Re: [topbraid-users] Problem with sh:constraint definitions in TBC

[Holger Knublauch]

I am not aware of a glitch that would remove sh:constraint triples. 
Usually TBC leaves such triples in the files untouched. Could you send 
me a file with instructions on what exactly made the triples disappear? 
Also, it rather sounds like the sh:sparql (now: sh:select) triple may 
have disappeared for you. Note this property has been renamed recently, too.


Holger


On 10/08/2016 2:55, Jack Hodges wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the following problem. I define an 
sh:constraint on a class and all is well. If I define a second one on 
the same class all is fine until I reload the graph, and then one of 
them 'disappears'. TBC knows that I had a second one, because it now 
tells me that I have an "(Incomplete SPARQL Constraint)". The first 
couple of times this happened I assumed it was my poor memory and 
luckily I keep my SPARQL queries around elsewhere and could copy it 
back in again. But today was the 3rd time and my memory just isn't 
that bad. It must be a glitch in the application.


Jack
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid 
Suite family of products and its base technologies such as 
SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.

To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid 
Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and 
its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[topbraid-users] Problem with sh:constraint definitions in TBC

[Jack Hodges]

Has anyone else noticed the following problem. I define an sh:constraint on 
a class and all is well. If I define a second one on the same class all is 
fine until I reload the graph, and then one of them 'disappears'. TBC knows 
that I had a second one, because it now tells me that I have an 
"(Incomplete SPARQL Constraint)". The first couple of times this happened I 
assumed it was my poor memory and luckily I keep my SPARQL queries around 
elsewhere and could copy it back in again. But today was the 3rd time and 
my memory just isn't that bad. It must be a glitch in the application.

Jack

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
"TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family 
of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages 
and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.