Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-21 Thread Jim Palfreyman
Why don't they build a watch that measures the temperature and every time
you accurately set it, it adds to a small database of time change v
temperature and then adjusts itself internally.

Over time it would become quite accurate I would think.

Jim


On 20 December 2011 11:12, Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:

 Looking at the datasheet for the DS3232, it doesn't appear
 that they mean for it to run off of a small coin cell in a
 watch.  Its battery operating capability is purely to keep
 it running when the main power is turned off.

 I would suspect that the DS3232's power consumption is due
 to its being able to drive sizable loads on its various pins.

 There is nothing inherent in temperature correcting a clock
 that should take significantly more power than would be used
 in a normal watch chip.  Measuring the temperature would be
 the most power hungry operation, I would suspect... but
 fortunately that doesn't have to be done all that often,
 perhaps once per minute.

 After the temperature is measured, a lookup table can be used
 to find a second by second correction value to be added to
 the seconds counter.

 -Chuck Harris


 Dan Rae wrote:

 On 12/19/2011 5:34 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:



 It is not clear to me that a 32KHz xtal is any less stable
 than a 262KHz xtal, though. I would think there would be a lot
 more to be gained by using a microprocessor/thermistor to
 measure the temperature within the watch, and provide an
 adjustment to compensate for the xtal's natural temperature
 sensitivity.

  Chuck, I have recently made a couple of Real Time Clocks for my
 homebrew radios using
 the Maxim DS3232 IC which has a built in TCXO at 32+ kHz doing what you
 describe, the
 temperature is checked at intervals and the corrections applied. The
 performance is
 excellent, once set, getting to what I term Harrison Level, i.e. less
 than a second
 a week error. The downside is that the standby battery demand is pretty
 high and my
 first builds using a Lithium button cell ran for only around a month max,
 so I had to
 go over to NiMH rechargeables. I suspect using this technology in a watch
 one would
 have the same problem.

 The best crystals for room temperature use are around 4 MHz with
 temperature
 inflections around 20C, and this is what was used in an early Braun alarm
 clock I had
 which also had this kind of performance. Long gone, alas.

 Dan



 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-21 Thread Don Latham
How about a turnip pocket watch with one of the new Cesium standards in it?
Harrison would approve...
Don

mike cook
 Le 19/12/2011 06:47, Perry Sandeen a écrit :
   Is a 10 MHz or so crystal on the horizon?


 Dunno, but  some  10-50MHz TCXO/VCTCXO are now available in 2mm
 packages, so why not.  There might  be battery longevity issues with
 driving the higher frequency.  I guess it comes down to whether the
 maker can sell enough to make a profit.
 FWIW, My Citizen Chronomaster is has gained just 1,8 seconds in the last
 12 months , well within the spec. of +/-5s.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-21 Thread David C. Partridge
But the Admiralty still wouldn't pay up ... 

Dave
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Don Latham
Sent: 19 December 2011 19:50
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

How about a turnip pocket watch with one of the new Cesium standards in it?
Harrison would approve...
Don


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-21 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:12:13 +1100
Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why don't they build a watch that measures the temperature and every time
 you accurately set it, it adds to a small database of time change v
 temperature and then adjusts itself internally.
 
 Over time it would become quite accurate I would think.

Because it doesn't work that way. The temperature curve is not linear.
So you would need to have a lot of reference points to get an acceptable
accuracy. Ie you would need at least a dozen if not more measurements
points, then calculate from that the correction factors (which isn't easy
if you have no control over the temperature).

It's far more economic to put the watch into a climate chamber for half
a day and do one or two cycles trough the expected range. This gives you
much more accurate data and the watch can then do simple lookup in a table
instead of doing complicated calculations.

If you do the calibration right, you can quite easily get below 1ppm 
(not accounting for aging).

Attila Kinali
-- 
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All 
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no 
use without that foundation.
 -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-21 Thread mike cook

Le 21/12/2011 10:53, Attila Kinali a écrit :

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:12:13 +1100
Jim Palfreymanjim77...@gmail.com  wrote:


Why don't they build a watch that measures the temperature and every time
you accurately set it, it adds to a small database of time change v
temperature and then adjusts itself internally.

Over time it would become quite accurate I would think.
For some of the techniques of compensation and timepieces using them, 
check out

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f9/thermocompensation-methods-movements-2087.htm

It's far more economic to put the watch into a climate chamber for half
a day and do one or two cycles trough the expected range. This gives you
much more accurate data and the watch can then do simple lookup in a table
instead of doing complicated calculations.

If you do the calibration right, you can quite easily get below 1ppm
(not accounting for aging).

Attila Kinali


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-20 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:12:43 -0500
Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:

 There is nothing inherent in temperature correcting a clock
 that should take significantly more power than would be used
 in a normal watch chip.  Measuring the temperature would be
 the most power hungry operation, I would suspect... but
 fortunately that doesn't have to be done all that often,
 perhaps once per minute.

Juup, it definitly should not draw much power.
I own a Tissot T-Touch (first gen) that goes wrong
less than 5s/y, ie it's definitly temperature compensated.
Battery lifetime is several years (i actually dont know
because i had to bring it back for repairs in shorter intervals
than the battery holds)

Attila Kinali

-- 
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread Peter Bell
I think the Grand Seikos are specified at the same +/- 10 seconds a
year accuracy as that Bulova. They use a slightly different approach
though - it's a standard 32768 Hz xtal, but its thermally compensated.
 I don't know of any other watches that use a 262144 Hz xtal on its
own, but there were some designs that used both a 32768 and 262244 Hz
xtals and used the tracking between them for temperature compensation
(I think this was used in some Seiko and ETA watches).  The Bulova
certainly has a great price for a watch of that spec.

I don't know of any watches that used an oscillator as high as 10 MHz
- the highest clock I ever heard of in a watch was in a very limited
edition Citizen that ran at 4 MHz, and which was specced at +/- 3
seconds a year without thermal compensation. Omega also made a
high-frequency watch that I think ran at 2.4 MHz and had a +/- 5
seconds / year accuracy spec. Both of these used AT-cut xtals and
suffered from rather poor battery life (about 1 year).

Regards,

Pete

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Perry Sandeen sandee...@yahoo.com wrote:
 List,

 I saw an ad today for a Bulova Champlain Precisionist watch.  It is supposed 
 to be accurate to + 10 seconds a year.  What stood out in the as is that they 
 are using a 262,144 KHz crystal eight times the frequency commonly used.

 I don’t know if it is more accurate than the Seiko (?) discussed on the list 
 about a year ago, but it seems to be about USD $2,100 cheaper.   Around USD 
 $600 or less depending on the model.  Is a 10 MHz or so crystal on the 
 horizon?

 Regards,

 Perrier



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread Chuck Harris

With the CMOS logic used in watches, the big power hog
is due to charging and discharging the gate capacitance
of the various logic gates.  The faster you charge and
discharge the gate's, the more power you loose due to
I2R losses, and E-M radiation.

Thankfully, the high capacity lithium cells available today
provide lots more uA-hours than the older silver-oxide cells
of yor, so it is possible for the energy budget on a
premium electronic watch to be higher than was previously
acceptable.  I would think that most watch manufacturers would
take that extra power budget, and use it to extend the time
between cell changes, and to spin more fancy dial motors.

It is not clear to me that a 32KHz xtal is any less stable
than a 262KHz xtal, though.  I would think there would be a lot
more to be gained by using a microprocessor/thermistor to
measure the temperature within the watch, and provide an
adjustment to compensate for the xtal's natural temperature
sensitivity.

-Chuck Harris

Perry Sandeen wrote:

List,

I saw an ad today for a Bulova Champlain Precisionist watch.  It is supposed to 
be
accurate to + 10 seconds a year.  What stood out in the as is that they are 
using
a 262,144 KHz crystal eight times the frequency commonly used.

I don’t know if it is more accurate than the Seiko (?) discussed on the list 
about
a year ago, but it seems to be about USD $2,100 cheaper.   Around USD $600 or 
less
depending on the model.  Is a 10 MHz or so crystal on the horizon?

Regards,

Perrier


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread mike cook

Le 19/12/2011 06:47, Perry Sandeen a écrit :

  Is a 10 MHz or so crystal on the horizon?


Dunno, but  some  10-50MHz TCXO/VCTCXO are now available in 2mm 
packages, so why not.  There might  be battery longevity issues with 
driving the higher frequency.  I guess it comes down to whether the 
maker can sell enough to make a profit.
FWIW, My Citizen Chronomaster is has gained just 1,8 seconds in the last 
12 months , well within the spec. of +/-5s.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread Dan Rae

On 12/19/2011 5:34 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:



It is not clear to me that a 32KHz xtal is any less stable
than a 262KHz xtal, though.  I would think there would be a lot
more to be gained by using a microprocessor/thermistor to
measure the temperature within the watch, and provide an
adjustment to compensate for the xtal's natural temperature
sensitivity.

Chuck, I have recently made a couple of Real Time Clocks for my homebrew 
radios using the Maxim DS3232 IC which has a built in TCXO at 32+ kHz 
doing what you describe, the temperature is checked at intervals and the 
corrections applied.  The performance is excellent, once set, getting to 
what I term Harrison Level, i.e. less than a second a week error.
The downside is that the standby battery demand is pretty high and my 
first builds using a Lithium button cell ran for only around a month 
max, so I had to go over to NiMH rechargeables.  I suspect using this 
technology in a watch one would have the same problem.


The best crystals for room temperature use are around 4 MHz with 
temperature inflections around 20C, and this is what was used in an 
early Braun alarm clock I had which also had this kind of performance.  
Long gone, alas.


Dan



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread iov...@inwind.it
dan...@verizon.net wrote:

The best crystals for room temperature use are around 4 MHz with 
temperature inflections around 20C, and this is what was used in an 
early Braun alarm clock I had which also had this kind of performance.  
Long gone, alas.

and this is what the clock of my old german car does (4 MHz crystal). Its 
performance always surprised me.

Antonio I8IOV

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New precision watch

2011-12-19 Thread Chuck Harris

Looking at the datasheet for the DS3232, it doesn't appear
that they mean for it to run off of a small coin cell in a
watch.  Its battery operating capability is purely to keep
it running when the main power is turned off.

I would suspect that the DS3232's power consumption is due
to its being able to drive sizable loads on its various pins.

There is nothing inherent in temperature correcting a clock
that should take significantly more power than would be used
in a normal watch chip.  Measuring the temperature would be
the most power hungry operation, I would suspect... but
fortunately that doesn't have to be done all that often,
perhaps once per minute.

After the temperature is measured, a lookup table can be used
to find a second by second correction value to be added to
the seconds counter.

-Chuck Harris

Dan Rae wrote:

On 12/19/2011 5:34 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:



It is not clear to me that a 32KHz xtal is any less stable
than a 262KHz xtal, though. I would think there would be a lot
more to be gained by using a microprocessor/thermistor to
measure the temperature within the watch, and provide an
adjustment to compensate for the xtal's natural temperature
sensitivity.


Chuck, I have recently made a couple of Real Time Clocks for my homebrew radios 
using
the Maxim DS3232 IC which has a built in TCXO at 32+ kHz doing what you 
describe, the
temperature is checked at intervals and the corrections applied. The 
performance is
excellent, once set, getting to what I term Harrison Level, i.e. less than a 
second
a week error. The downside is that the standby battery demand is pretty high 
and my
first builds using a Lithium button cell ran for only around a month max, so I 
had to
go over to NiMH rechargeables. I suspect using this technology in a watch one 
would
have the same problem.

The best crystals for room temperature use are around 4 MHz with temperature
inflections around 20C, and this is what was used in an early Braun alarm clock 
I had
which also had this kind of performance. Long gone, alas.

Dan



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.