[Trac] Re: Chart report generator (a little tool)
Suggestion: How about a screenshot? marcio Marcelo Salhab Brogliato wrote: I created a hack: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/ChartReportGeneratorPlugin There is an explanation about usage. I'll try to improve more.. Of course you will have questions, please, send me! :) I'm working now, so I can't get the explanation better. I'll do it tonight. Salhab On Jan 17, 2008 9:05 AM, stava [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:21:34 -0200, Marcelo Salhab Brogliato [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I finished my first version of a report generator using Google Chart API. If you have any lib that generates graphs, it's easy to migrate. It was development in python and I think, in the future, to integrate to Trac creating a plugin. There's a good idea. Any comments and suggestions are welcome, and I hope to help someone. I wan't to create a opensource project to share this little script. Does anyone can help me? See http://trac-hacks.org. I didn't write a howto.. just in portuguese. If anyone is interested, just ask me. Yes, I'm interested. /L -- Lars Stavholm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] Re: neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: NERR_PARSE
For the record, I am replying to my own message jut to share how I solved the problem, hoping it may help others. The solution was to go to Clearsilver 0.10.5, with these steps: Make sure you remove any clearsilver eggs from /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages. Also any neo_cgi.so in there. Now this: cd /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.5 ./configure --with-python=/usr/local/bin/python make make install cd python python setup.py bdist_egg cp /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.5/python/dist/clearsilver-0.10.5-py2.5-linux-i686.egg /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages chmod 644 /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/clearsilver-0.10.5-py2.5-linux-i686.egg restart apache marcio Marcio Marchini wrote: Hi, Can anybody help shed some light into this problem, please? Backgound: * I have installed Trac under Windows in the past, it was easy * A colleague installed Trac under Red Hat, he suffered but it was working fine * We moved to a new server (new hardware) and I am trying to get Trac up and running on the new hardware The error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line 406, in dispatch_request File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line 206, in dispatch File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/clearsilver.py, line 135, in __init__ TracError: ClearSilver not installed (/www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: NERR_PARSE) I believe I have multiple versions of Clearsilver due to a combination of rsyncing files from the old server and/or my attempt to recompile Clearsilver from source and/or my attempt o install it with easy_insall. Here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clearsilver]# find / -name neo_cgi.so -print /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver/python/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver/python/build/lib.linux-i686-2.5/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4/python/neo_cgi.so I believe the old server was using 0.10.4. Since I could not re-run ./configure, I renamed teh dir to /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver and untar'ed again into /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4 again and re-ran configure etc. I believe it was teh easy_install attempt which installed the older version, 0.10.1, but I could be wrong. Here's teh dates/details for teh different ones: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 457468 Nov 9 14:30 /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 apache foo 92478 Oct 16 13:01 /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 457468 Oct 16 13:04 /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# python --version Python 2.5.1 Even if I delete the egg cache, it comes back. Where is it getting that stuff from? SHouldn't my ./configure for clearsilver have replaced this stuff? Can anybody bring some light into this please? I am not a Python expert and by no means a Clearsilver expert either. easy_install does not seem able to uninstall, so I ran rpm -e clearsilver and re-installed from sources (0.10.4) using configure. But the problem persists. Thanks, marcio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] Re: TracError: ClearSilver not installed (No module named neo_cgi)
I hear you... I was once there where you are now. My notes say:
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
406, in dispatch_request
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
206, in dispatch
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/clearsilver.py, line
135, in __init__
TracError: ClearSilver not installed (No module named neo_cgi)
We need the Python-clearsilver bindings:
http://lists.edgewall.com/archive/trac/2004-December/001338.html points at
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/clearsilver/
Tried: easy_install clearsilver
It downloaded, compiled, configured, make'd installed clearsilver
(again??)
Tried to go to trac, error again:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
406, in dispatch_request
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
206, in dispatch
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/clearsilver.py, line
135, in __init__
TracError: ClearSilver not installed
(/www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so:
undefined symbol: NERR_PARSE)
So, that's where I am at. NERR_PARSE. I have tried Clearsilver from
sources, I have even crossed my fingers a couple of times. Still, no
light at the end of the tunnel. Well, there's the promise of a trac 0.11
release, but apart from that...
Let me know how it goes for you...
marcio
Tyrone Hed wrote:
Guys,
I know this issue has been dealt with exhaustively but the solutions
don't work in Unix. I and a Unix administrator have been trying for
days to get past this stupid ClearSilver problem. Despite installs of
all the pieces [that report themselves as having successfully
installed], and even an attempt to manually put the stupid neo_cgi.pyd
file where it is apparently supposed to be, we still cannot get past
this.
