Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread GMail / AnalogAficionado
Sorry to perpetuate the OT discussion, but there is an excellent series of 
articles by capacitor design engineer Cyril Bateman called Understanding 
Capacitors, published in EWWW magazine in the late '90s.  The article on 
electrolytics covers almost anything you might want to know about them, and is 
a very worthwhile read.  I highly recommend the whole series.

Cyril had the articles posted on his own website some time ago, which I can no 
longer find.  But, they are still available online if you search around.

- Chad.


On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:10, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:

 On 06/21/11 08:39 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
 In message4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck Harris writes:
 
 and yet, I find that some electrolytic
 capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
 when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
 couple of hours.
 
 I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
 warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
 was given.
 
 
 Note on the link posted by Robert LaJeunesse:
 
 
 http://www.cde.com/catalogs/AEappGUIDE.pdf
 
 
 it says voltage derating gives better reliability:
 
 
 ==
 Aluminum electrolytic capacitors made with formation voltages
 at least 35% higher than rated voltage and with rated tempera-
 tures of 85 oC or higher, don’t require much voltage derating. In
 applications operating at less than 45 oC no derating is needed,
 and with up to 75 oC, 10% is sufficient. For higher temperatures
 and with high ripple current, 15% or 20% is appropriate. Since
 operating life continues to increase for further derating, military
 and space applications use 50% voltage derating.
 
 
 I've herd stories one should not operating caps well below their rated 
 voltage, but that would tend to suggest that is not so.
 
 -- 
 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
 A: Top-posting.
 Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Chad:

Google found it:
http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
But it's not that informative.

The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent) 
Impedance Handbook.

http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf

I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how 
well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.

http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml

Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:

Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread J. Forster
Sencor LC 102.

-John

==


[snip]

 Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Alan Melia
Hi Brooke that is only the last of about 5 or 6 articles in the same journal
you need to find the others as well. Cyril used to work for one of the big
UK manufacturers I believe. I think I still have the paper copies  of EWW
somewhere.

Alan
G3NYK
- Original Message - 
From: Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high
temp ones?


 Hi Chad:

 Google found it:
 http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
 But it's not that informative.

 The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent)
 Impedance Handbook.
 http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf

 I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how
 well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.
 http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
 http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml

 Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:
  Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi John:

It's almost $1k and does much more than measure leakage.  Is there a 
much lower cost instrument that's aimed at just leakage?


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


J. Forster wrote:

Sencor LC 102


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi again John:

The manual for the LC 102 is free from BAMA and it's got all kinds of 
useful info.

http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/sencore/lc102/

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Brooke Clarke wrote:

Hi John:

It's almost $1k and does much more than measure leakage.  Is there a 
much lower cost instrument that's aimed at just leakage?


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


J. Forster wrote:

Sencor LC 102


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread J. Forster
Hi Brook,

I know it's a pricey box, but I got mine cheap ($100) at an MIT Flea Market.

If I wanted a cheapo leakage tester, I'd build one with a simple, variable
voltage inverter, maybe a Cockroft-Walton stage or so, and a couple of $20
DMMs.

-John

=




 Hi John:

 It's almost $1k and does much more than measure leakage.  Is there a
 much lower cost instrument that's aimed at just leakage?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 J. Forster wrote:
 Sencor LC 102





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread J. Forster
Yes, except the schematics suck. Dave H at ArtekMedia helped mo out with
that.

You could also get the manual from Sencor directly for something like $20
- $50, I forget exactly.

The LC 102 has been replaced with the LC 103, last seen.

-John

=


 Hi again John:

 The manual for the LC 102 is free from BAMA and it's got all kinds of
 useful info.
 http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/sencore/lc102/

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 Brooke Clarke wrote:
 Hi John:

 It's almost $1k and does much more than measure leakage.  Is there a
 much lower cost instrument that's aimed at just leakage?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 J. Forster wrote:
 Sencor LC 102

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Will Matney
All,

Speaking of replacing electrolytic capacitors, which I am now doing on a
Fluke 845A, I found a carbon comp resistor way out of spec. It is a 150
ohm, 1/4 watt current limiter, for a 10 Vdc zener. I noticed that it had
looked to have been hot (or gave off excessive heat), and had made a shiny
place on the PC board above it, though the resistor doesn't show any burnt
color. When I measured it, it was reading around 1 to 2 ohms. The zener was
still good, luckily, as was the bridge rectifiers, and filter cap (though
bulged), and this is the supply voltage for the switching transistors,
which run the chopper transformer.

My question is, have any of you seen a 150 ohm carbon comp resistor change
that much in value? I wouldn't think they could, but evidently, this one
did, and if so, I wonder about the others in the meter.

Thanks,

Will

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 6/24/2011 at 11:22 AM Brooke Clarke wrote:

Hi Chad:

Google found it:
http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
But it's not that informative.

The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent) 
Impedance Handbook.
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf

I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how 
well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.
http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml

Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:
 Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 5851 (20110206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Pete Lancashire
Sencore 102 or 103's. If your lucky you can find one for less  $200.

If you don't mind the age. At the bottom of the pile are ones like the
Eico 950-B and many that are close. The 950-B is about the best
in the lower shelf.  Stick with the B, newer if anything and remember
Eico's also came as a kit. If you not in a rush, wait till you find a 

Sprague Tel-Ohmike's The 5 and 6's being the last of the series
and the only ones to really consider. Just my call, others like some of the
older ones. Depending on condtion and phase of the moon you can get
a TO-6A for around $50, most go for about $100.

Next shelf up I would say the Clough-Brengle 712 and its military cousin
the ZM-11/U. I find it harder to use only in that everything is jammed so
close. And my 712 died a couple years ago and havn't got around to
looking inside. Price $50 to $100

Non of these prices reflect Ham-fests, Aunt Milli's thrift store etc.

All the above will or should be gone over, the usual stuff caps, resistors,
etc.

The one I use the most is the Tel-Ohmike 6A. Some say the 5 is better
and the 6's did dropped the transformer ration feature, but I only the thing
i use it for is caps.

Moving into the modern era, the Sencore's 75, 102 and 103.

Again at the top Sencore 102 and 103's, but you really have to be lucky
to get one under $100 or so. I've not been so lucky.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net wrote:
 Hi Chad:

 Google found it:
 http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
 But it's not that informative.

 The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent)
 Impedance Handbook.
 http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf

 I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how
 well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.
 http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
 http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml

 Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:

 Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Matt Osborn
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:11:34 -0700, GMail / AnalogAficionado
analogaficion...@gmail.com wrote:

Sorry to perpetuate the OT discussion, but there is an excellent series of 
articles by capacitor design engineer Cyril Bateman called Understanding 
Capacitors, published in EWWW magazine in the late '90s.  The article on 
electrolytics covers almost anything you might want to know about them, and is 
a very worthwhile read.  I highly recommend the whole series.

Cyril had the articles posted on his own website some time ago, which I can no 
longer find.  But, they are still available online if you search around.

- Chad.
.
This site has links to many of Cyril Bateman's articles, including the
EW series on capacitors.

http://www.proaudiodesignforum.com/forum/php/viewtopic.php?f=6t=153start=2

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread GMail / AnalogAficionado
Yes, that's the one...  As Alan mentions there are several other articles, and 
I see the same website has them - just lop off the file name at the end of the 
URL to see the rest.  Here's the one specifically on electrolytics:

http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155301644.pdf

- Chad.


On Jun 24, 2011, at 11:32, Alan Melia alan.me...@btinternet.com wrote:

 Hi Brooke that is only the last of about 5 or 6 articles in the same journal
 you need to find the others as well. Cyril used to work for one of the big
 UK manufacturers I believe. I think I still have the paper copies  of EWW
 somewhere.
 
 Alan
 G3NYK
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high
 temp ones?
 
 
 Hi Chad:
 
 Google found it:
 http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
 But it's not that informative.
 
 The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent)
 Impedance Handbook.
 http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf
 
 I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how
 well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.
 http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
 http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml
 
 Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?
 
 Have Fun,
 
 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com
 
 
 GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:
 Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Will Matney
If I recall, didn't BK make a capacitor analyzer that did ESR measurements
too? I think it was a hybrid, part solid-state, and part tube, but folks
swore by them.

Best,

Will

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 6/24/2011 at 2:34 PM Pete Lancashire wrote:

Sencore 102 or 103's. If your lucky you can find one for less  $200.

If you don't mind the age. At the bottom of the pile are ones like the
Eico 950-B and many that are close. The 950-B is about the best
in the lower shelf.  Stick with the B, newer if anything and remember
Eico's also came as a kit. If you not in a rush, wait till you find a 

Sprague Tel-Ohmike's The 5 and 6's being the last of the series
and the only ones to really consider. Just my call, others like some of
the
older ones. Depending on condtion and phase of the moon you can get
a TO-6A for around $50, most go for about $100.

Next shelf up I would say the Clough-Brengle 712 and its military cousin
the ZM-11/U. I find it harder to use only in that everything is jammed so
close. And my 712 died a couple years ago and havn't got around to
looking inside. Price $50 to $100

Non of these prices reflect Ham-fests, Aunt Milli's thrift store etc.

All the above will or should be gone over, the usual stuff caps,
resistors,
etc.

The one I use the most is the Tel-Ohmike 6A. Some say the 5 is better
and the 6's did dropped the transformer ration feature, but I only the
thing
i use it for is caps.

Moving into the modern era, the Sencore's 75, 102 and 103.

Again at the top Sencore 102 and 103's, but you really have to be lucky
to get one under $100 or so. I've not been so lucky.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net
wrote:
 Hi Chad:

 Google found it:
 http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/passivecomp/20061223155312558.pdf
 But it's not that informative.

 The best info I've seen on measuring components is the HP (Agilent)
 Impedance Handbook.
 http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5950-3000.pdf

 I measured dozens of caps using a number of different methods to see how
 well the combined ESR and Capacitance meter I sell works.
 http://www.prc68.com/I/ESRmicro.shtml
 http://www.prc68.com/I/Capacitors.shtml

 Does anyone know of a modern cap leakage tester?

 Have Fun,

 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com


 GMail / AnalogAficionado wrote:

 Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 5851 (20110206) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi:

Be careful, the web URL is Pro Audio Design Forum.  There are other cap 
articles by the same author where he's measuring the distortion at 1 kHz 
down to -140 dB.


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Matt Osborn wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:11:34 -0700, GMail / AnalogAficionado
analogaficion...@gmail.com  wrote:

   

Sorry to perpetuate the OT discussion, but there is an excellent series of articles 
by capacitor design engineer Cyril Bateman called Understanding Capacitors, 
published in EWWW magazine in the late '90s.  The article on electrolytics 
covers almost anything you might want to know about them, and is a very worthwhile 
read.  I highly recommend the whole series.

Cyril had the articles posted on his own website some time ago, which I can no 
longer find.  But, they are still available online if you search around.

- Chad.
 

.
This site has links to many of Cyril Bateman's articles, including the
EW series on capacitors.

http://www.proaudiodesignforum.com/forum/php/viewtopic.php?f=6t=153start=2

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


   


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-23 Thread Dr. David Kirkby

On 06/21/11 08:39 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

In message4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck Harris writes:


and yet, I find that some electrolytic
capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
couple of hours.


I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
was given.



Note on the link posted by Robert LaJeunesse:


http://www.cde.com/catalogs/AEappGUIDE.pdf


it says voltage derating gives better reliability:


==
Aluminum electrolytic capacitors made with formation voltages
at least 35% higher than rated voltage and with rated tempera-
tures of 85 oC or higher, don’t require much voltage derating. In
applications operating at less than 45 oC no derating is needed,
and with up to 75 oC, 10% is sufficient. For higher temperatures
and with high ripple current, 15% or 20% is appropriate. Since
operating life continues to increase for further derating, military
and space applications use 50% voltage derating.


I've herd stories one should not operating caps well below their rated voltage, 
but that would tend to suggest that is not so.


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-22 Thread paul swed
Oh to add further information.
I love old caps. They go bad and I get my test equipment for cheap.
That said I do measure the caps I am going to put in on a old style HP cap
meter that can apply up to 100 volts to the cap. I look for leakage. What I
see in quite modern caps that have been around for a while (Surplus you get
at hamfest approx 3-5 years) is that there is a higher leakage current that
does settle down after a while. So I sense the forming effect still exists.
Am I wrong about this??
Regard
Paul
WB8TSL

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I agree with your forming information, as applied to older caps,
 but not your temperature information.  The 105C high temp caps
 are just as happy, or unhappy really, with low temperatures as
 the 85C caps.  Basically the difference between the two is water.
 The 85C caps have an electrolyte with a significant amount of water,
 that boils dry at high temperatures.  The 105C caps don't.  Kind
 of like the difference between an antifreeze and water solution,
 and straight antifreeze.  Both seriously run out of capacitance
 when they get below freezing.

 The loss of capacitance can really bite you when you use integrated
 low overhead voltage regulators in automotive temperature ranges.
 The regulators will oscillate if they don't have enough capacitance
 on their input terminals... which can happen if you specify an
 electrolytic capacitor that is right around the 100uf needed.  When
 it gets to 0C, and becomes a 10uf capacitor, the regulator takes off
 and burns up your load.

 -Chuck Harris



 Bill Hawkins wrote:

 Group,

 During my days of interest in antique radios, I learned that
 the dielectric between aluminum plates was formed by passing
 current in one direction to build up an oxide coating on the
 plates, which became the dielectric. The thickness is directly
 proportional to working voltage and inversely proportional to
 capacitance. As we learned from reforming old caps, the oxide
 thins when there is no voltage on the cap, but can be restored
 by passing several milliamps through the cap. Applying rated
 voltage before it was formed would destroy the cap by welding
 spots of the plates together.

 I'm not sure that this applies to modern caps.

 As to the temperature rating, a high temp cap run in a cool
 environment will be as unhappy as someone transplanted from
 Miami to Minneapolis in the winter. It may work, but it will
 be very unhappy - so it depends on your empathy for the cap.

 There ought to be a way to work precision time into this
 thread, but I can't think of one.

 Bill Hawkins


 -Original Message-
 From: Poul-Henning Kamp
 Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:40 PM

 In message4E008A73.50701@erols.**com 4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck
 Harris writes:

  and yet, I find that some electrolytic
 capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve
 markedly
 when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
 couple of hours.


 I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
 warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
 was given.



 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-22 Thread J. Forster
IMO, the issue of reforming is very much alive with electrolytics, old and
new.

In some modern PZT actuator drivers, there is a warning to bring up the
supplies slowly if the unit has been dormant for sx months or more.

-John




 Oh to add further information.
 I love old caps. They go bad and I get my test equipment for cheap.
 That said I do measure the caps I am going to put in on a old style HP cap
 meter that can apply up to 100 volts to the cap. I look for leakage. What
 I
 see in quite modern caps that have been around for a while (Surplus you
 get
 at hamfest approx 3-5 years) is that there is a higher leakage current
 that
 does settle down after a while. So I sense the forming effect still
 exists.
 Am I wrong about this??
 Regard
 Paul
 WB8TSL

 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I agree with your forming information, as applied to older caps,
 but not your temperature information.  The 105C high temp caps
 are just as happy, or unhappy really, with low temperatures as
 the 85C caps.  Basically the difference between the two is water.
 The 85C caps have an electrolyte with a significant amount of water,
 that boils dry at high temperatures.  The 105C caps don't.  Kind
 of like the difference between an antifreeze and water solution,
 and straight antifreeze.  Both seriously run out of capacitance
 when they get below freezing.

 The loss of capacitance can really bite you when you use integrated
 low overhead voltage regulators in automotive temperature ranges.
 The regulators will oscillate if they don't have enough capacitance
 on their input terminals... which can happen if you specify an
 electrolytic capacitor that is right around the 100uf needed.  When
 it gets to 0C, and becomes a 10uf capacitor, the regulator takes off
 and burns up your load.

 -Chuck Harris



 Bill Hawkins wrote:

 Group,

 During my days of interest in antique radios, I learned that
 the dielectric between aluminum plates was formed by passing
 current in one direction to build up an oxide coating on the
 plates, which became the dielectric. The thickness is directly
 proportional to working voltage and inversely proportional to
 capacitance. As we learned from reforming old caps, the oxide
 thins when there is no voltage on the cap, but can be restored
 by passing several milliamps through the cap. Applying rated
 voltage before it was formed would destroy the cap by welding
 spots of the plates together.

 I'm not sure that this applies to modern caps.

 As to the temperature rating, a high temp cap run in a cool
 environment will be as unhappy as someone transplanted from
 Miami to Minneapolis in the winter. It may work, but it will
 be very unhappy - so it depends on your empathy for the cap.

 There ought to be a way to work precision time into this
 thread, but I can't think of one.

 Bill Hawkins


 -Original Message-
 From: Poul-Henning Kamp
 Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:40 PM

 In message4E008A73.50701@erols.**com 4e008a73.50...@erols.com,
 Chuck
 Harris writes:

  and yet, I find that some electrolytic
 capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve
 markedly
 when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for
 a
 couple of hours.


 I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
 warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
 was given.



 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-22 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
A very good reference for aluminum electrolytic use: 
http://www.cde.com/catalogs/AEappGUIDE.pdf

Guides for other capacitor types are also on this page: 
http://www.cde.com/appguide/ 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-22 Thread paul swed
Had not seen these links and at least so far the CDE sights quite good
Thanks

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Robert LaJeunesse 
rlajeune...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 A very good reference for aluminum electrolytic use:
 http://www.cde.com/catalogs/AEappGUIDE.pdf

 Guides for other capacitor types are also on this page:
 http://www.cde.com/appguide/
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-21 Thread Dr. David Kirkby

On 06/21/11 12:59 AM, Alan Melia wrote:

David Another important factor when considering power supply caps is ripple
current rating. It is generally the ripple current that makes them get warm.


Yes. I must admit I did not give that any thought, which was rather stupid of 
me. But I did not buy cheap caps. I will check the ripple ratings, but its hard 
to know exactly what is needed.



I think the usual thumbnail calculation still work for caps if you can
reduce the temperature by 20 degrees they will last at least 4 times as
long. That is an activation energy (Arrhenius eqn) of about 1ev. I also
believe though I cant quote that they are best run at about 75% of their
specified working voltage. I have always wonderd about this but it would
seem to be a mistake to have too low a voltage on electrolytics ...maybe
something to do with the strength of the instulating layer formed.


Yes, I have heard this before about not using them at too low a voltage. I don't 
know whether its an old-wives tale, or if there is any truth to it.




Alan
G3NYK


Thanks for your comments Alan,

Dave G8WRB.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-21 Thread Chuck Harris

Dr. David Kirkby wrote:


I think the usual thumbnail calculation still work for caps if you can
reduce the temperature by 20 degrees they will last at least 4 times as
long. That is an activation energy (Arrhenius eqn) of about 1ev. I also
believe though I cant quote that they are best run at about 75% of their
specified working voltage. I have always wonderd about this but it would
seem to be a mistake to have too low a voltage on electrolytics ...maybe
something to do with the strength of the instulating layer formed.


Yes, I have heard this before about not using them at too low a voltage.
I don't know whether its an old-wives tale, or if there is any truth to it.


It is discussed in ITT's Reference Data for Radio Engineers.  It certainly
was true at one time not necessarily anymore, though.  In the old days,
the oxide layer that formed the dielectric was mostly formed in place by
applying a controlled current to the capacitor at a voltage above the intended
operating voltage.  Now, the aluminum electrode foil is anodized before the
capacitor is assembled, and the electrolytes are specifically formulated to
not damage the oxide layer and yet, I find that some electrolytic
capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
couple of hours.

