RE: [tips] word confusions/language evolution?

2009-08-11 Thread Stuart McKelvie

Dear Tipsters,

What do you think about the ubiquitous use of looking to when it means 
hoping to or expecting to or wishing to? It annoys me. 

Am I an old fuddy-duddy who is not tolerant of one of our natural language 
evolutions or am I correct that there is a perfectly acceptable and more 
accurate existing term available?

Looking forward to your replies.

Sincerely,

Stuart
___

 Floreat Labore

 Recti cultus pectora roborant

Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,   Phone: (819)822-9600, Extension 2402
Department of Psychology,  Fax: (819)822-9661
Bishop's University,
2600 College Street,
Sherbrooke (Borough of Lennoxville),
Québec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.

E-mail: smcke...@ubishops.ca
or stuart.mckel...@ubishops.ca

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
___



-Original Message-
From: Paul C Bernhardt [mailto:pcbernha...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 11-Aug-09 8:33 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions- one more
 
Here is Grammar Girl's take on went missing.

http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/went-missing.aspx

She says that it is correct, a British usage dating to at least the 1940s that 
has gained a footing in the US recently. 

Paul C. Bernhardt
Department of Psychology
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, Maryland



-Original Message-
From: Patricia Santoro [mailto:psant...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 8/11/2009 7:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE:[tips] word confusions- one more
 
Finally, someone can tell me if the term went missing is actually correct, as 
in: The two hikers went missing shortly after sunset.
 
It sounds so wrong!
 
Pat Santoro
 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)winmail.dat

Re: [tips] word confusions/language evolution?

2009-08-11 Thread John Kulig

Stuart et al

I was influenced quite a bit by Pinker's books on language (Language Instinct, 
How Language Works ..) and his negative critique of 'langauge mavens', so I 
tend to be tolerant of language evolution so long as there is precision in 
sentences i.e. having language match thought - though sometimes it's the 
thought that is muddled. I suspect texting is speeding up evolution .. that's 
all 4 now, c u later :~)

--
John W. Kulig
Professor of Psychology
Plymouth State University
Plymouth NH 03264
--

- Original Message -
From: Stuart McKelvie smcke...@ubishops.ca
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:00:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions/language evolution?


Dear Tipsters,

What do you think about the ubiquitous use of looking to when it means 
hoping to or expecting to or wishing to? It annoys me. 

Am I an old fuddy-duddy who is not tolerant of one of our natural language 
evolutions or am I correct that there is a perfectly acceptable and more 
accurate existing term available?

Looking forward to your replies.

Sincerely,

Stuart
___

 Floreat Labore

 Recti cultus pectora roborant

Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,   Phone: (819)822-9600, Extension 2402
Department of Psychology,  Fax: (819)822-9661
Bishop's University,
2600 College Street,
Sherbrooke (Borough of Lennoxville),
Québec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.

E-mail: smcke...@ubishops.ca
or stuart.mckel...@ubishops.ca

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
___



-Original Message-
From: Paul C Bernhardt [mailto:pcbernha...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 11-Aug-09 8:33 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions- one more
 
Here is Grammar Girl's take on went missing.

http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/went-missing.aspx

She says that it is correct, a British usage dating to at least the 1940s that 
has gained a footing in the US recently. 

Paul C. Bernhardt
Department of Psychology
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, Maryland



-Original Message-
From: Patricia Santoro [mailto:psant...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 8/11/2009 7:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE:[tips] word confusions- one more
 
Finally, someone can tell me if the term went missing is actually correct, as 
in: The two hikers went missing shortly after sunset.
 
It sounds so wrong!
 
Pat Santoro
 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)


RE: [tips] word confusions/language evolution?

2009-08-11 Thread Rick Froman
The correct phraseology in such a circumstance is fixin' to.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3055
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
rfro...@jbu.edu
(479)524-7295
http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman


-Original Message-
From: Stuart McKelvie [mailto:smcke...@ubishops.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:00 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions/language evolution?


Dear Tipsters,

What do you think about the ubiquitous use of looking to when it means 
hoping to or expecting to or wishing to? It annoys me.

Am I an old fuddy-duddy who is not tolerant of one of our natural language 
evolutions or am I correct that there is a perfectly acceptable and more 
accurate existing term available?

Looking forward to your replies.

Sincerely,

Stuart
___

 Floreat Labore

 Recti cultus pectora roborant

Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,   Phone: (819)822-9600, Extension 2402
Department of Psychology,  Fax: (819)822-9661
Bishop's University,
2600 College Street,
Sherbrooke (Borough of Lennoxville),
Québec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.

E-mail: smcke...@ubishops.ca
or stuart.mckel...@ubishops.ca

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
___



-Original Message-
From: Paul C Bernhardt [mailto:pcbernha...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 11-Aug-09 8:33 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions- one more

Here is Grammar Girl's take on went missing.

http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/went-missing.aspx

She says that it is correct, a British usage dating to at least the 1940s that 
has gained a footing in the US recently.

Paul C. Bernhardt
Department of Psychology
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, Maryland



-Original Message-
From: Patricia Santoro [mailto:psant...@frostburg.edu]
Sent: Tue 8/11/2009 7:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE:[tips] word confusions- one more

Finally, someone can tell me if the term went missing is actually correct, as 
in: The two hikers went missing shortly after sunset.

It sounds so wrong!

Pat Santoro


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)