Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-25 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:  2.5
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by asn):

 * status:  needs_review => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed
 * actualpoints:   => 2.5


Comment:

 I'm gonna close this ticket and let's continue research and epxloration in
 #33712. If someone disagrees, please feel free to reopen it.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-25 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:  2.5
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33712   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by asn):

 * parent:  #33703 => #33712


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-24 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by asn):

 Replying to [comment:13 mikeperry]:
 > Are we satisfied with this analysis? Can we close this ticket? Should I
 report to tor-dev@lists?

 Great analysis.

 I'm not sure how viable it is to remove IPv6 link specifiers if we want to
 maintain IPv6-only support in the future, but it's good to know that
 things work end-to-end and that we can easily calculate how many bytes we
 have available (with and without ipv6).

 Let's close this ticket and report to tor-dev indeed.

 We also need to figure out next steps here.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-24 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by mikeperry):

 * status:  accepted => needs_review


Comment:

 Setting to "needs review" to signal that this analysis is complete, and
 that folks should take a look.

 **This code should not be merged**!

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-24 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 I dug pretty deep into the INTRO1/INTRO2 free bytes test. Turns out there
 is a layer of padding that tries to keep the pre-mac intro cell at least
 HS_CELL_INTRODUCE1_MIN_SIZE (246), as well as some optional things that
 are not always present. This tends to add about 100 bytes, give or take,
 of semi-unused slack space.

 In the unit tests, I was able to get 287 additional bytes into an INTRO1,
 and have it parse correctly, before hitting any asserts or errors.

 In the live network, I had to disable sending ipv6 addresses of rend
 points in order to get close to this. But the good news is that
 `hs_get_extend_info_from_lspecs()` on the service side currently ignores
 all link specs other than ipv4, legacy rsa, and ed25519 (which are all
 required). So if the DoS/PoW defense is enabled, we can safely disable
 sending IPv6 RPs and no one will notice.

 With IPv6 link spec sending disabled, I was able to get 253 bytes in
 either the unencrypted or encrypted sections. If I added more fields of
 extensions, that byte count went down. For example, if I used 10 fields in
 an extension, I was only able to send 217 bytes (because of  the nine
 additional type and length specifiers). If I added a single encrypted
 extension field, and a single unencrypted extension field, I was able to
 fit 124 bytes in each extension (for 248 bytes total).

 So we have more room here than 188 bytes. If we trim more unused fields,
 we might be able to slim it down even more?

 See https://github.com/mikeperry-tor/tor/commits/ticket33650-intro-
 smuggle-test for working code.

 No intropoints were harmed in this test. Everything seemed to work fine.

 Are we satisfied with this analysis? Can we close this ticket? Should I
 report to tor-dev@lists?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-24 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by asn):

 OK I finished an experiment on the descriptor "hi-mom" test. I went to the
 `encrypted` section (which is confusingly the inner layer of the
 descriptor which only authorized clients should have access to) and added
 the following line:
 {{{
 +  smartlist_add_asprintf(lines, "hi-mom lets-defend\n");
 }}}
 
[https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/6b0a40c81eddc1ab79ad71947f85a92206947c81/src/feature/hs/hs_descriptor.c#L768
 right below] the `"single-onion-service"` line and above the intro points.

 I then started a chutney network with that patch, and ensured that clients
 can connect to the HS, and that the string is present in the client-
 received descriptor:
 {{{
 create2-formats 2
 intro-auth-required ed25519
 single-onion-service
 hi-mom lets-defend
 introduction-point AgIUQ0NDQ0NDQ0NDQ0NDQ0NDQ0NDQ0MABgECAwQjKQ==
 onion-key ntor AAA=
 ...
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-24 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:  #33703   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by asn):

 * parent:   => #33703


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-23 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by asn):

 Replying to [comment:9 arma]:
 > Another piece of this ticket: let's discover how much extra space we
 actually have, in the cells, for these blobs.
 >

 I looked into this.

 tl;dr INTRO1 cells have about 188 bytes of free space...

 For more info, please see section [SPACE_CONSTRAINTS] in
 https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014198.html .

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-20 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by arma):

 Another piece of this ticket: let's discover how much extra space we
 actually have, in the cells, for these blobs.

 In particular, if we want to include a blob for the intro point and also a
 blob for the service, then these two will compete with each other for the
 limited space.

 And that realization opens up two directions for future research:

 * Space-compact tokens. For example, are there proof-of-work schemes where
 the proof can be communicated in very few bytes, yet it is still efficient
 for the checker to check it? As one example, I can imagine a scheme where
 you send only (x, y) where x is a short seed and y is a number of bytes
 you generate from that seed such that, when you hash the y bytes, you get
 the property you want. Thus the checker can just expand the y bytes and
 check the property, but the prover has to find an x and y that achieves
 the property. I just made that scheme up, and I bet other people have done
 it way better (i.e. more compact and/or more efficient for the verifier).

 * "Wide" intro cells. In the general case, we'll want to be able to send
 more than 100-200 bytes of tokens in these cells. So we'll want some way
 to send big cells, or to send multiple cells that are conceptually tied
 together. See proposal 249 ("Allow CREATE cells with >505 bytes of
 handshake data") for ideas that can hopefully be reused here.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by arma):

 Replying to [comment:7 mikeperry]:
 > The above notes are just for v3. Do we care about v2? Probably not,
 right?

 I'm thinking that focusing on v3 is the right answer.

 First because we have limited time and people to spend here, so let's be
 sure to do v3 right.

 And second because dgoulet and asn found some v2 bugs while they were
 doing v3 refactoring, and they opted to leave them in place rather than
 potentially breaking v2 and not noticing. So that v2 code is already kind
 of decaying.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 The above notes are just for v3. Do we care about v2? Probably not, right?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 Notes on v3 HSDesc codepaths:
  - We probably want to add our field in the superencrypted section. The
 spec says this may be extended.
  - v3 descriptors are built via `hs_desc_encode_descriptor()`, which calls
 `desc_encode_v3()` via a table lookup
  - The superencrypted stuff is done in `encode_superencrypted_data()`,
 which builds the fields in `build_secret_data()`
  - Decoding on the client side happens via `hs_desc_decode_descriptor()`,
 which calls down to `desc_decode_encrypted_v3()`, and then
 `hs_desc_decode_superencrypted()` and `hs_desc_decode_encrypted()`

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 Notes for the INTRO1->INTRO2 codepaths:
  - Intro1 is sent from `hs_circ_send_introduce1()`, and built in
 `hs_cell_build_introduce1()`
  - There are actually two extension areas: one is in the unencrypted
 section, set in `hs_cell_build_introduce1()`, and one is in the encrypted
 section, set in `introduce1_set_encrypted()`
  - The Intropoint processes the INTRO1 cell in
 `hs_intro_received_introduce1()`
  - v3 INTRO1 cells go into `handle_introduce1()` and the cell's
 unencrypted fields are parsed and validated
  - Requested rate limits are checked in `hs_dos_can_send_intro2()`
  - The cell is sent as an INTRO2 exactly as is towards the service
  - The service receives it in `hs_service_receive_introduce2()`
  - The service checks the IP in `service_handle_introduce2()`, and if
 valid, parses the cell in `hs_circ_handle_introduce2()` (via
 `hs_cell_parse_introduce2()` and ultimately the intro1 parsing functions)
  - If parsing was successful, a rend circuit is launched from
 `hs_circ_handle_introduce2()`

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 Oh, and we should test unencrypted extensions in the intro1, so we can
 know if the intropoint can easily locate and read them, if we want to do
 intro-side processing. And also test how ugly it gets to have more than
 one of these extensions in the same cell (like one encrypted, one
 unencrypted).

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:
 |  mikeperry
 Type:  task | Status:
 |  accepted
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by mikeperry):

 * status:  new => accepted
 * owner:  (none) => mikeperry


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  task | Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by mikeperry):

 We should also do the "hi mom" read + write thing in the HS descriptor, so
 we can be sure we can signal any required additional intro extension
 fields.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-19 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  task | Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-  |  Actual Points:
  credentials research   |
Parent ID:   | Points:
 Reviewer:   |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by asn):

 * keywords:   => tor-dos tor-dos-2020 anonymous-credentials research


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

[tor-bugs] #33650 [Core Tor/Tor]: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work

2020-03-18 Thread Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
#33650: Verify that intro2 cell extensions actually work
--+
 Reporter:  arma  |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  task  | Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium|  Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |Version:
 Severity:  Normal|   Keywords:
Actual Points:|  Parent ID:
   Points:|   Reviewer:
  Sponsor:|
--+
 In the future we're going to want to transport end-to-end tokens, proofs
 of work, or other blobs from client to onion service. We should make sure
 that we can actually add these into the cells without anything going
 wrong, like surprising asserts or surprising length enforcement.

 (Now is the time to notice if things will go wrong, so we can fix them and
 deploy that fix, and then people will have upgraded by the time we're
 ready to actually use them.)

 So: let's make a branch that adds "hi mom" on the client side, and reads
 it out again on the service side.

 In spelunking through the code and the spec, I found that modern intro2
 cells have an "extensions" field inside their encrypted component, which
 seems perfectly suited for transporting arbitrary blobs from client to
 service. Here's how we set it currently on the client side:
 {{{
   /* Set extension data. None are used. */
   ext = trn_cell_extension_new();
   tor_assert(ext);
   trn_cell_extension_set_num(ext, 0);
   trn_cell_introduce_encrypted_set_extensions(enc_cell, ext);
 }}}

 So that 0 needs to become a 1, and then we need something new that makes
 and sets a new extension in ext (modeled maybe on
 {{{build_establish_intro_dos_extension()}}}, and something on the
 receiving end that invokes trn_cell_extension_parse() and reads it out to
 us.

 I am optimistic, because this thing is encrypted, so the intro point in
 the middle can't be looking at it very carefully. But if we have bugs on
 the client side or the service side, or surprise length enforcement in the
 middle, now is a great time to notice and fix them.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs