Re: [tor-dev] GeoLite ASN Database (still) broken

2016-07-05 Thread Jason Ketola
Hi nusenu,

Sorry the issues aren't entirely resolved. We'll take a look at those.

Thanks,
Jason

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:08 PM, nusenu  wrote:

> Hello Jason,
>
> thanks for reporting back.
>
> > I'm writing on behalf of MaxMind. We believe we have addressed the issues
> > you noted in the latest update of our GeoLite ASN database:
> > http://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/legacy/geolite/#Downloads.
> >
> > Thank you for bringing the issues to our attention.
>
> I just downloaded the current version of GeoIPASNum2.zip
> (SHA1: c72a275c66cededf47157e3cea4625342b85bf94)
> to have a short look at it and I'm not sure the problem is fixed
> completely.
>
> While the number of unnamed AS entries significantly improved (unnamed
> count is down to 1462 from >57k, still not back to ~500 (Feb 2016), but
> just comparing absolute numbers without considering total entries in
> each CSV might be a bit flawed metric anyway),
> incorrect AS names apparently remain:
>
> I searched for the two examples I gave in my last email:
>
> AS8708 and AS12741
> they are still incorrectly named "73-75 Dr. Staicovici" and "Warszawa
> 02-822" in your DB, which means the problem still persists.
>
> actual names:
> http://bgp.he.net/AS8708
> http://bgp.he.net/AS12741
>
>
> thank you for looking into this again,
> nusenu
>
>


-- 
Jason Ketola
Vice President, Operations
MaxMind, Inc.
www.maxmind.com
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev


Re: [tor-dev] GeoLite ASN Database (still) broken

2016-07-05 Thread nusenu
Hello Jason,

thanks for reporting back.

> I'm writing on behalf of MaxMind. We believe we have addressed the issues
> you noted in the latest update of our GeoLite ASN database:
> http://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/legacy/geolite/#Downloads.
> 
> Thank you for bringing the issues to our attention.

I just downloaded the current version of GeoIPASNum2.zip
(SHA1: c72a275c66cededf47157e3cea4625342b85bf94)
to have a short look at it and I'm not sure the problem is fixed completely.

While the number of unnamed AS entries significantly improved (unnamed
count is down to 1462 from >57k, still not back to ~500 (Feb 2016), but
just comparing absolute numbers without considering total entries in
each CSV might be a bit flawed metric anyway),
incorrect AS names apparently remain:

I searched for the two examples I gave in my last email:

AS8708 and AS12741
they are still incorrectly named "73-75 Dr. Staicovici" and "Warszawa
02-822" in your DB, which means the problem still persists.

actual names:
http://bgp.he.net/AS8708
http://bgp.he.net/AS12741


thank you for looking into this again,
nusenu



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev