Re: [Toolserver-l] Patricia Pintilie
Hi! 2013-05-23 20:12, Patricia Pintilie wrote: 2013-05-23 09:49, Hersfold Wikipedia wrote: 2013-23-05 10:34, Daniel Schwen wrote: 2013-23-05 08:07, Jeremy Baron wrote: 2013-05-23 07:30, Patricia Pintilie wrote: General chat • Re: Navigating Multiboot GRUB2 menu entries successfully. http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=2195&p=15042#p15042 Hi Patricia, Are you human? Please send me the square root of 16. Thanks! At this point it doesn't even matter anymore. None of her posts so far made any sense or contributed in a meaningful way. Please block. 2013-05-23 08:07, Jeremy Baron wrote: +1. Only two of her emails I can pull up on my phone have been even potentially constructive; all of the more recent ones are nonsense or outright spam. I am not spam and a beautiful human being. Altho my replied might not make sense to some I am on many email lists so pardon if u are not understanding me, it maybe that information is for the ones that know what to do with the information. Its Hard to block a smooth operator such as myself. Keep up the good corrections I Pray all is well with my Wikiedians. Best Regards-MILASTARX-TS The right answer should have been 4. (So she must be a wit^Wbot.) *duck* bye seth ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Re: [Toolserver-l] Toolserver db outperformed by labs
On Fri, 24 May 2013 00:42:22 +0200 Platonides wrote: > Today^W Yesterday, I was asked about some file numbers, which involved > subcategory traversing, which is an "inefficient" problem. It seemed a > good problem for comparing toolserver and labs. And toolserver db sucks: > > willow: 31m5.157s (user 0m4.038s) > labs: 0m4.271s (user 2.488) > > Toolserver was *436 times slower*. > > Surely, the labs server is better (in hardware) than the one in TS. I > don't know how many scripts were hitting the TS db, while the labs one > would be almost-idle. Still, it seems a really big gap. Do we have > something wrongly configured? Did mariadb somehow massively improve vs > mysql? Are some parameters too small? Is it just a problem that the > mysql servers are underprovisioned of ram? Almost nobody is using the replicated Labs DB yet so it's not really a surprise. Wait half a year or so then try again. I expect the Labs DB to be faster still because of better hardware, but probably not *that* much faster. BTW: If you're doing recursive traversal of categories, you may be interested in CatGraph: http://tools.wmflabs.org/render-tests/catgraph/ Ask me if you want to know more about it. This address or JohannesK_WMDE on freenode. :) ___ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
