[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017999] Autopkgtest regression report (python-tz/2022.7.1-3ubuntu0.1)

2023-05-16 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-tz (2022.7.1-3ubuntu0.1) for 
lunar have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

cinder/2:22.0.0-0ubuntu1.1 (armhf)
ironic/1:21.4.0-0ubuntu1 (armhf)
python-caldav/0.11.0-1 (arm64)
senlin/1:15.0.0-0ubuntu1 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/lunar/update_excuses.html#python-tz

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017999

Title:
  tzdata 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 might have some inconsistency

Status in python-tz package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in python-tz source package in Focal:
  New
Status in tzdata source package in Focal:
  New
Status in python-tz source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in tzdata source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in python-tz source package in Kinetic:
  New
Status in tzdata source package in Kinetic:
  New
Status in python-tz source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in tzdata source package in Lunar:
  New

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  Recent updates have been using `PACKRATDATA=backzone` in order to add
  all out-of-scope lower-quality pre-1970 data back that existed in
  earlier tzadata releases (see bug #2003797). However it also leads to
  time zones like America/Ensenada, Atlantic/Jan_Mayen, Europe/Tiraspol,
  and Pacific/Enderbury to change:

  compared to 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.0
  - America/Ensenada->only dst changes until 2022 are shown
  - Atlantic/Jan_Mayen->now valid data is shown
  - Europe/Tiraspol->only dst changes until 2010 are shown

  [ Test Plan ]

  Add an autopkgtest test case for post-1970 symlink consistency: Check
  that the timezones for today and in half a year (= to cover DST
  changes) do not change compared to building them without
  `PACKRATDATA=backzone`.

  The mentioned timezones that differed can also be tested manually.
  Running following commands should have the same output (the output
  mentioned here is from tzdata 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.1):

  ```
  $ TZ=America/Ensenada date -d "2023-04-28 13:49 Z"
  Fri Apr 28 05:49:00 PST 2023
  $ TZ=Atlantic/Jan_Mayen date -d "2023-04-28 13:49 Z"
  Fri Apr 28 12:49:00 -01 2023
  $ TZ=Europe/Tiraspol date -d "2023-04-28 13:49 Z"
  Fri Apr 28 16:49:00 MSK 2023
  ```

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  Timezone data could be wrong. Systems with incorrect timezone set may
  observe unexpected time shift when updating the package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-tz/+bug/2017999/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019904] [NEW] package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.

2023-05-16 Thread RICHART SMITH ESCOBEDO QUISPE
Public bug reported:

Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:
 libcc1-0 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va a 
ser instalado
 libitm1 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va a 
ser instalado
 liblsan0 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va a 
ser instalado
 libubsan1 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va a 
ser instalado
E: No se pudieron corregir los problemas, usted ha retenido paquetes rotos.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
Uname: Linux 5.19.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Tue May 16 17:57:50 2023
ErrorMessage: intentando sobreescribir 
`/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', que está también 
en el paquete libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0:amd64 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-05-16 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
PythonDetails: N/A
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
 apt  2.4.9
SourcePackage: gst-plugins-bad1.0
Title: package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1 failed to 
install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir 
`/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', que está también 
en el paquete libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0:amd64 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-bad1.0 in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019904

Title:
  package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
  gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', que está también en el paquete
  libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0:amd64 1.20.3-0ubuntu1

Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:
   libcc1-0 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va 
a ser instalado
   libitm1 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va a 
ser instalado
   liblsan0 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va 
a ser instalado
   libubsan1 : Depende: gcc-12-base (= 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) pero 12.2.0-14 va 
a ser instalado
  E: No se pudieron corregir los problemas, usted ha retenido paquetes rotos.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-32-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Tue May 16 17:57:50 2023
  ErrorMessage: intentando sobreescribir 
`/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', que está también 
en el paquete libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0:amd64 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-05-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.9
  SourcePackage: gst-plugins-bad1.0
  Title: package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.20.3-0ubuntu1 failed to 
install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir 
`/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', que está también 
en el paquete libgstreamer-plugins-good1.0-0:amd64 1.20.3-0ubuntu1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad1.0/+bug/2019904/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Autopkgtest regression report (iptables/1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1)

2023-05-16 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted iptables (1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

nova/2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.3 (armhf)
systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.21 (armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
ufw/0.36-6ubuntu1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#iptables

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454

Title:
  iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Status in iptables package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iptables source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]
   * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users

  This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] :

  This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the
  last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.

   * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
  Without this patch, users may experience segmentation fault when using
  the following versions of iptables :

    - Bionic : iptables
    - Focal  : iptables
    - Jammy  : iptables-legacy
    - Kinetic: iptables-legacy

   * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
     explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.

  The upstream fix adjust the size of the chain_index if the element is the
  last chain in the list.

  [1]
  
http://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f

  [ Test Plan ]

   * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug

   The following code (adapted from the upstream commit to work on Kinetic) may 
be used to reproduce the issue :
  8<
  #!/bin/bash
  #
  # Cover for a bug in libiptc:
  # - the chain 'node-98-tmp' is the last in the list sorted by name
  # - there are 81 chains in total, so three chain index buckets
  # - the last index bucket contains only the 'node-98-tmp' chain
  # => rename temporarily removes it from the bucket, leaving a NULL bucket
  # behind which is dereferenced later when inserting the chain again with new
  # name again

  (
   echo "*filter"
   for chain in node-1 node-10 node-101 node-102 node-104 node-107 node-11 
node-12 node-13 node-14 node-15 node-16 node-17 node-18 node-19 node-2 node-20 
node-21 node-22 node-23 node-25 node-26 node-27 node-28 node-29 node-3 node-30 
node-31 node-32 node-33 node-34 node-36 node-37 node-39 node-4 node-40 node-41 
node-42 node-43 node-44 node-45 node-46 node-47 node-48 node-49 node-5 node-50 
node-51 node-53 node-54 node-55 node-56 node-57 node-58 node-59 node-6 node-60 
node-61 node-62 node-63 node-64 node-65 node-66 node-68 node-69 node-7 node-70 
node-71 node-74 node-75 node-76 node-8 node-80 node-81 node-86 node-89 node-9 
node-92 node-93 node-95 node-98-tmp; do
    echo ":$chain - [0:0]"
   done
   echo "COMMIT"
  ) | $XT_MULTI iptables-legacy-restore
  $XT_MULTI iptables-legacy -E node-98-tmp node-98
  exit $?
  >8

  Alternatively, this test has been added to the DEP8 list of tests, and
  will be executed automatically once the package is accepted into
  proposed. The DEP8 logs can be inspected for its run. Look for a test
  named "0006rename-segfault".

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  For Jammy and onward, only users of the -legacy commands may be affected.
  Since Jammy, iptables uses the new nft libraries which are not affected
  by the bug.

  For Bionic and Focal users, the regular iptables command is affected by
  the change.

  As stated in the manpage :
  E, --rename-chain old-chain new-chain
    Rename the user specified chain to the user supplied name.  
This is cosmetic, and has no effect on the structure of the table.

  In case of a problem, only the modification of the name would be affected
  as this is clearly outlined as a cosmetic only change.

  [ Other Info ]
  The patch is also applied to lunar and mantic, but is fixed in upstream's 
1.8.9 release which so far is only in debian testing/unstable.

  This is being uploaded together with test fixes from bug #1992454
  (bionic-specific) and bug #2019023 (focal-specific), which were found
  and fixed while trying out the DEP8 runs for this package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019023] Autopkgtest regression report (iptables/1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1)

2023-05-16 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted iptables (1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

nova/2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.3 (armhf)
systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.21 (armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
ufw/0.36-6ubuntu1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#iptables

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019023

Title:
  Fix shell test suite

Status in iptables package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iptables source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  The shell test suite (iptables/tests/shell/run-tests.sh) is currently
  failing on the firewalld tests in focal only:

  W: [FAILED] ././testcases/firewalld-restore/0001-firewalld_0: expected 0 but 
got 1
  W: [FAILED] ././testcases/firewalld-restore/0002-firewalld-restart_0: 
expected 0 but got 1

  After some troubleshooting, it turns out this is happening because of
  an unsorted order in the output of iptables-save, which was fixed[1]
  in later releases of iptables. The code was trying to compensate for
  that, but there was a small mistake[2] in a case/esac globbing:

  case "$XT_MULTI" in
  -*/xtables-nft-multi)
  +*xtables-nft-multi)

  The upstream fix includes other similar changes in other tests, but in
  the case of focal, the above is the minimal fix needed.

  Note that this shell test suite is not being run in focal, just in
  later ubuntu releases. But since the fix for #1992454 is adding such a
  test, I decided to fix the shell test run and add it to the existing
  DEP8 tests for focal via this bug, so we have test parity between
  focal and later ubuntu releases.

  1. 
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=e28cf12cf50b9e2e0114f04331635fc122cb8aef
  2. 
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=2b2b7948c1960ba4680677664ff58477be869de6

  [ Test Plan ]
  Verify that the DEP8 tests now include a run-tests.sh test suite, and that it 
passes.

  [ Where problems could occur ]
  If the fix is incorrect, it would affect only the already-failing firewalld 
test. But in addition to fixing that test, we are now also including a full 
test run of all shell tests, something which wasn't being done for focal until 
now. While these tests are passing now, they could fail in a future iptables 
SRU, or turn out to be flaky. They are being run in ubuntu releases after 
focal, though, so that is a good sign.

  [ Other Info ]
  This fix is being included in the same upload as bug #1992454.

  [ Original Description ]

  The shell test suite (iptables/tests/shell/run-tests.sh) is currently
  failing on the firewalld tests:

  W: [FAILED]  ././testcases/firewalld-restore/0001-firewalld_0: expected 0 
but got 1
  W: [FAILED]  ././testcases/firewalld-restore/0002-firewalld-restart_0: 
expected 0 but got 1

  After some troubleshooting, it turns out this is happening because of
  an unsorted order in the output of iptables-save, which was fixed[1]
  in later releases of iptables. The code was trying to compensate for
  that, but there was a small mistake[2] in a case/esac globbing:

  case "$XT_MULTI" in
  -*/xtables-nft-multi)
  +*xtables-nft-multi)

  1. 
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=e28cf12cf50b9e2e0114f04331635fc122cb8aef
  2. 
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=2b2b7948c1960ba4680677664ff58477be869de6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/2019023/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1302192] Re: capabilities not preserved on installation

2023-05-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I thought as part of this work we agreed to always unpack tar with
xattrs, but i'm not sure how to check if this was done or in place. will
investigate.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iputils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302192

Title:
  capabilities not preserved on installation

Status in attr package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iputils package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in live-installer package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in attr source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in iputils source package in Trusty:
  Confirmed
Status in live-installer source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in ubiquity source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in livecd-rootfs source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Ping is not longer setuid root and I have to ping as root:

  [~]$ ping kubuntu.org
  ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted
  [~]$ sudo ping kubuntu.org
  PING kubuntu.org (91.189.94.156) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from vostok.canonical.com (91.189.94.156): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 
time=52.2 ms
  --- kubuntu.org ping statistics ---
  1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.231/52.231/52.231/0.000 ms
  [~]$

  Related bugs:
   bug 1313550: ping does not work as a normal user on trusty tarball cloud 
images.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/attr/+bug/1302192/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

2023-05-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I cleared the DEP8 failures:
- nova: retry fixed it
- west-chamber/i386: migration-reference/0 is also failing, so that cleared it

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454

Title:
  iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Status in iptables package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iptables source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in iptables source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]
   * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users

  This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] :

  This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the
  last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.

   * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
  Without this patch, users may experience segmentation fault when using
  the following versions of iptables :

    - Bionic : iptables
    - Focal  : iptables
    - Jammy  : iptables-legacy
    - Kinetic: iptables-legacy

   * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
     explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.

  The upstream fix adjust the size of the chain_index if the element is the
  last chain in the list.

