[transfer-dev] Re: Lazy Loading Question
Okay yes, turning on debug shows that the gain is very small. Absolutely no point in what I was trying to do. Having sensible indexes helps though :-) Thanks Mark (again!). 2009/7/1 Andrew Myers am2...@gmail.com Doesn't the lazy one need to do more queries making it slower? Or is the end result much the same? 2009/7/1 Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com Why not just make it lazy all the time? Seems to me like you're just doubling your effort from not much gain. Mark On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Andrew am2...@gmail.com wrote: Is doing this a bad idea? object name=Thingy table=thingy sequence=THINGY_KEY_SEQ id name=id type=numeric column=key_num/ property name=a type=string column=a/ onetomany name=AnotherThiny lazy=true link to=thingies.AnotherThingy column=another_thingy_id/ collection type=array order property=thingyNumber order=asc/ /collection /onetomany /object object name=PopulatedThingy table=thingy sequence=THINGY_KEY_SEQ id name=id type=numeric column=key_num/ property name=a type=string column=a/ . onetomany name=AnotherThingy lazy=false link to=thingies.AnotherThingy column=another_thingy_id/ collection type=array order property=thingyNumber order=asc/ /collection /onetomany /object So if I want to use lazy loading I use the Thingy object, but if I want to get a fully populated object I use the PopulatedThingy object. It works, but is it good practice? -- E: mark.man...@gmail.com T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups transfer-dev group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[transfer-dev] Re: Lazy Loading Question
On Jun 30, 11:15 pm, Andrew Myers am2...@gmail.com wrote: Okay yes, turning on debug shows that the gain is very small. Absolutely no point in what I was trying to do. Having sensible indexes helps though :-) Thanks Mark (again!). Lazy loading causes clones to make more queries though which will be slower if you need to do anything complicated with lots of clones. Of course cloning collections doesn't clone the lazy collections so you /gain/ performance there. It's something you'd need to benchmark for your whole application. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups transfer-dev group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[transfer-dev] Re: Lazy Loading Question
Doesn't the lazy one need to do more queries making it slower? Or is the end result much the same? 2009/7/1 Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com Why not just make it lazy all the time? Seems to me like you're just doubling your effort from not much gain. Mark On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Andrew am2...@gmail.com wrote: Is doing this a bad idea? object name=Thingy table=thingy sequence=THINGY_KEY_SEQ id name=id type=numeric column=key_num/ property name=a type=string column=a/ onetomany name=AnotherThiny lazy=true link to=thingies.AnotherThingy column=another_thingy_id/ collection type=array order property=thingyNumber order=asc/ /collection /onetomany /object object name=PopulatedThingy table=thingy sequence=THINGY_KEY_SEQ id name=id type=numeric column=key_num/ property name=a type=string column=a/ . onetomany name=AnotherThingy lazy=false link to=thingies.AnotherThingy column=another_thingy_id/ collection type=array order property=thingyNumber order=asc/ /collection /onetomany /object So if I want to use lazy loading I use the Thingy object, but if I want to get a fully populated object I use the PopulatedThingy object. It works, but is it good practice? -- E: mark.man...@gmail.com T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups transfer-dev group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
