Re: [time-nuts] homebrew counter new board test result

2015-02-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
 2) Does any one have the test data of 12 digit/s counter when DUT=REF?
 I want to know the gap between mine and a  commercial counter.
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Li Ang

I did a lot of testing of 53132A counters a while back to research how well the 
interpolators worked and to measure the interference when CH1 gets too close to 
CH2. There was some discussion on the list about this at the time.

For the context, see: 
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2014-April/084670.html
For the plots, see: http://leapsecond.com/pages/53132/

A good paper to read about the trouble when DUT is close (or equal to REF) is:
http://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/5990-9189EN.pdf
Isolating Frequency Measurement Error and Sourcing Frequency Error near the 
Reference Frequency Harmonics

See also: https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-October/070737.html

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] patek phillipe digital clock, sold as curio/antique

2015-02-27 Thread Jim Lux

On 2/27/15 3:23 AM, Flemming Larsen wrote:

Check the price here:
Patek Philippe Digital Display Clock

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Patek Philippe Digital Display ClockVintage digital display clock by Patek 
Philippe of Geneva. Made for Abou Watfa of Damascus, circa 1970. Rare Patek 
Philippe digital clocks for sale at M.S. Rau Anti... |
|  |
| View on www.rauantiques.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |






wow.. $50k. I hope it has an interesting provenance.. This clock was 
used to countdown to the first French nuclear test or This clock was 
used to time Formula 1 races in Monte Carlo. Lots of other clocks in 
their stock, probably using the same movement that tvb was describing..





In yesterday's Wall Street Journal (or maybe USA Today, I can't remember..)

Nice Nixie displays...
I wonder if it normally displays the same time on all, or if it is a
multi-time zone/elapsed time kind of thing.  It looks a lot like clock
display stacks used for displaying Mission Elapsed Time, Local Time,
UTC, etc.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

2015-02-27 Thread Al Wolfe
   I have an XL-DC and it has an internal GPS receiver in it. It supplies 
and monitors 5 volts to a BNC antenna  jack for an external amplified GPS 
antenna. I don't know what the internal GPS engine is but doubt if it is 
anything special.


   The manual describes the down converter system as an option.

Al, k9si



Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks 
like

that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
changed over time.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Using NIST ACTS with Datum/Symmetricom TS2100

2015-02-27 Thread Sean Gallagher

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone has ever had any success with the TS2100 and 
getting the ACTS system to work correctly and adjust the clock. As most 
of you know there is a bug in the 4.1 firmware version that was putting 
everything off a second with GPS. So my company purchased another one 
(before we knew it was firmware) to try and fix the GPS. What I have 
currently going on is I reverted the firmware, one of them is on 2.84 
and the other 3.1, and am testing them to see if these setups work.


On the v2.84 machine I have a GPS signal going into it and timecode 
coming out and it actually appears to be working. What we are trying to 
do is get the other, v3.1, to sync with NIST so that we have 2 time 
sources. We are using a U.S. Robotics 56K V.92 fax modem and since it's 
the same one as the example in the manual the init string is the same 
ATH2N6. I set the time initially just based on my computer then based 
on the other TS2100 that is on gps so right now they are about a half of 
a second off. My problem is that even when a NIST call works it is not 
adjusting the time. It is outputting


ACTS recorded 0 offset
ACTS adjusted clocks

but the time is not adjusting at all. It is in Freerun mode and I 
disabled decode even though that shouldn't have mattered since it is 
solely using ACTS and pulled out the GPS card, again this shouldn't matter.


--
Respectfully,


Sean Gallagher
Malware Analyst
571-340-3475

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites

2015-02-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

All of these older rack mount “GPSDO” products had a fairly long lifespan 
compared 
to the advances in GPS receivers. When some / most of them first came out, the 
only practical /proven
way to do timing off GPS was with a downconverter. Without things like serial 
numbers / date codes it’s 
tough to figure out if this sample of box A has anything at all to do with 
another sample of the same box. 
On top of that, these are very low volume products compared to normal HP or 
Fluke
test gear. It’s unlikely that anybody has a database that tells what is what 
simply from
the serial numbers or date codes. I’d bet that many of them were built to order 
and rarely in 
groups larger than a few dozen. 

Bob

 On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:19 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
 versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like
 that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
 changed over time.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it.
 It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of
 these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It
 allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and
 losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick.
 Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those
 stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless.
 I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the
 austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated
 receivers to fake it.
 So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers
 a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics
 and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to
 go on.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins b...@iaxs.net wrote:
 
 Doesn't the DC in the model number mean down conversion or something
 like that?
 
 Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had
 to down convert to about 1.8 MHz.
 Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and
 mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was
 in the base of the antenna.
 
 Bill Hawkins
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Shoppa
 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites
 
 Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
 runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
 difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses
 all have the downconverter option and the option is very common.
 
 Tim N3QE
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

2015-02-27 Thread Russell Rezaian
I can confirm there are at least two common varieties of the XL-DC GPS 
RX board.


One uses a normal GPS antenna (no down-converter, provides DC on the 
antenna line for an amp in the antenna, the typical antenna provided 
seems to be an AeroAntenna AT575 variety, but I suspect other antennas 
that are similar should be fine).  The specific antenna part I have is:  
AT575-142TTW-TNCF-000-RG-41-NM


It's been a while since I last decoded that part number but it's a very 
easily re-useable general use GPS antenna with an integrated RF amp.  
Works over a fairly wide range of DC supply voltages and claims a 
slightly higher gain than some other standard timing GPS ice cream cones.


There are also versions of the GPS module for the XL-DC that use a GPS 
antenna with an integrated down converter that is actually physically 
part of the antenna provided.


The down converter antenna is normally a single integrated unit. The 
part numbers I see on one I have handy are 140-614 (TrueTime) or Model 
142-6150 on the Symmetricom label.


I don't have any details for the voltages or whether there is a 
reference frequency provided for the down converter style receiver.


I have seen some suggestions that they also had a dedicated down 
converter module that could be used with normal GPS antennas, but I 
don't have any details on that option.


If you have a RX module that needs the converter antenna there should be 
a clearly visible little label indicating this on the module itself near 
the antenna connector.  If you don't have that label the RX should work 
with most GPS antenna systems (and also with most antenna splitter 
systems too).

--
Russell

Al Wolfe wrote:
   I have an XL-DC and it has an internal GPS receiver in it. It 
supplies and monitors 5 volts to a BNC antenna  jack for an external 
amplified GPS antenna. I don't know what the internal GPS engine is 
but doubt if it is anything special.


   The manual describes the down converter system as an option.

Al, k9si


Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if 
some
versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure 
looks like

that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
changed over time.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] FS -- Thunderbolt temp sensor chips DS1620S Rev C

2015-02-27 Thread Peter Loron
Hello, all. I have a reel of the good Rev C DS1620S chips as used in 
the T-bolt. $1 each + shipping. Pic of the chip is at the link below. 
Please contact me off list if interested. Not sure if anybody needs them 
anymore, and wanted to check with the list before I get rid of them. 
Thanks.


http://standingwave.org/webdav/maximdsst-1264178984-1808.jpg

-Pete

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

2015-02-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

One important caution on antennas:

The 575 is  quite happy with anything from 5 to 18V as a feed voltage and only 
pulls 35 ma. There are antennas out there that don’t like voltages over 6V. 
There also are antennas on the market that pull well over 50 ma.

If the “original” box sourced 12V to the antenna and triggers as “overload” 
around 50 ma, the 575 will work great with the box. If you plug a modern timing 
antenna (= 5V version) into the box the antenna may be 
damaged and / or the over current may trigger. 

There also are 3.3 V antennas out there, but they are rarely seen in timing 
applications (yet). 

Simply put - the 575 is a great antenna and it will work on a lot of stuff. The 
problem is not at all with the antenna. It’s with the stuff specified to work 
with it. You have no way of knowing if it’s a 12V gizmo or a 5V feed.

The same issue can come up with downconverter feeds. They often put +12 on the 
feed to run the downconverter. It’s best to put a DVM on the feed before 
attaching a nice new $1,500 antenna to it …(or even a $20 one)

Bob

 On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Russell Rezaian r.reza...@earthlink.net wrote:
 
 I can confirm there are at least two common varieties of the XL-DC GPS RX 
 board.
 
 One uses a normal GPS antenna (no down-converter, provides DC on the 
 antenna line for an amp in the antenna, the typical antenna provided seems to 
 be an AeroAntenna AT575 variety, but I suspect other antennas that are 
 similar should be fine).  The specific antenna part I have is:  
 AT575-142TTW-TNCF-000-RG-41-NM
 
 It's been a while since I last decoded that part number but it's a very 
 easily re-useable general use GPS antenna with an integrated RF amp.  Works 
 over a fairly wide range of DC supply voltages and claims a slightly higher 
 gain than some other standard timing GPS ice cream cones.
 
 There are also versions of the GPS module for the XL-DC that use a GPS 
 antenna with an integrated down converter that is actually physically part of 
 the antenna provided.
 
 The down converter antenna is normally a single integrated unit. The part 
 numbers I see on one I have handy are 140-614 (TrueTime) or Model 142-6150 on 
 the Symmetricom label.
 
 I don't have any details for the voltages or whether there is a reference 
 frequency provided for the down converter style receiver.
 
 I have seen some suggestions that they also had a dedicated down converter 
 module that could be used with normal GPS antennas, but I don't have any 
 details on that option.
 
 If you have a RX module that needs the converter antenna there should be a 
 clearly visible little label indicating this on the module itself near the 
 antenna connector.  If you don't have that label the RX should work with most 
 GPS antenna systems (and also with most antenna splitter systems too).
 --
 Russell
 
 Al Wolfe wrote:
   I have an XL-DC and it has an internal GPS receiver in it. It supplies and 
 monitors 5 volts to a BNC antenna  jack for an external amplified GPS 
 antenna. I don't know what the internal GPS engine is but doubt if it is 
 anything special.
 
   The manual describes the down converter system as an option.
 
 Al, k9si
 
 
 Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
 versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like
 that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
 changed over time.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase [WAS: No GPSsatellites]

2015-02-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
 If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different 
 power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation 
 *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it 
 seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same 
 grid would actually change (a bit).
 
 Has anybody done this experiment?
 
 Philip

Yes, it's really quite interesting and very easy to do. Check the time nuts 
archives -- over the years there are by now hundreds of postings about 
measuring mains phase and frequency. See also:

http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/mains-picpet-23.gif
http://leapsecond.com/pages/ac-detect/

There are many wonderful web sites that deal with power line frequency; some 
with live plots. Just google for words like: mains frequency detect accuracy 
stability measurement

Also, make sure to read the growing literature about ENF:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_network_frequency_analysis

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt NMEA ?

2015-02-27 Thread Matthias Brändli
Hi Tim,

probably not the answer you are looking for, because it's a piece of
software and not a device, and it doesn't output NMEA, but maybe it can
still be of some help

https://github.com/mpbraendli/trimble-thunderbold

Matthias
  HB9EGM

On 26. 02. 15 05:11, Tim wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Is there a way to get NMEA instead of TSIP out of a Thunderbolt ?
 
 Failing that, is there some translating device that I can insert between
 the Thunderbolt and another device that is expecting NMEA ?
 
 thanks
 
 Tim
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

2015-02-27 Thread Doug Ronald
In my XL-DC's case, there must have been a downconverter built into the antenna 
(which I don't have), but there was an upconverter in the chassis which took 
the IF signal from the cable, and heterodyned it back up to L-Band. I haven't 
fiddled-around with the upconverter, but I suspect the IF was in the HF band.

Overnight my XL-DC says the GPS is unlocked, but is tracking 6 satellites, so 
my troubles still persist...

-Doug

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Russell Rezaian
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 10:12 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

I can confirm there are at least two common varieties of the XL-DC GPS RX board.

One uses a normal GPS antenna (no down-converter, provides DC on the antenna 
line for an amp in the antenna, the typical antenna provided seems to be an 
AeroAntenna AT575 variety, but I suspect other antennas that are similar should 
be fine).  The specific antenna part I have is:  
AT575-142TTW-TNCF-000-RG-41-NM

It's been a while since I last decoded that part number but it's a very easily 
re-useable general use GPS antenna with an integrated RF amp.  
Works over a fairly wide range of DC supply voltages and claims a slightly 
higher gain than some other standard timing GPS ice cream cones.

There are also versions of the GPS module for the XL-DC that use a GPS antenna 
with an integrated down converter that is actually physically part of the 
antenna provided.

The down converter antenna is normally a single integrated unit. The part 
numbers I see on one I have handy are 140-614 (TrueTime) or Model
142-6150 on the Symmetricom label.

I don't have any details for the voltages or whether there is a reference 
frequency provided for the down converter style receiver.

I have seen some suggestions that they also had a dedicated down converter 
module that could be used with normal GPS antennas, but I don't have any 
details on that option.

If you have a RX module that needs the converter antenna there should be a 
clearly visible little label indicating this on the module itself near the 
antenna connector.  If you don't have that label the RX should work with most 
GPS antenna systems (and also with most antenna splitter systems too).
--
Russell

Al Wolfe wrote:
I have an XL-DC and it has an internal GPS receiver in it. It 
 supplies and monitors 5 volts to a BNC antenna  jack for an external 
 amplified GPS antenna. I don't know what the internal GPS engine is 
 but doubt if it is anything special.

The manual describes the down converter system as an option.

 Al, k9si


 Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if 
 some versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure 
 looks like that could be the case. The manual does say down 
 converter. Maybe it changed over time.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase [WAS: No GPS satellites]

2015-02-27 Thread Bob Camp
HI
 On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Philip Gladstone 
 pjsg-timen...@nospam.gladstonefamily.net wrote:
 
 On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:
 ben wrote:
 
 I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of
 circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to
 a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?
 
 Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:
 
 http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf
 
 
 Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
 port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
 to a file of such time stamps.
 If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power 
 grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation *within* a 
 grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible 
 that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually 
 change (a bit).
 
 Has anybody done this experiment?

It’s done by utilities to monitor power flow and balance electric grids. The 
first data on this (grid vs GPS) date to the 1980’s. I think the
paper I recall was done by Quebec Hydro. Since then it’s become a pretty 
standard monitoring tool. 

Bob

 
 Philip
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal

2015-02-27 Thread Paul Alfille
I don't think your TTi TF930 has a GPS input to calibrate against, based on
a quick perusal of the data sheet. I would guess that the calibration
constants are thus fixed from the factory (including temperature
coefficients).


On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:36 PM, James via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
wrote:

 I presume that this is what my TTi TF930 does. Calibration is closed box
 so I guess the TCXO is free running and the micro inside just uses
 calibration constants.

 James








 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Alfille paul.alfi...@gmail.com
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:02
 Subject: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal


 I have a couple of HP 5370s with the beaglebone brain transplant. They
 come
 with a nice 10811 that has a little adjustment screw.

 Testing against a
 Thunderbolt or KS-24361 the 5370 is off by less than 1Hz.

 I know the
 traditional method would be to adjust the crystal slowly and
 make careful
 measurements, but since I have a fancy computer in there, I
 wonder if I could
 just adjust the frequency in software. 64-bit floating
 point numbers should
 have sufficient accuracy. All reported measurments
 would be corrected for the
 actual reference frequency.

 Basically, I'd have a 1000.226 Hz internal
 reference.

 In fact, could I connect the beaglebone to a a GPS 1 pps source
 and make
 this a GPS-disciplined-software-corrected oscillator.

 So my
 question is is this a known technique? The discipline feedback
 circuit seems a
 little different, I'd adjusting for drift and offset, but
 not the gain of
 control-oscillator
 linkage.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing
 list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the
 instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase [WAS: No GPS satellites]

2015-02-27 Thread Philip Gladstone

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:


I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of
circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to
a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?


Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf


Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
to a file of such time stamps.
If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different 
power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation 
*within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it 
seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same 
grid would actually change (a bit).


Has anybody done this experiment?

Philip
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal

2015-02-27 Thread James via time-nuts
I presume that this is what my TTi TF930 does. Calibration is closed box so I 
guess the TCXO is free running and the micro inside just uses calibration 
constants.

James


 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Paul Alfille paul.alfi...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:02
Subject: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal


I have a couple of HP 5370s with the beaglebone brain transplant. They
come
with a nice 10811 that has a little adjustment screw.

Testing against a
Thunderbolt or KS-24361 the 5370 is off by less than 1Hz.

I know the
traditional method would be to adjust the crystal slowly and
make careful
measurements, but since I have a fancy computer in there, I
wonder if I could
just adjust the frequency in software. 64-bit floating
point numbers should
have sufficient accuracy. All reported measurments
would be corrected for the
actual reference frequency.

Basically, I'd have a 1000.226 Hz internal
reference.

In fact, could I connect the beaglebone to a a GPS 1 pps source
and make
this a GPS-disciplined-software-corrected oscillator.

So my
question is is this a known technique? The discipline feedback
circuit seems a
little different, I'd adjusting for drift and offset, but
not the gain of
control-oscillator
linkage.
___
time-nuts mailing
list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
instructions there.

 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal

2015-02-27 Thread Dave Martindale
The TF930/960 does have a calibration procedure that is performed from 
the front panel.  Basically, you feed it a stable input from any known 
source (so both 1 Hz and 10 MHz from a GPSDO should work) and then 
adjust until the displayed frequency agrees with the known input 
frequency.  The resolution of this setting is quite a bit better than 
the stability of the TCXO in the box.


Now, this process could occur either by actually adjusting the frequency 
of a VCTCXO in the box using a DAC, or by changing a calibration 
constant stored in the memory of the device.  I suspect it's actually 
the former, because the instructions say that the adjustment path has a 
low-pass filter that you need to allow to settle.  This wouldn't be 
necessary if the calibration simply changed a stored number.


Dave

On 27/02/2015 15:08, Paul Alfille wrote:

I don't think your TTi TF930 has a GPS input to calibrate against, based on
a quick perusal of the data sheet. I would guess that the calibration
constants are thus fixed from the factory (including temperature
coefficients).


On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:36 PM, James via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
wrote:


I presume that this is what my TTi TF930 does. Calibration is closed box
so I guess the TCXO is free running and the micro inside just uses
calibration constants.

James








-Original Message-
From: Paul Alfille paul.alfi...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:02
Subject: [time-nuts] Measuring frequency rather than tuning crystal


I have a couple of HP 5370s with the beaglebone brain transplant. They
come
with a nice 10811 that has a little adjustment screw.

Testing against a
Thunderbolt or KS-24361 the 5370 is off by less than 1Hz.

I know the
traditional method would be to adjust the crystal slowly and
make careful
measurements, but since I have a fancy computer in there, I
wonder if I could
just adjust the frequency in software. 64-bit floating
point numbers should
have sufficient accuracy. All reported measurments
would be corrected for the
actual reference frequency.

Basically, I'd have a 1000.226 Hz internal
reference.

In fact, could I connect the beaglebone to a a GPS 1 pps source
and make
this a GPS-disciplined-software-corrected oscillator.

So my
question is is this a known technique? The discipline feedback
circuit seems a
little different, I'd adjusting for drift and offset, but
not the gain of
control-oscillator
linkage.
___
time-nuts mailing
list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33

2015-02-27 Thread Björn
Hi,

AT575-142TTW-TNCF-000-RG-41-NM

Not all 575 antennas eat the same power. Its the RG in the part number above 
that specifies 4.2V to 15V DC power for the internal LNA.

This is the most common option - but there are others.

--

       Björn

div Originalmeddelande /divdivFrån: Bob Camp 
kb...@n1k.org /divdivDatum:2015-02-27  20:21  (GMT+01:00) 
/divdivTill: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com /divdivRubrik: Re: [time-nuts] XL-DC was Re: time-nuts 
Digest, Vol 127, Issue 33 /divdiv
/divHi

One important caution on antennas:

The 575 is  quite happy with anything from 5 to 18V as a feed voltage and only 
pulls 35 ma. There are antennas out there that don’t like voltages over 6V. 
There also are antennas on the market that pull well over 50 ma.

If the “original” box sourced 12V to the antenna and triggers as “overload” 
around 50 ma, the 575 will work great with the box. If you plug a modern timing 
antenna (= 5V version) into the box the antenna may be 
damaged and / or the over current may trigger. 

There also are 3.3 V antennas out there, but they are rarely seen in timing 
applications (yet). 

Simply put - the 575 is a great antenna and it will work on a lot of stuff. The 
problem is not at all with the antenna. It’s with the stuff specified to work 
with it. You have no way of knowing if it’s a 12V gizmo or a 5V feed.

The same issue can come up with downconverter feeds. They often put +12 on the 
feed to run the downconverter. It’s best to put a DVM on the feed before 
attaching a nice new $1,500 antenna to it …(or even a $20 one)

Bob

 On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Russell Rezaian r.reza...@earthlink.net wrote:
 
 I can confirm there are at least two common varieties of the XL-DC GPS RX 
 board.
 
 One uses a normal GPS antenna (no down-converter, provides DC on the 
 antenna line for an amp in the antenna, the typical antenna provided seems to 
 be an AeroAntenna AT575 variety, but I suspect other antennas that are 
 similar should be fine).  The specific antenna part I have is:  
 AT575-142TTW-TNCF-000-RG-41-NM
 
 It's been a while since I last decoded that part number but it's a very 
 easily re-useable general use GPS antenna with an integrated RF amp.  Works 
 over a fairly wide range of DC supply voltages and claims a slightly higher 
 gain than some other standard timing GPS ice cream cones.
 
 There are also versions of the GPS module for the XL-DC that use a GPS 
 antenna with an integrated down converter that is actually physically part of 
 the antenna provided.
 
 The down converter antenna is normally a single integrated unit. The part 
 numbers I see on one I have handy are 140-614 (TrueTime) or Model 142-6150 on 
 the Symmetricom label.
 
 I don't have any details for the voltages or whether there is a reference 
 frequency provided for the down converter style receiver.
 
 I have seen some suggestions that they also had a dedicated down converter 
 module that could be used with normal GPS antennas, but I don't have any 
 details on that option.
 
 If you have a RX module that needs the converter antenna there should be a 
 clearly visible little label indicating this on the module itself near the 
 antenna connector.  If you don't have that label the RX should work with most 
 GPS antenna systems (and also with most antenna splitter systems too).
 --
 Russell
 
 Al Wolfe wrote:
   I have an XL-DC and it has an internal GPS receiver in it. It supplies and 
 monitors 5 volts to a BNC antenna  jack for an external amplified GPS 
 antenna. I don't know what the internal GPS engine is but doubt if it is 
 anything special.
 
   The manual describes the down converter system as an option.
 
 Al, k9si
 
 
 Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
 versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like
 that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
 changed over time.
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] patek phillipe digital clock, sold as curio/antique

2015-02-27 Thread Jim Lux

In yesterday's Wall Street Journal (or maybe USA Today, I can't remember..)

Nice Nixie displays...
I wonder if it normally displays the same time on all, or if it is a 
multi-time zone/elapsed time kind of thing.  It looks a lot like clock 
display stacks used for displaying Mission Elapsed Time, Local Time, 
UTC, etc.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] patek phillipe digital clock, sold as curio/antique

2015-02-27 Thread Flemming Larsen
Check the price here:
Patek Philippe Digital Display Clock

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Patek Philippe Digital Display ClockVintage digital display clock by Patek 
Philippe of Geneva. Made for Abou Watfa of Damascus, circa 1970. Rare Patek 
Philippe digital clocks for sale at M.S. Rau Anti... |
|  |
| View on www.rauantiques.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

  
  From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
 Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 2:22 PM
 Subject: [time-nuts] patek phillipe digital clock, sold as curio/antique
   
In yesterday's Wall Street Journal (or maybe USA Today, I can't remember..)

Nice Nixie displays...
I wonder if it normally displays the same time on all, or if it is a 
multi-time zone/elapsed time kind of thing.  It looks a lot like clock 
display stacks used for displaying Mission Elapsed Time, Local Time, 
UTC, etc.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] homebrew counter new board test result

2015-02-27 Thread Li Ang
 Hi
   Thanks about the explanation on hysteresis and comparator.
   The PM6685(http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/PM6685__smeng.pdf )
is using 74ALS176 as the frontend for REF channel.
So
I tried that on the previous board. The performance is better with
74ALS176+74LVC2G14 than MC100LVELT22 at the sin wave input condition.
Since the stdev has reached the spec of TDC chip, I need to do
some more experiments with these chips next.
There are some questions I want to ask:
1) Does the trigger interval need to be very accurate? Now I am using
software scheduler to generate the interval, it might vary few ms.
2) Does any one have the test data of 12 digit/s counter when DUT=REF?
I want to know the gap between mine and a  commercial counter.


Thanks

Li Ang

2015-02-27 4:30 GMT+08:00 Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com:

 Magnus wrote:

  A bit of hysteresis can help to avoid flipping back, but considering the
 type of signal, it passes the mid-point (0 V) at highest slew-rate, so
 there is very little risk of flipping back and fourth in the first
 place, so hysteresis may not even be needed.


 A 1 Vrms, 10MHz sine wave has a zero-cross slew rate of 88v/uS (88mV/nS).
 One would think that would be enough to avoid indecision in a comparator
 with 5-10nS of propagation delay.  However, the LT1016 (10nS) is prone to
 jitter problems when operating as a ZCD with such a signal, and external
 hysteresis does not help much because it is delayed by 10nS.  (The problem
 appears to be that the front end has some indecision at this input slew
 rate that happens faster than the propagation delay to the output -- but
 this is just an inference because the internal nodes are not accessible for
 measurement.)  For this application, the small amount of internal
 hysteresis of the LT1719 and LT1720 is very beneficial.

 Best regards,

 Charles





 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
 mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] patek phillipe digital clock, sold as curio/antique

2015-02-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
 In yesterday's Wall Street Journal (or maybe USA Today, I can't remember..)
 
 Nice Nixie displays...
 I wonder if it normally displays the same time on all, or if it is a 
 multi-time zone/elapsed time kind of thing.  It looks a lot like clock 
 display stacks used for displaying Mission Elapsed Time, Local Time, 
 UTC, etc.

Jim -- Nice find. Crazy prices. Color images cached at: 
http://leapsecond.com/museum/patek/

Time Nuts -- Not many of us are interested in high-end mechanical clocks and 
watches, but the name Patek Philippe catches our eye because many of the early 
time/frequency standards from Tracor, Austron, and Hewlett Packard used a 1 PPS 
stepper driven analog dial clock display made by Patek Philippe. After the 
Nixie tube era, but before the LED, LCD, and VFD era, HP used these wonderful 
Patek movements in their 5061A and 5065A standards.

You can see an example on the early model 5061A/01 at 
http://www.leapsecond.com/hpclocks/

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.