can set you up with 
author rights.


Cheers,
David GM8ARV
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Trimble Nortel GPSTM Boards

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Sims
In Lady Hather,  set the elevation mask to a low value,  clear the signal level 
data (S A C),  let the unit run for a day or so,  then do the oscillator 
autotune (A).  This will set the elevation mask to a level that matches what 
your antenna can see.  Or you can check the elevation plot (S A E) and see 
where the tick mark shows the signal level dropping off and enter that value 
manually.  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Low cost GPS for model aircraft

2013-08-06 Thread Mark Sims
It would now pretty much be illegal in Texas.  Our Wise Legislature has pretty 
much banned aerial photography unless you have the written permission of 
everybody in the images and landowners of all properties.  Definition of aerial 
photos?  Apparently anything taken from  more than 6 feet off the ground.  Tall 
person?  Tough luck,  get on your knees to snap your photos...
--
For a very low cost Ready To Fly quad copter that includes a TV camera see:
http://www.prc68.com/I/DCpmMotors.html#Heli-Max

  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Mark C. Stephens
Hi Chris,


The Mac OS X user base is also growing rapidly, with many preferring the X 
desktop to Winders.
And, under the hood is BSD unix (sort of).. And there is MkLinux if you don't 
like OS X..  

 It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands radios and 
 can build and design them 
 or the kind who would have never remove the cover off his commercial built 
 radio.
 Linux is the best OS for developers and those who like to build gear.   
 Windows is better for the appliance user crowd.


--marki


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Nortel GPSTM Boards

2013-08-06 Thread GandalfG8
Hi Jim,
 
Yes I did, no value was perfect in this respect, ie as affecting the  DAC 
steps, so settled on 20 as a bit of a compromise. The number of sats being  
tracked still seems to be a factor in the equation, setting an elevation 
angle  of 20 degrees had quite a smoothing effect last night, today I'm back to 
much  more noticeable steps again.
 
Although I have used Lady Heather in the past I've tended rather to stick  
with Trimbles own more simplistic software for making basic  adjustments and 
just to ensure things are set up and working ok, so  I'm back on a fairly 
steep learning curve and perhaps being given too  much information for my own 
good:-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 01:15:17 GMT Daylight Time, wb4...@wb4gcs.org 
 writes:

Did you  /increase/ the elevation mask?
Jim
wb4...@amsat.org

On 8/5/2013  8:06 PM, gandal...@aol.com wrote:
 Many thanks to those who commented  on this and apologies for the delayed
 response, having spent a few  days in an internet free zone I've also had 
to
 contend with a couple  of power failures since returning but am just  
about
 getting back  to normal again, whatever normal might be:-)
   
 As  suggested, changing the elevation mask does make a difference to the  
DAC
   voltage jumps, I'd just run up Lady Heather on default  settings to 
start
 with  which sets it to 10 degrees and changing  that to 20 degrees, for
 example, has reduced the steps in the DAC  voltage as sats come and go,  
they're
 still there but not so  pronounced.
   
 Having said that, comparing this with  a Thunderbolt, albeit using another
 Thunderbolt as the reference for  both, does tend to give more  pronounced
 steps on the Thunderbolt  for the same elevation mask and sensitivity  
settings.
 As others  have commented previously I'm also noticing the much reduced
  temperature sensitivity of this unit compared with the Thunderbolt which 
 is
 quite a big plus, but it's not all totally one sided, both Lady  Heather 
and  a
 couple of Pendulum counters are showing somewhat  lower Adev values for  
the
 Thunderbolt although the plots of  frequency against time show very  
similar
  limits.
   
 Either way, so far at least this does  seem to be working well. I still
 haven't heard from anyone who's run  the two available GPSTM variants 
side  by
 side so I'm still  debating whether or not to try that for myself,  or 
whether
 to  just quit whilst I'm ahead:-)
   
  Regards
   
 Nigel
 GM8PZR

   
   

   
   

   
 In a message dated 31/07/2013 22:48:13 GMT  Daylight Time, 
gandal...@aol.com
   writes:

  Having  stuck a late bid on a recent auction for what I'd  assumed  was a
 Trimble Nortel NTGS50AA I then realised I'd  just bought  the single  
board
 version, part number 4500-00-CH  with the  Trimble 49422-CR  OCXO.

 That in itself wasn't a problem,  except perhaps the doubts cast  over  my
 sanity:-), it  arrived earlier today and has been   running for several
  hours
 now, chatting comfortably with  Lady  Heather, and  generally settling in
 nicely.

 However, it does prompt  the  question, has anyone had a chance to compare
 one of these  side by  side with an NTGS50AA and, if so, were there any
 obvious  differences  in  performance?