-Chuck Harris

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck Harris writes:

and yet, I find that some electrolytic
capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
couple of hours.

I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
was given.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-21 Thread Bill Hawkins
Group,

During my days of interest in antique radios, I learned that
the dielectric between aluminum plates was formed by passing
current in one direction to build up an oxide coating on the
plates, which became the dielectric. The thickness is directly
proportional to working voltage and inversely proportional to
capacitance. As we learned from reforming old caps, the oxide
thins when there is no voltage on the cap, but can be restored
by passing several milliamps through the cap. Applying rated
voltage before it was formed would destroy the cap by welding
spots of the plates together.

I'm not sure that this applies to modern caps.

As to the temperature rating, a high temp cap run in a cool
environment will be as unhappy as someone transplanted from
Miami to Minneapolis in the winter. It may work, but it will
be very unhappy - so it depends on your empathy for the cap.

There ought to be a way to work precision time into this
thread, but I can't think of one.

Bill Hawkins


-Original Message-
From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:40 PM

In message 4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck Harris writes:

and yet, I find that some electrolytic
capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
couple of hours.

I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
was given.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-21 Thread Chuck Harris

Hi Bill,

I agree with your forming information, as applied to older caps,
but not your temperature information.  The 105C high temp caps
are just as happy, or unhappy really, with low temperatures as
the 85C caps.  Basically the difference between the two is water.
The 85C caps have an electrolyte with a significant amount of water,
that boils dry at high temperatures.  The 105C caps don't.  Kind
of like the difference between an antifreeze and water solution,
and straight antifreeze.  Both seriously run out of capacitance
when they get below freezing.

The loss of capacitance can really bite you when you use integrated
low overhead voltage regulators in automotive temperature ranges.
The regulators will oscillate if they don't have enough capacitance
on their input terminals... which can happen if you specify an
electrolytic capacitor that is right around the 100uf needed.  When
it gets to 0C, and becomes a 10uf capacitor, the regulator takes off
and burns up your load.

-Chuck Harris


Bill Hawkins wrote:

Group,

During my days of interest in antique radios, I learned that
the dielectric between aluminum plates was formed by passing
current in one direction to build up an oxide coating on the
plates, which became the dielectric. The thickness is directly
proportional to working voltage and inversely proportional to
capacitance. As we learned from reforming old caps, the oxide
thins when there is no voltage on the cap, but can be restored
by passing several milliamps through the cap. Applying rated
voltage before it was formed would destroy the cap by welding
spots of the plates together.

I'm not sure that this applies to modern caps.

As to the temperature rating, a high temp cap run in a cool
environment will be as unhappy as someone transplanted from
Miami to Minneapolis in the winter. It may work, but it will
be very unhappy - so it depends on your empathy for the cap.

There ought to be a way to work precision time into this
thread, but I can't think of one.

Bill Hawkins


-Original Message-
From: Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:40 PM

In message4e008a73.50...@erols.com, Chuck Harris writes:


and yet, I find that some electrolytic
capacitors that have been run at lower than normal voltage improve markedly
when reformed by applying  rated voltage through a 10K resistor for a
couple of hours.


I noticed in a datasheet at one point, that the capacity only was
warranted above a certain percentage of rated voltage.  No explanation
was given.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-20 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I'm sure many of you with old equipment must have considered the fact that 
electrolytic caps have a finite life and considered replacing them. I have a few 
that look suspect (bulging) on a transceiver, and decided to replace them. I'm 
tempted to do all of them in the PSU, as:


* It runs hot
* PSU could destory other bits
* Two of the 15 or so caps on the PSU board show signs of bulging.

For the PSU I used all 105 deg C caps, apart from one which was rated at 125 deg 
C. These are higher spec than the originals.


I also replaced another cap (not in a hot region) with a 105 deg C rated cap.

I've made my capacitor choice based on assuming.

1) Higher temperature devices (like 105 deg C) will be more relieable than low 
temperature ones like the standard 85 deg C cap. I'm sure at high temperatures, 
that must be true, but I've no idea if it would be beneficial if the cap does 
not get very warm.


2) There are no disadvantage of the higher temperature caps, other than cost.

Are these true?

I've ruled out the idea of replacing all electrolytics with new ones. That would 
be a LOT of work, and cost a lot of money.


Dave


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4dffbaf4.4070...@onetel.net, Dr. David Kirkby writes:

1) Higher temperature devices (like 105 deg C) will be more relieable than low 
temperature ones like the standard 85 deg C cap. I'm sure at high 
temperatures, 

You should check both temperature and lifetime rating of the capactors.

There are many capacitors on the market these days with 5000h or
even 2000h rated life.

That is 7 or 3 months respectively.

And yes, it should be criminal to manufacture and sell those.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-20 Thread Dr. David Kirkby

On 06/20/11 10:44 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

In message4dffbaf4.4070...@onetel.net, Dr. David Kirkby writes:


1) Higher temperature devices (like 105 deg C) will be more relieable than low
temperature ones like the standard 85 deg C cap. I'm sure at high temperatures,


You should check both temperature and lifetime rating of the capactors.


I have, but I would assume one rated at 6000 hours at 125 deg C would be at 
least as good as one rated at 7000 hours at 105 deg C.



There are many capacitors on the market these days with 5000h or
even 2000h rated life.

That is 7 or 3 months respectively.


Even 1000 hours I've seen. But these are of course at the maximum temperature, 
which few would use them at. Otherwise failure rates would be a lot higher than 
they are.


I've not seen any electrolytics rated more than 10,000 hours (14 months), but 
they last a lot longer if the temperature is lower.


My PC is already more than 14 months old, and has been on 24/7. Hopefully it is 
not dying on me.



And yes, it should be criminal to manufacture and sell those.


Well, I think the MTBF will be a lot more than that in practical use, as few 
would design equipment to run at 85 deg C, which is the lowest maximum 
temperature rating I've seen on any cap.


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high temp ones?

2011-06-20 Thread Alan Melia
David Another important factor when considering power supply caps is ripple
current rating. It is generally the ripple current that makes them get warm.

I think the usual thumbnail calculation still work for caps if you can
reduce the temperature by 20 degrees they will last at least 4 times as
long. That is an activation energy (Arrhenius eqn) of about 1ev. I also
believe though I cant quote that they are best run at about 75% of their
specified working voltage. I have always wonderd about this but it would
seem to be a mistake to have too low a voltage on electrolytics ...maybe
something to do with the strength of the instulating layer formed.

Alan
G3NYK

- Original Message - 
From: Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Replacing electrolytics - any disadvantages of high
temp ones?


 On 06/20/11 10:44 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
  In message4dffbaf4.4070...@onetel.net, Dr. David Kirkby writes:
 
  1) Higher temperature devices (like 105 deg C) will be more relieable
than low
  temperature ones like the standard 85 deg C cap. I'm sure at high
temperatures,
 
  You should check both temperature and lifetime rating of the capactors.

 I have, but I would assume one rated at 6000 hours at 125 deg C would be
at
 least as good as one rated at 7000 hours at 105 deg C.

  There are many capacitors on the market these days with 5000h or
  even 2000h rated life.
 
  That is 7 or 3 months respectively.

 Even 1000 hours I've seen. But these are of course at the maximum
temperature,
 which few would use them at. Otherwise failure rates would be a lot higher
than
 they are.

 I've not seen any electrolytics rated more than 10,000 hours (14 months),
but
 they last a lot longer if the temperature is lower.

 My PC is already more than 14 months old, and has been on 24/7. Hopefully
it is
 not dying on me.

  And yes, it should be criminal to manufacture and sell those.

 Well, I think the MTBF will be a lot more than that in practical use, as
few
 would design equipment to run at 85 deg C, which is the lowest maximum
 temperature rating I've seen on any cap.

 -- 
 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
 A: Top-posting.
 Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.