  [1]
  
http://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f

  [ Test Plan ]

   * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug

   The following code (adapted from the upstream commit to work on Kinetic) may 
be used to reproduce the issue :
  8<
  #!/bin/bash
  #
  # Cover for a bug in libiptc:
  # - the chain 'node-98-tmp' is the last in the list sorted by name
  # - there are 81 chains in total, so three chain index buckets
  # - the last index bucket contains only the 'node-98-tmp' chain
  # => rename temporarily removes it from the bucket, leaving a NULL bucket
  # behind which is dereferenced later when inserting the chain again with new
  # name again

  (
   echo "*filter"
   for chain in node-1 node-10 node-101 node-102 node-104 node-107 node-11 
node-12 node-13 node-14 node-15 node-16 node-17 node-18 node-19 node-2 node-20 
node-21 node-22 node-23 node-25 node-26 node-27 node-28 node-29 node-3 node-30 
node-31 node-32 node-33 node-34 node-36 node-37 node-39 node-4 node-40 node-41 
node-42 node-43 node-44 node-45 node-46 node-47 node-48 node-49 node-5 node-50 
node-51 node-53 node-54 node-55 node-56 node-57 node-58 node-59 node-6 node-60 
node-61 node-62 node-63 node-64 node-65 node-66 node-68 node-69 node-7 node-70 
node-71 node-74 node-75 node-76 node-8 node-80 node-81 node-86 node-89 node-9 
node-92 node-93 node-95 node-98-tmp; do
    echo ":$chain - [0:0]"
   done
   echo "COMMIT"
  ) | $XT_MULTI iptables-legacy-restore
  $XT_MULTI iptables-legacy -E node-98-tmp node-98
  exit $?
  >8

  Alternatively, this test has been added to the DEP8 list of tests, and
  will be executed automatically once the package is accepted into
  proposed. The DEP8 logs can be inspected for its run. Look for a test
  named "0006rename-segfault".

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  For Jammy and onward, only users of the -legacy commands may be affected.
  Since Jammy, iptables uses the new nft libraries which are not affected
  by the bug.

  For Bionic and Focal users, the regular iptables command is affected by
  the change.

  As stated in the manpage :
  E, --rename-chain old-chain new-chain
    Rename the user specified chain to the user supplied name.  
This is cosmetic, and has no effect on the structure of the table.

  In case of a problem, only the modification of the name would be affected
  as this is clearly outlined as a cosmetic only change.

  [ Other Info ]
  The patch is also applied to lunar and mantic, but is fixed in upstream's 
1.8.9 release which so far is only in debian testing/unstable.

  This is being uploaded together with test fixes from bug #1992454
  (bionic-specific) and bug #2019023 (focal-specific), which were found
  and fixed while trying out the DEP8 runs for this package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980239] Proposed package upload rejected

2023-05-16 Thread Steve Langasek
An upload of gst-plugins-ugly1.0 to jammy-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "Request for test cases
on gst-plugins-ugly1.0 has gone unanswered since last July".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980239

Title:
  Update gstreamer to 1.20.3

Status in gst-libav1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-good1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-ugly1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-python1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-rtsp-server1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer-editing-services1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer-vaapi package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-libav1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-good1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-ugly1.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in gst-python1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in gst-rtsp-server1.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in gstreamer-editing-services1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete
Status in gstreamer-vaapi source package in Jammy:
  Triaged
Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Since Ubuntu 22.04 LTS's release with gstreamer 1.20.1, there have been two 
bugfix stable releases. 

  https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/releases/1.20/#1.20.2
  https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/releases/1.20/#1.20.3

  Test Case 1
  ---
  We now run upstream's test suite for most gstreamer components at build time 
and fail the build for errors on our key desktop architectures, amd64 & arm64.

  Ensure the builds succeeed.

  Test Case 2
  ---
  Play a variety of videos in Totem. Play a variety of audio tracks in 
Rhythmbox. Try to stream audio and/or video. Try to install a missing codec.

  In all cases, make sure that everything which worked before still
  works.

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  If one of the fixes is bad then it might break video or audio playback, or 
could crash any application that tries to use gstreamer.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-libav1.0/+bug/1980239/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980239] Proposed package upload rejected

2023-05-16 Thread Steve Langasek
An upload of gst-python1.0 to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "rejected as discussed on the
bug".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980239

Title:
  Update gstreamer to 1.20.3

Status in gst-libav1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-good1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-ugly1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-python1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-rtsp-server1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer-editing-services1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer-vaapi package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-libav1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-good1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gst-plugins-ugly1.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in gst-python1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in gst-rtsp-server1.0 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in gstreamer-editing-services1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete
Status in gstreamer-vaapi source package in Jammy:
  Triaged
Status in gstreamer1.0 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Since Ubuntu 22.04 LTS's release with gstreamer 1.20.1, there have been two 
bugfix stable releases. 

  https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/releases/1.20/#1.20.2
  https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/releases/1.20/#1.20.3

  Test Case 1
  ---
  We now run upstream's test suite for most gstreamer components at build time 
and fail the build for errors on our key desktop architectures, amd64 & arm64.

  Ensure the builds succeeed.

  Test Case 2
  ---
  Play a variety of videos in Totem. Play a variety of audio tracks in 
Rhythmbox. Try to stream audio and/or video. Try to install a missing codec.

  In all cases, make sure that everything which worked before still
  works.

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  If one of the fixes is bad then it might break video or audio playback, or 
could crash any application that tries to use gstreamer.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-libav1.0/+bug/1980239/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018538] Re: All PDFs when printed come out mirror image

2023-05-16 Thread Ondrej Maly
Affects my Brother QL-800 label printer too, just after the upgrade to 23.04. 
My Xerox Phaser-3010 printer is fine although connected to the same computer.
Setting the printer to mirror-print in settings won't help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018538

Title:
  All PDFs when printed come out mirror image

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since updating to Ubuntu 23.04.  Whenever I try to print a PDF
  (regardless of application the PDF is open in) it will print the PDF
  in mirror image.

  If I enable printing mirror image in the settings, every other page
  become mirror image as instead. (I'm printing double sided/long edge
  print, so one side is normal and the other side becomes mirror image
  when I do this).

  I'm trying to print to a HP Colour LaserJet CP2025dn

  Note: If I print from my second device when it was running Ubuntu
  22.10 it would print normally, but as soon as I updated it to 23.04,
  it started having the same issue as well.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-20.20-generic 6.2.6
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu May  4 20:31:48 2023
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-10-22 (194 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Release amd64 (20221020)
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  Symptom: installation
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to lunar on 2023-04-21 (13 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2018538/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979258] Re: lxc: lxc-test-parse-config-file failed (failed to set config item)

2023-05-16 Thread Magali Lemes do Sacramento
I've sent a fix related to this issue:
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/8575ffeb7fc04b96e1d7bc736afb46670c5f7631

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979258

Title:
  lxc: lxc-test-parse-config-file failed (failed to set config item)

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in lxc package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in lxc source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  With bug 1943441 (expected value and retrieved value do not match)
  fixed with lxc 1:4.0.12-0ubuntu1 on Jammy (still exist on F / I)

  Now this test on Jammy with lxc 1:5.0.0~git2209-g5a7b9ce67-0ubuntu1 will fail 
with:
   Running '/tmp/lxc-pkg-ubuntu/src/tests/lxc-test-parse-config-file'
   parse_config_file.c: 49: set_get_compare_clear_save_load: failed to set 
config item "lxc.selinux.context" to "system_u:system_r:lxc_t:s0:c22"

   parse_config_file.c: 49: set_get_compare_clear_save_load: failed to
  set config item "lxc.seccomp.profile" to "/some/seccomp/file"

   parse_config_file.c: 580: main: lxc.seccomp.profile

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1979258/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018656] Re: login process frozen in between username and password

2023-05-16 Thread Tulir Asokan
This seems to be logged after entering username and clicking next:

May 16 19:02:28 maunium kernel: WebKitWebProces[560981]: segfault at 
563a37787e6d ip 563a37787e6d sp 7ffea85fdc98 error 14 in 
WebKitWebProcess[563f5260e000+1000] likely on CPU 15 (core 7, socket 0)
May 16 19:02:28 maunium kernel: Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 
0x563a37787e43.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018656

Title:
  login process frozen in between username and password

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
   MY SYSTEM 
  No LSB modules are available.
  Description:  Ubuntu 23.04
  Release:  23.04

  gnome-online-accounts:
Installed: 3.48.0-1
Candidate: 3.48.0-1
Version table:
   *** 3.48.0-1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lunar/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  
  I have tested this on my desktop running 23.04 on Intel I-9, and the second 
desktop running the same (23.04) but on Intel I-7, and both of them show the 
same problem.

  -PROBLEM---

  When I entered my email address in my Google account, I could provide
  my email address, and after I clicked on the following form to enter
  my password.  The form was able to pick up my email address and moved
  to the following form for password entry; it just froze in between.
  Sometimes, the password form could pick up the first keyboard
  character but never go past 2nd character.  Sometimes, it just froze
  without being able to pick up the first keyboard character.

  Then a bit later, the whole box of gnome-online-accounts blacks out.
  Closing with X didn't work, so I had to xkill the app.

  -TYPICAL BEHAVIOR---

  Usually, on 22.04, I never had a problem adding online accounts,
  particularly for Google accounts.   The first form asked for my email
  address, and quickly moved on to the following form asking for a
  password.  Once the password is accepted, it will move on to the next
  form requesting my authorization for GNOME to connect to my account on
  Google before adding it to my Ubuntu system (I'd see the drive folder
  on the bar on Nautilus).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.48.0-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-20.20-generic 6.2.6
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat May  6 13:51:07 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-05-04 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2018656/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2011458] Autopkgtest regression report (openssh/1:9.0p1-1ubuntu7.2)

2023-05-16 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted openssh (1:9.0p1-1ubuntu7.2) for 
kinetic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

gvfs/1.50.2-2 (ppc64el)
hg-git/0.10.4-3 (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
nova/3:26.1.0-0ubuntu2.1 (armhf)
piuparts/1.1.5 (amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x)
sbuild/0.83.1ubuntu1 (amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x)
tinyssh/20190101-1ubuntu1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/kinetic/update_excuses.html#openssh

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011458

Title:
  ssh fails to rebind when it is killed with -HUP

Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in openssh source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Committed
Status in openssh source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The sshd re-execution logic is generally broken with systemd socket 
activation, which means that (1) sshd fails when it is told to re-exec
  via SIGHUP (e.g. systemctl reload ssh), and (2) sshd fails when started in 
debug mode.

  [Test Case]

  (1) Test systemctl reload ssh:

  * On a machine with openssh-server installed, make a connection to
  localhost to activate ssh.service (the connection does not need to be
  complete, so you can just say "no" at the host key verification
  stage):

  $ ssh localhost
  [...]

  * Send SIGHUP to sshd by calling systemctl reload ssh:

  $ systemctl reload ssh

  * Check the service state:

  $ systemctl status ssh
  × ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell server
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ssh.service; disabled; preset: 
enabled)
  Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/ssh.service.d
   └─00-socket.conf
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2023-04-17 20:43:27 UTC; 4s 
ago
 Duration: 2min 44.132s
  TriggeredBy: ● ssh.socket
 Docs: man:sshd(8)
   man:sshd_config(5)
  Process: 1112 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/sshd -D $SSHD_OPTS (code=exited, 
status=255/EXCEPTION)
  Process: 1152 ExecReload=/usr/sbin/sshd -t (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
  Process: 1153 ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 1112 (code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION)
  CPU: 79ms

  Apr 17 20:40:43 lunar systemd[1]: Started ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server.
  Apr 17 20:41:06 lunar sshd[1113]: Connection closed by 127.0.0.1 port 54666 
[preauth]
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar systemd[1]: Reloading ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure 
Shell server...
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar sshd[1112]: Received SIGHUP; restarting.
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar systemd[1]: Reloaded ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server.
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar sshd[1112]: error: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: 
Address already in use.
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar sshd[1112]: error: Bind to port 22 on :: failed: 
Address already in use.
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar sshd[1112]: fatal: Cannot bind any address.
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar systemd[1]: ssh.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION
  Apr 17 20:43:27 lunar systemd[1]: ssh.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.

  * On an affected machine, the service will fail as shown above.

  (2) Test debug mode:

  * On a machine with openssh-server installed, edit /etc/default/ssh to
  configure debug mode for sshd:

  $ cat /etc/default/ssh 
  # Default settings for openssh-server. This file is sourced by /bin/sh from
  # /etc/init.d/ssh.

  # Options to pass to sshd
  SSHD_OPTS=-ddd

  * Attempt to make a connection to localhost:

  $ ssh localhost
  kex_exchange_identification: read: Connection reset by peer
  Connection reset by 127.0.0.1 port 22

  * On an affected machine, the attempt will fail as shown above, and
  the service will be in a failed state:

  $ systemctl status ssh
  × ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell server
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ssh.service; disabled; preset: 
enabled)
  Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/ssh.service.d
   └─00-socket.conf
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2023-04-17 20:46:34 UTC; 
2min 27s ago
 Duration: 5ms
  TriggeredBy: ● ssh.socket
 Docs: man:sshd(8)
   man:sshd_config(5)
  Process: 1166 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/sshd -t (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)
  Process: 1167 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/sshd -D $SSHD_OPTS (code=exited, 
status=255/EXCEPTION)
 Main PID: 1167 (code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION)
  CPU: 40ms

  Apr 17 20:46:34 lunar sshd[1167]: Server listening on :: port 22.
  Apr 17 20:46:34 lunar sshd[1167]: debug3: fd 4 is 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019856] Re: Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

2023-05-16 Thread Heather Lemon
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856

Title:
  Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in util-linux source package in Lunar:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't 
report a model name:

  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model: 0

  [Fix]
  Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the problem. 
The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's version.

  https://github.com/util-linux/util-
  linux/commit/6857cccbb4157d5da34ca98f77a0ac9d68e1e740

  [Evidence]
  When upstream code is compiled, output of lscpu is correctly displayed:
  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model name: Neoverse-V2

  [What Could Go Wrong]
  The fix does not apply directly to Jammy's version, as other commits change 
sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c. The suggestion is only to add the missing arm_part to 
the list.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2019856/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951018] Re: No ability to discern IPv4 vs IPv6 rules through Python

2023-05-16 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thank you for reporting a bug in ufw. I've committed a fix for this to
add get_rules_ipv4() and get_rules_ipv6().

** Changed in: ufw
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: ufw
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ufw
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)

** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951018

Title:
  No ability to discern IPv4 vs IPv6 rules through Python

Status in ufw:
  Fix Committed
Status in ufw package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Version: ufw 0.36
  Ubuntu Version: 20.04.3 LTS

  There doesn't appear to be a Python method for accessing IPv4 and IPv6
  rules in a distinguishable manner.

  In the source code (root/src/backend.py) there is an object that
  stores IPv4 and IPv6 rules in separate lists. Those lists are then
  accessed with the following method:

  def get_rules(self):
  '''Return list of all rules'''
  return self.rules + self.rules6

  The issue with this is that the returned list doesn't contain an
  indication of what IP version each item corresponds to and would
  display something like the following.

  1 allow 22/tcp
  2 allow 80
  3 allow 443
  4 allow 22/tcp
  5 allow 80
  6 allow 443

  I don't currently see a way to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6 rules other 
than accessing the lists in the backend object directly (but I don't think this 
is best practice). E.g.:
  rules_ipv4 = backend.rules
  rules_ipv6 = backend.rules6

  One possible fix would be to add functions that return only the IPv4 or IPv6 
rules. E.g.:
  def get_rules_ipv4(self):
  '''Return list of all ipv4 rules'''
  return self.rules
  def get_rules_ipv6(self):
  '''Return list of all ipv6 rules'''
  return self.rules6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufw/+bug/1951018/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000798] Re: cannot connect to K380 bluetooth keyboard

2023-05-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2000798

Title:
  cannot connect to K380 bluetooth keyboard

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Had trouble connecting my K380 keyboard with the laptop (previously
  used it without issues), unpaired and now I can no longer pair it.

  Other bluetooth devices work with this particular laptop (mouse,
  earbuds), the keyboard works flawlessly with a different laptop
  (running the same Ubuntu 20.04 OS) and an Android phone.

  Used bluetoothctl to peek under the hood and got nowhere after turning scan 
on on the controller and activating the keyboard:
  [NEW] Device [...mac address of the keyboard...] Keyboard K380
  [CHG] Device [...mac address of the keyboard...] Connected: no
  [DEL] Device [...mac address of the keyboard...] Keyboard K380

  After this action, I get:

  # connect [...mac address of the keyboard...]
  Device [...mac address of the keyboard...] not available

  When I activate the keyboard (by pressing any key on it while it's
  turned on), in the bluetooth settings GUI tool I see the keyboard
  appear for a fraction of a second in the list of unpaired devices and
  then it disappears.

  Help?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: bluez 5.53-0ubuntu3.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-56.62~20.04.1-generic 5.15.64
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-56-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.25
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Dec 30 19:41:41 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-11-03 (57 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220831)
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: Intel(R) Client Systems LAPKC71E
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.15.0-56-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/12/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 5.19
  dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
  dmi.bios.version: KCTGL357.0037.2021.0712.0948
  dmi.board.name: LAPKC71E
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: M1-402
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel(R) Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: 2.0
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.5
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrKCTGL357.0037.2021.0712.0948:bd07/12/2021:br5.19:efr1.5:svnIntel(R)ClientSystems:pnLAPKC71E:pvrM38559-402:rvnIntelCorporation:rnLAPKC71E:rvrM1-402:cvnIntel(R)Corporation:ct10:cvr2.0:skuBKC71EBFB6000:
  dmi.product.family: KC
  dmi.product.name: LAPKC71E
  dmi.product.sku: BKC71EBFB6000
  dmi.product.version: M38559-402
  dmi.sys.vendor: Intel(R) Client Systems
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 20:1E:88:3C:4C:FD  ACL MTU: 1021:4  SCO MTU: 96:6
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN 
RX bytes:221779 acl:5063 sco:0 events:6018 errors:0
TX bytes:785416 acl:104 sco:0 commands:4168 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2000798/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019739] Re: Cannot reauthorize Google account or authorize again. The app crashes

2023-05-16 Thread mastier1
ad. 1 not sure whether that's the one but I only see google chrome
beside

-rw-r-  1 mastier  whoopsie 11313793 May 15 17:43 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.crash
-rw-r--r--  1 mastier  whoopsie0 May 15 17:43 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.upload
-rw---  1 whoopsie whoopsie   37 May 15 17:43 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.uploaded

it was sent
 ubuntu-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.crash

ok, I run now from the console and click to authorize new google account

mastier@drakkar:~$ gnome-control-center 
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

mastier@drakkar:~$ sudo cat /var/lib/whoopsie/whoopsie-id 
9dd61bf1171ac3761d445e300092a9cdcc1c72aef677e03db46fe3494f040a7ad1798ce8986311da05f2e54c89013eb395d3a9942206f177c01b5cae5fc72c95

mastier@drakkar:~$ ls -la /var/crash/
total 28356
drwxrwsrwt  2 root whoopsie8 May 16 13:41 ./
drwxr-xr-x 15 root root   17 Nov 20 15:20 ../
-rw-r-  1 mastier  whoopsie 19583853 May 16 01:58 
_opt_google_chrome_chrome.1000.crash
-rw-r--r--  1 mastier  whoopsie0 May 16 01:58 
_opt_google_chrome_chrome.1000.upload
-rw---  1 whoopsie whoopsie5 May 16 01:58 
_opt_google_chrome_chrome.1000.uploaded
-rw-r-  1 mastier  whoopsie 11339816 May 16 13:39 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.crash
-rw-r--r--  1 mastier  whoopsie0 May 16 13:39 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.upload
-rw---  1 whoopsie whoopsie   37 May 16 13:39 
_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.uploaded

new file appeared

Seems crucial issue, can haz fix asap, plz ? ;-)

I was ablwe to send it
mastier@drakkar:~$ ubuntu-bug 
/var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-control-center.1000.crash
mastier@drakkar:~$ echo $?
0

Ok, so it seems the gnome-controler-center crashes
https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/9dd61bf1171ac3761d445e300092a9cdcc1c72aef677e03db46fe3494f040a7ad1798ce8986311da05f2e54c89013eb395d3a9942206f177c01b5cae5fc72c95




** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019739

Title:
  Cannot reauthorize Google account or authorize again. The app crashes

Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  As in title

  I tried to relogin, The window prompt appears and quickly exits and
  nothing happens. Still cannot not logged in. Have to remove account
  and sign in again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-41.42~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon May 15 17:45:34 2023
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2019739/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019856] [NEW] Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

2023-05-16 Thread Joao Andre Simioni
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't report 
a model name:

Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 0

[Fix]
Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the problem. The 
commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's version.

https://github.com/util-linux/util-
linux/commit/6857cccbb4157d5da34ca98f77a0ac9d68e1e740

[Evidence]
When upstream code is compiled, output of lscpu is correctly displayed:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Neoverse-V2

[What Could Go Wrong]
The fix does not apply directly to Jammy's version, as other commits change 
sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c. The suggestion is only to add the missing arm_part to 
the list.

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856

Title:
  Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  When running "lscpu" on a Grace-based system + Ubuntu 22.04, it doesn't 
report a model name:

  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model: 0

  [Fix]
  Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the problem. 
The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Jammy's version.

  https://github.com/util-linux/util-
  linux/commit/6857cccbb4157d5da34ca98f77a0ac9d68e1e740

  [Evidence]
  When upstream code is compiled, output of lscpu is correctly displayed:
  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model name: Neoverse-V2

  [What Could Go Wrong]
  The fix does not apply directly to Jammy's version, as other commits change 
sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c. The suggestion is only to add the missing arm_part to 
the list.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2019856/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939537] Re: Tests in ubuntu_lxc failed with "ERROR: Couldn't find a matching image." on X-hwe and older releases

2023-05-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939537

Title:
  Tests in ubuntu_lxc failed with "ERROR: Couldn't find a matching
  image." on X-hwe and older releases

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in lxc package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lxc source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Issue found on node onibi 4.15.0-142-generic #146~16.04.1

  With bug 1916087 resolved, the following tests:
* lxc-test-apparmor-mount
* lxc-test-autostart
* lxc-test-unpriv
* lxc-test-usernic

  Are now failing with:
ERROR: Couldn't find a matching image.
   
  This is because with lxc version 2.0.11-0ubuntu1~16.04.3 the default target 
release is "trusty" or the system release if supported. It will be checked with:
ubuntu-distro-info --supported

  However Xenial is an ESM series now, it won't use xenial as the target
  release but use trusty instead.

  The attempt to download trusty image will fail with this error.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1939537/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939537] Re: Tests in ubuntu_lxc failed with "ERROR: Couldn't find a matching image." on X-hwe and older releases

2023-05-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939537

Title:
  Tests in ubuntu_lxc failed with "ERROR: Couldn't find a matching
  image." on X-hwe and older releases

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in lxc package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in lxc source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Issue found on node onibi 4.15.0-142-generic #146~16.04.1

  With bug 1916087 resolved, the following tests:
* lxc-test-apparmor-mount
* lxc-test-autostart
* lxc-test-unpriv
* lxc-test-usernic

  Are now failing with:
ERROR: Couldn't find a matching image.
   
  This is because with lxc version 2.0.11-0ubuntu1~16.04.3 the default target 
release is "trusty" or the system release if supported. It will be checked with:
ubuntu-distro-info --supported

  However Xenial is an ESM series now, it won't use xenial as the target
  release but use trusty instead.

  The attempt to download trusty image will fail with this error.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1939537/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018656] Re: login process frozen in between username and password

2023-05-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Could you do
$ journalctl -f
then trigger the bug and see if any error is printed in the journal log?

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018656

Title:
  login process frozen in between username and password

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
   MY SYSTEM 
  No LSB modules are available.
  Description:  Ubuntu 23.04
  Release:  23.04

  gnome-online-accounts:
Installed: 3.48.0-1
Candidate: 3.48.0-1
Version table:
   *** 3.48.0-1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lunar/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  
  I have tested this on my desktop running 23.04 on Intel I-9, and the second 
desktop running the same (23.04) but on Intel I-7, and both of them show the 
same problem.

  -PROBLEM---

  When I entered my email address in my Google account, I could provide
  my email address, and after I clicked on the following form to enter
  my password.  The form was able to pick up my email address and moved
  to the following form for password entry; it just froze in between.
  Sometimes, the password form could pick up the first keyboard
  character but never go past 2nd character.  Sometimes, it just froze
  without being able to pick up the first keyboard character.

  Then a bit later, the whole box of gnome-online-accounts blacks out.
  Closing with X didn't work, so I had to xkill the app.

  -TYPICAL BEHAVIOR---

  Usually, on 22.04, I never had a problem adding online accounts,
  particularly for Google accounts.   The first form asked for my email
  address, and quickly moved on to the following form asking for a
  password.  Once the password is accepted, it will move on to the next
  form requesting my authorization for GNOME to connect to my account on
  Google before adding it to my Ubuntu system (I'd see the drive folder
  on the bar on Nautilus).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.48.0-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-20.20-generic 6.2.6
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat May  6 13:51:07 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-05-04 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2018656/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019746] Re: package bluez 5.64-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed bluez package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-05-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Could you give some details on your
system?

The error is
>   Failed to stop bluetooth.service: Unit bluetooth.service not loaded.

it seems bluetooth isn't active. It also look from the report that you
have the bluez snap installed? Did you disable the bluetooth deb service
yourself?

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019746

Title:
  package bluez 5.64-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed bluez
  package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  adding import of OBD with these packages as requirements, but are in
  constrast to each other.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: bluez 5.64-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-41.42~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-41-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
  AptOrdering:
   pulseaudio-module-bluetooth:amd64: Remove
   gnome-bluetooth:amd64: Remove
   bluez:amd64: Remove
   NULL: ConfigurePending
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Mon May 15 13:30:12 2023
  DpkgTerminalLog:
   Removing pulseaudio-module-bluetooth (1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1) ...
   Removing gnome-bluetooth (3.34.5-8) ...
   Removing bluez (5.64-0ubuntu1) ...
   Failed to stop bluetooth.service: Unit bluetooth.service not loaded.
   invoke-rc.d: initscript bluetooth, action "stop" failed.
  ErrorMessage: installed bluez package pre-removal script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-23 (112 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
  InterestingModules: bluetooth
  MachineType: Gateway NE56R
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.19.0-41-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.6, python3-minimal, 
3.10.6-1~22.04
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.1
   apt  2.4.9
  Snap.Changes:
   ID   Status  Spawn  Ready  Summary
   27   Done2023-05-14T20:11:56-04:00  2023-05-14T20:13:10-04:00  Install 
"bluez" snap
  SourcePackage: bluez
  Title: package bluez 5.64-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed bluez 
package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/15/2012
  dmi.bios.release: 2.7
  dmi.bios.vendor: Gateway
  dmi.bios.version: V2.07
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: EG50_HC_HR
  dmi.board.vendor: Gateway
  dmi.board.version: Type2 - Board Version
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Gateway
  dmi.chassis.version: V2.07
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 0.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnGateway:bvrV2.07:bd10/15/2012:br2.7:efr0.0:svnGateway:pnNE56R:pvrV2.07:rvnGateway:rnEG50_HC_HR:rvrType2-BoardVersion:cvnGateway:ct10:cvrV2.07:skuNE56R_0649_V2.07:
  dmi.product.family: Type1Family
  dmi.product.name: NE56R
  dmi.product.sku: NE56R_0649_V2.07
  dmi.product.version: V2.07
  dmi.sys.vendor: Gateway
  hciconfig:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2019746/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019739] Re: Cannot reauthorize Google account or authorize again. The app crashes

2023-05-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It sounds like some part of the system has crashed. To
help us find the cause of the crash please follow these steps:

1. Look in /var/crash for crash files and if found run:
ubuntu-bug YOURFILE.crash
Then tell us the ID of the newly-created bug.

2. If step 1 failed then look at https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/ID where
ID is the content of file /var/lib/whoopsie/whoopsie-id on the machine.
Do you find any links to recent problems on that page? If so then please
send the links to us.

Please take care to avoid attaching .crash files to bugs as we are
unable to process them as file attachments. It would also be a security
risk for yourself.

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019739

Title:
  Cannot reauthorize Google account or authorize again. The app crashes

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  As in title

  I tried to relogin, The window prompt appears and quickly exits and
  nothing happens. Still cannot not logged in. Have to remove account
  and sign in again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-online-accounts 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-41.42~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-41-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon May 15 17:45:34 2023
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-online-accounts
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2019739/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019424] Re: Heimdal can be synced

2023-05-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
@Steve / @Vorlon

As outlined above we still can't see the diff in dependencies due to LTO.
But I'm sure you have seen it or you wouldn't have said so and we want to spot 
where in our work the mistake was ...
Therefore let me ask - was that a local build that you did or is that somewhere 
we could have a look at for comparison?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019424

Title:
  Heimdal can be synced

Status in heimdal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After heimdal merge process, I was trying to figure out if the delta that is 
still not dropped is required or not.
  So, to test it, I have created 2 PPAs, one in which lto is disabled, and the 
second one, where the lto is enabled. I have built them and downloaded the debs 
for i386 and amd64.
  Then I have compared amd64 deb from PPA1 with amd64 deb from PPA2. The same 
story with i386. The binary dependencies were identical. There is no difference 
between the files. So in that case, the delta can possibly be dropped.

  The package has already been merged again, with the change:

  heimdal (7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-2ubuntu1) mantic; urgency=low

    * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
  - d/rules: Disable lto, to regain dep on roken, otherwise
    dependencies on amd64 are different than i386 resulting in
    different files on amd64 and i386.

   -- Steve Langasek  Tue, 02 May 2023
  09:56:10 +0200

  heimdal (7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=low

    * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
  - d/rules: Disable lto, to regain dep on roken, otherwise
    dependencies on amd64 are different than i386 resulting in
    different files on amd64 and i386.
    (LP #1934936)

   -- Steve Langasek  Tue, 24 Jan 2023
  19:14:54 -0800

  Due to this, syncpackage doesn't run.
  The package can be sync'd next time it comes up.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/2019424/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019424] Re: Heimdal can be synced

2023-05-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hmm - odd,
Michal has checked the files and the build logs as he outlined above.
And in addition to all those checks being done, if we just grep for all final 
dependencies and compare there is no difference (other than a glibc min version 
level).

I know names are not too helpful:
- ~ppa1 = LTO-off
- ~ppa2 = LTO-on

This compares amd64 vs i386 without LTO enabled

$ grep "Depends" 
buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.heimdal_7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2_BUILDING.txt
  > amd64.deps
$ grep "Depends" 
buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-i386.heimdal_7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2_BUILDING.txt
  > i386.deps
$ diff -Naur amd64.deps i386.deps
--- amd64.deps  2023-05-16 10:18:49.754334825 +0200
+++ i386.deps   2023-05-16 10:18:51.106344323 +0200
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
  Depends: debconf (>= 0.5.00) | debconf-2.0, heimdal-clients, krb5-config, 
lsb-base, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226), libc6 (>= 2.34), libcap-ng0 (>= 0.7.9), libgssapi3-heimdal 
(>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libhcrypto5-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), 
libhdb9-heimdal (>= 1.6~git20131117), libheimntlm0-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226), libkadm5srv8-heimdal (>= 7.8.git20221115.a6cf945+dfsg), 
libkdc2-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 
1.7~git20160418), libroken19-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20150920), libsl0-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226)
  Depends: comerr-dev, libasn1-8-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libgssapi3-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libhcrypto5-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libhdb9-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libheimbase1-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libhx509-5-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libkadm5clnt7-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libkadm5srv8-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libkafs0-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libkdc2-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libkrb5-26-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libwind0-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libotp0-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libsl0-heimdal (= 
7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2), libc6 (>= 2.34), libcom-err2 (>= 
1.43.9), libroken19-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226)
  Depends: krb5-config, openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, libc6 (>= 2.34), 
libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226)
- Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226)
+ Depends: libc6 (>= 2.8), libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.4.0+git20110226)
  Depends: libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libc6 (>= 2.34), 
libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9), libhcrypto5-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), 
libheimntlm0-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 
1.6~git20131117), libroken19-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20150920)
  Depends: libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libc6 (>= 2.36), 
libheimbase1-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.7~git20150920)
- Depends: libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 1.6~git20120311g), libc6 (>= 2.14), 
libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9), libdb5.3, libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20161112), 
libldap2 (>= 2.6.2), libroken19-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20150920), libsqlite3-0 (>= 
3.5.9)
+ Depends: libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 1.6~git20120311g), libc6 (>= 2.8), libcom-err2 
(>= 1.43.9), libdb5.3, libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20161112), libldap2 (>= 
2.6.2), libroken19-heimdal (>= 1.7~git20150920), libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.5.9)
  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.34)
  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libhcrypto5-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), 
libkrb5-26-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.7~git20150920), libwind0-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226)
  Depends: libasn1-8-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), libc6 (>= 2.34), 
libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9), libhcrypto5-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226), 
libheimbase1-heimdal (>= 1.6~git20131117), libroken19-heimdal (>= 
1.7~git20150920), libwind0-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226)
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@
  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.33), libdb5.3, libhcrypto5-heimdal (>= 1.4.0+git20110226)
  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.36), libcrypt1 (>= 1:4.1.0)
  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.11), libedit2 (>= 2.11-20080614-0)
- Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9)
+ Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libcom-err2 (>= 1.43.9)


And checking the PPAs build if LTO was really back on I indeed see "... 
-ffat-lto-objects ..." used in
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/646899573/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.heimdal_7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1~ppa2_BUILDING.txt.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019424

Title:
  Heimdal can be synced

Status in heimdal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017979] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] Cannot upgrade Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS to 22.04. because the package language-pack-en-base cannot be updated

2023-05-16 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi - the majority of engineers where on Sprints in the recent weeks, so
we were a bit short on staff - apologize. This bug got already assigned.

But to get you unblocked, you may just remove (sudo apt remove ...) the package 
in question (and the one that has it as dependency), since they are not 
mandatory:
$ apt-cache policy language-pack-en-base language-pack-en
language-pack-en-base:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1:20.04+20220818
  Version table:
 1:20.04+20220818 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-updates/main s390x 
Packages
 1:20.04+20200416 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal/main s390x Packages
language-pack-en:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1:20.04+20200416
  Version table:
 1:20.04+20200416 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal/main s390x Packages
If you remove them, please note if further (reverse) dependencies are removed 
too, if so record them and re-install again after the upgrade.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to language-pack-en-base in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017979

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] Cannot upgrade Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS to 22.04. because the
  package language-pack-en-base cannot be updated

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Confirmed
Status in language-pack-en-base package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in language-pack-en-base source package in Focal:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  ---Problem Description---
  Cannot upgrade Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS to 22.04. because the package 
language-pack-en-base cannot be updated

  do-release-update does not work

  Contact Information = pp...@de.ibm.com 
   
  ---uname output---
  Linux lnxut06 5.4.0-148-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 18 08:52:35 UTC 2023 
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
   
  Machine Type = 3906 758 M03 
   
  ---Debugger---
  A debugger is not configured
   
  ---Steps to Reproduce---

  root@lnxz:/etc/apt# do-release-upgrade
  Checking for a new Ubuntu release
  Please install all available updates for your release before upgrading.

  root@lnxz:/etc/apt# apt update
  Hit:1 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal InRelease
  Get:2 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-updates InRelease [114 kB]
  Get:3 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-security InRelease [114 kB]  
 
  Ign:4 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ InRelease  
   
  Hit:5 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ Release
   
  Hit:7 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-backports InRelease
  Fetched 228 kB in 1s (201 kB/s)
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  1 package can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see it.

  root@lnxz:/etc/apt# apt list --upgradable
  Listing... Done
  language-pack-en-base/focal-updates 1:20.04+20220818 all [upgradable from: 
1:20.04+20220211]
  N: There are 2 additional versions. Please use the '-a' switch to see them.

  root@lnxz:/etc/apt# apt upgrade 
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Calculating upgrade... Done
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

  root@lnxz:/etc/apt# apt --only-upgrade install language-pack-en-base
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   language-pack-en-base : Depends: language-pack-en (>= 1:20.04+20220818) but 
it is not going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2017979/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp