Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-07-27 Thread xufenghu1

link:herve leger
herve leger sale
herve leger sales
herve leger on sale
herve leger dress
herve leger dresses
herve leger bandage dress
bandage skirt
herve leger skirtfertertretqwe
cheap herve leger
herve leger bandage
party dresses
bandage dress


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-28 Thread 2585004677

Hermes Group
hermes scraf CEO Patrick
michael kors handbags - Thomas said,
hermes beltif inventory
Louis Vuitton Handbagsshortage, the hermes handbagsGroup's
michael kors outletsales last
ray ban wayfarer year, may
Louis Vuitton Bags exceed 3
michael kors bags billion euros
hermes birkin bag (about $ 4 billion).hermes handbags In 2012,
michael kors pursesthe Group
hermes birkinwill slow
hermes belts down the
Louis Vuitton Outlet speed shop,
rolex watches for men the focus
ray ban sunglasses is to
rolex watches expand production,
ray ban glasses inventory adjustments,michael kors purses sales are
Louis Vuitton Outlet expected to
Louis Vuitton handbags grow by at
hemres bags least 10%.
Louis Vuitton PursesHermes's product
rolex watches for sale prices remained stable last year, this year may rise. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-28 Thread aidihang

Hermes Group
hermes scraf CEO Patrick
michael kors handbags - Thomas said,
hermes beltif inventory
Louis Vuitton Handbagsshortage, the hermes handbagsGroup's
michael kors outletsales last
ray ban wayfarer year, may
Louis Vuitton Bags exceed 3
michael kors bags billion euros
hermes birkin bag (about $ 4 billion).hermes handbags In 2012,
michael kors pursesthe Group
hermes birkinwill slow
hermes belts down the
Louis Vuitton Outlet speed shop,
rolex watches for men the focus
ray ban sunglasses is to
rolex watches expand production,
ray ban glasses inventory adjustments,michael kors purses sales are
Louis Vuitton Outlet expected to
Louis Vuitton handbags grow by at
hemres bags least 10%.
Louis Vuitton PursesHermes's product
rolex watches for sale prices remained stable last year, this year may rise. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-26 Thread rooneyandy72


Louis Vuitton
authentic louis vuitton handbags first entered
louis vuitton outlet handbags the fashion
cheap louis vuitton bags world with
louis vuitton purses their luggage
louis vuitton handbags line. In
louis vuitton outlet  the age
louis vuitton handbags where more
Louis Vuitton purses people were
louis vuitton outlet beginning to
louis vuitton outlet travel on
louis vuitton outlet cruise ships
louis vuitton outlet store and trains and with the invention of the car,  
Louis Vuitton created a large flat case, a steamer bag and a large overnight  
bag called a Keepall. Their luggage range now contains travel accessories  
such as garment carriers, travel trunks, flight bags, laptop cases, vanity  
cases, dog carriers, hat boxes, jewellery cases, golf bags, diaper bags and  
passport covers.





Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread rajeshali50

Thank you guys for answering my question.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread icarolongo

Here in Brazil too.
Ten years ago the Brazilian government says it will migrate to free software.  
But still using Windows, iPhone and iPad.


I know all countries are equal, Windows is everywhere.
I do not know of a country that Windows is below 80% usage.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread tegskywalker
If it were me, I would use the extra money to market the OS and improve  
things that need to be improved by throwing some compensation to the core  
programmers and artists. In return, that would mean less stress on everyone  
as more people are available to tighten things up and get quicker releases.  
Of course once you start paying people, you have to maintain it or else  
people may leave. How does the FSF do it?


If that money was spent to maintain Debian testing or unstable (which Linux  
Mint and Ubuntu already do), it would be a waste of time and resources. You  
guys have already did a great job in filtering out the Ubuntu main and  
universe repositories and bringing in the libre kernel.


If you guys want to make this OS more than a niche OS in an already niche  
Linux desktop market, then I am all for it. Wouldn't it be nice to get more  
people off of Windows in the places where it matters? I'm talking schools,  
government offices, and maybe even small businesses. I live in the US and  
understand that in Europe things run differently regarding business, but  
Microsoft pretty much rules everything here.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread ninenine78
80 thousand US dollars? Or was the k a typo. I nearly did a cereal spitting  
meme impression.




Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Lindley
On 15/03/12 11:22, ch...@thinkpenguin.com wrote:
> I think if each Trisquel user donates 80k USD a year the project could
> easily move to Debian and retain the stability and remain up to date as
> Ubuntu is.
> 
> Who is with me?

Sadly not I.  In reviewing my sub-poverty line income I have already
decided to forgo the coffee I had when out on my weekly shop so I could
pay for a FSF membership.  And also decided to pass on the benefit of
not being harrassed by drunks and youths in the Bus Station in my one
late evening trip that I used to travel by minicab home from so I could
afford the 10 € Trisquel monthly membership fee.

Non-members  think this is a piece of cheap emotional blackmail trying
to get them to join they'd be damned right.  But, that doesn't stop it
being true that you should put your money where your mouth is when it
comes to your principles and that the memberships are affordable even on
very limited incomes if you just make a little effort.

Go on non-members 5 € is two coffees a month in the UK.

Leny


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread Loic J. Duros

On 03/15/2012 07:22 AM, ch...@thinkpenguin.com wrote:
I think if each Trisquel user donates 80k USD a year the project could 
easily move to Debian and retain the stability and remain up to date 
as Ubuntu is.


Who is with me?


$80,000 per person per year??


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread chris
I think if each Trisquel user donates 80k USD a year the project could easily  
move to Debian and retain the stability and remain up to date as Ubuntu is.


Who is with me?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-15 Thread mikko . viinamaki
[http://www.gnewsense.org/ gNewSense] was based on Ubuntu but are moving onto  
Debian, i.e. the mirror move compared to Trisquel.  
[http://www.gnewsense.org/FAQ#Will_gNewSense_3.0_be_based_on_Debian_instead_of_Ubuntu.2C_and_why.3F  
Here] are their reasons for doing so. I think they thus have a more solid  
foundation than we do. However, we currently have more up-to-date releases.  
I'm happy we have both alternatives.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-14 Thread tegskywalker

I can think of two reasons: quality control and package support.

Debian on testing and sid repositories is really the wild west. Packages are  
put out there and many times it will break. When Linux Mint offered a Debian  
version, they had to move to Update Packs where the team locked down a  
repository, tested the heck out of it, and released through their update  
manager. Even then there are issues and maintaining that release has been a  
lot of work and the Update Packs are few and far in-between. The Ubuntu based  
versions of Mint are still more recommended.


Ubuntu essentially does the same thing with locking down packages before a  
release and will often use older versions to make sure everything works.  
There is a post by Jeremy Bicha about the Ubuntu team swapping out Gnome  
versions for performance and to ease performance issues. There is also recent  
news that Gnome 3.4 will make it into 12.04 and they are hard at work fixing  
bugs. It is good that they do that because with Debian, they are just put out  
there and maybe it works. Maybe it doesn't.


As for package support, not only is Ubuntu generally more supported with  
popular packages and mirrors serving them, but the PPAs at launchpad.net are  
the icing on the cake. I've tried pure Debian and LMDE and the quality of  
packages (support and latest versions) by 3rd parties is night and day.


Now don't get me wrong.. Debian Stable is considered rock solid even though  
the packages are old and it is supported for 2 years. Its just that Ubuntu  
LTS releases on the desktop and server have 5 years of support so you will be  
updating your OS less on Ubuntu than Debian.


The best part of using Ubuntu? You don't have to use the official versions.  
You can try any desktop available and derivatives like Trisquel with the rock  
solid Ubuntu foundation to build upon.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Why were the repos of Trisquel changed from Debian to Ubuntu?

2012-03-14 Thread alonivtsan
Debian doesn't use FSF definition for free software, but its own instead.  
Ubuntu's main and universe repositories contain only free software as defined  
by FSF (but some packages require cleaning up so they don't recommend  
non-free software).