  Regards

 Nigel
 GM8PZR


  ___
 time-nuts   mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the  instructions there.

  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Nortel GPSTM Boards

2013-08-06 Thread GandalfG8
Hi Bjorn,
 
Many thanks for the tip, I'd seen discussions on the two part boards,  
NTGS50AA, but hadn't realised the extent to which this version had also been  
mentioned.
Given that it was discussed as recently as early July, including  comments 
on the wheel I've just reinvented, and that I did read those  comments at 
the time, I think it's perhaps time I took a break, or wrote out 500  
times...I must pay more attention :-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
 
In a message dated 01/08/2013 20:21:00 GMT Daylight Time, b...@lysator.liu.se 
 writes:

Hi  Nigel!

This has been discussed before in time-nuts. I have two of the  big boards, 
but they are not running right now. If I remember correctly the  big ones 
are more of a cost reduction model compared to the 2 board split  solition. 
Giving lower SV snr than the split version. 

But my ran  just fine compared to my standard Tbolts.

--
Björn


Skickat från min Mobil 

  Originalmeddelande 
Från: gandal...@aol.com 
Datum:  2013-08-01  11:09  (GMT+01:00) 
Till: time-nuts@febo.com  
Rubrik: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Nortel GPSTM Boards 

Hi  Charles

Thanks for your comments, the surveyed position on this is  looking pretty  
good but what I have now realised is that the  severity of the jumps  seems 
very much related to the number of  sattelites being tracked.

Switching from 8 to 7, or 7 to 8, sats seems  to produce the biggest  step 
change whilst switching in either  direction between 5 and 6, for  example, 
doesn't seem to show up at  all on the monitored DAC voltage.
Ok, I take that back, it does still seem  to depend on the number of sats  
being switched between but I've just  seen a switch from 5 to 4 sats induce 
a  
very noticeable step change  in DAC voltage, so the relationship  doesn't 
appear to be  linear.

Unfortunately I need to power this down now for a few days  but  will 
investigate more  later.

Regards

Nigel
GM8PZR


In a message dated  01/08/2013 09:45:24 GMT Daylight Time,  
charles_steinm...@lavabit.com  writes:

Nigel  wrote:

at times I'm seeing very  noticeable step changes in the DAC  voltage 
on this one as that  happens.
   **   *
I am a bit surprised by the extent, a  Mark Sims  online plot from 
2012 shows some correlation on an NTGS50AA  but  not as noticeable as 
this, and I  don't recall seeing   anything quite so pronounced on a 
Thunderbolt.

IME (with TBolts),  the  magnitude of the DAC steps with constellation 
changes varies  with the  accuracy of the positional data used by the 
GPS.  To a  point, the  more accurate the survey, the smaller the DAC 
jumps will  be.  (Other  errors prevent reducing the 
constellation-change  DAC steps to  zero.)

Mark has commented here on survey accuracy,  and the methods he  used 
in Lady Heather to maximize  it.

Best   regards,

Charles




___
time-nuts   mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to   
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the  instructions  there.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions  there.
___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Nortel GPSTM Boards

2013-08-06 Thread GandalfG8
Thanks Mark
 
I'll start over and will do as you suggest.
 
I'm sure you'll have been told this many times before but Lady Heather is  
an amazing piece of software, thank you, even if I do feel at  times that 
I'm suffering from severe information overload:-)
 
I guess this might be more a question for John Miles, to whom also many  
thanks for the Windows version, but I've noticed that, here at  least, LH 
seems much happier running under XP than it does under Windows 7,  unless of 
course it's a hardware issue.
 
On a 3GHz P4, using a native serial port under XP, I'm seeing around 10%  
CPU load with time and data updating smoothly, whilst on a 2GHz dual core  
laptop using a serial to USB adapter under Win7 although it runs ok the CPU 
load  is showing as around 50% and updates are erratic.
It will tick away nicely for several seconds, then pause before making a  
dash to catch up, which it never quite manages with the display always at  
least a few seconds behind the XP machine.
 
It's not a major problem, I can run more serial ports on the XP machine  
anyway, and I've not yet spent any time investigating further but it is just  
heather.exe that's showing as loading the CPU, so thought I'd ask first.
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 08:10:49 GMT Daylight Time,  
hol...@hotmail.com writes:

In Lady  Hather,  set the elevation mask to a low value,  clear the signal  
level data (S A C),  let the unit run for a day or so,  then do the  
oscillator autotune (A).  This will set the elevation mask to a  level that 
matches what your antenna can see.  Or you can check the  elevation plot (S A 
E) 
and see where the tick mark shows the signal level  dropping off and enter 
that value manually. 
___
time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Rb video

2013-08-06 Thread Raj
Found this on Hack-a-day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chrzrod3tQY

Cheers

-- 
Raj, VU2ZAP
Bangalore, India. 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread Mark C. Stephens
Can someone put a finger on the name (type) of the antenna connector on the 
Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805, please?

:DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA INC.,SFTW P/N # 98-P39972M ,SOFTWARE VER 
# 8  ,SOFTWARE REV # 4  ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 1995,MODEL 
#B1121P1114 ,HDWR P/N # _  ,SERIAL #   SSG0134726 
,MANUFACTUR DATE 6C08  ,OPTIONS LISTIB
E-230

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread GandalfG8
My records show the B1121P1114 as a 6 channel Oncore VP, which  means it 
should be the same receiver as used in the Z3801A although I  haven't looked 
to check that.
 
The standard connector on these was what's known as an OSX
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 10:25:27 GMT Daylight Time,  
ma...@non-stop.com.au writes:

Can  someone put a finger on the name (type) of the antenna connector on 
the  Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805,  please?

:DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA INC.,SFTW  P/N # 98-P39972M ,SOFTWARE 
VER # 8   ,SOFTWARE REV # 4   ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 
1995,MODEL #B1121P1114   ,HDWR P/N # _   ,SERIAL #   
SSG0134726 ,MANUFACTUR DATE  6C08  ,OPTIONS LISTIB
E-230

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread Mark C. Stephens
Can't seem to find anything in Aussie that is Called OSX connector.
Could they be called MCX connector? We got some of those ):

--marki


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of gandal...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013 7:43 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

My records show the B1121P1114 as a 6 channel Oncore VP, which  means it should 
be the same receiver as used in the Z3801A although I  haven't looked to check 
that.
 
The standard connector on these was what's known as an OSX
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 10:25:27 GMT Daylight Time, ma...@non-stop.com.au 
writes:

Can  someone put a finger on the name (type) of the antenna connector on the  
Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805,  please?

:DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA INC.,SFTW  P/N # 98-P39972M ,SOFTWARE 
VER # 8   ,SOFTWARE REV # 4   ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 
1995,MODEL #B1121P1114   ,HDWR P/N # _   ,SERIAL #   
SSG0134726 ,MANUFACTUR DATE  6C08  ,OPTIONS LISTIB
E-230

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Rb video

2013-08-06 Thread David J Taylor

Found this on Hack-a-day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chrzrod3tQY

Cheers

Raj, VU2ZAP
Bangalore, India. 
===


Thanks for the pointer - I enjoyed that, particularly the PIC programming!

73,
David GM8ARV
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread Hui Zhang
Yes, it's MCX connector, I replaced one on my VP oncore board. 

Hui

At 2013-08-06 18:19:53,Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au wrote:
Can't seem to find anything in Aussie that is Called OSX connector.
Could they be called MCX connector? We got some of those ):

--marki


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of gandal...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013 7:43 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

My records show the B1121P1114 as a 6 channel Oncore VP, which  means it 
should be the same receiver as used in the Z3801A although I  haven't looked 
to check that.
 
The standard connector on these was what's known as an OSX
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 10:25:27 GMT Daylight Time, 
ma...@non-stop.com.au writes:

Can  someone put a finger on the name (type) of the antenna connector on the  
Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805,  please?

:DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA INC.,SFTW  P/N # 98-P39972M ,SOFTWARE 
VER # 8   ,SOFTWARE REV # 4   ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 
1995,MODEL #B1121P1114   ,HDWR P/N # _   ,SERIAL #   
SSG0134726 ,MANUFACTUR DATE  6C08  ,OPTIONS LISTIB
E-230

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread GandalfG8
Ah, yes, sorry I forgot that, it's the same thing.
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 06/08/2013 11:20:26 GMT Daylight Time,  
ma...@non-stop.com.au writes:

Can't  seem to find anything in Aussie that is Called OSX connector.
Could they be  called MCX connector? We got some of those  ):

--marki


-Original Message-
From:  time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On 
Behalf Of  gandal...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013 7:43 PM
To:  time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna  connector

My records show the B1121P1114 as a 6 channel Oncore VP,  which  means it 
should be the same receiver as used in the Z3801A  although I  haven't looked 
to check that.

The standard connector  on these was what's known as an  OSX

Regards

Nigel
GM8PZR


In a message dated  06/08/2013 10:25:27 GMT Daylight Time, 
ma...@non-stop.com.au  writes:

Can  someone put a finger on the name (type) of the  antenna connector on 
the  Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805,   please?

:DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA  INC.,SFTW  P/N # 98-P39972M 
,SOFTWARE 
VER #  8   ,SOFTWARE REV # 4 ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 
1995,MODEL # B1121P1114   ,HDWR P/N # _   ,SERIAL #   
SSG0134726  ,MANUFACTUR DATE  6C08  ,OPTIONS LIST IB
 
E-230

___
time-nuts   mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the  instructions  there.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions  there.


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Eugen
  Having a Linux/FreeBSD PC synchronized using NTP/chrony, what would
  be the best way of generating an output 1 PPS signal on a
  (hardware) serial port ?   
 
 I haven't tried it.
 
 
 On Linux, /drivers/pps/generators/Kconfig (from kernel-devel or
 kernel sources) says:
 
 # PPS generators configuration
 #
 
 comment PPS generators support
 
 config PPS_GENERATOR_PARPORT
 tristate Parallel port PPS signal generator
 depends on PARPORT  BROKEN
 help
   If you say yes here you get support for a PPS signal
 generator which utilizes STROBE pin of a parallel port to send PPS
 signals. It uses parport abstraction layer and hrtimers to precisely
 control the signal.
 
 Documentation/pps/pps.txt (from kernel-doc) has a section on that.

Thanks, I'll check the documentation.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Eugen
 Marki the smart search engine came back with:
 
 Prof David Mills: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/pps.html
 Pulse-Per-Second (PPS) Signal Interfacing Hardware:
 http://www.vk2hmc.net/blog/?p=583
 
 If using Linux you need kernel version  2.6.39.4 or version 3 kernel
 as the PPS interface is now included in the kernel. Unless of course,
 low latency and jitter is not an issue for you ;) You can use either
 parallel or serial PPS.
 
 For windows see http://www.davehart.net/ for binaries.
 David Taylor pretty much covers it here:
 http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html

Thanks, but I need it the other way: the PC itself should generate the
1 PPS signal without an external reference, except the network
connection to NTP servers. It's more of a software problem.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Mark C. Stephens
I am not really sure what you are trying to do either..

If you are trying to tee the output of a GPS, make a Y cable and connect TxD 
from GPS and DCD to each end (as PPS and NMEA are broadcast or one way if you 
like) once the receiver has been configured. You will have timenuts having 
strokes if you try and do it in software!

However if you are hell bent on generating PPS in software somehow (please let 
me know you plan? - curious)
Use http://www.curioustech.net/xport.html
Been around for years and its pretty good and free to boot.

Or am I still looking at your problem from the wrong end?

Personally, I am moving my NTP server to the parallel port shortly.


--marki






-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Eugen
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013 10:32 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

 Marki the smart search engine came back with:
 
 Prof David Mills: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/pps.html
 Pulse-Per-Second (PPS) Signal Interfacing Hardware:
 http://www.vk2hmc.net/blog/?p=583
 
 If using Linux you need kernel version  2.6.39.4 or version 3 kernel 
 as the PPS interface is now included in the kernel. Unless of course, 
 low latency and jitter is not an issue for you ;) You can use either 
 parallel or serial PPS.
 
 For windows see http://www.davehart.net/ for binaries.
 David Taylor pretty much covers it here:
 http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html

Thanks, but I need it the other way: the PC itself should generate the
1 PPS signal without an external reference, except the network connection to 
NTP servers. It's more of a software problem.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Anders Wallin
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.auwrote:

 However if you are hell bent on generating PPS in software somehow (please
 let me know you plan? - curious)


FWIW:
Over in the hobby-CNC world where it is common to use the parallel port for
driving machine tools (mills, lathes, 3d printers) pulses with good timing
are output by LinuxCNC which sits on top of a real-time kernel (RTAI,
Xenomai, or RT-Preempt). With a well-behaving bios/cpu/motherboard
combination it is possible to achieve around 10-20 us maximum jitter - in
good cases down to 5 us. The same program run on a non-realtime kernel will
easily show 3-5 milliseconds or more of jitter.
This is relative to a clock that the real-time kernel uses for internal
timing - I am not sure if that clock can be NTP-disciplined.

Anders
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Eugen eu...@lavabit.com wrote:


 Thanks, but I need it the other way: the PC itself should generate the
 1 PPS signal without an external reference, except the network
 connection to NTP servers. It's more of a software problem.



The current Linux kernel has a PPS GENERATOR.   See pps_gen_parport

Put WHY would you need this? The documentation for pps_gen_parport suggests
only using it for crude synchronization of sevel computers but NTP would in
every case work better for that purpose.

But for whatever reason Linux does PPS in both directions

Be warned that any software PPS gignal will not be great, expect a few
microseconds or error



Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Eugen
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:07:28 +
Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au wrote:

 I am not really sure what you are trying to do either..
 
 If you are trying to tee the output of a GPS, make a Y cable and
 connect TxD from GPS and DCD to each end (as PPS and NMEA are
 broadcast or one way if you like) once the receiver has been
 configured. You will have timenuts having strokes if you try and do
 it in software!
 
 However if you are hell bent on generating PPS in software somehow
 (please let me know you plan? - curious) Use
 http://www.curioustech.net/xport.html Been around for years and its
 pretty good and free to boot.
 
 Or am I still looking at your problem from the wrong end?
 
 Personally, I am moving my NTP server to the parallel port shortly.
 
 
 --marki
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On Behalf Of Eugen Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2013 10:32 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port
 
  Marki the smart search engine came back with:
  
  Prof David Mills: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/pps.html
  Pulse-Per-Second (PPS) Signal Interfacing Hardware:
  http://www.vk2hmc.net/blog/?p=583
  
  If using Linux you need kernel version  2.6.39.4 or version 3
  kernel as the PPS interface is now included in the kernel. Unless
  of course, low latency and jitter is not an issue for you ;) You
  can use either parallel or serial PPS.
  
  For windows see http://www.davehart.net/ for binaries.
  David Taylor pretty much covers it here:
  http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html
 
 Thanks, but I need it the other way: the PC itself should generate the
 1 PPS signal without an external reference, except the network
 connection to NTP servers. It's more of a software problem.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow
 the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow
 the instructions there.

No, I don't use a GPS or other synchronization hardware. The PC uses
only network communication with NTP, and the PC itself should output an
1 PPS signal on a port serial / parallel. 

I want to analyze the 1 PPS signal generated by the PC and the
synchronization process or to compare two 1 PPS signals generated by
different computers. 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Javier Herrero

Hello,

On 06.08.2013 17:25, Chris Albertson wrote:


The current Linux kernel has a PPS GENERATOR.   See pps_gen_parport

Put WHY would you need this? The documentation for pps_gen_parport suggests
only using it for crude synchronization of sevel computers but NTP would in
every case work better for that purpose.

But for whatever reason Linux does PPS in both directions

Be warned that any software PPS gignal will not be great, expect a few
microseconds or error




There are applications for that... I had to do that some time ago, since 
I was required to send a PPS signal aligned to UTC, and a time-stamp of 
this PPS signal using MIL-1553 (surely this is familiar to some people 
in the list). The time was the UTC time at the computer (well, in this 
case an embedded one, ntp sync'd through LAN). Since at that time (not 
that long ago) there was not a pps generator available in the linux 
kernel, I developed a small kernel module to drive an ouput pin. It 
worked nicely enough, with a few microseconds of error - completely 
tolerable in that application.


Regards,

Javier

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] motorola GPS antenna connector

2013-08-06 Thread Azelio Boriani
Motorola UT/GT units have the MCX type antenna connector, then they
adopted the MMCX on the M12 series.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au wrote:
 Can someone put a finger on the name (type) of the antenna connector on the 
 Motorola GPS units in the HP Z3805, please?

 :DIAG:IDEN:GPS?
 COPYRIGHT 1991-1995 MOTOROLA INC.,SFTW P/N # 98-P39972M ,SOFTWARE 
 VER # 8  ,SOFTWARE REV # 4  ,SOFTWARE DATE  13 JUL 
 1995,MODEL #B1121P1114 ,HDWR P/N # _  ,SERIAL #   
 SSG0134726 ,MANUFACTUR DATE 6C08  ,OPTIONS LISTIB
 E-230

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] SITime oscillators

2013-08-06 Thread Demian Martin
SITime just got some press for their temperature insensitive mems
oscillators. I went to the web site and saw some interesting parts with
pretty ambitious claims. Specifically better than Quartz.
http://www.sitime.com/index.php
http://www.sitime.com/products/datasheets/sit8208/SiT8208-datasheet.pdf  

 

They look too good to be true. However the phase noise plot stops at 1 KHz.
There is another that stops at 100 Hz elsewhere on the site. Does anyone
have real experience with the technology? 

 

Demian Martin

PDS

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SITime oscillators

2013-08-06 Thread Marek Peca

SITime just got some press for their temperature insensitive mems
oscillators. I went to the web site and saw some interesting parts with
pretty ambitious claims. Specifically better than Quartz.
http://www.sitime.com/index.php
http://www.sitime.com/products/datasheets/sit8208/SiT8208-datasheet.pdf

They look too good to be true. However the phase noise plot stops at 1 KHz.
There is another that stops at 100 Hz elsewhere on the site. Does anyone
have real experience with the technology?


Not yet. I hope we will be able to buy few of them soon, if the price will 
be reasonable.


However, there was a good introductory presentation of SiTime founder 
Aaron Partridge two weeks ago at IFCS-EFTF conference, describing lots of 
their MEMS' internals. Basically, the fine frequency tuning and 
temperature independence is all done using frac-N PLL, implemented 
completely within ordinary non-MEMS CMOS chip. So, the MEMS osc output is 
not directly led out. The MEMS is there, as far as I got it, to maintain 
long-term stability.



Regards,
Marek
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SITime oscillators

2013-08-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Demian,

On 08/06/2013 06:45 PM, Demian Martin wrote:
 SITime just got some press for their temperature insensitive mems
 oscillators. I went to the web site and saw some interesting parts with
 pretty ambitious claims. Specifically better than Quartz.
 http://www.sitime.com/index.php
 http://www.sitime.com/products/datasheets/sit8208/SiT8208-datasheet.pdf  

  

 They look too good to be true. However the phase noise plot stops at 1 KHz.
 There is another that stops at 100 Hz elsewhere on the site. Does anyone
 have real experience with the technology? 
Close-in phase-noise is interesting, or should I say lively.

There are applications where these gives a run for the money, and a nice
complement in the arsenal, but for good close-in noise you need real
crystals.