The installation instructions by themselves are really hard to
follow and confusing. We have gone back to scratch three times, trying
to find some magic combination that works.
I will skip about 40 sentences I want to add here but I just want
to know how to solve this. Please please anybody. Help.
/apps/trac-0.10.4:tracd --port 9000 /home/jrun/tracproject
Exception happened during processing of request from ('161.221.45.98',
2707)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/SocketServer.py, line 464, in
process_request_thread
self.finish_request(request, client_address)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/SocketServer.py, line 254, in
finish_request
self.RequestHandlerClass(request, client_address, self)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/SocketServer.py, line 522, in
__init__
self.handle()
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/BaseHTTPServer.py, line 316, in
handle
self.handle_one_request()
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/wsgi.py, line
174, in handle_one_request
gateway.run(self.server.application)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/wsgi.py, line
87, in run
response = application(self.environ, self._start_response)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/
standalone.py, line 88, in __call__
return self.application(environ, start_response)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
363, in dispatch_request
env_paths)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line
456, in send_project_index
req.hdf = HDFWrapper(loadpaths)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/
clearsilver.py, line 135, in __init__
raise TracError, ClearSilver not installed (%s) % e
TracError: ClearSilver not installed (No module named neo_cgi)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] Re: TRAC
Tyrone, Did you see my message? Please try the command easy_install clearsilver and let me know if that works for you. You have to install easy_install first. Here's my notes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd /usr/local/src [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py Downloading http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Jason, For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be found. Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if it's impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The directions are a bunch of with this version you use this version and then that version has its dependencies. It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 but I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all the problems I have mentioned. Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw in the towel here. -Original Message- From: Jason Winnebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install, in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL + Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache. Jason -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Jason, Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much! -Original Message- From: Jason Winnebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:39 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC difficult install = 2,760 Google hits Well, trac easy install (with the quotes results in 10,500 hits :), so it is about 80% easy to install. Jason -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:12 PM To: Trac Users Subject: [Trac] TRAC difficult install = 2,760 Google hits Well, this really explains it: EVERYBODY thinks it's impossible to install TRAC. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] Re: TRAC
Hy Tyrone, The name is Marcio, not Mario :-) Are you familiar with Google? If you Google for easy_install you will find: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#installing-easy-install It says Download ez_setup.py . Get it and try my steps. Cheers, marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Mario, I'm game. Where do you find that easy_install? I looked in the Python directory and didn't see it. I looked also in the ClearSilver directory and also didn't see it? From where are you executing it? -Original Message- From: Marcio Marchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:59 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Tyrone, Did you see my message? Please try the command easy_install clearsilver and let me know if that works for you. You have to install easy_install first. Here's my notes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd /usr/local/src [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py Downloading http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Jason, For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be found. Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if it's impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The directions are a bunch of with this version you use this version and then that version has its dependencies. It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 but I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all the problems I have mentioned. Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw in the towel here. -Original Message- From: Jason Winnebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install, in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL + Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache. Jason -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Jason, Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much! -Original Message- From: Jason Winnebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:39 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC difficult install = 2,760 Google hits Well, trac easy install (with the quotes results in 10,500 hits :), so it is about 80% easy to install. Jason -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:12 PM To: Trac Users Subject: [Trac] TRAC difficult install = 2,760 Google hits Well, this really explains it: EVERYBODY thinks it's impossible to install TRAC. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] Re: TRAC
Tyrone, You just download 1 Python source file, which is there as a hyperlink: http://peak.telecommunity.com/dist/ez_setup.py . You right-click on your web browser and choose Save. Then my steps, from teh dir where you saved the file above: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd /usr/local/src [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py Downloading http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Marcio, I following that link and it, again, takes me to yet another third party bit of software. So, this really just expands the problems I have. Now, I'm even farther back, hoping that the many combinations of these tools work together. This seems tailor made to frustrate users. -Original Message- From: Marcio Marchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 2:07 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Hy Tyrone, The name is Marcio, not Mario :-) Are you familiar with Google? If you Google for easy_install you will find: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#installing-easy-install It says Download ez_setup.py . Get it and try my steps. Cheers, marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Mario, I'm game. Where do you find that easy_install? I looked in the Python directory and didn't see it. I looked also in the ClearSilver directory and also didn't see it? From where are you executing it? -Original Message- From: Marcio Marchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:59 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Tyrone, Did you see my message? Please try the command easy_install clearsilver and let me know if that works for you. You have to install easy_install first. Here's my notes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# pwd /usr/local/src [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# python ez_setup.py Downloading http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Copying setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages Adding setuptools 0.6c6 to easy-install.pth file Installing easy_install script to /usr/local/bin Installing easy_install-2.5 script to /usr/local/bin Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c6-py2.5.egg Processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 Finished processing dependencies for setuptools==0.6c6 marcio Tyrone Hed wrote: Jason, For me, the Windows install was easy and I liked Trac. When you try to install on Unix, NO MATTER WHAT you get this message about the neo_cgi not being found. Our unix Admin put it right where it was supposed to be found. Trac seems like a good project--I loved the Windows version--but if it's impossible to install, then nobody will see how good it can be. The directions are a bunch of with this version you use this version and then that version has its dependencies. It's a dependency nightmare. Everybody admits this ClearSilver part is the nightmare and that I should use 0.11 but I don't see that as being available. I have 0.10.4 and it exhibits all the problems I have mentioned. Does anybody know of any alternative to TRAC? I'm about ready to throw in the towel here. -Original Message- From: Jason Winnebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Nov 9, 2007 1:45 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Actually I hadn't read your thread at all until now. I was about to say that Trac is hard to install on Windows but not on Linux. Surprisingly it seems that you were trying to do this on UNIX. In some cases it can be easy, in Debian a simple apt-get install trac does most of what you need -- at least it installs all of the dependencies, which gets you through the hardest part. But, I do agree that Trac is hard to install, in general. It took me awhile to figure how to set up Apache + SSL + Trac + SVN. It also took me a long time to figure out how to properly install plugins and macros and how to test them outside of Apache. Jason -Original Message- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyrone Hed Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:41 PM To: trac-users@googlegroups.com Subject: [Trac] Re: TRAC Jason, Thank you! All the Trac-install issues that have had me tearing my hair out for three days just magically disappeared. Thank you so much! -Original Message
[Trac] neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: NERR_PARSE
Hi, Can anybody help shed some light into this problem, please? Backgound: * I have installed Trac under Windows in the past, it was easy * A colleague installed Trac under Red Hat, he suffered but it was working fine * We moved to a new server (new hardware) and I am trying to get Trac up and running on the new hardware The error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line 406, in dispatch_request File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/main.py, line 206, in dispatch File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/clearsilver.py, line 135, in __init__ TracError: ClearSilver not installed (/www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: NERR_PARSE) I believe I have multiple versions of Clearsilver due to a combination of rsyncing files from the old server and/or my attempt to recompile Clearsilver from source and/or my attempt o install it with easy_insall. Here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clearsilver]# find / -name neo_cgi.so -print /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver/python/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver/python/build/lib.linux-i686-2.5/neo_cgi.so /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4/python/neo_cgi.so I believe the old server was using 0.10.4. Since I could not re-run ./configure, I renamed teh dir to /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4-oldserver and untar'ed again into /usr/local/src/clearsilver-0.10.4 again and re-ran configure etc. I believe it was teh easy_install attempt which installed the older version, 0.10.1, but I could be wrong. Here's teh dates/details for teh different ones: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 457468 Nov 9 14:30 /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 apache foo 92478 Oct 16 13:01 /www/svn.foo.org/egg-cache/clearsilver-0.10.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg-tmp/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# ls -la /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 457468 Oct 16 13:04 /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugzilla]# python --version Python 2.5.1 Even if I delete the egg cache, it comes back. Where is it getting that stuff from? SHouldn't my ./configure for clearsilver have replaced this stuff? Can anybody bring some light into this please? I am not a Python expert and by no means a Clearsilver expert either. easy_install does not seem able to uninstall, so I ran rpm -e clearsilver and re-installed from sources (0.10.4) using configure. But the problem persists. Thanks, marcio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Trac] ticket due date, default Cc: , aggregator
Hi, 1) Is there a plugin or similar that allows a due date to be assigned to a ticket? Or is it just by milestone? 2) Is it possible to pre-define default Cc emails to be used for certain components when a ticket is filed? 3) Is there a Trac aggregator that allows for reporting across multiple projects (e.g. view all open tickets for all projects)? Or do I have to use an RSS reader and point at the various ones separately? (I presume this relates to the limitation of no multi-project support in the core) Thanks, marcio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
