Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Mike Waters
This is what I use:
www.w0btu.com/W0BTU-broadband-preamps.html

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com wrote:


 Can someone recommend me a good  preamplifier for the beverage antennas on
 80/160m?

 I found on the market a few like Z10043 Norton Amplifier, KD9SV dual band
 preamp, RPA-1 from DX Engineering.

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Jim N7US
I have all of my licenses, starting with a Novice in 1964.  The last one
that specified a Fixed Station Operation Location was issued in 1984.

73, Jim N7US

-Original Message-

On Mon,2/2/2015 2:32 AM, Dragoslav Balaban wrote:
 Callsign is assigned to HAM for Station, and Station have physical / 
 geographic Location , Latitude/Longitude..

That is no longer true for US hams, since the 1970s. Our license is an
operator license only, the address is a mailing address where we receive
official communications from the FCC. :)  My callsign is simply K9YC
anywhere within the US. I live in California.

Before that time, we had a single piece of paper with two licenses -- one
for operator privileges, the second for the station at a single location,
and we had to sign /n at any other location.

73, Jim K9YC


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Michael Walker
I was going to mention both Clifton Labs and the Active-Antenna.eu site.

Mike va3mw


On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:10 PM, donov...@starpower.net wrote:

 Hi Andy ,

 I use preamps from three different manufacturers in my station :

 - DX Engineering RPA-1 $143.95
 - Clifton Labs Z10043 (or Z10042) Norton Preamp $100.00 (with enclosure)
 - Advanced Receiver Research P1-30/20VD $69.95

 I use W3LPL bandpass filters in front of every preamp because
 of the extreme out-of-band signal levels in my multi-multi station.

 All three types of preamps perform very well, I've detected no
 practical difference in performance among the three types of preamps
 used on my Beverages and 8-circle receiving arrays.

 The Clifton Labs Norton preamp is clearly superior on 15 and 10
 meters because it appears to be unconditionally stable. The same is
 not true of the ARR preamps which self-oscillate on 15 and 10 meters
 when fed through a band pass filter. I've never observed the self-
 oscillation problem with ARR preamps on 160 through 20 meters.

 73
 Frank
 W3LPL



 - Original Message -

 From: Mike Waters mikew...@gmail.com
 To: Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com
 Cc: topband topband@contesting.com
 Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 9:17:32 PM
 Subject: Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

 This is what I use:
 www.w0btu.com/W0BTU-broadband-preamps.html

 73, Mike
 www.w0btu.com

 On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com wrote:

 
  Can someone recommend me a good preamplifier for the beverage antennas on
  80/160m?
 
  I found on the market a few like Z10043 Norton Amplifier, KD9SV dual band
  preamp, RPA-1 from DX Engineering.
 
 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Don Kirk
You might consider building a W7IUV preamp.  It is a very easy to build
boradband preamp that you can build using double sided circuit board in
which you can easily cut in the pattern on one side of the circuit board
using a Dremel tool, and the opposite side is the ground plane.  I created
a website to document my builds of this preamp, and here is my website URL
in which I provide the artwork for the circuit board, along with parts
placement.  On my website I also provide a link to the W7IUV website where
you can find the most current schematic.

http://sites.google.com/site/rxpreamps/

This preamp can handle very strong input signals without being harmed.

Gain approximately 20 to 22 dB.

73,
Don (wd8dsb)


On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,



 Can someone recommend me a good  preamplifier for the beverage antennas on
 80/160m?

 I found on the market a few like Z10043 Norton Amplifier, KD9SV dual band
 preamp, RPA-1 from DX Engineering.

 Anyone familiar with this preamps?

 Looking forward for replies.

 Thanks in advance!

 Best regards, Andy YO3JR





 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Eddy Swynar

On 2015-02-02, at 4:08 PM, Andy YO3JR wrote:
 
 Can someone recommend me a good  preamplifier for the beverage antennas on
 80/160m?

 Best regards, Andy YO3JR
 





Hi Andy,

All I ever used here was an old AMECO-brand pre-selector that I paid $10.00 
for, I believe, at a Hamfest...

If signals get too loud  distort, all I do is reduce the gain on the thing. 
Works perfectly for me, even if it isn't ...politically correct in to-day's 
Topband scene...!

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Bill Cromwell

Hi,

While I agree in principle I question whether the receiver and it's 
location have legal identification requirements. In the U.S.A. at least, 
receivers and their operators are NOT licensed. Transmitters and 
transmitter operation are. One guideline I saw suggested a remote 
receiver - located in a quiet area - should be in the same grid square 
as the associated transmitter. A rule like that is from a contest or 
certificate sponsor and not from a regulatory agency like our FCC.


There have always been and will always be 'cheaters'. They know who they 
are.


73,

Bill  KU8H


On 02/02/2015 12:07 AM, m.r. wrote:

To me the remote operation ethics have always been clear, and still are.

It makes absolutely NO difference where the operator is sitting. The 
contact is between the two physical stations.


Any station - remotely controlled or not - must identify legally under 
the rules of the county in which the RF transmitter and receiver are 
located.  This includes properly identifying the zone, state, section, 
grid square, whatever the current activity requires. When it is just 
the country, that must also be clear.


In this case, if OE1AZS was using the W4ABC station, he could legally 
identify in two ways, Just W4ABC, or W4/OE1AZS.  It is NOT legal for a 
transmitter in the W4 district of the US to be identified ONLY as OE1AZS.


It does not matter if the person, OE1AZS, is sitting at the knobs at 
W4ABC, or is sitting at home controlling the W4ABC station by remote 
control.


But, folks who can, will cheat just to be first in a log. They really 
only cheat themselves, to the DX station, its just one more contact  
Claming the contact for DXCC or any other kind of award credit is 
cheating.  Again, the person most cheated is the individual who 
submits the contact for the award.


Robin Critchell
WA6CDR



_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Dragoslav Balaban
Absolutly agree,

 It makes absolutely NO difference where the operator is sitting.  The
contact is between the two physical stations.

I send same statement few days ago, and its VERY CLEAR, except someone
deliberatly dont want to make it clear

Callsign is assigned to HAM for Station, and Station have physical /
geographic Location , Latitude/Longitude... 
if Op not operating from that location, then there is /p /m /mm /am etc,  /
ctry pfx if in other ctry,  and its perfect system

then only question remain is how far RX Antenna/ Antennas can be from TX ,
as we taking TX Location as Station location
(is remote Acces by dedicated IP Link, public  Interent, RF Link, make no
diffrence at all...)

All this is self understandable, so I think no need for any wide discussion,
I just repeat my Opinoin


73 all dado E74AW


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of m.r.
Sent: Monday, 02 February, 2015 06:07
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Remote Operation

To me the remote operation ethics have always been clear, and still are.

It makes absolutely NO difference where the operator is sitting.  The
contact is between the two physical stations.

Any station - remotely controlled or not - must identify legally under the
rules of the county in which the RF transmitter and receiver are located.
This includes properly identifying the zone, state, section, grid square,
whatever the current activity requires. 
When it is just the country, that must also be clear.

In this case, if OE1AZS was using the W4ABC station, he could legally
identify in two ways, Just W4ABC, or W4/OE1AZS.  It is NOT legal for a
transmitter in the W4 district of the US to be identified ONLY as OE1AZS.

It does not matter if the person, OE1AZS, is sitting at the knobs at W4ABC,
or is sitting at home controlling the W4ABC station by remote control.

But, folks who can, will cheat just to be first in a log. They really only
cheat themselves, to the DX station, its just one more contact  Claming the
contact for DXCC or any other kind of award credit is cheating.  Again, the
person most cheated is the individual who submits the contact for the award.

Robin Critchell
WA6CDR


- Original Message -
From: Doug Renwick ve...@sasktel.net
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 20:13
Subject: Topband: Remote Operation


 Listening to K1N on 7023 and to stations calling this evening.  OE1AZS was
 calling and boy was he loud here.  Obviously not calling from Europe and
he
 wasn't signing portable.  My beam was pointed at K1N and the eu stations
he
 was working were weak off the side of the beam except for OE1AZS.  What
 would be his ethics limits?

 Doug

 There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual or lawyer could
 believe them. - George Orwell, 1984



 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 http://www.avast.com

 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Agelos-SV3RF via Topband

J310 push-pull HF pre-amp KIT BUILT  TESTED
This is also one option, I use it with excelent results.It is sold as a kit 
also.SV3RF-Agelos
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| J310 push-pull HF pre-amp KIT BUILT  TESTEDUS $29.90 New in Consumer 
Electronics, Radio Communication, Ham, Amateur Radio |
|  |
| View on www.ebay.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

  
 

  
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

2015-02-02 Thread Jeff AC0C

Z10043 used here.

It's sold by Jack Smith K8ZOA who is an instrumentation and test engineer - 
which means all of his stuff is wrung out to the max.  In the preamp 
business, there are a lot of loosely defined claims but with Jack's preamps, 
if you want a specific or special test performed on your unit (for example, 
trimmed for optimal NF) he can arrange it.


73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-Original Message- 
From: donov...@starpower.net

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:10 AM
To: topband
Cc: andyru...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

Hi Andy ,

I use preamps from three different manufacturers in my station :

- DX Engineering RPA-1 $143.95
- Clifton Labs Z10043 (or Z10042) Norton Preamp $100.00 (with enclosure)
- Advanced Receiver Research P1-30/20VD $69.95

I use W3LPL bandpass filters in front of every preamp because
of the extreme out-of-band signal levels in my multi-multi station.

All three types of preamps perform very well, I've detected no
practical difference in performance among the three types of preamps
used on my Beverages and 8-circle receiving arrays.

The Clifton Labs Norton preamp is clearly superior on 15 and 10
meters because it appears to be unconditionally stable. The same is
not true of the ARR preamps which self-oscillate on 15 and 10 meters
when fed through a band pass filter. I've never observed the self-
oscillation problem with ARR preamps on 160 through 20 meters.

73
Frank
W3LPL



- Original Message -

From: Mike Waters mikew...@gmail.com
To: Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com
Cc: topband topband@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 9:17:32 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Preamplifiers

This is what I use:
www.w0btu.com/W0BTU-broadband-preamps.html

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andy YO3JR andyru...@gmail.com wrote:



Can someone recommend me a good preamplifier for the beverage antennas on
80/160m?

I found on the market a few like Z10043 Norton Amplifier, KD9SV dual band
preamp, RPA-1 from DX Engineering.


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Tod
US hams who were licensed in the 50's will remember that you got a separate 
Operator's license and Station license. At some point the FCC merged the two -- 
probably to save paper. 

Tod, K0TO


Sent from my iPad air


 On Feb 2, 2015, at 5:47 AM, Bill Cromwell wrcromw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 While I agree in principle I question whether the receiver and it's location 
 have legal identification requirements. In the U.S.A. at least, receivers and 
 their operators are NOT licensed. Transmitters and transmitter operation are. 
 One guideline I saw suggested a remote receiver - located in a quiet area - 
 should be in the same grid square as the associated transmitter. A rule like 
 that is from a contest or certificate sponsor and not from a regulatory 
 agency like our FCC.
 
 There have always been and will always be 'cheaters'. They know who they are.
 
 73,
 
 Bill  KU8H
 
 
 On 02/02/2015 12:07 AM, m.r. wrote:
 To me the remote operation ethics have always been clear, and still are.
 
 It makes absolutely NO difference where the operator is sitting. The contact 
 is between the two physical stations.
 
 Any station - remotely controlled or not - must identify legally under the 
 rules of the county in which the RF transmitter and receiver are located.  
 This includes properly identifying the zone, state, section, grid square, 
 whatever the current activity requires. When it is just the country, that 
 must also be clear.
 
 In this case, if OE1AZS was using the W4ABC station, he could legally 
 identify in two ways, Just W4ABC, or W4/OE1AZS.  It is NOT legal for a 
 transmitter in the W4 district of the US to be identified ONLY as OE1AZS.
 
 It does not matter if the person, OE1AZS, is sitting at the knobs at W4ABC, 
 or is sitting at home controlling the W4ABC station by remote control.
 
 But, folks who can, will cheat just to be first in a log. They really only 
 cheat themselves, to the DX station, its just one more contact  Claming the 
 contact for DXCC or any other kind of award credit is cheating.  Again, the 
 person most cheated is the individual who submits the contact for the award.
 
 Robin Critchell
 WA6CDR
 
 _
 Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Jim Brown

On Mon,2/2/2015 2:32 AM, Dragoslav Balaban wrote:

Callsign is assigned to HAM for Station, and Station have physical /
geographic Location , Latitude/Longitude..


That is no longer true for US hams, since the 1970s. Our license is an 
operator license only, the address is a mailing address where we receive 
official communications from the FCC. :)  My callsign is simply K9YC 
anywhere within the US. I live in California.


Before that time, we had a single piece of paper with two licenses -- 
one for operator privileges, the second for the station at a single 
location, and we had to sign /n at any other location.


73, Jim K9YC
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Remote Operation

2015-02-02 Thread Bill Cromwell

Hi,

I just pulled my last license (now expired) from the desk drawer and 
looked at it. It refers to my primary station and has the physical 
address. I'm pretty sure my current license will bear the same 
information. It's up for renewal and maybe the new one will be 
different. Other parts of the rules regulate our emitted signals and 
NOT our received signals. I have read and/or heard that in some other 
countries receivers were or are regulated. Therefore - YMMV.


73,

Bill  KU8H


On 02/02/2015 10:18 AM, Tod wrote:

US hams who were licensed in the 50's will remember that you got a separate 
Operator's license and Station license. At some point the FCC merged the two -- 
probably to save paper.

Tod, K0TO





_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband