Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Amy Roh]

>
> 
> [X] +1: Make the release
> [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
>
> 
>
> 
> [X] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
> [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
>
> 

Chrs,

Amy



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[costinm]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote:

> Costin:
>
> Where does Manager get the 'route id' from.

Easiest: from server.xml ( just add an option somewhere
that can be set on the Manager ). I would make it a
property of server or service, as it is an id for
the running instance of tomcat.
That require setting exactly the same id as the worker
name in workers.properties.

Harder: the information is sent by apache
along with the request. You can check ( in AjpRequest )
if Manager has a 'id' set, and if not set it.

That will not solve the problem of 'multiple workers
for the same tomcat' - but that shouldn't affect 4.0
( since a single worker type is available - ajp13 ),
and will not be a problem in jk2 ( or if it is, we'll
solve it then )

Costin




>
> Tom
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1
>
>
> | On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> |
> | > > The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
> | > > is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
> | > >
> | > > What about ?
> | >
> | > I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
> | > There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
> | > documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.
> |
> | I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
> | remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
> | connector / protocol ).
> |
> | Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...
> |
> |
> | Costin
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | --
> | To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> |
> |
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Tom Drake]

Costin:

Where does Manager get the 'route id' from.

Tom
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


| On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
|
| > > The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
| > > is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
| > >
| > > What about ?
| >
| > I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
| > There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
| > documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.
|
| I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
| remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
| connector / protocol ).
|
| Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...
|
|
| Costin
|
|
|
|
|
|
| --
| To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|
|


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[costinm]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
> > is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
> >
> > What about ?
>
> I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
> There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
> documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.

I am planning some enahncements in jk2, but the basic stuff
remains - Manager must append the route id ( regardless of the jk
connector / protocol ).

Sorry, didn't have time to work on this ( lb ), maybe next release...


Costin






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Bill Barker]

- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:25 AM
Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1


> 
> [X ] +1: Make the release
> [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
>
>
> 
>
> There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
> could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
> code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
> notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
>
> 
> [X] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
> [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
>
>
> 
>
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Kin-Man Chung]

> 
> [X] +1: Make the release
> [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
> 

Since 4.0.1, there have been lots of bug fixes.  It's time.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Ryan Lubke]

Hi,

Did you rebuild/redploy and test with the latest Watchdog?

-rl

On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 11:16, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have noted that 4 of the jsp tests fail:
> jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
> jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
> jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
> jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
> It sounds like a tag library is missing (in my test environment) the line where
> the exception comes from is
> TagLibraryInfo tlibInfo=tagInfo.getTagLibrary(); 
> From TestTag.java (of jakarta-watchdog-4.0).
> 
> 
> The WARP part needs a little review...
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jean-frederic
> 
> 
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 4.0.2 this
> > week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release as soon as
> > this vote is considered approved). This release has already been approved,
> > and although there are some issues which will need to be addressed before
> > 4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
> > additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.
> > 
> > The list of changes and fixes is available at:
> > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/Attic/RELEAS
> > E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4
> > 
> > 
> > [ ] +1: Make the release
> > [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
> > could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
> > code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
> > notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
> > 
> > 
> > [ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
> > [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Remy
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[jean-frederic clere]

Hi,

I have noted that 4 of the jsp tests fail:
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTagXML.jsp
jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/TagSupport/positiveDoStartTag.jsp
It sounds like a tag library is missing (in my test environment) the line where
the exception comes from is
TagLibraryInfo tlibInfo=tagInfo.getTagLibrary(); 
>From TestTag.java (of jakarta-watchdog-4.0).


The WARP part needs a little review...


Cheers

Jean-frederic


Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 4.0.2 this
> week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release as soon as
> this vote is considered approved). This release has already been approved,
> and although there are some issues which will need to be addressed before
> 4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
> additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.
> 
> The list of changes and fixes is available at:
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/Attic/RELEAS
> E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4
> 
> 
> [ ] +1: Make the release
> [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:
> 
> 
> 
> There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
> could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
> code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
> notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
> 
> 
> [ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
> [ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
> 
> 
> 
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Larry Isaacs]

[X] +1: Make the release
[ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed:




> There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD branch which
> could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. I wrote the
> code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
> notice any thread safety issues during load testing).


[X] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
[ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:



Larry


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[Remy Maucherat]

> The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
> is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?
>
> What about ?

I thought Costin wanted to do it in another way in his JK2 connector ?
There's also the auto configuration which isn't going to be very well
documented or working in the first beta, but will be in the final.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

[GOMEZ Henri]

The stuff I'd like to see added in TC 4.0.2 (release)
is vmroute for supporting load-balancing via mod_jk ?

What about ?

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1
>
>
>Hi,
>
>After some delay, I'd like to release the first beta of Tomcat 
>4.0.2 this
>week (the sooner, the better, so I plan to package the release 
>as soon as
>this vote is considered approved). This release has already 
>been approved,
>and although there are some issues which will need to be 
>addressed before
>4.0.2 final is released, there is no open showstopper problems. A few
>additional fixes may be made before beta 1 is released.
>
>The list of changes and fixes is available at:
>http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat-4.0
>/Attic/RELEAS
>E-NOTES-4.0.2-B1.txt?rev=1.1.2.4
>
>
>[ ] +1: Make the release
>[ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues 
>are fixed:
>
>
>
>
>There is also a new feature that has been added in the HEAD 
>branch which
>could be worth porting: the instance pooling for STM servlets. 
>I wrote the
>code as an experiment, but it appears to be working very well (I didn't
>notice any thread safety issues during load testing).
>
>
>[ ] +1: Add the feature to the 4.0 branch
>[ ] -1: Don't add the feature, because:
>
>
>
>
>Remy
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   

For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: