RE: [TruthTalk] Private Interpretation *Reprimand*

2005-01-16 Thread ShieldsFamily








It’s dropped already-!  Iz

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
6:28 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private
Interpretation *Reprimand*



 



Ok, Judy.  You have gone too far.  Your post said, "YOU
ARE STIRRING THE POT."  That's a personal accusation.





 





Izzy, you too have gone too far.  You said, "why must
you keep stirring the pot of strife."  





 





Both of you might be right, but the list does not exist for this
purpose.  So let's just drop it.  





 





Judy, you can talk about why focusing on tradition might cause one to
disagree with someone who is focused on God's Word, but skip the commentary on
how another list member is stirring the pot.  





 





David Miller





Moderator.





 





p.s.  No public replies to this post please.  Subject line
has *Reprimand* in it.  Read and obey.  Let's move on.







- Original Message - 





From: Judy Taylor






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: Sunday, January
16, 2005 2:26 PM





Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Private Interpretation





 





You are "stirring the pot"
here John, that just didn't need to be said..





 





On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:26:17 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:







In a message dated 1/16/2005 7:38:01
AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:


jt: Possibly because you appear to be focused in/on tradition
right now and I study God's Word 
(just a guess on my part)


Possibly an insult. (just a guess on my part).  

JD, why must you keep
stirring the pot of strife (as if there isn’t enough already.)  





Let Slade determine for himself if he is insulted. Izzy

It is funny that you think I am the one who stirrs the pot when it was Judy who
made the statement.  LOL

Jd 





 














Re: [TruthTalk] Private Interpretation *Reprimand*

2005-01-16 Thread David Miller
ï


Ok, Judy.  You have gone too far.  Your post said, "YOU ARE 
STIRRING THE POT."  That's a personal accusation.
 
Izzy, you too have gone too far.  You said, "why must you keep 
stirring the pot of strife."  
 
Both of you might be right, but the list does not exist for this 
purpose.  So let's just drop it.  
 
Judy, you can talk about why focusing on tradition might cause one to 
disagree with someone who is focused on God's Word, but skip the commentary on 
how another list member is stirring the pot.  
 
David Miller
Moderator.
 
p.s.  No public replies to this post please.  Subject line has 
*Reprimand* in it.  Read and obey.  Let's move on.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:26 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private 
  Interpretation
  
  You are "stirring the pot" here John, that just 
  didn't need to be said..
   
  On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:26:17 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
In a message dated 1/16/2005 7:38:01 AM Pacific Standard 
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:jt: Possibly because you appear to be focused in/on tradition 
right now and I study God's Word (just a guess on my part)Possibly an insult. (just a guess on my part).  
JD, why must you keep stirring 
the pot of strife (as if there isnât enough already.)  

Let Slade determine for 
himself if he is insulted. IzzyIt is funny that you think I am the one who stirrs the 
pot when it was Judy who made the statement.  LOLJd 

 


RE: [TruthTalk] Private Interpretation *REPRIMAND*

2005-01-16 Thread Slade Henson
ï


The 
*naner-naner* needs to stop. As I stated in a previous 
email...

  I hear the tone 
  behind the words better than David does. David sees the words used far better 
  than I. When I tried to speak with others about the tone (even the implied 
  tone), I got shot down. EVERY 
TIME.
Simply stated, it's clear that JD "feels" what I felt 
in JudyT's post. From my understanding, JD is attempting to show JudyT 
where the tone can be perceived as mean or insulting. As it now stands, JD 
is not viewed as "stirring the pot" unless overturned by the Owner of the 
forum.
 
--slade

  -Original Message-From: Judy TaylorSent: 
  Sunday, 16 January, 2005 14.27Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private 
  Interpretation
  You are "stirring the pot" here John, that just 
  didn't need to be said..
   
  On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:26:17 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
jt: Possibly because you 
appear to be focused in/on tradition right now and I study God's Word 
(just a guess on my part)Possibly an insult. (just a 
guess on my part).  JD, why must you keep stirring 
the pot of strife (as if there isnât enough already.)  

Let Slade determine for 
himself if he is insulted. IzzyIt is funny that you think I am the one who stirrs the 
pot when it was Judy who made the statement.  LOLJd