[VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Remy Maucherat

Hi,

After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 4.0.2 this
week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release as soon as
this vote is considered approved). This release has already been approved,
and although there are some issues which will need to be addressed before
4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.

The list of changes and fixes is available at:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/Attic/RELEAS
E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4

ballot
[ ] +1: Make the release
[ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:


/ballot

There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
notice any thread safety issues during load testing).

ballot
[ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
[ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:


/ballot

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri

The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?

What about ?

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


Hi,

After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 
4.0.2 this
week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release 
as soon as
this vote is considered approved). This release has already 
been approved,
and although there are some issues which will need to be 
addressed before
4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.

The list of changes and fixes is available at:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0
/Attic/RELEAS
E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4

ballot
[ ] +1: Make the release
[ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues 
are fixed:


/ballot

There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD 
branch which
could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. 
I wrote the
code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
notice any thread safety issues during load testing).

ballot
[ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
[ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:


/ballot

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Remy Maucherat

 The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
 is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?

 What about ?

I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Larry Isaacs



ballot
[X] +1: Make the release
[ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:


/ballot

 There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
 could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
 code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
 notice any thread safety issues during load testing).

ballot
[X] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
[ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
/ballot


Larry


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread jean-frederic clere

Hi,

I have noted that 4 of the jsp tests fail:
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
It sounds like a tag library is missing (in my test environment) the line where
the exception comes from is
TagLibraryInfo tlibInfo=tagInfo.getTagLibrary(); 
From TestTag.java (of jakarta-watchdog-4.0).


The WARP part needs a little review...


Cheers

Jean-frederic


Remy Maucherat wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 4.0.2 this
 week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release as soon as
 this vote is considered approved). This release has already been approved,
 and although there are some issues which will need to be addressed before
 4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
 additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.
 
 The list of changes and fixes is available at:
 http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/Attic/RELEAS
 E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4
 
 ballot
 [ ] +1: Make the release
 [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
 
 /ballot
 
 There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
 could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
 code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
 notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
 
 ballot
 [ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
 [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
 
 /ballot
 
 Remy
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Ryan Lubke

Hi,

Did you rebuild/redploy and test with the latest Watchdog?

-rl

On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 11:16, jean-frederic clere wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have noted that 4 of the jsp tests fail:
 jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
 jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
 jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
 jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
 It sounds like a tag library is missing (in my test environment) the line where
 the exception comes from is
 TagLibraryInfo tlibInfo=tagInfo.getTagLibrary(); 
 From TestTag.java (of jakarta-watchdog-4.0).
 
 
 The WARP part needs a little review...
 
 
 Cheers
 
 Jean-frederic
 
 
 Remy Maucherat wrote:
  
  Hi,
  
  After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 4.0.2 this
  week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release as soon as
  this vote is considered approved). This release has already been approved,
  and although there are some issues which will need to be addressed before
  4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
  additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.
  
  The list of changes and fixes is available at:
  http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/Attic/RELEAS
  E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4
  
  ballot
  [ ] +1: Make the release
  [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
  
  /ballot
  
  There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
  could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
  code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
  notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
  
  ballot
  [ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
  [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
  
  /ballot
  
  Remy
  
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Kin-Man Chung


 ballot
 [X] +1: Make the release
 [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
 

Since 4.0.1, there have been lots of bug fixes.  It's time.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Bill Barker


- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:25 AM
Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


 ballot
 [X ] +1: Make the release
 [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:


 /ballot

 There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
 could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
 code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
 notice any thread safety issues during load testing).

 ballot
 [X] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
 [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:


 /ballot

 Remy


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread costinm

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:

  The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
  is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
 
  What about ?

 I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
 There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
 documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.

I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
connector / protocol ).

Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...


Costin






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Tom Drake

Costin:

Where does Manager get the 'route id' from.

Tom
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


| On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
|
|   The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
|   is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
|  
|   What about ?
| 
|  I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
|  There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
|  documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.
|
| I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
| remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
| connector / protocol ).
|
| Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...
|
|
| Costin
|
|
|
|
|
|
| --
| To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread costinm

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote:

 Costin:

 Where does Manager get the 'route id' from.

Easiest: from server.xml ( just add an option somewhere
that can be set on the Manager ). I would make it a
property of server or service, as it is an id for
the running instance of tomcat.
That require setting exactly the same id as the worker
name in workers.properties.

Harder: the information is sent by apache
along with the request. You can check ( in AjpRequest )
if Manager has a 'id' set, and if not set it.

That will not solve the problem of 'multiple workers
for the same tomcat' - but that shouldn't affect 4.0
( since a single worker type is available - ajp13 ),
and will not be a problem in jk2 ( or if it is, we'll
solve it then )

Costin





 Tom
 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


 | On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
 |
 |   The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
 |   is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
 |  
 |   What about ?
 | 
 |  I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
 |  There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
 |  documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.
 |
 | I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
 | remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
 | connector / protocol ).
 |
 | Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...
 |
 |
 | Costin
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | --
 | To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 | For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
 |
 |


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]