Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Wes
You save me a lot of writing.  This is my thought experiment.  Just another 
point or two. 1) the more radials there are the lower the current in each.  With 
enough radials, the currents are milliamps, unless you're running the megawatts 
I spoke of earlier.  2) If there are two (or more) verticals, the power divides 
and there is even less current per radial.


Now consider two verticals driven in phase.  The radial currents will also be in 
phase and even if they cross there is no voltage difference between them so 
there is no arc.  You can tie them together if you like but it serves no 
function other than to change the resonant frequency of the shortened radials 
and upset the current distribution.  Yes, they do have a resonant frequency, 
they are after all open ended transmission lines.


Now consider the case where the verticals are driven out of phase.  The radial 
currents are also out of phase and there will a maximum voltage gradient between 
them.  This however, is the DESIRED condition.  Short the ends together and you 
upset the phasing.  I have no idea how significant this is, as I said this is a 
thought experiment not a thesis.


Wes  N7WS



On 11/6/2020 10:43 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
I of course defer to Frank's expertise here.  But after thinking about this 
for a couple of hours, I'm trying to wrap my head around this arc risk concept 
as well.  It's interesting and I toss this comment out because my two sets of 
4sq don't have a single cross-bonded wire anywhere - all the ground structure 
is ground mounted, with overlapping wires literally all over the place.  And 
despite that, the do seem to work more or less OK, as far as I can tell.


I guess my thinking is list this...  All those radial wires are laying out on 
the ground.  So they are at least connected at some point, at a DC level, 
assuming your talking about something conventional like a 4SQ.


Of course, we are talking about AC here, so I will agree that maybe the 
conditions could exist where - with just the right configuration between the 
two radials - that some larger than expected voltage differential may be 
present.  Given how low Q a 4SQ is, how current is split between multiple 
elements, my gut feeling is that the excitation voltages are pretty mild even 
if you have your 1500W source right there at the 4SQ input.


And on top of that, the wires are laying on the ground, right? The radials are 
in more or less intimate contact with the ground, so I would expect there to 
exist leakage resistance between adjacent conductors (if they are bare).  And 
if they are perfectly insulated, this being AC, that means there is going to 
be some amount of cap coupling between adjacent wires and to the ground. With 
all of that R spread out all over the field, I would certainly think this 
conspires to work against the probability that any two optimally aligned 
individual crossing conductors would provide a condition sufficient to support 
an arc, and that if so, it would survive long enough to cause a fire.


It's very very very dry here in the summer and again in the winter.  So fire 
risk is something we keep a real close eye on. Then again, out here in the 
Midwest some of us do a lot of IL-advised things because they seem to work and 
of course because laziness is a BIG part of the calculation.  ha ha.  Maybe we 
have been taking a walk on the wild side without realizing it.  Hope not 
because I sure don't want to go try to rectify this poor decision 3 years post 
installation!  Say it ain't so!


73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Jeff Blaine

Wow, that's amazing.

I suppose the risk of micro arcing then specifically with insulated 
radials has got to be closer to zero - at least until the insulation 
breakdown was sufficient to facilitate the arcing. If that's a 
reasonable guess, then maybe guys like me - who are from the start not 
going to cross connect - would have some benefit from the use of 
insulated wire in that it would side step this issue for the most part?


In any event, when I do get around to building my personal MW station - 
needed in anticipation of the zombie apocalypse - for THAT set of 
radials, I will definitely plan on doing the cross connect work!


73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 11/7/20 12:39 AM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Hi Jeff,


Micro arcing can be excited by just a few volts of RF. While micro arcing
probably is n't a fire risk, micro arcing radiates low level phase noise
on transmitted signals. This is can cause a serious interference
problem to nearby receivers such as neighboring hams or co-located
receivers such an in-band receiver in a contest station.


I personally experienced these problems with megawatt transmitters.
In one instance, a massive radial system for a one mile long of array of
HF phased verticals had to be completely replaced because it generated an
elevated noise floor that degraded the performance of the HF over the
horizon radar. In another case a poorly engineered, badly installed and
inadequately maintained radial system for a 500 kw VLF system caused
severe television interference to neighbors that forced premature site closure.


73
Frank
W3LPL

- Original Message -

From: "Jeff Blaine" 
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:43:25 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

I of course defer to Frank's expertise here. But after thinking about
this for a couple of hours, I'm trying to wrap my head around this arc
risk concept as well. It's interesting and I toss this comment out
because my two sets of 4sq don't have a single cross-bonded wire
anywhere - all the ground structure is ground mounted, with overlapping
wires literally all over the place. And despite that, the do seem to
work more or less OK, as far as I can tell.

I guess my thinking is list this... All those radial wires are laying
out on the ground. So they are at least connected at some point, at a
DC level, assuming your talking about something conventional like a 4SQ.

Of course, we are talking about AC here, so I will agree that maybe the
conditions could exist where - with just the right configuration between
the two radials - that some larger than expected voltage differential
may be present. Given how low Q a 4SQ is, how current is split between
multiple elements, my gut feeling is that the excitation voltages are
pretty mild even if you have your 1500W source right there at the 4SQ
input.

And on top of that, the wires are laying on the ground, right? The
radials are in more or less intimate contact with the ground, so I would
expect there to exist leakage resistance between adjacent conductors (if
they are bare). And if they are perfectly insulated, this being AC,
that means there is going to be some amount of cap coupling between
adjacent wires and to the ground. With all of that R spread out all
over the field, I would certainly think this conspires to work against
the probability that any two optimally aligned individual crossing
conductors would provide a condition sufficient to support an arc, and
that if so, it would survive long enough to cause a fire.

It's very very very dry here in the summer and again in the winter. So
fire risk is something we keep a real close eye on. Then again, out here
in the Midwest some of us do a lot of IL-advised things because they
seem to work and of course because laziness is a BIG part of the
calculation. ha ha. Maybe we have been taking a walk on the wild side
without realizing it. Hope not because I sure don't want to go try to
rectify this poor decision 3 years post installation! Say it ain't so!

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 11/6/20 10:59 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Always beware of any communication that begins "with all due respect"

- Original Message -

From: "Wes" 
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:49:23 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

With all due respect, I must ask, how many megawatts are you guys running?

Wes N7WS


On 11/6/2020 3:26 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Hi Carl,


If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire


73
Frank
W3LPL

On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:

Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L


Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross
over each other, is that to be treated differently th

Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread donovanf
Hi Jeff, 


Micro arcing can be excited by just a few volts of RF. While micro arcing 
probably is n't a fire risk, micro arcing radiates low level phase noise 
on transmitted signals. This is can cause a serious interference 
problem to nearby receivers such as neighboring hams or co-located 
receivers such an in-band receiver in a contest station. 


I personally experienced these problems with megawatt transmitters. 
In one instance, a massive radial system for a one mile long of array of 
HF phased verticals had to be completely replaced because it generated an 
elevated noise floor that degraded the performance of the HF over the 
horizon radar. In another case a poorly engineered, badly installed and 
inadequately maintained radial system for a 500 kw VLF system caused 
severe television interference to neighbors that forced premature site closure. 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 

- Original Message -

From: "Jeff Blaine"  
To: topband@contesting.com 
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:43:25 AM 
Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections 

I of course defer to Frank's expertise here. But after thinking about 
this for a couple of hours, I'm trying to wrap my head around this arc 
risk concept as well. It's interesting and I toss this comment out 
because my two sets of 4sq don't have a single cross-bonded wire 
anywhere - all the ground structure is ground mounted, with overlapping 
wires literally all over the place. And despite that, the do seem to 
work more or less OK, as far as I can tell. 

I guess my thinking is list this... All those radial wires are laying 
out on the ground. So they are at least connected at some point, at a 
DC level, assuming your talking about something conventional like a 4SQ. 

Of course, we are talking about AC here, so I will agree that maybe the 
conditions could exist where - with just the right configuration between 
the two radials - that some larger than expected voltage differential 
may be present. Given how low Q a 4SQ is, how current is split between 
multiple elements, my gut feeling is that the excitation voltages are 
pretty mild even if you have your 1500W source right there at the 4SQ 
input. 

And on top of that, the wires are laying on the ground, right? The 
radials are in more or less intimate contact with the ground, so I would 
expect there to exist leakage resistance between adjacent conductors (if 
they are bare). And if they are perfectly insulated, this being AC, 
that means there is going to be some amount of cap coupling between 
adjacent wires and to the ground. With all of that R spread out all 
over the field, I would certainly think this conspires to work against 
the probability that any two optimally aligned individual crossing 
conductors would provide a condition sufficient to support an arc, and 
that if so, it would survive long enough to cause a fire. 

It's very very very dry here in the summer and again in the winter. So 
fire risk is something we keep a real close eye on. Then again, out here 
in the Midwest some of us do a lot of IL-advised things because they 
seem to work and of course because laziness is a BIG part of the 
calculation. ha ha. Maybe we have been taking a walk on the wild side 
without realizing it. Hope not because I sure don't want to go try to 
rectify this poor decision 3 years post installation! Say it ain't so! 

73/jeff/ac0c 
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie 
www.ac0c.com 


On 11/6/20 10:59 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote: 
> Always beware of any communication that begins "with all due respect" 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> 
> From: "Wes"  
> To: topband@contesting.com 
> Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:49:23 AM 
> Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections 
> 
> With all due respect, I must ask, how many megawatts are you guys running? 
> 
> Wes N7WS 
> 
> 
> On 11/6/2020 3:26 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote: 
>> Hi Carl, 
>> 
>> 
>> If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire 
>> 
>> 
>> 73 
>> Frank 
>> W3LPL 
>> 
>> On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: 
>>> On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote: 
>>>> Frank, 
>>>> 
>>>> “Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them? 
>>>> 
>>>> 73, Carl WS7L 
>>>> 
>>> Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross 
>>> over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare 
>>> metal wires that cross over each other and touch 
>>> so as to have electrical connectivity? 
>>> 
>>> Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the 
>>> crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes". 
>>> 
>>> For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated

Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Jeff Blaine
I of course defer to Frank's expertise here.  But after thinking about 
this for a couple of hours, I'm trying to wrap my head around this arc 
risk concept as well.  It's interesting and I toss this comment out 
because my two sets of 4sq don't have a single cross-bonded wire 
anywhere - all the ground structure is ground mounted, with overlapping 
wires literally all over the place.  And despite that, the do seem to 
work more or less OK, as far as I can tell.


I guess my thinking is list this...  All those radial wires are laying 
out on the ground.  So they are at least connected at some point, at a 
DC level, assuming your talking about something conventional like a 4SQ.


Of course, we are talking about AC here, so I will agree that maybe the 
conditions could exist where - with just the right configuration between 
the two radials - that some larger than expected voltage differential 
may be present.  Given how low Q a 4SQ is, how current is split between 
multiple elements, my gut feeling is that the excitation voltages are 
pretty mild even if you have your 1500W source right there at the 4SQ 
input.


And on top of that, the wires are laying on the ground, right? The 
radials are in more or less intimate contact with the ground, so I would 
expect there to exist leakage resistance between adjacent conductors (if 
they are bare).  And if they are perfectly insulated, this being AC, 
that means there is going to be some amount of cap coupling between 
adjacent wires and to the ground. With all of that R spread out all 
over the field, I would certainly think this conspires to work against 
the probability that any two optimally aligned individual crossing 
conductors would provide a condition sufficient to support an arc, and 
that if so, it would survive long enough to cause a fire.


It's very very very dry here in the summer and again in the winter.  So 
fire risk is something we keep a real close eye on. Then again, out here 
in the Midwest some of us do a lot of IL-advised things because they 
seem to work and of course because laziness is a BIG part of the 
calculation.  ha ha.  Maybe we have been taking a walk on the wild side 
without realizing it.  Hope not because I sure don't want to go try to 
rectify this poor decision 3 years post installation!  Say it ain't so!


73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 11/6/20 10:59 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Always beware of any communication that begins "with all due respect"

- Original Message -

From: "Wes" 
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:49:23 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

With all due respect, I must ask, how many megawatts are you guys running?

Wes N7WS


On 11/6/2020 3:26 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Hi Carl,


If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire


73
Frank
W3LPL

On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:

Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L


Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross
over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare
metal wires that cross over each other and touch
so as to have electrical connectivity?

Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the
crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes".

For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is
nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire. And
Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives:http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread donovanf
Always beware of any communication that begins "with all due respect" 

- Original Message -

From: "Wes"  
To: topband@contesting.com 
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:49:23 AM 
Subject: Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections 

With all due respect, I must ask, how many megawatts are you guys running? 

Wes N7WS 


On 11/6/2020 3:26 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote: 
> Hi Carl, 
> 
> 
> If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire 
> 
> 
> 73 
> Frank 
> W3LPL 
> 
> On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: 
>> On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote: 
>>> Frank, 
>>> 
>>> “Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them? 
>>> 
>>> 73, Carl WS7L 
>>> 
>> Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross 
>> over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare 
>> metal wires that cross over each other and touch 
>> so as to have electrical connectivity? 
>> 
>> Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the 
>> crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes". 
>> 
>> For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is 
>> nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire. And 
>> Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires. 
>> 
>> Rick N6RK 
>> _ 
>> Searchable Archives:http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
>> Reflector 


_ 
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Wes

With all due respect, I must ask, how many megawatts are you guys running?

Wes  N7WS


On 11/6/2020 3:26 PM, donov...@erols.com wrote:

Hi Carl,


If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire


73
Frank
W3LPL

On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:

Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L


Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross
over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare
metal wires that cross over each other and touch
so as to have electrical connectivity?

Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the
crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes".

For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is
nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire. And
Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives:http://www.contesting.com/_topband  - Topband
Reflector



_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread donovanf

Hi Carl, 


If the insulation breaks down they will arc, potentially causing a fire 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 

On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: 
> 
> 
> On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote: 
>> Frank, 
>> 
>> “Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them? 
>> 
>> 73, Carl WS7L 
>> 
> 
> Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross 
> over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare 
> metal wires that cross over each other and touch 
> so as to have electrical connectivity? 
> 
> Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the 
> crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes". 
> 
> For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is 
> nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire. And 
> Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires. 
> 
> Rick N6RK 
> _ 
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
> Reflector 

-- 
Dave manu...@artekmanuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com 

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
https://www.avast.com/antivirus 

_ 
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Artek Manuals
Among other things they will and can arc if very close or even 
intermittently touching. if they are not bonded the currents and 
voltages on each wire may be different enough to arc then you get 
interesting things going on especially at high power,. I had a related 
experience where I had radial wires stapled on a wooden fence. At one 
point two of the wires crossed each other, during a high power 
transmission the two arced repeatedly and set the fence on fire. Luckily 
the window of the shack faced the back yard and I saw it early on and 
went out an put the fire out and resolved the cause


Dave

NR1DX

On 11/6/2020 4:27 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:



On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:

Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L



Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross
over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare
metal wires that cross over each other and touch
so as to have electrical connectivity?

Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the
crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes".

For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is
nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire.  And
Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband 
Reflector


--
Dave manu...@artekmanuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist



On 11/6/2020 1:10 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:

Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L



Also, if insulated wires are used for radials that cross
over each other, is that to be treated differently than bare
metal wires that cross over each other and touch
so as to have electrical connectivity?

Does it matter if cross over radials are soldered at the
crossovers, so as to prevent parasitic "diodes".

For whatever weird reason, the price of insulated wire is
nearly always lower than the equivalent bare wire.  And
Romex sells for less than the equivalent individual wires.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Carl Clawson
Frank,

“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?

73, Carl WS7L

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:47 PM  wrote:

> Hi Bob,
>
>
> While bonding the radials is desirable, its not essential. But you
> must NOT cross the radials over each other.
>
>
> ...



> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Robert L. Chortek" 
> To: "TopBand List" 
> Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 2:05:43 AM
> Subject: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections
>
> I just finished installing a two element vertical array on 40M. The
> instructions say to bond the radials from one vertical where they intersect
> with a radial for the other vertical.
>
> My question is, is this really necessary and what effect would doing so
> (or not) have on the performance of the Array?
>
> Much appreciated.
>
> 73,
>
> Bob AA6VB
>
> Bob
> Robert L. Chortek
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-06 Thread Lloyd - N9LB
I use the "Lead-Free" plumbing solder to connect my radials & ground straps.
"Oatley Safe-Flo Lead Free Solder" is sold in most Home Improvement stores
in the plumbing department.

Do NOT use Lead-Tin "Radio Solder" - as that will leach into the soil fairly
rapidly.

73
Lloyd - N9LB


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+lloydberg=tds@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Rob Atkinson
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2020 4:55 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

Scroll down to drawing 5 and 6 to see the proper way of handing intersecting
radials.

http://www.hatdaw.com/papers/groundsystem.pdf

73
Rob
K5UJ
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections

2020-11-05 Thread donovanf
Hi Bob, 


While bonding the radials is desirable, its not essential. But you 
must NOT cross the radials over each other. 


The radials of a multi-element vertical array are usually bonded to 
a common wire bisecting the verticals where they would otherwise 
cross over each other. See this figure by K6LA: 


https://ac6la.com/adhoc/radials3.png 


I modelled phased vertical arrays where the radials are laid out exactly 
as shown by K6LA but without the bisecting wire. In this configuration 
the radials that would have been bonded to the bisecting wire are instead 
simply continued to the bottom of the adjacent vertical. The model shows 
absolutely no difference in the performance of a multi-element vertical 
array with -- or without -- the bisecting wire(s). I built my 160 meter 
4-square array in this fashion -- without the bisecting wires -- and its 
performance is excellent. 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 





- Original Message -

From: "Robert L. Chortek"  
To: "TopBand List"  
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 2:05:43 AM 
Subject: Topband: OT - Bonding Radials at Intersections 

I just finished installing a two element vertical array on 40M. The 
instructions say to bond the radials from one vertical where they intersect 
with a radial for the other vertical. 

My question is, is this really necessary and what effect would doing so (or 
not) have on the performance of the Array? 

Much appreciated. 

73, 

Bob AA6VB 

Bob 
Robert L. Chortek 
_ 
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector