Prevent mod_jk from checking all virtual hosts

2003-03-06 Thread Adam Denenberg
I posted this once before but go no response, so I am trying again.  Does
anybody know how to prevent mod_jk from checking all virtual hosts in
apache?  JKWorkers and JkLog setting need to be global.  However even in
VirtualHosts that have no JkMount statement, mod_jk still checks for matches
for every request for every virtual host.  Is there a way to turn this
behavior off and on ?

 thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Disable mod_jk for virtualhosts

2003-03-05 Thread Adam Denenberg
Is this possible?  I know that JkWorkers and  JkLog stuff needs to  be set
globally.  But even the virtualhosts that I don¹t have any JkMount
statements in , I still see in the debug log, mod_jk trying to match for
those.  Seems like a lot of extra work for no reason.

 Anyone know the deal with mod_jk and virtualhosts ?

 thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Server denies access to resource (mysql JDBC)

2003-03-04 Thread Adam Denenberg
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: java.sql.SQLException: Server
configuration denies access to data source

 IS the error I am getting for my mysql JDBC Connection.  I dropped the
mysql-connector-java-3.0.6-stable-bin.jar file in common/lib as per
instructions and have the following setup as one of my contexts.

 I can log in fine from the command line to mysql, just not thru JDBC.

 here is my server.xml snippet.. Anyone have similar issues with Mysql ?  I
am wondering if it is a hostname thing.

...


 
 

  

   
 factory
 org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory


   
   
driverClassName
com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
   

   
url
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/testDB
   

   
username
testDB
   

   
password
mypass
   

   
maxActive
50
   

   
maxIdle
10
   

   
maxWait
-1
   

 

  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Does mod_jk work with virtualhosts ?

2003-03-04 Thread Adam Denenberg
I just figured out why my mod_Jk config was not working.  It seems if I put
the Include conf/mod_jk.conf in the Virtualhost block , or put the Jk*
parameters inside a Virtualhost , it does not work.  Only when set globally
does this work.

 Does anyone know if mod_jk will work with virtualhosts and if so how to
turn it on and off for virtualhosts?  I don¹t want mod_jk checking JkMounts
for each virtualhost I have, that seems way too expensive.

 thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tomcat error

2003-03-04 Thread Adam Denenberg
Has anyone seen this error before and know what it means?

 thanks
Adam

INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080
ServerLifecycleListener: createMBeans: MBeanException
java.lang.Exception: ManagedBean is not found with Ajp13Connector
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.MBeanUtils.createMBean(MBeanUtils.java:224)
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener.createMBeans(ServerLifecy
cleListe
ner.java:369)
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener.createMBeans(ServerLifecy
cleListe
ner.java:777)
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener.createMBeans(ServerLifecy
cleListe
ner.java:751)
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener.createMBeans(ServerLifecy
cleListe
ner.java:339)
at 
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent(ServerLife
cycleLis
tener.java:206)
at 
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSuppor
t.java:1
66)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:2182)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:512)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:400)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:180)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39
)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl
.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:203)
Starting service Tomcat-Standalone


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mysql connector/j

2003-03-04 Thread Adam Denenberg
Anyone have instructions for installing and configuring the mysql
connector/j jar file on tomcat 4.1.18 unix machine?  I have the jar but not
sure how to configure tomcat to use the jar file.. Do I need to rename the
jar file to something specific?

 thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mod_jk source vs binary

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
Has anyone had any issues with using the mod_jk binary vs source versions?
I saw some posts that said the build of the source fixed a lot of problems
that the binary was having.

 I keep getting the error
 
   [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done did not found a worker
 
  and wondering if it has anything to do with binary vs source.

 any ideas?

 adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Jk_map.c (map_get function)

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
Anyone familiar with the mod_jk source who would know why jk_map.c function
map_get() would not return a value?

 I have indentified my problem to that source file where it gets called from
jk_worker.c (136) and then map_get() does not return any value, hence the
result of the "could not found worker" error from mod_jk

 thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache 1.3.27 + mod_jk 1.2.2 + tomcat 4..1.18

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
I have tried on both linux and solaris and still recive this same "did not
found worker" error from mod_jk and have no idea why.  I am just wondering
if it has to do with a version issue.

 Any unix platform will do.

Adam

On 3/3/03 2:13 PM, "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What platform?  I'm on unixware...
> 
> --mikej
> -=-
> mike jackson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:02 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Apache 1.3.27 + mod_jk 1.2.2 + tomcat 4..1.18
>> 
>> 
>> Anyone have a working config for this combo?
>> 
>>  Trying to resolve my "did not found worker" error from mod_jk
>> 
>>  adam
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Apache 1.3.27 + mod_jk 1.2.2 + tomcat 4..1.18

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
Anyone have a working config for this combo?

 Trying to resolve my "did not found worker" error from mod_jk

 adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk error (jk_map.c ERROR)

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
I have identified the problem to be in the jk_map.c file.  For some reason
when jk_worker.c calls "map_get()" in jk_map.c, it does not get a value back
and thus produces this error.

 Anyone good in C or who works on mod_jk source know why this would happen ?

 thanks
Adam

On 3/3/03 9:12 AM, "Adam Denenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks john.  Does this error come from a problem in the workers.properties
> file, or an entry in the httpd.conf do you know?
> 
> It seems that mod_jk finds the match fine in the httpd.conf file, but then
> when tries to use a worker it for some reason can not.  I have debug on but
> am missing the piece that it is specifically dying on.
> 
> thanks again for the help.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On 3/3/03 8:50 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> No other ideas, really.  In the past, problems like this have come down to
>> something really simple, such as using an el ("l") instead of a one ("1") in
>> "ajp13" and other typo-related problems (or permission problems).  My
>> eyesight isn't as good as it used to be, but it looks like you have "ajp13"
>> typed out correctly in all the places where it needs to be.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
>>> To: Tomcat Users List
>>> Subject: Re: mod_jk error
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
>>> 
>>>  I still get the following
>>> 
>>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
>>> Attempting to map
>>> URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
>>> 
>>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
>>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match
>>> ajp13 -> *.jsp
>>> 
>>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into
>>> wc_get_worker_for_name
>>> ajp13
>>> 
>>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>>> done did not found a worker
>>> 
>>> Using a very simple workers.properties file.
>>> 
>>> worker.list=ajp13
>>> worker.ajp13.port=8009
>>> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
>>> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
>>> 
>>>   any other suggestions?  I am totally out of ideas as to
>>> what is causing
>>> this error..
>>>  
>>>  thanks
>>> Adam
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/3/03 8:06 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Try deleting the "lbfactor" line from your
>>> workers.properties file.  It's
>>>> not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it
>>> may be causing
>>>> confusion to mod_jk.so.
>>>> 
>>>> John
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Subject: mod_jk error
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to
>>>>> this error
>>>>> that I am getting.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the
>>> root of its
>>>>> cause?
>>>>> 
>>>>>  [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>>>>> done did not found a worker
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Adam
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk error

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
Thanks john.  Does this error come from a problem in the workers.properties
file, or an entry in the httpd.conf do you know?

 It seems that mod_jk finds the match fine in the httpd.conf file, but then
when tries to use a worker it for some reason can not.  I have debug on but
am missing the piece that it is specifically dying on.

 thanks again for the help.

Adam

On 3/3/03 8:50 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> No other ideas, really.  In the past, problems like this have come down to
> something really simple, such as using an el ("l") instead of a one ("1") in
> "ajp13" and other typo-related problems (or permission problems).  My
> eyesight isn't as good as it used to be, but it looks like you have "ajp13"
> typed out correctly in all the places where it needs to be.
> 
> John
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk error
>> 
>> 
>> Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
>> 
>>  I still get the following
>> 
>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
>> Attempting to map
>> URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
>> 
>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match
>> ajp13 -> *.jsp
>> 
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into
>> wc_get_worker_for_name
>> ajp13
>> 
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>> done did not found a worker
>> 
>> Using a very simple workers.properties file.
>> 
>> worker.list=ajp13
>> worker.ajp13.port=8009
>> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
>> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
>> 
>>   any other suggestions?  I am totally out of ideas as to
>> what is causing
>> this error..
>>  
>>  thanks
>> Adam
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/3/03 8:06 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Try deleting the "lbfactor" line from your
>> workers.properties file.  It's
>>> not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it
>> may be causing
>>> confusion to mod_jk.so.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: mod_jk error
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to
>>>> this error
>>>> that I am getting.
>>>> 
>>>>  Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the
>> root of its
>>>> cause?
>>>> 
>>>>  [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>>>> done did not found a worker
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Adam
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk error

2003-03-03 Thread Adam Denenberg
Hmm, tried that but still no luck.

 I still get the following

 [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map
URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'

 [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match ajp13 -> *.jsp

[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name
ajp13

[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name,
done did not found a worker

Using a very simple workers.properties file.

worker.list=ajp13
worker.ajp13.port=8009
worker.ajp13.host=localhost
worker.ajp13.type=ajp13

  any other suggestions?  I am totally out of ideas as to what is causing
this error..
 
 thanks
Adam


On 3/3/03 8:06 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Try deleting the "lbfactor" line from your workers.properties file.  It's
> not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it may be causing
> confusion to mod_jk.so.
> 
> John
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: mod_jk error
>> 
>> 
>> I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to
>> this error
>> that I am getting.
>> 
>>  Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the root of its
>> cause?
>> 
>>  [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>> done did not found a worker
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Adam
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



mod_jk error

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Denenberg
I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to this error
that I am getting.

 Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the root of its
cause?

 [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name,
done did not found a worker

Thanks
Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Internal Server Error

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Denenberg
Still tested this 100 times and it still only works directly to  tomcat at
8080 but not through mod_jk.  Are there any additions to the server.xml file
that need to be made to make this work properly?
 
 It doesn¹t appear the connection even gets to tomcat since the logs don¹t
show anything.  I am still unlcear why mod_jk is unable to "find a worker"
as it complains about? Anyone know what would cause that?

 thanks
Adam

On 2/28/03 5:29 PM, "Adam Denenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey ,
> 
> I am using apache 1.3.X with tomcat 4.1.18 on solaris 7 and sun JDK 1.4.
> 
> I am getting an internal server error with the folloing jk error in my
> mod_jk.log file
> 
> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]
> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match ajp13 ->
> *.jsp
> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name
> ajp13
> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name,
> done did not found a worker
> 
> My workers.properties file is
> 
> workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat
> workers.java_home=/usr/local/java
> ps=/
> worker.list=ajp13
> worker.ajp13.port=8009
> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
> worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
> 
> and my httpd.conf section is
> 
> JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache/conf/workers.properties
>Alias /examples /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/examples
>JkLogFile  logs/jk.log
>JkLogLevel debug
>JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
>JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
> 
> And server.xml relevant  is ..
> 
>   port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
>  acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
> 
> The jk2/coyote on 8009  connector was commented out.
> 
> Static content looks fine, however when trying to access a .jsp file, it
> fails with an internal server error and the message above.
> 
> Anyone seen this problem or can diagnose why I would get it?  I cant figure
> it for the life of me.
> 
> thanks
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Internal Server Error

2003-02-28 Thread Adam Denenberg
Yeah sorry should have included that.  Everything works fine on the normal
tomcat port of 8080. Its going through mod_jk that it breaks.

 thanks
Adam

On 2/28/03 5:30 PM, "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'll ask the obvious question, is tomcat running?
> 
> --mikej
> -=-
> mike jackson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:29 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Internal Server Error
>> 
>> 
>> Hey ,
>> 
>>  I am using apache 1.3.X with tomcat 4.1.18 on solaris 7 and sun JDK 1.4.
>> 
>> I am getting an internal server error with the folloing jk error in my
>> mod_jk.log file
>> 
>> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]
>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match ajp13 ->
>> *.jsp
>> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into
>> wc_get_worker_for_name
>> ajp13
>> [Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name,
>> done did not found a worker
>> 
>> My workers.properties file is
>> 
>> workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat
>> workers.java_home=/usr/local/java
>> ps=/
>> worker.list=ajp13
>> worker.ajp13.port=8009
>> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
>> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
>> worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1
>> 
>>  and my httpd.conf section is
>> 
>>  JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache/conf/workers.properties
>>  Alias /examples /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/examples
>>  JkLogFile  logs/jk.log
>>  JkLogLevel debug
>>  JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
>>  JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
>> 
>> And server.xml relevant  is ..
>> 
>> >port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
>>acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
>> 
>> The jk2/coyote on 8009  connector was commented out.
>> 
>>  Static content looks fine, however when trying to access a .jsp file, it
>> fails with an internal server error and the message above.
>> 
>>  Anyone seen this problem or can diagnose why I would get it?  I
>> cant figure
>> it for the life of me.
>> 
>>  thanks
>> Adam
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Internal Server Error

2003-02-28 Thread Adam Denenberg
Hey ,

 I am using apache 1.3.X with tomcat 4.1.18 on solaris 7 and sun JDK 1.4.

I am getting an internal server error with the folloing jk error in my
mod_jk.log file

[Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]
jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match ajp13 ->
*.jsp
[Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name
ajp13
[Fri Feb 28 17:15:43 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name,
done did not found a worker

My workers.properties file is

workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat
workers.java_home=/usr/local/java
ps=/
worker.list=ajp13
worker.ajp13.port=8009
worker.ajp13.host=localhost
worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
worker.ajp13.lbfactor=1

 and my httpd.conf section is

 JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache/conf/workers.properties
 Alias /examples /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/examples
 JkLogFile  logs/jk.log
 JkLogLevel debug
 JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
 JkMount /*.jsp ajp13

And server.xml relevant  is ..



The jk2/coyote on 8009  connector was commented out.

 Static content looks fine, however when trying to access a .jsp file, it
fails with an internal server error and the message above.

 Anyone seen this problem or can diagnose why I would get it?  I cant figure
it for the life of me.

 thanks
Adam

 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]