RE: fault-tolerant/backup_mode in mod_jk : Was: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
>This is actually very easy with the existing code and a tiny patch I >submitted a few weeks ago. We're using it in production mode, so it is >known to be stable. The first version I submitted had some additional >logging added, but I'm attaching a minimal patch. > >All you have to do is set the lbfactor in workers.properties to 0, and >it should never select that worker unless the session route points to >it, or the primary worker is down. Exactly what we want :) >This also has the added benefit of making externally load balanced >clusters behave properly for AOL/Compuserve users without special >configuration of the load balancer. Those services use IP randomizing >proxies which break generic IP-based sticky. This will cause the >sessions to be re-routed from the Apache that receives the request to >the Tomcat that initiated the session. This actually works, because we >were able to remove all of our special configurations to deal with this >from our load balancers. The problem is described at >http://webmaster.info.aol.com/index.cfm?article=15 >This patch changes the behavior by pre-initializing lb_value for each >worker. The selection algorithm searches for the worker with >the lowest >lb_value that is not in a failed state. It then increments >the lb_value >by the lb_factor. lb_factor is set to the inverse (1/x) of the >lb_factor specified in the config file. When lb_factor in the config >file is 0, this number becomes basically MAX_DOUBLE. That means that >lb_value becomes MAX_DOUBLE, so it will never be selected for any >practical purposes. > >This patch has been tested extensivly in production use, and works >perfectly. Seems fine to me. I'll commit it today :)
Re: fault-tolerant/backup_mode in mod_jk : Was: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Henri, This is actually very easy with the existing code and a tiny patch I submitted a few weeks ago. We're using it in production mode, so it is known to be stable. The first version I submitted had some additional logging added, but I'm attaching a minimal patch. All you have to do is set the lbfactor in workers.properties to 0, and it should never select that worker unless the session route points to it, or the primary worker is down. This also has the added benefit of making externally load balanced clusters behave properly for AOL/Compuserve users without special configuration of the load balancer. Those services use IP randomizing proxies which break generic IP-based sticky. This will cause the sessions to be re-routed from the Apache that receives the request to the Tomcat that initiated the session. This actually works, because we were able to remove all of our special configurations to deal with this from our load balancers. The problem is described at http://webmaster.info.aol.com/index.cfm?article=15 This patch changes the behavior by pre-initializing lb_value for each worker. The selection algorithm searches for the worker with the lowest lb_value that is not in a failed state. It then increments the lb_value by the lb_factor. lb_factor is set to the inverse (1/x) of the lb_factor specified in the config file. When lb_factor in the config file is 0, this number becomes basically MAX_DOUBLE. That means that lb_value becomes MAX_DOUBLE, so it will never be selected for any practical purposes. This patch has been tested extensivly in production use, and works perfectly. Paul Frieden GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:28:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> mod_jk support Apache 2.0 > >> > >> And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used > >> in mod_jk. > >> > >> Could you take a look at it ? > > > >Okay, what's the difference between mod_webapp and mod_jk? I thought > >that mod_webapp was the preferred TC 4.0 connector? This seems like > >this is worthy of a FAQ. We've still got people using mod_jserv... > > One of the goal of j-t-c, is to be the answer to : > > 'how to connect my webserver to tomcat ?' > > A great effort has been deployed in having an easy to use > build stuff. > Next effort will be documentation and ... lobbying :) > > >Oh, is it that mod_webapp uses the Warp protocol, not ajp13? Does > >ajp13 support the TC 4.0 hot-deploy functionality? -- justin > > not in ajp13. But it's successor ajp14, have a strongest login > procedure, and autoconf support (uri handled passed to web-server). > Also planned is to inform the web-server of context state, ie > when a context is put down (for admin purpose), the web-servlet > must learn it and route request to another servlet-engine (if we > are in load-balancing configuration). > > what make me think we should add a fault-tolerant/backup-mode worker > in mod_jk. A la load-balancing, having a group of worker (servlet engine), > with one principal, and many as backup. If the principal could no more > handle a request (failure or context down), just have the request > routed to next worker in list. > > What about ? --- jk_lb_worker.orig Fri Jun 15 10:23:42 2001 +++ jk_lb_worker.c Fri Jun 15 10:23:54 2001 @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ p->lb_workers[i].lb_factor = jk_get_lb_factor(props, worker_names[i]); p->lb_workers[i].lb_factor = 1/p->lb_workers[i].lb_factor; -p->lb_workers[i].lb_value = 0.0; +p->lb_workers[i].lb_value = p->lb_workers[i].lb_factor; p->lb_workers[i].in_error_state = JK_FALSE; p->lb_workers[i].in_recovering = JK_FALSE; if(!wc_create_worker(p->lb_workers[i].name,
fault-tolerant/backup_mode in mod_jk : Was: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
>On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:28:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> mod_jk support Apache 2.0 >> >> And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used >> in mod_jk. >> >> Could you take a look at it ? > >Okay, what's the difference between mod_webapp and mod_jk? I thought >that mod_webapp was the preferred TC 4.0 connector? This seems like >this is worthy of a FAQ. We've still got people using mod_jserv... One of the goal of j-t-c, is to be the answer to : 'how to connect my webserver to tomcat ?' A great effort has been deployed in having an easy to use build stuff. Next effort will be documentation and ... lobbying :) >Oh, is it that mod_webapp uses the Warp protocol, not ajp13? Does >ajp13 support the TC 4.0 hot-deploy functionality? -- justin not in ajp13. But it's successor ajp14, have a strongest login procedure, and autoconf support (uri handled passed to web-server). Also planned is to inform the web-server of context state, ie when a context is put down (for admin purpose), the web-servlet must learn it and route request to another servlet-engine (if we are in load-balancing configuration). what make me think we should add a fault-tolerant/backup-mode worker in mod_jk. A la load-balancing, having a group of worker (servlet engine), with one principal, and many as backup. If the principal could no more handle a request (failure or context down), just have the request routed to next worker in list. What about ?
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:28:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > mod_jk support Apache 2.0 > > And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used > in mod_jk. > > Could you take a look at it ? Okay, what's the difference between mod_webapp and mod_jk? I thought that mod_webapp was the preferred TC 4.0 connector? This seems like this is worthy of a FAQ. We've still got people using mod_jserv... Oh, is it that mod_webapp uses the Warp protocol, not ajp13? Does ajp13 support the TC 4.0 hot-deploy functionality? -- justin
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:39:58AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: > I made a first try some months ago and get it started on a non-threaded machine, > by adding #define APACHE20 but the code has evolved a lot from that time. Should > I try again in the today code? If you've got time. You might not be able to use #ifdef the changes - you probably want to split it out into another directory. The module structs are just too different - it'd be too confusing. And, mod_webapp (depending upon on the webapp library works - haven't looked at it) should probably be a filter... As I said, when I have some spare time, I'll try to look at it if no one else has by then. But, I don't have commit privs to j-t-c, so you could do it a bit more efficiently than I. =) -- justin
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Apache1.3 on Redhat 6.1, 6.2, 7.1 Apache1.3 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 8
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
mod_jk support Apache 2.0 And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used in mod_jk. Could you take a look at it ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:00 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll > > >On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:16AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> Now which webservers are you using : >> >> - Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) >> - Apache 2.0 >> - Domino >> - IIS 4/5/2000 >> - JNI >> - Netscape/IPlanet >> >> This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put >> the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes > >Yeah, but we should concentrate on getting a mod_webapp functional on >Apache 2.0 (so you can have Tomcat4 with Apache 2.0). Looking at the >j-t-c repository, I don't think Apache 2.0 is supported by mod_webapp >yet. (BTW, what's the status of hot deploy in mod_webapp for Apache >1.3?) > >Depending upon what I get involved with on the httpd side, I could >spend a few hours trying to get mod_webapp.c ported to Apache 2.0. >I probably won't be able to look at it for a couple of weeks though. >I can't imagine it'd take more than a few hours. If you port it to >using the new filters API, that might take a bit longer. -- justin >
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:16AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Now which webservers are you using : > > > > - Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) > > - Apache 2.0 > > - Domino > > - IIS 4/5/2000 > > - JNI > > - Netscape/IPlanet > > > > This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put > > the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes > > Yeah, but we should concentrate on getting a mod_webapp functional on > Apache 2.0 (so you can have Tomcat4 with Apache 2.0). Looking at the > j-t-c repository, I don't think Apache 2.0 is supported by mod_webapp > yet. (BTW, what's the status of hot deploy in mod_webapp for Apache > 1.3?) > > Depending upon what I get involved with on the httpd side, I could > spend a few hours trying to get mod_webapp.c ported to Apache 2.0. > I probably won't be able to look at it for a couple of weeks though. > I can't imagine it'd take more than a few hours. If you port it to > using the new filters API, that might take a bit longer. -- justin I made a first try some months ago and get it started on a non-threaded machine, by adding #define APACHE20 but the code has evolved a lot from that time. Should I try again in the today code?
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Hi, > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll [...] > Now which webservers are you using : Tomcat, stand alone, newest beta available - 4.0b5 for about a month > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 Greetings, deacon Marcus
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Now which webservers are you using : Apache 1.3 on Linux + Solaris 8 -- Best regards, Ansgar W. Konermann eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Hello, I am a message footer. -
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
I missed the OS poll, so here goes for both. I/We currently use: Apache1.3,Tomcat3.2.2 - WinNT/2000, Solaris6/7 Websphere3.02 - WinNT, AIX IIS4/5,Tomcat3.2.2 - WinNT/2000 And are about to use: Apache1.3,Tomcat3.2.2 - AIX/RH7.1 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll >Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:57:16 +0200 > >Here is the result of the j-t-c OS poll : > >- OPERATING SYSTEM - - USERS - - REF - > > >- AS/400 - > >AS/400 V4R51 => 1 > >- BS2000 - > >BS2000 / 390 1 => 1 > >- FreeBSD - > >FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE / x86 1 >FreeBSD 4.2 / x86 2 => 3 > >- HP - > >HP-UX 10.0 1 => 1 > >- Linux - > >Gnu Linux 1 >Linux 2.2.15 / SPARC 1 >Redhat 6.2 / x86 3 >Redhat 7.0 / x86 3 >Redhat 7.1 / x86 6 >Slackware 7.1 / x861 >Suse 7.0 / x86 1 >Suse 7.1 / x86 1 => 17 > >- Mac - > >MacOS/X 10.0.3 1 >MacOS/9 9.11 => 2 > >- Reliant - > >ReliantUnix 5.45/5.43 / Mips 1 => 1 > >- Sun/Solaris - > >Solaris 2.61 >Solaris 2.71 >Solaris 2.82 >Solaris 7 / x861 >Solaris 7 / SPARC 2 >Solaris 8 / x862 >Solaris 8 / SPARC 2 >SunOS 5.8 / Sparc641 => 12 > >- Windows - > >Window NT 3 >Window 2000 Pro5 >Window 2000 Pro+Cygwin / x86 1 >Windows 98 SE 1 >Windows Millenium 1 => 11 > > >Conclusion: > >Linux is clearly the most referenced, with Solaris / Windows >immediate followers. > >FreeBSD (no OpenBSD ?) is the next one (apache.org prefs OS). >MacOS appears (thks Pier), HPUX, ReliantUnix. > >Some exotics systems (AS/400 - BS2000). > >On the AS/400, you could allready use an Apache HTTP Server. >IBM announced that this port will soon accept externals modules. >May be even an APR port. I'll track this OS :) > >Surprizingly, no vote for AIX. > >Now which webservers are you using : > >- Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) >- Apache 2.0 >- Domino >- IIS 4/5/2000 >- JNI >- Netscape/IPlanet > >This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put >the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes > >- >Henri Gomez ___[_] >EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) >PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... >PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Apache 1.3/Win32 Apache 1.3/GNU/Linux (actually RedHat 6, 7) IIS 4.0/NT IIS 5.0/2000 Domino 5/Linux Domino 5/NT -- Andy Armstrong, Tagish
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Netscape Enterprise 3.5(+) on NetWare. Apache 1.3 on NetWare. Apache 1.3 on Win2K and Linux to verify fixes. Probably be looking at IIS on Win2K but not currently. Mike Anderson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/01 02:57AM >>> Here is the result of the j-t-c OS poll : - OPERATING SYSTEM -- USERS - - REF - - AS/400 - AS/400 V4R5 1 => 1 - BS2000 - BS2000 / 3901 => 1 - FreeBSD - FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE / x861 FreeBSD 4.2 / x86 2 => 3 - HP - HP-UX 10.0 1 => 1 - Linux - Gnu Linux 1 Linux 2.2.15 / SPARC1 Redhat 6.2 / x863 Redhat 7.0 / x863 Redhat 7.1 / x866 Slackware 7.1 / x86 1 Suse 7.0 / x86 1 Suse 7.1 / x86 1 => 17 - Mac - MacOS/X 10.0.3 1 MacOS/9 9.1 1 => 2 - Reliant - ReliantUnix 5.45/5.43 / Mips1 => 1 - Sun/Solaris - Solaris 2.6 1 Solaris 2.7 1 Solaris 2.8 2 Solaris 7 / x86 1 Solaris 7 / SPARC 2 Solaris 8 / x86 2 Solaris 8 / SPARC 2 SunOS 5.8 / Sparc64 1 => 12 - Windows - Window NT 3 Window 2000 Pro 5 Window 2000 Pro+Cygwin / x861 Windows 98 SE 1 Windows Millenium 1 => 11 Conclusion: Linux is clearly the most referenced, with Solaris / Windows immediate followers. FreeBSD (no OpenBSD ?) is the next one (apache.org prefs OS). MacOS appears (thks Pier), HPUX, ReliantUnix. Some exotics systems (AS/400 - BS2000). On the AS/400, you could allready use an Apache HTTP Server. IBM announced that this port will soon accept externals modules. May be even an APR port. I'll track this OS :) Surprizingly, no vote for AIX. Now which webservers are you using : - Apache 1.3(Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) - Apache 2.0 - Domino - IIS 4/5/2000 - JNI - Netscape/IPlanet This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:16AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Now which webservers are you using : > > - Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) > - Apache 2.0 > - Domino > - IIS 4/5/2000 > - JNI > - Netscape/IPlanet > > This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put > the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes Yeah, but we should concentrate on getting a mod_webapp functional on Apache 2.0 (so you can have Tomcat4 with Apache 2.0). Looking at the j-t-c repository, I don't think Apache 2.0 is supported by mod_webapp yet. (BTW, what's the status of hot deploy in mod_webapp for Apache 1.3?) Depending upon what I get involved with on the httpd side, I could spend a few hours trying to get mod_webapp.c ported to Apache 2.0. I probably won't be able to look at it for a couple of weeks though. I can't imagine it'd take more than a few hours. If you port it to using the new filters API, that might take a bit longer. -- justin
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
> > - Apache 1.3(Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) > - Apache 2.0 > - Domino > - IIS 4/5/2000 > - JNI > - Netscape/IPlanet > apache 1.3 on windows nt/2000, solaris 2.[6-8], linux iis on windows nt/2000 netscape/iplanet on solaris 2.[6-8]
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Apache 1.3/mod_ssl GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Now which webservers are you using : > > - Apache 1.3(Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) > - Apache 2.0 > - Domino > - IIS 4/5/2000 > - JNI > - Netscape/IPlanet > -- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | --
[j-t-c] OS poll => [j-t-c] webserver poll
Here is the result of the j-t-c OS poll : - OPERATING SYSTEM -- USERS - - REF - - AS/400 - AS/400 V4R5 1 => 1 - BS2000 - BS2000 / 3901 => 1 - FreeBSD - FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE / x861 FreeBSD 4.2 / x86 2 => 3 - HP - HP-UX 10.0 1 => 1 - Linux - Gnu Linux 1 Linux 2.2.15 / SPARC1 Redhat 6.2 / x863 Redhat 7.0 / x863 Redhat 7.1 / x866 Slackware 7.1 / x86 1 Suse 7.0 / x86 1 Suse 7.1 / x86 1 => 17 - Mac - MacOS/X 10.0.3 1 MacOS/9 9.1 1 => 2 - Reliant - ReliantUnix 5.45/5.43 / Mips1 => 1 - Sun/Solaris - Solaris 2.6 1 Solaris 2.7 1 Solaris 2.8 2 Solaris 7 / x86 1 Solaris 7 / SPARC 2 Solaris 8 / x86 2 Solaris 8 / SPARC 2 SunOS 5.8 / Sparc64 1 => 12 - Windows - Window NT 3 Window 2000 Pro 5 Window 2000 Pro+Cygwin / x861 Windows 98 SE 1 Windows Millenium 1 => 11 Conclusion: Linux is clearly the most referenced, with Solaris / Windows immediate followers. FreeBSD (no OpenBSD ?) is the next one (apache.org prefs OS). MacOS appears (thks Pier), HPUX, ReliantUnix. Some exotics systems (AS/400 - BS2000). On the AS/400, you could allready use an Apache HTTP Server. IBM announced that this port will soon accept externals modules. May be even an APR port. I'll track this OS :) Surprizingly, no vote for AIX. Now which webservers are you using : - Apache 1.3(Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl) - Apache 2.0 - Domino - IIS 4/5/2000 - JNI - Netscape/IPlanet This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be put the most effort. I bet for Apache 1.3 on Unix boxes - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll
Also : W2K / VisualAge 3.5 (JDK 1.2) AS/400 V4R5 / JDKs 1.7-1.2.2-1.3 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > And, if Costin gives out permission (he's root on those), we all should be > able also to access: > > Solaris 7 / SPARC >- Running on a Sun Ultra-1 (UltraSparc/133) > Linux 2.2.15 / SPARC >- Running on a Sun Ultra-1 (UltraSparc/133) Sure - the only problem is that sometimes ( and I have no idea why ) they go to sleep and need a ping from nagoya to wake up. I spent some time trying to figure what's happening, with no luck, it's very strange ( but consistent ). You can't connect or ping from any remote machine if they go to sleep, but a ping from nagoya does wake them up imediatly. If anyone know how to fix this - please let me know. ( I'll start restoring the nightly build on nagoya - probably this evening) Costin
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
Mandrake 5, Redhat 6.2, Redhat 6.2 Enterprise, Redhat 7.0, Redhat 7.1 (with all the compat libs) under variation of IBM1.3, Sun1.3, Sun1.3.1 Window 2000 (SP2) and Windows NT 4 (Service Pack 6)
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll
Hi, One more for the Poll: Win2k / JBuilder4 / IIS 5 Win2k / WebAF 2 / IIS 5 RH7.1 / JBuilder4 / Apache 1.3.20 Michel Lehon Outwares. > > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > > > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > > > > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > > > > > - > > > Henri Gomez ___[_] > > > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > > > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > > > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > > > -- > > -- > > Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| > > MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | > > Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | > > -- > > > >
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
NT4/5, GNU/Linux (Various kernels) GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- Andy Armstrong, Tagish
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [j-t-c] OS poll > > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 Development: Win 98 se / me Deployment: RedHat 7.1 > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 Greetings, deacon Marcus
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
Windows 2000 - primary build/development platform for NetWare RedHat 7.0 for verifying changes I make don't kill someone else :-) Mike Anderson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/11/01 06:54AM >>> Hi, A quick poll to get informations about OS used by j-t-c developpers & users ... I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll
Redhat 7.1 (3 x), on of them is portable (acer travalmate 312T, if your interested). Furthermore 1 proliant 380 2 cpu's , rh 7, 2 proliants 360's with 2 cpu's and rh 7, 1 rh 5.2 with jserv (still running) and many more machines, all running together with apache httpd btw. Mvgr, Martin van den Bemt > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [j-t-c] OS poll > > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
Quoting Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Solaris 7 & 8 both Sparc and x86, and FreeBSD. Win2k / Cygwin / XEmacs. Remy > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > > > - > > Henri Gomez ___[_] > > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > -- > -- > Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| > MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | > Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | > -- >
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
Solaris 7 & 8 both Sparc and x86, and FreeBSD. GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- -- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | --
RE: [j-t-c] OS poll
Redhat 6.x/7.1 currently Solaris 2.6, 8 (and maybe WinNT/2K) soon. > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [j-t-c] OS poll > > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 Intel = Suse 7.0/7.1 Intel = FreeBSD 4.2 (Martin Kraemer's machine). Misp= ReliantUnix 5.45/5.43. (JVM is JDK1.2.2). 390 = BS2000 (EBCDIC mainframe). Well, I have not tried it yet and it is with Apache-1.3 for the moment. Sparc64 = SunOS 5.8 - Jean-frederic
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 Pier's: MacOS/X (10.0.3) - Running on a PowerBook G4 , on a PowerMac Dual G4 , and on a PowerMac G3 (white and blue) MacOS/9 (9.1) - Running on a PowerBook G4 "Cube" Solaris 8 / x86 - Running on a Dual PIII 700 and on a Dual Celeron 450 Linux RH71 - Running on Pentium 366 "Sun Donver Javastation" (RH71 sucks badly, I'm going to update it to some not-so-braindamaged distribution one of these days) Pier @ Sun Micro (within SWAN, so, access is only for Sun Employees - duh): Solaris 8 / SPARC - Running on a Sun Ultra-1 (UltraSparc/133) Linux RH71 - Running on a PIII 800 Pier's Upcoming Systems: HP-UX 10.0 - Running on a Undisclosed HP box (need to pick it up in Arsenal this Wed, hopefully) Windows 2000 Professional - Running on a Celeron 600 (in transit from San Francisco to London and should be here tomorrow) And few others here and there across the planet... Most of my systems are behind firewalls (*.ca.betaversion.org and *.uk.betaversion.org) but should be visible pretty soon, as we got a couple of blocks of IPs for San Francisco and London... If you need an account (nah, not on Windows or MacOS/9 :), let me know (my systems are tendentially open to anyone). On the list there should be also a couple of machines available to all Apache developers: FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE - Running on a Undisclosed x86 box (Don't load it too much with builds) MacOS X (10.0.3) - Running on a Undisclosed PowrMac G4 Solaris 8 / SPARC: - Running on a Sun E4500 (6xUltraSparc II/400) or or And, if Costin gives out permission (he's root on those), we all should be able also to access: Solaris 7 / SPARC - Running on a Sun Ultra-1 (UltraSparc/133) Linux 2.2.15 / SPARC - Running on a Sun Ultra-1 (UltraSparc/133) Pier
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 Slackware 7.1 plus several tarballs -- Best regards, Ansgar W. Konermann eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Hello, I am a message footer. -
Re: [j-t-c] OS poll
windows 2000/nt solaris 2.6/2.7/2.8 redhat 6/7 GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hi, > > A quick poll to get informations about OS used by > j-t-c developpers & users ... > > I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
[j-t-c] OS poll
Hi, A quick poll to get informations about OS used by j-t-c developpers & users ... I: Redhat 6.2 / 7.1 - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