Cheers,
Magnus
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SITime oscillators

2013-08-06 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:54:41 +0200 (CEST)
Marek Peca ma...@duch.cz wrote:

 However, there was a good introductory presentation of SiTime founder 
 Aaron Partridge two weeks ago at IFCS-EFTF conference, describing lots of 
 their MEMS' internals. Basically, the fine frequency tuning and 
 temperature independence is all done using frac-N PLL, implemented 
 completely within ordinary non-MEMS CMOS chip. So, the MEMS osc output is 
 not directly led out. The MEMS is there, as far as I got it, to maintain 
 long-term stability.

Yes, and that pretty much sums it up as well:
The MEMS oscillators are for applications where you need good long term
stability, can live with some temperature dependence (although i must
say the no-tempco parts from SiTime are pretty impressive*) and don't
care much about phase noise.

The biggest effect on the phase noise comes from the frac-N
synthesiser that is present in all parts. It generates a lot of
spikes in the spectrum that can be pretty bad for radio applications.
That is probably also the main reason why the phase noise plots
stop at 1kHz: they don't want to show those messy parts.

I guess the main applications for those MEMS parts are low footprint,
low power uC devices that need a precise frequency but care little
about superior phase noise. But then, current quartz oscillators
still beat them at power consumption.

One main advantage of those MEMS is that you can get odd frequencies
pretty quick, as it just means to reprogramm the PLL and you're done.
But then, Epson (and for sure others as well) had similar devices based
on quartz for ages.

Oh, and i would take the long term aging numbers with a grain of salt.
The company has been around for roughly 10 years and according to
wikipedia released their first production oscillator in 2006.


Attila Kinali

* They managed to build a MEMS oscillator with IIRC 30ppm temperature
dependence, prior to temperature compensation, and over the whole
temperature range.

-- 
1.) Write everything down.
2.) Reduce to the essential.
3.) Stop and question.
-- The Habits of Highly Boring People, Chris Sauve
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Alberto di Bene

On 8/6/2013 5:12 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:


/It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands radios and
can build and design them or the kind who would have never remove the cover
off his commercial built radio.Linux is the best OS for developers and
those who like to build gear.   Windows is better for the appliance user
crowd./


When I developed Winrad and my other SDR programs, a few years ago, I examined 
which
were the tools available to a serious developer.

My conclusion was that under Windows you could find professional tools, geared 
towards
professional developments.  What was available under Linux were little more 
than toys,
meant for the hobbyists and the tinkerers.  For example, at the time I was 
unable to find
under Linux a development environment with the features and the power of the 
Embarcadero
Rad Studio, which is what I use.  This made me to choose Windows as my main 
platform.

73  Alberto  I2PHD



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Generate 1 PPS signal on serial port

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Albertson

 I want to analyze the 1 PPS signal generated by the PC and the
 synchronization process or to compare two 1 PPS signals generated by
 different computers.


OK, but that just kicks the question further down the road.  WHY would you
want to compare two PPS signals?

It is easy to do as Linux now has a PPS generator built-in.   There is
nothing to do but configure it.

Expect the PPs to have a random 2 uSec or more jitter.   It could be much
worse.   I think the PPS generation uses timer interrupts.  The timer
advances in uSec ticks and then there is some latency so expect and error
in the range of a 'handful of uSec.

-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Albertson
Yes,  I'm writing this on an iMac.  I'm a long time BSD Unix user going
back to about 1980.

Now, FINALLY we can say the UNIX and Linux are the most commonly used OSes
in the wold as one of those runs on most phones.  Linux is in Androids and
a unix varient is on iPhones and Macs

I remember going to a talk by Bill Gates, this was in the  pre-Windows ears
when his main product was MS-DOS.  He said that he would make DOS more and
more unix-like as PC hardware grew in power.  At that time he did not
understand what an OS was and they UNIX was just the shell, and worked like
DOS.  It was was an amusing speak he was completely ignorant about OS
design.  But he was the exec not the engineer so he did not have to know.
 Still  Had Windows not surprised them Gates would have done have Apple
(and Sun and man others) did and simply sold a re-branded UNIX.   What much
better off we'd all have been


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.auwrote:

 Hi Chris,


 The Mac OS X user base is also growing rapidly, with many preferring the X
 desktop to Winders.
 And, under the hood is BSD unix (sort of).. And there is MkLinux if you
 don't like OS X..

  It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands radios
 and can build and design them
  or the kind who would have never remove the cover off his commercial
 built radio.
  Linux is the best OS for developers and those who like to build gear.
  Windows is better for the appliance user crowd.


 --marki


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread gchafee
Have you ever looked at the unit put out by Ariel Rocholl called the RF 
Explorer? (link - http://micro.arocholl.com/) 

I bought one of these units and although they do not have everything ( I would 
love to have different demods on it), it has been an impressive unit, and 
inexpensive.

I believe as Ariel gets more people interested in the handheld spectrum 
analyzer concept,he will be building better units with more capabilities.

He has the spurs and birdies and other noise makers in any of these type of 
units, but he knows where they are and have taken them out ( mostly) in 
firmware.

