DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4612] New: - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4612

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs

   Summary: Thread which extracts Session object obtained from
HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries the session object
hangs
   Product: Tomcat 4
   Version: 4.0.1 Final
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Other
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Code example:
  public void valueUnbound(HttpSessionBindingEvent parm1) {
HttpSession session = parm1.getSession();
log.debug(SessionBindingListener::valueUnbound:Name:+parm1.getName()
+ :Session+session.getId());
System.out.println(1);
// THE FOLLOWING CALL HANGS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CALL ***
User user = (User) session.getAttribute(PTLConstants.USER_KEY);
// THE THREAD NEVER EXECUTES THE NEXT STATEMENT
System.out.println(2);
if (user == null) {
   System.out.println(3);
   // log him off anyway
   log.warn(Could not find User object in session+session.getId());
   log.debug(user object was null);
   return;
}
System.out.println(4);
  }

Works OK! in Tomcat 3.2.3, but the User object cannot be found in the session 
in Tomcat 3.2.3 too. User object was placed in the session which should have 
been available here.

I believe this is the same problem of the thread hanging in HttpSessionListener 
too on sessionDestroyed() method.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4613] New: - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs

   Summary: Thread which extracts Session object obtained from
HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries the session object
hangs
   Product: Tomcat 4
   Version: 4.0.1 Final
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
  Severity: Major
  Priority: Other
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Code example:
  public void valueUnbound(HttpSessionBindingEvent parm1) {
HttpSession session = parm1.getSession();
log.debug(SessionBindingListener::valueUnbound:Name:+parm1.getName()
+ :Session+session.getId());
System.out.println(1);
// THE FOLLOWING CALL HANGS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CALL ***
User user = (User) session.getAttribute(PTLConstants.USER_KEY);
// THE THREAD NEVER EXECUTES THE NEXT STATEMENT
System.out.println(2);
if (user == null) {
   System.out.println(3);
   // log him off anyway
   log.warn(Could not find User object in session+session.getId());
   log.debug(user object was null);
   return;
}
System.out.println(4);
  }

Works OK! in Tomcat 3.2.3

I believe this is the same problem of the thread hanging in HttpSessionListener 
too on sessionDestroyed() method.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4612] - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4612

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 01:32 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4613 ***

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4613] - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 01:32 ---
*** Bug 4612 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4615] New: - jsp compilation problem in iplanet version 4.1

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4615.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4615

jsp compilation problem in iplanet version 4.1

   Summary: jsp compilation problem in iplanet version 4.1
   Product: Tomcat 3
   Version: Unknown
  Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
  Severity: Critical
  Priority: Other
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


IPlanet 4.1 when configured to support jsp with some protection(iplanet's 
obj.conf configuration file modified to do some initial activity before the 
request goes to jspengine using a nsapi plugin), and when accessed for the 
first time gives the compilation error. The request to the jsp is fired 2 times 
automatically and in the second request gives the following error msg.

[01/Nov/2001:19:57:06] info ( 1753): JSP: JSP1x compiler threw exception
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /dispatch.jsp
 at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspReader.pushFile(JspReader.java, Compile
d Code)
 at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspReader.pushFile(JspReader.java, Compile
d Code)
 at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspReader.init(JspReader.java, Compiled
Code)
 at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspReader.createJspReader(JspReader.java,
Compiled Code)
 at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java, Compiled C
ode)
 at com.netscape.server.http.servlet.NSServletEntity.load(NSServletEntity
.java, Compiled Code)
 at com.netscape.server.http.servlet.NSServletEntity.update(NSServletEnti
ty.java, Compiled Code)
 at com.netscape.server.http.servlet.NSServletRunner.Service(NSServletRun
ner.java, Compiled Code)
[01/Nov/2001:19:57:06] warning ( 1753): Internal error: Failed to get GenericSer
vlet. (uri=/dispatch.jsp,SCRIPT_NAME=/dispatch.jsp)

The same is working fine if the protection(nsapi plugin component) is removed 
or if the protection is put in place after the jsp's are compiled into servlets.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




patch to jk_uri_worker_map.c ApacheConfig.java

2001-11-03 Thread Michael Jennings

Here are my diffs to allow mod_jk to understand URIs of the form
/context/*whatever
and for ApacheConfig to write entries to mod_jk.conf-auto of the form
/context/*j_security_check

Combined, these patches should allow form-based authentication to work with
Apache+tomcat

If anyone sees any glaring problems with the modifications, please
let me know and I'll try and fix it.

-Mike Jennings

- Original Message -
From: Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: patch to jk_uri_worker_map.c - slightly more sophisticated
string matching


 Hi Costin  Larry,

 I'll apply my change to jakarta-tomcat-connectors then send the diff as an
 attachment.

