Versions of JVM to use with Tomcats 5.0.28 and 5.5.4
Can anyone point me to where there can be resource on which preferred versions of JVM to use with Tomcats 5.0.28 and 5.5.4? Cheers, Hari - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting virtual path
I have set it up from Apache - which acts as the HTTP listener and siimple redirects request to the Tomcat. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:52:56 +, Centaur zeus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI All, > > I have a path like: > http://www.foo.com/fooapp/testing.do?id=2 > > Is it possible to point > http://www.foo.com/2 > to this location ? > > of course I still have id=3, 4, 5... where this path should be dynamic. > > Thanks. > > Perseus > > _ > Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Version
The only, but inconvenient way, I have found is to stop/start Tomcat and look at the 'catalina.out' log file. The Tomcat version number is written to the log file on start-up. cheers, Hari Mailvaganam On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:40:10 -0800, Billy Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is there any way to find out the tomcat version from the command line? > > Thanks! > > Billy Ng > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help me
You can load balance between the two instances. cheers, Hari Mailvaganam On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:29:16 +0530, Rajesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i tryed but sometimes it gives error when i restart(restarting webapp) > it works good > > or is it possible to display a page for any request to the server or a > perticular webapp that > > "site is under maintanance please visit in few minutes" > > is it possible? > > Rajesh > > > > VTR Ravi Kumar wrote: > > > I dont think u would have to shut down the server to upload files. > > The context must be reloadable ie., set the reloadable = true in the > > context using the > > admin page > > > > > > VTR > > BHEL haridwar > > - Original Message - From: "Rajesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 2:25 PM > > Subject: Please help me > > > > > >> Hai all, > >> > >> i have a doubt please help me. > >> > >> in my tomcat server, am developing a online shopping site. > >> > >> the site is live, > >> > >> i periodically upload updated pages, when uploading i donot want to > >> down the server, > >> > >> i use a way that creating 2 webapps, one will run, i upload the > >> updated pages to webapp 2 afteruploading i go to webapp1 and point it > >> to webapp2 when i need to upload second time ill upload to webapp 1 > >> and i will make point from webapp2 to webapp 1 . > >> > >> is there any way to do this affectively ?? > >> > >> Please reply > >> Rajesh > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache+Tomcat
Scenario two will be less hassle - unless you need a feature of Apache HTTP Server. If you plan to only use Apache HTTP Server as a listener for http request - it will be better off with the Tomcat alone. If, for any particular reason, you absolutely wish to use the Apache HTTP server as the http listener only - you can proxy the request in Apache to Tomcat. And not bother with mod-jk2. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 5/10/05, Praveen KUMAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am little bit confuse in following decision: > > Should be use > > 1- Apache (2.0.54) + Tomcat (5.0.28) in production with tomcat listener > (through Coyote connector) configured with mod_jk (1.2.12) with apache > 2- Or Standalone Tomcat (with their standard apache provided by tomcat) > > What would be difference in both the scenarios in terms of performance > and reliability? > > -- > With best regards, > Praveen Soni > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form Authentication with SSL behind Load Balancer
A couple of suggestions: - force all traffic on load balancer to/from extrenal world to SSL. - after form authentication on Tomcat, redirect users to the URL used by the load balancer - i.e. not XXX:8080/authenticate but www.YYY.com/authenticate - or both Hope this helps. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 5/11/05, Brian Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running into a problem using form-based authentication with Tomcat 5.5.9 > behind a Cisco CSS load balancer, and I'm hoping someone can point me in the > right direction. > > We've got Tomcat deployed on 2 nodes, not clustered, but load-balanced via > NAT distribution by the Cisco device. We want the site traffic to be secured > with SSL, but the SSL is actually terminated in the load balancer for > efficiency and to offload the encryption/decryption burden from Tomcat. > > We also planned to use J2EE container-managed authentication using the > form-based option. This is where we're having problems. > > When we reference secure content within the target web app with an HTTPS > address, Tomcat serves back the configured Login page just fine. When we > submit the Login form, however, and authentication succeeds, we are > redirected to the original resource over HTTP instead of HTTPS. > > Since the SSL terminates in the load balancer, the Cisco device actually > routes the request to Tomcat on the standard HTTP port (8080). It appears > that, after successful authentication by the container via the Login form, > Tomcat redirects the user to the original resource URL with the HTTP protocol > instead of HTTPS, because Tomcat doesn't know about the HTTPS address > intercepted by Cisco. To Tomcat, the requests all come in looking like plain > old HTTP. > > Just for grins, I tried setting transport-guarantee = CONFIDENTIAL in my > web.xml. It didn't work, just created a Catch-22 where Tomcat tries to > redirect to HTTPS but Cisco intercedes and forwards the request to Tomcat as > HTTP. I spoke with our Network engineers, and they don't believe they can do > anything about this on the Cisco side. They believe it's a web server / > Tomcat issue. > > Once I'm into the app, I can type the "s" after "http" in the browser's > location bar to "switch back" to SSL. Clicking links with relative URLs in > the pages appears to stick with the HTTPS protocol after that. It's only the > initial container-managed login and redirection to the original requested > resource that seems to cause the protocol switch. > > Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks! > > Brian Burt > Enterprise Application Engineer > Gordon Food Service > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > office phone: 616-717-6972 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scalability issue question
It can be a good idea to have it load balanced from a performance and uptime point of view. It is hard to absolutely decipher what each Tomcat can specifically handle in terms of load. A load test, which emualates user actions, may give you a ball park. The dependencies are on network, server OS, memory, JVM etc. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 6/2/05, Wallace, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently using IIS and the ISAPI Tomcat redirect. Would like to just > use Tomcat instead but don't know if it can handle my static content. > The book "Apache Tomcat 5" published by WROX warns of performance issues > with static content, but ComputerWorld just did an article about > Weather.com running their site on multiple load balanced Tomcat servers > servicing 18 million hits a day. > http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,92583 > ,00.html > > I currently only get around 250 k hits per day but we're about to > integrate email with Livelink and that puts me into a whole new > performance arena. Any thoughts or guidance would be appreciated. > > Scott Wallace > Livelink Global Infrastructure Coordinator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 405-270-2027 wk > 405-323-2237 cell > 405-228-6027 fax > "I have an existential map; it has 'you are here' > written all over it. " - Steven Wright > > > > Important Notice!! > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, any use, > distribution or copying of the message is prohibited. > Please let me know immediately by return e-mail if you have received this > message by mistake, then delete the e-mail message. > Thank you. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache-Tomcat Servlet Mapping Issues
Hi David: An alternate to using mod_JK is to proxy http (or https) request to the Tomcat from Apache. i.e: ProxyPass /path http://localhost:port/path ProxyPassReverse /path http://localhost/path There are valid reasons for using mod_JK - above just an alternate suggestion if you can do without mod_JK regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 6/22/05, David Rickard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > System: Solaris SunOS 5.9 > Apache: 2.0.52 > Tomcat: 4.1.31 > Mod JK: 1.2.6 > The problem: Apache/mod_jk cannot resolve servlet URL mappings > > When Tomcat is running stand-alone, it can resolve servlet mappings without > any problems; so that a page with this form definition: > > correctly invokes the com.company.LoginHandler servlet (which suggests > there's nothing syntactically wrong with the and > entries in web.xml); > > When Tomcat stand-alone is turned off and Apache is turned on, that same > page always throws a 404 error for "site/loginhandler"; these are the error > messages in mod_jk.log: > > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [mod_jk.c (2313)]: mod_jk::jk_translate, check > alias_dir: /usr/apache/tomcat/webapps > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [mod_jk.c (2337)]: mod_jk::jk_translate, > AutoAlias child_dir: loginhandler > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [mod_jk.c (2363)]: mod_jk::jk_translate, > AutoAlias OK for file: /usr/apache/tomcat/webapps/aiwosc/loginhandler > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (445)]: Into > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (459)]: Attempting to map > URI '/aiwosc/loginhandler' > [Wed Jun 22 09:04:08 2005] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (577)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match > > What terribly simple configuration error have I made here? > > These are the web.xml entries for this servlet: > > loginhandler > com.company.aiwosc.LoginHandler > > > loginhandler > /loginhandler > > > This is the workers.properties file: > worker.list=ajp13 > worker.ajp13.port=8009 > worker.ajp13.host=server.org > worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 > > > This is the app section from mod_jk.conf: > server.org:/aiwosc > > # Static files > Alias /aiwosc "/var/apache/tomcat/webapps/aiwosc" > > > Options Indexes FollowSymLinks > DirectoryIndex index.html > > > > # Deny direct access to WEB-INF and META-INF > # > > AllowOverride None > deny from all > > > > AllowOverride None > deny from all > > > JkMount /aiwosc/addtitleservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/submittitleservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/transfertitleservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/saveoscservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/reordercastservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/loginhandler ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/editcategoryservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/edittitleservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/addaddendumservlet ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/*.jsp ajp13 > JkMount /aiwosc/addcategoryservlet ajp13 > > This is the entry for the app in server.xml: > > reloadable="true" crossContext="true"> > prefix="aiwosc_log." suffix=".txt" > timestamp="true"/> > >type="javax.sql.DataSource"/> > > > > factory > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory > > > driverClassName > oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver > > > url > > jdbc:oracle:thin:@gtsora2.gtsgraphics.com:1521:ACAD > > > username > IMPC_ADMIN > > > password > PIRANHA > > > maxActive > 20 > > > maxIdle > 10 > > > maxWait > -1 > > > > > And these are the mod_jk load/configuration entries from httpd.conf: > > LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so > > > Include /usr/apache/tomcat/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf > JkWorkersFile /usr/apache/tomcat/conf/workers.properties > JkLogFile /usr/apache/logs/mod_jk.log > JkLogLev
Re: sporadic problem connecting from Apache web server to Tomcat 5
Hi Amarish: This could be a network or DNS issue. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 6/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey guys, > > I was wondering if anybody has seen an intermittent communication error > between Apache web server and Tomcat. We were seeing something happening > intermittentlyabout every 15-30 minutes where the apache logs were showing > something like this: > > > > [Tue Jun 21 14:47:25 2005] [error] [client CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS] proxy: error > reading status line from remote server MY IP ADDRESS, referer: > https://blah.blah.blah/blah/blah.do > > > [Tue Jun 21 14:47:25 2005] [error] [client CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS] proxy: Error > reading from remote server returned by /blah/blah.do, referer: > https://blah.blah.blah/blah/blah.do > > > > > > And neither the tomcat logs nor the tomcat access logs actually showed any > entries around this time. > > > Amarish > > > > NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND NONPUBLIC INFORMATION. IT > IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) OR ENTITY(IES) NAMED ABOVE, > AND OTHERS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE IT. If you are not the > intended recipient of this document, you are notified that any review, > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify me > immediately by return email, delete the electronic message and destroy any > printed copies. Thank you for your cooperation. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Version detection
Hi Steve: When Tomcat is started, the version number appears in Catalina.log. regards, Hari Mailvaganam On 6/20/05, Steve Vanspall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am running tomcat under linux, unfortunately can't remember whether it is > 4.1.24 or 4.1.31, which made me relise, I don't know how to find out. > > When i look at the logs it jsut says Tomcat 4.1 unlike on windows where it > actually gives the full version number. > > So where would i look to find the tomcat version? > > Regards > > Steve > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?
IMHO avoid JK2 On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially > unsupported. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 > > We're in the process of configuring new servers and integrating Apache with > Tomcat. We are migrating applications from servers running Apache w/ mod_jk > against Tomcat 4 w/ JK (not JK2). > > I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light of > the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from here-on-in? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monitoring Performance Tomcat 5.0.28
Hi: What would be the best way to monitor the performance of Tomcat - while in production? Apache HTTP server has an option that can view threads etc of a production web server. Does Tomcat have anything equivalent? On a separate note are there any kind of benchmarks on performance of Tomcat available online - i.e throughput, response times? It can be a challenge finding benchmarks that fits ones criterias - as there are a huge number of variables to consider. I was hoping to find one which had a study the base parameters. Have a Happy and Peaceful 2005. regards, Hari Mailvaganam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failed JDBC connection hangs Tomcat
The JTDS driver can cause the hanging you described - this has occured in a test we did on Win 2k, SQL Server 2k, 1.5 JDK. reagrds, Hari Mailvaganam On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:39:50 +0200, Igor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have the same problem, that described in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg58799.html > > There is ServletContextListener in our application, that schedule two tasks > for repeated fixed rate execution on context initialization > (Timer.scheduleAtFixedRate). > > First task is executed every minute. It queries MS SQL server, second task is > executed every hour. > > If MS SQL server goes down, first task tries to use connection to database. > After this Tomcat may hang: when user tries to download a page, he or her > will wait for a long time (more that 1 day). > > At the same time second taks (that is executed every hour) works as it was > expected: there are corresponding entries in log file. > > First task is executed in separate thread, and I do not understand how can it > hang whole tomcat (at least one context). > > We use JDK 1.5, tomcat 5.0.28. The same problem was on 1.4.2. Both for MS and > JTDS drivers :-( > > Does somebody know how can I prevent tomcat from hang in such situations? > > Thank you in advance, > Igor > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtualhost and deployment applications
The VirtualHost binding can be conducted via Apache HTTP Server and use mod_proxy to the appropriate URI running in the Tomcat. On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:41:24 -0500, Carlos Gabriel Arce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good Day > > I have a question. Is possible deploy an application per virtualhost, > where the deployed applications could'nt see them each other? > > Thanks in advance. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat hangs
Have you analyze the memory usage on the box?
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:35:37 +0530, Dhana Sekar Sugunan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure i am posting this in the correct area. Please bear and advice.
>
> My application needs to run a thread contiuously for every 1 hr. I have made
> the coding in servlet as
> package invservlet;
> import javax.servlet.*;
> import javax.servlet.http.*;
> import java.io.IOException;
> import java.util.Timer;
> import java.util.TimerTask;
> import java.util.Date;
> import java.util.Calendar;
> import sample.Reminder;
> public class SampleReminder extends HttpServlet{
> Timer timer;
> Date date=new Date();
> Calendar calc=Calendar.getInstance();
> public void init(){
> timer = new Timer();
> timer.schedule(new Reminder(),calc.getTime(),1*1000*60*60);
> }
> public void doService(HttpServletRequest request,HttpServletResponse
> response) throws ServletException,IOException{
> }
> public void destroy(){
> timer.cancel();
> super.destroy();
> }
> }
>
> and the execution file is
>
> package sample;
> import java.util.TimerTask;
> import java.util.Date;
> import box.util.SendMail;
>
> public class Reminder extends TimerTask{
> SendMail sendMail=new SendMail();
> public void run() {
> taskBody();
> }
> public void taskBody()
> {
>
> try{
> sendMail.SendMail("192.168.0.33","[EMAIL PROTECTED]","[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]","","","Test
> log mail","This is a test mail for every 1 hour"+new Date());
> }catch(Exception e){System.out.println("ERROR IN Remainder");}
>
> }
> }
>
> BUT EVERY 2 - 3 DAYS I AM GETTING MY TOMCAT HANGING. I THINK THE PROBLEM IS
> IN THE THREAD. PLEASE ADVICE. THANKS.
>
> Sorry, forget to add some more points which may help for analysation.
> My application will fetch more than 1000 records for single transaction.
> And also some times in will be transferred (sendRedirect) to another page
> with nearly 20 fields of data.
>
> Will this also create problem?
>
> _
> MSN Spaces! Your space, your time. http://www.msn.co.in/spaces Your personal
> haven online.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preferred Platform for Tomcat5
Solaris 9 JVM 1.4.2_06 Tomcat 5.0.28 Any *NIX variant should be within an expected tolerance bandwidth - as long as a stable Tomcat and JVM version is used. On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:11:26 -0600, Todd Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Excluding Windows, is there a particular platform that works better with > Tomcat5? What are members of this list using for a production > installation of Tomcat? > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Application slows down
What is the specs of the server? What memory has been allocated to Tomcat? Are there other apps running on the same server that grindas up memory? regards, Hari Mailvaganam On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:11:59 -0600, Kiran Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a software application, which uses Tomcat 4.1. It is database > oriented application and it uses Access database. There are about fifteen > users using the same application and entering data to the database. Tomcat > is installed in one computer and all the users are connected to that > computer through network. The problem is that the application becomes > really slow after sometime unless at certain interval I restart the Tomcat. > Is there any better solution then restarting the server? Any help will be > appreciated. > > Thank you > > Kiran Patel > Software Engineer > Solutions Inc. > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jk2.properties Query
Hi: I noticed the following on the catalina.out: >Feb 15, 2005 9:19:13 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start >INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=1/37 >config=/local/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/conf/jk2.properties Does Tomcat 5.0.28 have mod_jk on by default? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Connection refused :-(
Did installing Oracle or jBoss change your JVM path? On Apr 4, 2005 5:49 AM, gaurav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Crowther wrote: > > >>From: gaurav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>I am using tomcat 5.5.7 on Fedora 3 with jdk1.5.0_02 > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>my i have disable firewal and stopped Iptables !! > >> > >> > > > >OK. > > > > > > > >>netstat -a | grep tomcat or 8080-> nothing , zero , blank > >> > >> > > > >You already said that you had moved the Tomcat port from 8080, though? > >If so, I wouldn't expect anything on 8080. And I would expect something > >on Tomcat's shutdown port as well (check your server.xml for its port > >number) - is that not starting either? > > > > - Peter > > > > > > > I dont whats the wrong here... I have just installed Jboss .its > tunning fine ...what the problem tomcat ?? > Why o Why tomcat says connection refused is there any hidden lock or > temp files thats is causing proble ?? > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: R: TROUBLE UNCOMPRESSING jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz
There could be a corruption during the download - try to download from another mirror. regards, Hari On 9/8/05, Ratti Michele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you, Ben. > I tried but I get the same error. > :| > > > > Da: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: gio 08/09/2005 20.29 > A: Tomcat Users List > Oggetto: Re: TROUBLE UNCOMPRESSING jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz > > > > I just downloaded and tried with: > tar -zxvf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz > on FC2 > > Try downloading it again > > > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:14, Ratti Michele wrote: > > Good morning everybody! > > > > I'd like to use Tomcat so I download this file > > "jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz" > > But I'm not able to uncompress it. > > On Linux I have this error: "tar: A lone zero block at 25257" > > On Solaris I have this error: "tar: Directory checksum error" > > > > Can someone help me? > > I need this file. It's quiet urgent. > > Thank you very much. > > > > Michele > > -- > Ben Souther > F.W. Davison & Co. > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > > This e-mail message, and any accompanying documents, is for the sole use > of > the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or > copying is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact our office by email or by telephone at (508) 747-7261 and > immediately destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