I bought one of the wideband units and even though the standalone units does 
not look very impressive, the Windows software make it into a very nice 
inexpensive and quite accurate handheld spectrum analyzer.

I am not associated with Ariel, but he is approachable if you wish to talk to 
him ( I believe he is in Spain).

I got mine from China at Seedstudio and other than one minor battery issue that 
they resolved I am very happy with it.

Let me know if there is anything I could let you know if the online data does 
not tell you enough.

Thanks,

Jerry Chafee




 J. Forster j...@quikus.com wrote: 
 OK. Thanks everybody. Can you please reccomend a make/model?
 
 I'd like something like:
 
 75 to 1300 MHz
 USB
 Ability to function as a crude SA.
 Not crawling w/ birdies or aliasing issues.
 Will run on Win XP.
 Demod selecttable for all modes at all frequencies.
 In a package, rather than a loose PCB.
 $150
 
 Prefer:
 
 SMA rather than RCA or F
 Receiver and SW from same vendor.
 
 Suggestions, please.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -John
 
 ===
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Orin Eman
Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix

Microsoft DID sell a re-branded Unix.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Chris Albertson
albertson.ch...@gmail.comwrote:

 Yes,  I'm writing this on an iMac.  I'm a long time BSD Unix user going
 back to about 1980.

 Now, FINALLY we can say the UNIX and Linux are the most commonly used OSes
 in the wold as one of those runs on most phones.  Linux is in Androids and
 a unix varient is on iPhones and Macs

 I remember going to a talk by Bill Gates, this was in the  pre-Windows ears
 when his main product was MS-DOS.  He said that he would make DOS more and
 more unix-like as PC hardware grew in power.  At that time he did not
 understand what an OS was and they UNIX was just the shell, and worked like
 DOS.  It was was an amusing speak he was completely ignorant about OS
 design.  But he was the exec not the engineer so he did not have to know.
  Still  Had Windows not surprised them Gates would have done have Apple
 (and Sun and man others) did and simply sold a re-branded UNIX.   What much
 better off we'd all have been


 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au
 wrote:

  Hi Chris,
 
 
  The Mac OS X user base is also growing rapidly, with many preferring the
 X
  desktop to Winders.
  And, under the hood is BSD unix (sort of).. And there is MkLinux if you
  don't like OS X..
 
   It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands radios
  and can build and design them
   or the kind who would have never remove the cover off his commercial
  built radio.
   Linux is the best OS for developers and those who like to build gear.
   Windows is better for the appliance user crowd.
 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Albertson
Yes.  I rememebr.  I used one back when it was new.

Getting back to the OP, what he was looking for.  And SDR has two parts, a
hardware front end and some software.   Those two parts can be mostly
independent.

I'd suggest finding one or two or so SDR software system you like then
collecting hardware.   Make sure the software is free and open source.  You
don't want a closed source .exe file.   That is like buying a radio with
the cassis welded shut or potted in epoxy.


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Orin Eman orin.e...@gmail.com wrote:

 Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix

 Microsoft DID sell a re-branded Unix.

 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Chris Albertson
 albertson.ch...@gmail.comwrote:

  Yes,  I'm writing this on an iMac.  I'm a long time BSD Unix user going
  back to about 1980.
 
  Now, FINALLY we can say the UNIX and Linux are the most commonly used
 OSes
  in the wold as one of those runs on most phones.  Linux is in Androids
 and
  a unix varient is on iPhones and Macs
 
  I remember going to a talk by Bill Gates, this was in the  pre-Windows
 ears
  when his main product was MS-DOS.  He said that he would make DOS more
 and
  more unix-like as PC hardware grew in power.  At that time he did not
  understand what an OS was and they UNIX was just the shell, and worked
 like
  DOS.  It was was an amusing speak he was completely ignorant about OS
  design.  But he was the exec not the engineer so he did not have to know.
   Still  Had Windows not surprised them Gates would have done have Apple
  (and Sun and man others) did and simply sold a re-branded UNIX.   What
 much
  better off we'd all have been
 
 
  On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au
  wrote:
 
   Hi Chris,
  
  
   The Mac OS X user base is also growing rapidly, with many preferring
 the
  X
   desktop to Winders.
   And, under the hood is BSD unix (sort of).. And there is MkLinux if you
   don't like OS X..
  
It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands
 radios
   and can build and design them
or the kind who would have never remove the cover off his commercial
   built radio.
Linux is the best OS for developers and those who like to build
 gear.
Windows is better for the appliance user crowd.
  
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Mark C. Stephens
That is true, Windows is great for Mr. Joe average, because of the ease of use, 
and because of the ease of use and user-base size, a lot of software has been 
developed for it.
I use windows for a most tasks including software development and just to be 
compatible to everyone else.
As you say, a lot of software is written for winders including professional 
programming IDE's etc.
However, if Windows gets a virus or something breaks or corrupt, 9 times out of 
10 you are screwed and have to reinstall.

The great thing about Linux (Unix), there is always 101 ways to do the same 
thing,
If something breaks, you can work around it until its fixed. Heck you can 
reinstall the GUI if you feel like it :)
Each day I am drawn back to using Unix CLI and I have to say, I learn something 
new each day.

As OS X roots are in a mature, robust OS (BSD), it is getting a great 
reputation as a robust but easy to use operating system.
In fact, my next door neighbour has kicked his Windows out and bought a MAC!
He is 82, and learning a new computing environment was not a trivial task for 
him and his wife.
But he says he has never looked back.


--marki

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Alberto di Bene
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013 7:04 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

On 8/6/2013 5:12 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

 /It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands 
 radios and can build and design them or the kind who would have never remove 
 the cover
 off his commercial built radio.Linux is the best OS for developers and
 those who like to build gear.   Windows is better for the appliance user
 crowd./

When I developed Winrad and my other SDR programs, a few years ago, I examined 
which were the tools available to a serious developer.

My conclusion was that under Windows you could find professional tools, geared 
towards professional developments.  What was available under Linux were little 
more than toys, meant for the hobbyists and the tinkerers.  For example, at the 
time I was unable to find under Linux a development environment with the 
features and the power of the Embarcadero Rad Studio, which is what I use.  
This made me to choose Windows as my main platform.

73  Alberto  I2PHD



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Albertson
Funny that those toys that come with Linux pretty much run the entire
Internet and every Android phone and almost every TV set top box and
firewall/router. But in the end as a developer you either follow the
market and the dollar or you do what your boss pays you to do.   What tools
are needed anyway but a few terminal windows and a text editor?

Anyways the hot market now if you are chasing the dollar and customers is
phone apps.  That is what users want and that is who the companies are
hiring.   I'd really like to see SDR move to phones and tablets.   It would
make them even more portable.   These phone now days have quad core 32-bit
CPUs and GPUs that can be tapped for compting power for thing like FFTs and
other DSP.

As for development tools, there is no shortage.

We also need some new ideas.  So muct SDR software tries to emulate a
1980's radio.





On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.auwrote:

 That is true, Windows is great for Mr. Joe average, because of the ease of
 use,
 and because of the ease of use and user-base size, a lot of software has
 been developed for it.
 I use windows for a most tasks including software development and just to
 be compatible to everyone else.
 As you say, a lot of software is written for winders including
 professional programming IDE's etc.
 However, if Windows gets a virus or something breaks or corrupt, 9 times
 out of 10 you are screwed and have to reinstall.

 The great thing about Linux (Unix), there is always 101 ways to do the
 same thing,
 If something breaks, you can work around it until its fixed. Heck you can
 reinstall the GUI if you feel like it :)
 Each day I am drawn back to using Unix CLI and I have to say, I learn
 something new each day.

 As OS X roots are in a mature, robust OS (BSD), it is getting a great
 reputation as a robust but easy to use operating system.
 In fact, my next door neighbour has kicked his Windows out and bought a
 MAC!
 He is 82, and learning a new computing environment was not a trivial task
 for him and his wife.
 But he says he has never looked back.


 --marki

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Alberto di Bene
 Sent: Wednesday, 7 August 2013 7:04 AM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

 On 8/6/2013 5:12 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

  /It depends of it you want to be the kind of ham who understands
  radios and can build and design them or the kind who would have never
 remove the cover
  off his commercial built radio.Linux is the best OS for developers
 and
  those who like to build gear.   Windows is better for the appliance
 user
  crowd./

 When I developed Winrad and my other SDR programs, a few years ago, I
 examined which were the tools available to a serious developer.

 My conclusion was that under Windows you could find professional tools,
 geared towards professional developments.  What was available under Linux
 were little more than toys, meant for the hobbyists and the tinkerers.  For
 example, at the time I was unable to find under Linux a development
 environment with the features and the power of the Embarcadero Rad Studio,
 which is what I use.  This made me to choose Windows as my main platform.

 73  Alberto  I2PHD



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question

2013-08-06 Thread Tom Van Baak

This thread does not belong on time-nuts. Please stop.

/tvb
http://www.leapsecond.com/time-nuts.htm

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Large Qty HP C-Beam Tubes available

2013-08-06 Thread Donald Henderickx

On 9/22/2012 12:13 AM, Greg Burnett wrote:

Hello Everyone,
...Apology for the long delay in getting out an update regarding 
availability of the late Chuck Norton's pull-out C-Beam tubes (in 
used, unknown condition).
Allow me to introduce Harv Smith, who is storing the equipment in 
Pueblo, Colorado as a favor to Chuck's surviving family.
Harv has graciously offered to handle the sales and disposition of the 
C-Beam tubes and equipment. Therefore please contact him directly at:

   Harv Smith baculitem...@aol.com mailto:baculitem...@aol.com
My best,
Greg

What ever happened to  this??
I tried to e mail him several times.
Said I was on list?
Don H
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.