RE: [Trac] TRAC: Want to search comments, but does not seem possible
The way we do this is generally in the upper right hand corner above login/helpguid/preferences, there is a search field. Enter the keywords and click search it will list the results in everything. You can narrow it down some by deselecting the checkboxes for changesets, Milestones, and wiki and search just on tickets. Works pretty well most of the time, although it doesn't target the "comments" field specifically or a specific ticket directly. But usually we can easily find the ticket that we were interested in. From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [trac-users@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Chris Shelton [cshel...@shelton-family.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 4:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Cc: Dan Gawarecki Subject: Re: [Trac] TRAC: Want to search comments, but does not seem possible Dan, On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dan Gawarecki mailto:dan_gaware...@datacard.com>> wrote: Greetings: I want to search the comments that have been added to a ticket, but this does not seem possible (at least not in 0.11 or 012). By “not possible” I mean, when on “View Tickets” and I choose the Custom Query feature, there is no choice titled “Comments” (or even “Change History”) in the drop down list of fields (this list contains things like Component, Keywords, Milestone, Owner, Priority, Type, etc). I found a list of columns that exist in the ticket table (see http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracReports) and could see nothing related to comments. I attempted to search the “description” field but results imply that only the description fields was searched, and comments were excluded (which is as it should be). This topic doesn’t seem to have surfaced on the mailing list, other than a more highly refined “search for comments by date” question, nor do any plug-ins at http://trac-hacks.org/tags/ seem to address this. Is searching comments, for a text or phrase, possible? If not, would it be appropriate to enter this as an ‘enhancement’ ticket? I believe that the simplest way is to use the built in search function available here: http://trac.edgewall.org/search or the top right search box available in the header of most pages. After a few tests, this seems to return results for a full text search of both the ticket body and all followups to a ticket. chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac 0.12.1 attachements after upload broken
goo...@ifo.net wrote: Hi all, We have the problem, that every attachment are broken after upload via the trac-page. This could be an image (jpg or png), which is corrupt, if you download the file again. If you upload executable files, the executables are corrupt and so on. There are no error-message in Debug-Log, nor special config settings for this behavior. May you have some suggestions, Thanks in advance! Greets, Peter Hi Peter. For your information I want to point your attention to my own post: Subj: [Trac] Attachment upload error - "stringobject: bad argument to internal function" Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:37:14 +0100 From: Clemens Feige With my Trac 0.11.6 I had/have problems with large binary files when uploading as ticket attachment. I experimented a little. My guess is that Trac is trying to read a binary file line-by-line like a text file. But because binary files do not have normal line-breaks the "line to read" can become huge. If the "line" is getting too large (somewhere at 240.000 characters) then it fails. The crazy thing is that my problem depends not only on file size but also on file contents. Note that different from your case, for my issue I get an error message when it happens. Clemens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Sophisticated ticket interface (with tabs)
I realized what you are suggesting is what i need. I've already started to hack a template, but i would need access to all fields. I want to place manually all of them. Do you know any good howto or documentation what would help me? If i could use buttons to switch fields visible and hidden, that would solve my problem. Erik Bray wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Squirr3l wrote: >> >> We want to migrate to another ticket system, and trac seems the best >> choice. >> My problem is that we have too many stuctured information for one ticket, >> and trac's initial ticket layout is too simple. I would like to structure >> the trac ticket by using tabs for example. This way every information >> would >> be there, but only if the user is curious. >> >> I'm also thinking to use what you mentioned, to show specified fields >> based >> on some variable, but it would be nice to show everything, but in a >> stuctured way.. > > Whatever it is exactly that you're trying to do would have to be > analyzed and explained in detail. It doesn't sound like what you need > is already possible in Trac with the flip of a switch. But depending > on your requirements it may be very easy to do with a simple plugin: > For example, you might be able to do it with a simple Genshi template > transform. Or possibly by dropping in some custom JavaScript to > modify the ticket interface. But whatever it is will probably require > some programming, and without more details it's hard to say what the > best approach would be. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Trac Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Sophisticated-ticket-interface-%28with-tabs%29-tp31049786p31056934.html Sent from the Trac Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
