Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi Greg, hi David! Sure, there is anoter factory you could use: The tomcat-built-in datasource factory. Unfortunately I do not know the classname of this factory, but I think it is somewhere in the library naming-factory-dbcp.jar which is located in common/lib. (The Tomcat-guys didn't want to add the complete jakarta-commons-pool and jakarta-commons-dbcp libraries because most of the classes inside these libraries are not needed by tomcat. So they extracted the required classes only and repacked them thogether with some other classes into naming-factory-dbcp.jar. To avoid confusions and errors, they also modified the package names - thats why you get a ClassNotFoundException when you configure the JNDI-context to use the org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory). But I'm not sure if it is a good idea to extend one of those tomcat-internal datasource factories! This would REALLY tie your code close to tomcat! Apart from that: If you implement/extend an existing DataSource factory, you have to put your implementation inside the common/classes directory - otherwise tomcat won't find it when it initializes the JNDI-context! So why not put the commons-pool and commons-dbcp jars into common/lib too? So my suggestion: Extend BasicDataSourceFactory from commons-dbcp and put the two jars mentioned above into common/lib. Best regards, Tex Greg Guerin schrieb: Hi David, Mario, We actually specify the factory parameter because we extend the BasicDataSourceFactory so we can encrypt passwords in the resource definition. My question is: Is there already a way to do that using another factory I'm unaware of? It works fine, but we have to include the jars that Mario mentioned and it'd be nice to not have to tie our code that close to the container. Greg -Original Message- From: Mario Winterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:37 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David! I think, you do not need to explicitely define a bean factory because Tomcat 5 automatically uses dbcp for JNDI-DataSources (I think tomcat looks at the type of resource - in your case a javax.sql.DataSource - and uses the tomcat-internal dbcp-factory). In my project, I've configured a JNDI-DataSource using the Oracle thin driver and it works perfectly without specifying a bean factory and without adding any special libraries to my tomcat installation (apart from the oracle database driver which is in commons/lib). So try the following configuration: Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password / Again: You do not need any additional commons-libraries! Best regards, Tex Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered
RE: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi all, Most of the examples I've come across specify the factory parameter. And, after rereading the Tomcat docs, those additional three commons jar files are needed. I too, have gotten the datasource to work when I didn't specify the factory parameter, but my impression right now is that it's not pooling the datasources/connections when you don't specify it. Is there a way to see that Tomcat is actually pooling these connections/datasources? Greg Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/03/2005 04:51 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To 'Tomcat Users List' tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject RE: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David, Mario, We actually specify the factory parameter because we extend the BasicDataSourceFactory so we can encrypt passwords in the resource definition. My question is: Is there already a way to do that using another factory I'm unaware of? It works fine, but we have to include the jars that Mario mentioned and it'd be nice to not have to tie our code that close to the container. Greg -Original Message- From: Mario Winterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:37 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David! I think, you do not need to explicitely define a bean factory because Tomcat 5 automatically uses dbcp for JNDI-DataSources (I think tomcat looks at the type of resource - in your case a javax.sql.DataSource - and uses the tomcat-internal dbcp-factory). In my project, I've configured a JNDI-DataSource using the Oracle thin driver and it works perfectly without specifying a bean factory and without adding any special libraries to my tomcat installation (apart from the oracle database driver which is in commons/lib). So try the following configuration: Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=""> username=userid password=password / Again: You do not need any additional commons-libraries! Best regards, Tex Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=""> username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered the below error on Tomcat startup: Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener addResource WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could not create resource factory, ClassNotFoundException:org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory My webapp uses JDBC DataSource's and the BasicDataSourceFactory for pooling so this problem of ClassNotFoundException is causing my webapp to not work properly. I have Tomcat 5.5.4 also installed on my local maching which has Windows XP on it, and there is absolutely no problem on startup and and my webapp. Does anyone no what's happening here? Why does Tomcat register the BasicDataSourceFactory with no problems in Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows XP and
Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Look at your database. There should be at least the pool size of connections open when there is no activity. Whether or not you specify the factory depends on the factory being used. If it is a standard factory in Tomcat that Tomcat is already aware of, it is not needed. But if you use a set of drivers that use a different or special factory you will need to call it out. This information is in the docs but is a little scattered. Read all the pages on jndi, jdbc and global resources. Including: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/jndi-resources-howto.html The other simple answer is what code are you using? If you are calling the DriverManager then no, but if you are calling DataSource ds = (DataSource) ctx.lookup(java:comp/env/jdbc/myDB); or similar then you are using Tomcats built in pooling. Otherwise you would get an error. Doug - Original Message - From: DAVID TURNER [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:19 AM Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi all, Most of the examples I've come across specify the factory parameter. And, after rereading the Tomcat docs, those additional three commons jar files are needed. I too, have gotten the datasource to work when I didn't specify the factory parameter, but my impression right now is that it's not pooling the datasources/connections when you don't specify it. Is there a way to see that Tomcat is actually pooling these connections/datasources? Greg Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/03/2005 04:51 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To 'Tomcat Users List' tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject RE: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David, Mario, We actually specify the factory parameter because we extend the BasicDataSourceFactory so we can encrypt passwords in the resource definition. My question is: Is there already a way to do that using another factory I'm unaware of? It works fine, but we have to include the jars that Mario mentioned and it'd be nice to not have to tie our code that close to the container. Greg -Original Message- From: Mario Winterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:37 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David! I think, you do not need to explicitely define a bean factory because Tomcat 5 automatically uses dbcp for JNDI-DataSources (I think tomcat looks at the type of resource - in your case a javax.sql.DataSource - and uses the tomcat-internal dbcp-factory). In my project, I've configured a JNDI-DataSource using the Oracle thin driver and it works perfectly without specifying a bean factory and without adding any special libraries to my tomcat installation (apart from the oracle database driver which is in commons/lib). So try the following configuration: Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password / Again: You do not need any additional commons-libraries! Best regards, Tex Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta
Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered the below error on Tomcat startup: Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener addResource WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could not create resource factory, ClassNotFoundException:org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory My webapp uses JDBC DataSource's and the BasicDataSourceFactory for pooling so this problem of ClassNotFoundException is causing my webapp to not work properly. I have Tomcat 5.5.4 also installed on my local maching which has Windows XP on it, and there is absolutely no problem on startup and and my webapp. Does anyone no what's happening here? Why does Tomcat register the BasicDataSourceFactory with no problems in Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows XP and not on Windows 2000 Server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi David! I think, you do not need to explicitely define a bean factory because Tomcat 5 automatically uses dbcp for JNDI-DataSources (I think tomcat looks at the type of resource - in your case a javax.sql.DataSource - and uses the tomcat-internal dbcp-factory). In my project, I've configured a JNDI-DataSource using the Oracle thin driver and it works perfectly without specifying a bean factory and without adding any special libraries to my tomcat installation (apart from the oracle database driver which is in commons/lib). So try the following configuration: Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password / Again: You do not need any additional commons-libraries! Best regards, Tex Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered the below error on Tomcat startup: Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener addResource WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could not create resource factory, ClassNotFoundException:org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory My webapp uses JDBC DataSource's and the BasicDataSourceFactory for pooling so this problem of ClassNotFoundException is causing my webapp to not work properly. I have Tomcat 5.5.4 also installed on my local maching which has Windows XP on it, and there is absolutely no problem on startup and and my webapp. Does anyone no what's happening here? Why does Tomcat register the BasicDataSourceFactory with no problems in Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows XP and not on Windows 2000 Server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi David, Mario, We actually specify the factory parameter because we extend the BasicDataSourceFactory so we can encrypt passwords in the resource definition. My question is: Is there already a way to do that using another factory I'm unaware of? It works fine, but we have to include the jars that Mario mentioned and it'd be nice to not have to tie our code that close to the container. Greg -Original Message- From: Mario Winterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:37 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi David! I think, you do not need to explicitely define a bean factory because Tomcat 5 automatically uses dbcp for JNDI-DataSources (I think tomcat looks at the type of resource - in your case a javax.sql.DataSource - and uses the tomcat-internal dbcp-factory). In my project, I've configured a JNDI-DataSource using the Oracle thin driver and it works perfectly without specifying a bean factory and without adding any special libraries to my tomcat installation (apart from the oracle database driver which is in commons/lib). So try the following configuration: Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password / Again: You do not need any additional commons-libraries! Best regards, Tex Hi Mario, Thanks for getting back to me. Below is the context I set up. After doing my own digging, I realized I was missing some jakarta commons jar files. After getting these jars and restarting Tomcat the ClassNotFoundExceptions went away. What I find really puzzling though is why I didn't get the same ClassNotFoundException on my local machine that was running the same version of Tomcat but on Windows XP profession. Context debug=0 privileged=true !-- the jdbc driver's jar needs to go into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib -- Resource name=jdbc/as400 auth=Container type=javax.sql.DataSource factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory maxActive=20 maxIdle=10 maxWait=-1 removeAbandoned=true removeAbandonedTimeout=60 logAbandoned=true driverClassName=com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver url=jdbc:as400://a53pb3;naming=system;libraries=,pgmdbt,caelib;errors=full username=userid password=password/ /Context Mario Winterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2005 07:19 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered the below error on Tomcat startup: Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener addResource WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could not create resource factory, ClassNotFoundException:org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory My webapp uses JDBC DataSource's and the BasicDataSourceFactory for pooling so this problem of ClassNotFoundException is causing my webapp to not work properly. I have Tomcat 5.5.4 also installed on my local maching which has Windows XP on it, and there is absolutely no problem on startup and and my webapp. Does anyone no what's happening here? Why does Tomcat register the BasicDataSourceFactory with no problems in Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows XP and not on Windows 2000 Server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5.4/Windows 2000 server - Failed to register in JMX: BasicDataSourceFactory
Hi! How did you define your JDBC DataSource? As far as I know, the original jakarta-commons-dbcp and jakarta-commons-pool-libraries are not included with Tomcat. Instead, just a subset of the required classes with modified package names (starting with 'org.apache.tomcat.dbcp') are packed in 'naming-factory-dbcp.jar' that can be found in commons/lib. But if you configure your JDBC DataSource correctly, this should not bother. Please post your resource-configuration! Best regards, Tex I'm running Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows 2000 Server and encountered the below error on Tomcat startup: Feb 2, 2005 10:50:49 AM org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener addResource WARNING: Failed to register in JMX: javax.naming.NamingException: Could not create resource factory, ClassNotFoundException:org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory My webapp uses JDBC DataSource's and the BasicDataSourceFactory for pooling so this problem of ClassNotFoundException is causing my webapp to not work properly. I have Tomcat 5.5.4 also installed on my local maching which has Windows XP on it, and there is absolutely no problem on startup and and my webapp. Does anyone no what's happening here? Why does Tomcat register the BasicDataSourceFactory with no problems in Tomcat 5.5.4 on Windows XP and not on Windows 2000 Server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