 -Mike


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:08 PM
 Subject: Re: patch to jk_uri_worker_map.c - slightly more sophisticated
 string matching


  Mike,
 
  Thanks for the patch and your interest. One small problem: the
development
  of jk moved to jakarta-tomcat-connectors. We should do only 'major' bug
  fixes in j-t/src/native.
 
  Of course, all rules have exceptions - but it is extremely painfull to
  merge and track 2 codebases.
 
  Costin
 
 
  On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Michael Jennings wrote:
 
   If anyone sees any glaring problems with the following modification to
   mod_jk
   please let me know.
  
   -Mike Jennings
  
   Index: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/jk/jk_uri_worker_map.c
   ===
   RCS file:
  
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat/src/native/jk/Attic/jk_uri_worker_map.c,v
   retrieving revision 1.3.2.1
   diff -r1.3.2.1 jk_uri_worker_map.c
   75,77c75,78
#define MATCH_TYPE_EXACT(0)
#define MATCH_TYPE_CONTEXT  (1)
#define MATCH_TYPE_SUFFIX   (2)
   ---
#define MATCH_TYPE_EXACT(0)   /* match an exact pattern */
#define MATCH_TYPE_CONTEXT  (1)   /* match all URIs in a given
context
 */
#define MATCH_TYPE_SUFFIX   (2)   /* match all URIs of the form
*.ext
 */
#define MATCH_TYPE_GENERAL_SUFFIX (3) /* match all URIs of the form
 *ext
   */
   231c232
   
   ---
   
   236,237c237,238
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
   
   jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, malloc failed\n);
   ---
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
   
   jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, malloc failed\n);
   244,245c245,246
 * we need to have a '/' then a '*' and
 the a
   '.' or a
 * '/' then a '*'
   ---
 * we need to have a '/' then a '*' and
 the a
   '.' or a
 * '/' then a '*'
   247c248,252
asterisk--;
   ---
asterisk--;  /* point to char before
 asterisk
   */
/* asterisk[0]='/'
   asterisk[1]='*'
   asterisk[2]='.' or asterisk[2]='\0'
or
   asterisk[2]!='\0'
*/
   248a254
asterisk[1] = '\0'; /* terminate the
 uri
   pattern at the asterisk */
   251c257
asterisk[1] = asterisk[2] =
'\0';
   ---
asterisk[2] = '\0';
   252a259,260
/* uri-pattern will now contain
   context only
   since asterisk[1]='\0' */
   256,258c264,276
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
   Into
   jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, suffix rule %s.%s=%s was
 added\n,
   uri, asterisk + 3,
worker);
   ---
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
   Into
   jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, suffix rule %s.%s=%s was
 added\n,
   uri, asterisk + 3,
worker);
j++;
} else if ('\0' != asterisk[2]) {
/* general suffix rule */
uw_map-maps[j].worker_name =
 worker;
uw_map-maps[j].context = uri;
uw_map-maps[j].suffix  =
asterisk
 +
   2;
uw_map-maps[j].match_type =
   MATCH_TYPE_GENERAL_SUFFIX;
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
   Into
   jk_uri_worker_map_t::uri_worker_map_open, general suffix rule %s*%s=%s
 was
   added\n,
   uri, asterisk + 2,

AW: serious problem with Tomcat JVM running out of memory

2001-11-03 Thread manju

Hi,

We are facing serious problems with the above problem when running jsp on 
tomcat/linux. Could anyone please update me on the current status of handling this 
problem.

It is extremely critical for us. Please reply ASAP.

Manjunath



Re: AW: serious problem with Tomcat JVM running out of memory

2001-11-03 Thread Pier Fumagalli

manju at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 We are facing serious problems with the above problem when running jsp on
 tomcat/linux. Could anyone please update me on the current status of handling
 this problem.
 
 It is extremely critical for us. Please reply ASAP.

As far as I know there are no memory leaks in the latest releases of Tomcat
in Tomcat. Please verify your application because 99% sure there is your
problem.

Pier


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: serious problem with Tomcat JVM running out of memory

2001-11-03 Thread Remy Maucherat

 We are facing serious problems with the above problem when running jsp on
tomcat/linux.
 Could anyone please update me on the current status of handling this
problem.

If your application has lots of JSPs which need to get compiled, the VM may
run out of memory because javac leaks memory each time it compiles a page.
There's an article about the problem in the release notes for 4.0.1, but it
exists in all Tomcat versions.

If your application doesn't use many JSPs, then I have no explanation, as
Tomcat has no known memory leaks.

To get around this, you can either:
- precompile the JSPs
- stop and restart Tomcat when it starts to happen; after a while, all the
JSPs will get compiled
- join the crusade to open-source the JDK, so that we're able to fix that
kind of feature

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Meta Refresh and jsessionid - a proposal

2001-11-03 Thread Robert Lucier

That works perfectly! I feel like a monkey for not trying that. Sorry
to bother you guys.


--- Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Why not simply encoding the url ?
 
 See http://nagoya.betaversion.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1482
 
 Saludos ,
 Ignacio J. Ortega
 
 
  -Mensaje original-
  De: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]En nombre 
  de Craig R.
  McClanahan
  Enviado el: viernes 2 de noviembre de 2001 22:59
  Para: Robert Lucier
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Asunto: Re: Meta Refresh and jsessionid - a proposal
  
  
  
  On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Robert Lucier wrote:
  
   Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:44:20 -0800 (PST)
   From: Robert Lucier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Meta Refresh and jsessionid - a proposal
  
   I understand, and that bothers me. Has there been any talk 
  of modifying
   that portion of the spec to be compatible with the meta-refresh
 tag?
   The problem shows up on this and other lists fairly frequently.
  
  
  I don't recall any such discussion -- the best way to make sure it
 at
  least gets paid attention to is to submit feedback to the Servlet
 Spec
  feedback address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
  
  It may also be that the expert group doesn't consider 
  compatible with the
  meta-refresh tag to be a very compelling argument:
  
  - Refresh is not a standard HTTP header
  
  - Browsers that misinterpret this kind of thing:
  
  meta http-equiv=refresh
   content=2;URL=http://foo/bar;jsessionid=12345;
  
sound like they are broken in the first place -- they should be
parsing on the first semicolon, not the second one.
  
  Craig
  
  
   --- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The servlet spec is pretty clear about where the session id is
supposed to
be.  I don't think it is a good idea to introduce something
 that
violates
those requirements (and which would trap unwary developers into
dependence on a non-standard implementation of this 
  functionality).
   
Craig
   
   
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Robert Lucier wrote:
   
 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:22:58 -0800 (PST)
 From: Robert Lucier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Meta Refresh and jsessionid - a proposal

 I'm having a seemingly common problem where I can't use
url-rewriting
 with the META HTTP-EQUIV=Refresh tag because the 
  semi-colon in
the
 rewritten URL is confused with the delimiter in the meta tag.

 I didn't see a solution or workaround, so here's mine. 
  I'd like to
 modify the HttpProcessor.parseRequest method to look for
jsessionid=
 in the query string if ;jsessionid is not found in 
  the uri. That
way
 the existing encodeURL method will still work, but 
  those who need
the
 refresh method can put the jsessionid in the query string
parameters.

 Please let me know if this is acceptable or if there is a
 better
way to
 solve this problem


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Find a job, post your resume.
 http://careers.yahoo.com

 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
  
  
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Find a job, post your resume.
   http://careers.yahoo.com
  
  
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4613] - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 11:50 ---
It is far more likely that an uncaught exception occurs on that line. Try 
replacing it with: 
try {
 User user = (User) session.getAttribute(PTLConstants.USER_KEY);
} catch (Throwable t) {
 t.printStackTrace();
}
to see what's happening. The most likely is a ClassCastException when casting 
to the 'User' type.

If I'm wrong and no exception is thrown on that line, please reopen the bug.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4592] - Tomcat exits/dies without warning or messages

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4592

Tomcat exits/dies without warning or messages





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 18:48 ---
In general, we will not attempt to fix VM crash bugs (since it's a VM bug, not 
a Tomcat bug), and they will be closed with either 'WONTFIX' or 'INVALID'. Your 
description really looks like a VM crash.

The problem may be with the JDBC driver Poolman uses. It may contain native 
code, which in turn may crash the VM.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4613] - Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent queries the session object hangs

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4613

Thread which extracts Session object obtained from HttpSessionBindingEvent  queries 
the session object hangs





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 21:15 ---
Most likely what is happening is that it is throwing an InvalidStateException 
due to the fact that the session has expired, and calls to getAttribute are no 
longer allowed.  This is exactly what the 2.3 servlet spec specifies (it was 
unspecified in the 2.2 spec), so Remy (and Tomcat) are right.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4615] - jsp compilation problem in iplanet version 4.1

2001-11-03 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4615.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4615

jsp compilation problem in iplanet version 4.1





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-03 21:30 ---
This looks very much like a bug in iPlanet, but I haven't used iPlanet enough 
to change the status.  However, you could try using Tomcat 3.x (3.3 has the 
best configuration support) with the Netscape plugin (which I am told works 
with iPlanet).

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]