Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-16 Thread Lance Muir

'Say not'?


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 22:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



The problem with Debbie's analysis is that this street preacher does not
herald a call from immoral living to moral living without Christ.  Rather,
the call is to turn from immoral living to a relationship with Jesus 
Christ.

It's another one of those straw man divisions which does not really exist.

Nevertheless, the Elijah spirit is one which prepares the way of the Lord,
and one to which we ought not object.  If you happen to have stumbled on a
street preacher in the spirit of Elijah, you ought not object just because
your theology tells you he is majoring on the minors.  John the Baptist
prepared people to believe upon Jesus by preaching the following:

Luke 3:7-14
(7) Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O
generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
(8) Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to 
say

within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
(9) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree
therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into
the fire.
(10) And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then?
(11) He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him
impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.
(12) Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master,
what shall we do?
(13) And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed 
you.

(14) And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we
do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any
falsely; and be content with your wages.

In modern times, the call goes out, say not that you are Catholic, say 
not

you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or
Presbyterian.  God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk.
Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut 
down
and cast into the fire.  Turn away from your sins and believe upon the 
Lord

Jesus Christ in deed and in truth.  He that says he believes in him will
keep his commandments.

David Miller.

- Original Message - 
From: Taylor

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

Couldn't have said it better myself! In fact, what upsets me is that I
couldn't have even said it }:(

Oh well, that's not going to stop me from agreeing with it :)

Well said, Debbie.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

- Original Message - 
From: Debbie Sawczak

To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 14, 2006 14:18
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

Of course it is sin and needs repenting of. (JD is actually making the 
same

vocabulary mistake below as DM.) But it is not immorality; in fact, it is
morality. Where this whole discussion of repentance began was with a
critique of street preachers' focus on repentance as a call to turn from
immoral living to moral living. As pointed out long ago by Bill and/or JD,
the repentance urged on people in much biblical preaching was not a call 
to
moral living, but a call to recognize God. Insofar as it was a call to 
moral
living, it was to people who were already the people of God, and was a 
call

to recognize God as covenant partner. Peter's sermon fits right into that
and moves beyond it; the covenant is gathered up in Christ who turns out 
to
be both its maker and keeper, and that is why repentance is sealed by 
being

baptized into him.

D




From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:45 PM
To: Debbie Sawczak
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



- Original Message - 
From: Judy Taylor

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 14, 2006 12:54
Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


Well it is something that needs to be repented of JD; if it is not sin, 
then

why the need to repent?
Dead works is something lifeless as opposed to works of righteousness 
which

are the fruit of walking after the spirit.
One is dead religion - the other is life and peace.

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:17:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes   --  and who said that repentance from dead works  is speaking of
sin, anyway?   Dead works is that body of works that convinces someone
that she is accpted by God RATHER THAN PLACING HER FAITH IN THE CHRIST and
allowing Him and Him alone to be glorified in this [saving] function.
Bill's comment is brilliant, I think, and as it is attached to Acts 2  --
the best possible understanding

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-16 Thread Dean Moore



 [Original Message]
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Date: 1/15/2006 10:29:21 PM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

 The problem with Debbie's analysis is that this street preacher does not 
 herald a call from immoral living to moral living without Christ. 
Rather, 
 the call is to turn from immoral living to a relationship with Jesus
Christ. 
 It's another one of those straw man divisions which does not really exist.

 Nevertheless, the Elijah spirit is one which prepares the way of the
Lord, 
 and one to which we ought not object.  If you happen to have stumbled on
a 
 street preacher in the spirit of Elijah, you ought not object just
because 
 your theology tells you he is majoring on the minors.  John the Baptist 
 prepared people to believe upon Jesus by preaching the following:

 Luke 3:7-14
 (7) Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him,
O 
 generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
 (8) Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to
say 
 within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you,
That 
 God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
 (9) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree 
 therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into 
 the fire.
 (10) And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then?
 (11) He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him 
 impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.
 (12) Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master, 
 what shall we do?
 (13) And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed
you.
 (14) And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we 
 do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any 
 falsely; and be content with your wages.

 In modern times, the call goes out, say not that you are Catholic, say
not 
 you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or 
 Presbyterian.  God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk. 
 Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut
down 
 and cast into the fire.  Turn away from your sins and believe upon the
Lord 
 Jesus Christ in deed and in truth.  He that says he believes in him will 
 keep his commandments.

 David Miller.
cd: Amen and Amen.




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-16 Thread Lance Muir
THE CALL? From unbelief to belief? From immorality to morality (already 
addressed). From morality? The latter is certainly no 'straw man'. It may be 
that some on TT need to be called from this. I sometimes see DM with one 
foot in this camp.



- Original Message - 
From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2006 08:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?







[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/15/2006 10:29:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

The problem with Debbie's analysis is that this street preacher does not
herald a call from immoral living to moral living without Christ.

Rather,

the call is to turn from immoral living to a relationship with Jesus

Christ.
It's another one of those straw man divisions which does not really 
exist.


Nevertheless, the Elijah spirit is one which prepares the way of the

Lord,

and one to which we ought not object.  If you happen to have stumbled on

a

street preacher in the spirit of Elijah, you ought not object just

because

your theology tells you he is majoring on the minors.  John the Baptist
prepared people to believe upon Jesus by preaching the following:

Luke 3:7-14
(7) Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him,

O

generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
(8) Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to

say

within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you,

That

God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
(9) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree
therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into
the fire.
(10) And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then?
(11) He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him
impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.
(12) Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master,
what shall we do?
(13) And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed

you.

(14) And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we
do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any
falsely; and be content with your wages.

In modern times, the call goes out, say not that you are Catholic, say

not

you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or
Presbyterian.  God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk.
Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut

down

and cast into the fire.  Turn away from your sins and believe upon the

Lord

Jesus Christ in deed and in truth.  He that says he believes in him will
keep his commandments.

David Miller.

cd: Amen and Amen.






--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-15 Thread Taylor



Couldn't have said it better myself! In fact, what upsets me 
is that I couldn't have even said it }:( 

Oh well, that's not going to stop me from agreeing with it 
:)

Well said, Debbie.

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Lance 
  Muir 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:20 
  PM
  Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the 
  gospel?
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Debbie Sawczak 
  To: 'Lance Muir' 
  Sent: January 14, 2006 14:18
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
  
  Of course it is sin and needs repenting of. (JD is 
  actually making the same vocabulary mistake below as DM.) But it is not 
  immorality; in fact, it is morality.Where this wholediscussion of 
  repentance began was with a critique ofstreet preachers' focus on 
  repentance as a call to turn from immoral living to moral living.As 
  pointed out long ago by Bill and/or JD, the repentance urged on people in much 
  biblical preaching was not a call to moral living, but a call to recognize 
  God. Insofar as it was a call to moral living,it was to people who were 
  already the people of God, and was a call to recognize God as covenant 
  partner.Peter's sermon fits right into that and moves beyond 
  it;the covenant is gathered up in Christ who turns out to be both its 
  maker and keeper, and that is why repentance is sealed by being baptized into 
  him.
  
  D
  
  
  From: Lance Muir 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 
  1:45 PMTo: Debbie SawczakSubject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What 
  is the gospel?
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 14, 2006 12:54
  Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
  
  Well it is something that needs to be repented of JD; 
  if it is not sin, then why the need to repent?
  Dead works is something lifeless as opposed to works 
  of righteousness which are the fruit of walking after the spirit.
  One is dead religion - the other is life and 
  peace.
  
  On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:17:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Yes -- and who said that "repentance from dead 
works" is speaking of sin, anyway? "Dead works" is that 
body of works that convinces someone that she is accpted by God RATHER THAN 
PLACING HER FAITH IN THE CHRIST and allowing Him and Him alone to be 
glorified in this [saving] function. Bill's comment 
is brilliant, I think, and as it is attached to Acts 2 -- 
the best possible understanding of what happened on that First 
Day. 

There is no reason to think that the Hebrews writer has something else 
in mind when he speaks of repentance from the failing effort of self 
justification. 

jd
From: 
  "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  

  From: Debbie Sawczak 
  
  Dead worksis not the same as immorality, which 
  is what I think David means by sin. IMO, that [his equating sin with 
  immorality] is where this false and hence problematic distinction arises 
  between repentance from 'sin' and repentance from a failure to recognize 
  who Christ is.
  
  yD
  
  
  From: Lance Muir 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 
  10:01 AMTo: Debbie SawczakSubject: Fw: Fw: 
  [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 14, 2006 09:38
      Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
  
  Re: 
  repentance: basically, your admitting that Bill's understanding of the 
  Acts passage he postedis correct--i'd agree that's bible 
  teaching
  
  however, the 
  point you are trying tomake about it, represented below,is a 
  scripturedog that don't hunt--as usual, itis your own private 
  notion universalized, shot through with geekness butrooted plainly 
  (through contrast) in personalized philosophy,over which you 
  sprinklesome home-brew holy waterlabeled 'Heb 
  6:1'
  
  the issue 
  historically is that you don't study and think much about (e.g.) Heb 6:1 
  while continually presupposing that it matches your philosophical 
  bias,bec to you it sounds alwayslike it 
  does
  
  in the end, 
  it simply ain't bible teaching, Bro
  
  
  On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:46:06 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:|| Surely you know better than to hang the entire 
  gospel on one's  interpretation of one sermon.
  || Heb. 6:1 says that an elementary principle of the doctrine 
  of Christ  is repentance from dead works. This clearly links 
  repentance and sin. 
  ||
  --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked 
  by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Datab

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-15 Thread David Miller
The problem with Debbie's analysis is that this street preacher does not 
herald a call from immoral living to moral living without Christ.  Rather, 
the call is to turn from immoral living to a relationship with Jesus Christ. 
It's another one of those straw man divisions which does not really exist.

Nevertheless, the Elijah spirit is one which prepares the way of the Lord, 
and one to which we ought not object.  If you happen to have stumbled on a 
street preacher in the spirit of Elijah, you ought not object just because 
your theology tells you he is majoring on the minors.  John the Baptist 
prepared people to believe upon Jesus by preaching the following:

Luke 3:7-14
(7) Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O 
generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
(8) Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say 
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That 
God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
(9) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree 
therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into 
the fire.
(10) And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then?
(11) He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him 
impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.
(12) Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master, 
what shall we do?
(13) And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed you.
(14) And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we 
do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any 
falsely; and be content with your wages.

In modern times, the call goes out, say not that you are Catholic, say not 
you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or 
Presbyterian.  God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk. 
Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down 
and cast into the fire.  Turn away from your sins and believe upon the Lord 
Jesus Christ in deed and in truth.  He that says he believes in him will 
keep his commandments.

David Miller.

- Original Message - 
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

Couldn't have said it better myself! In fact, what upsets me is that I 
couldn't have even said it }:(

Oh well, that's not going to stop me from agreeing with it :)

Well said, Debbie.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

- Original Message - 
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 14, 2006 14:18
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

Of course it is sin and needs repenting of. (JD is actually making the same 
vocabulary mistake below as DM.) But it is not immorality; in fact, it is 
morality. Where this whole discussion of repentance began was with a 
critique of street preachers' focus on repentance as a call to turn from 
immoral living to moral living. As pointed out long ago by Bill and/or JD, 
the repentance urged on people in much biblical preaching was not a call to 
moral living, but a call to recognize God. Insofar as it was a call to moral 
living, it was to people who were already the people of God, and was a call 
to recognize God as covenant partner. Peter's sermon fits right into that 
and moves beyond it; the covenant is gathered up in Christ who turns out to 
be both its maker and keeper, and that is why repentance is sealed by being 
baptized into him.

D




From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:45 PM
To: Debbie Sawczak
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



- Original Message - 
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 14, 2006 12:54
Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


Well it is something that needs to be repented of JD; if it is not sin, then 
why the need to repent?
Dead works is something lifeless as opposed to works of righteousness which 
are the fruit of walking after the spirit.
One is dead religion - the other is life and peace.

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:17:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes   --  and who said that repentance from dead works  is speaking of 
sin, anyway?   Dead works is that body of works that convinces someone 
that she is accpted by God RATHER THAN PLACING HER FAITH IN THE CHRIST and 
allowing Him and Him alone to be glorified in this [saving] function. 
Bill's comment is brilliant, I think, and as it is attached to Acts 2  --  
the best possible understanding of what happened on that First Day.

There is no reason to think that the Hebrews writer has something else in 
mind when he speaks of repentance from the failing effort of self

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-15 Thread knpraise

In modern times, the call goes out, "say not that you are Catholic, say not you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or Presbyterian. God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk. Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and cast into the fire. Turn away from your sins and believe upon the Lord Jesus Christ in deed and in truth. He that says he believes in him will keep his commandments." dm

Why the quotes? 









-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The problem with Debbie's analysis is that this street preacher does not  herald a call from immoral living to moral living without Christ. Rather,  the call is to turn from immoral living to a relationship with Jesus Christ.  It's another one of those straw man divisions which does not really exist.   Nevertheless, the Elijah spirit is one which prepares the way of the Lord,  and one to which we ought not object. If you happen to have stumbled on a  street preacher in the spirit of Elijah, you ought not object just because  your theology tells you he is majoring on the minors. John the Baptist  prepared people to believe upon Jesus by preaching the following:   Luke 3:7-14  (7) Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of
 him, O  generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?  (8) Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say  within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That  God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.  (9) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree  therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into  the fire.  (10) And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then?  (11) He answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him  impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.  (12) Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master,  what shall we do?  (13) And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed you.  (14) And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we  do? And he s
aid unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any  falsely; and be content with your wages.   In modern times, the call goes out, "say not that you are Catholic, say not  you have a pope, say not you are Baptist, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or  Presbyterian. God is able to raise up children from this sidewalk.  Judgment is coming and every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down  and cast into the fire. Turn away from your sins and believe upon the Lord  Jesus Christ in deed and in truth. He that says he believes in him will  keep his commandments."   David Miller.   - Original Message -  From: Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:03 PM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?   Couldn't have said it better myself! In fact, what upsets me is that I  couldn't have even said it }:(   Oh well, t
hat's not going to stop me from agreeing with it :)   Well said, Debbie.   Bill   - Original Message -  From: Lance Muir  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:20 PM  Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?   - Original Message -  From: Debbie Sawczak  To: 'Lance Muir'  Sent: January 14, 2006 14:18  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?   Of course it is sin and needs repenting of. (JD is actually making the same  vocabulary mistake below as DM.) But it is not immorality; in fact, it is  morality. Where this whole discussion of repentance began was with a  critique of street preachers' focus on repentance as a call to turn from  immoral living to moral living. As pointed out long ago by Bill and/or JD,  the repentance urged on people in much biblical preaching was not a call to  mo
ral living, but a call to recognize God. Insofar as it was a call to moral  living, it was to people who were already the people of God, and was a call  to recognize God as covenant partner. Peter's sermon fits right into that  and moves beyond it; the covenant is gathered up in Christ who turns out to  be both its maker and keeper, and that is why repentance is sealed by being  baptized into him.   D  From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:45 PM  To: Debbie Sawczak  Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel? - Original Message -  From: Judy Taylor  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org  Sent: January 14, 2006 12:54  Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?Well it is something that needs to be repented of JD; if it is not sin, then  why the need to repent?  Dead works is something lifeless as opposed to works of righteousness which  are the fruit of walking after the spirit.  One is dead religion - the other is life an

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-14 Thread knpraise

"Dead works" are those personal imperatives that one one uses to point to the right path to salvation. Works of righteousness flow FROM the influence of the Indwelling and testify to a fact already accomplished.

jd

-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Well it is something that needs to be repented of JD; if it is not sin, then why the need to repent?
Dead works is something lifeless as opposed to works of righteousness which are the fruit of walking after the spirit.
One is dead religion - the other is life and peace.

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:17:39 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Yes -- and who said that "repentance from dead works" is speaking of sin, anyway? "Dead works" is that body of works that convinces someone that she is accpted by God RATHER THAN PLACING HER FAITH IN THE CHRIST and allowing Him and Him alone to be glorified in this [saving] function. Bill's comment is brilliant, I think, and as it is attached to Acts 2 -- the best possible understanding of what happened on that First Day. 

There is no reason to think that the Hebrews writer has something else in mind when he speaks of repentance from the failing effort of self justification. 

jd
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



From: Debbie Sawczak 

Dead worksis not the same as immorality, which is what I think David means by sin. IMO, that [his equating sin with immorality] is where this false and hence problematic distinction arises between repentance from 'sin' and repentance from a failure to recognize who Christ is.

yD


From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 10:01 AMTo: Debbie SawczakSubject: Fw: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: January 14, 2006 09:38
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

Re: repentance: basically, your admitting that Bill's understanding of the Acts passage he postedis correct--i'd agree that's bible teaching

however, the point you are trying tomake about it, represented below,is a scripturedog that don't hunt--as usual, itis your own private notion universalized, shot through with geekness butrooted plainly (through contrast) in personalized philosophy,over which you sprinklesome home-brew holy waterlabeled 'Heb 6:1'

the issue historically is that you don't study and think much about (e.g.) Heb 6:1 while continually presupposing that it matches your philosophical bias,bec to you it sounds alwayslike it does

in the end, it simply ain't bible teaching, Bro


On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:46:06 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:|| Surely you know better than to hang the entire gospel on one's  interpretation of one sermon.
|| Heb. 6:1 says that an elementary principle of the doctrine of Christ  is repentance from dead works. This clearly links repentance and sin. 
||
--No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 1/13/2006
--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 1/13/2006



Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread David Miller
 not taken too much of your time.  I don't think we are really 
that far apart on this matter, but perhaps my comments will provoke some 
additional considerations on your part.  My prayers and blessings are with 
you and your family.  God bless.

David Miller.


- Original Message - 
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


Hi David,

I want to begin by apologizing to you, but I am not going to be able to give 
your questions the attention they deserve. I wrote most of last night (in 
between short posts to others), thinking I was approximating what I needed 
to say in order present a satisfactory response; however, upon reading my 
reply, I realized that I was still leaving much unsaid. Nevertheless the 
problem boils down to this: either an appropriate answer is going to take 
more time than I have to offer, or I am going to have to condense my 
thoughts, knowing that they will not fully -- or perhaps even adequately --  
address your inquiry. I'll attempt to do the best I can with the latter.

I think Dean said quite well one of the points I would like to make: If one 
is going to preach the condemnation of the law of sin, then he or she must 
give the sinner a way out, which is Christ; for to fail to do so is to leave 
a soul in torment, and not in a state of grace (thanks Dean). This it seems 
to me is the locus of failure in most of the preaching on repentance which I 
have encountered. It is certainly at the center of my concerns against 
street preaching.

When repentance is preached as the introduction to the good news of Jesus 
Christ to people whose background is not rooted and grounded in the grammar 
of God's correspondence with humanity, which is inclusive of most people in 
the western world today, the bottom line is this: it is being preached out 
of context. There is no repentance apart from Jesus Christ and to expect 
people to repent who do not know him is to demand of them the impossible. 
Repent? What the hell for? and What does that even mean?

The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance, is based in a 
failure on the part of most Christians to realize that repentance, when it 
was preached in the New Testament, was directed almost exclusively (I am 
inclined to leave off the almost but have not fully research it) to people 
who were already people of God: it was preached to God's people, the Jews; 
or to people who knew Christ -- relationally, if not also via personal 
encounter -- and had put their faith in him. These were people to whom the 
utterance had meaning. It was meaningful because it was already 
contextualized in the language of God. To them, repentance meant not only a 
turning away from something -- as Dean puts it, the law of sin -- but a 
turning to the one whom they already knew as God. The great difficulty they 
had was in turning to Jesus Christ as the One who was that God. And as you 
know, many of them refused to do so.

And so, to those people, repentance was firstly a change of mind, a 
turning away from old beliefs and a turning to a new way of thinking about 
God. The task of repentance for them entailed a restructuring of their 
thinking about who this God was in whom they had believed. Theirs was to 
begin to think of God in a way which placed Jesus at the heart of God's 
identity. It was thus a first order paradigm shift. Repent for what? Repent 
about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth. Change your mind about him. He 
is your Messiah.

To preach repentance to people who do not have this contextual background is 
to place upon them a death sentence. It is to throw the whole weight of 
salvation upon their shoulders and to expect of them what no one apart from 
Christ has ever accomplished: I have to do something in order to be saved, 
but I have not the will to pull it off. Hence, if it is taken seriously at 
all, the weight of that decision will crush them -- if not today, then 
someday soon.

Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes, the NT is replete with directives to 
repent. But repentance is not a means by which or through which people are 
saved. It is Jesus Christ who is our Savior. Salvation is in him, complete 
with mediation on our behalf. Repentance is therefore our response to the 
greatest news the world has ever heard; it is our response to the good news 
of Jesus Christ. Amen.

I think I'll cut is off with that, David. To go further would be to get into 
things we have discussed many times in the past. I hope this begins to 
address your questions and to give you some indication as to my thoughts in 
relation to this subject. I am sorry that I do not have more time to spend 
on this, but I have dozens of papers to grade, on top of wanting to spend 
some time with Tanya and Andy, not to mention I'm over sixty posts behind in 
my ready :) Thanks DavidM. I hope you are not displeased with me.

Bill


- Original Message

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread Lance Muir
The interloper speaks: NO DAVID, IT DID NOT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. You saw 
the 'yes' and, harkening back the days of olde (yes/no) it made you think 
that it answered the question. (remember those days?) You wished for him 
(Bill) to say YES so, you read him to say yes.



- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 12, 2006 12:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



Bill wrote:

Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes


This answered my question, Bill, thank you.  It was nice icing on the cake
to read the rest of your thoughts.  Nevertheless, I'm not sure that your
standard framework of thinking readily sees repentance as part of the
gospel.  What I mean is that it seems to me that you are kind of being
pushed toward admitting that repentance is part of the gospel because of
what you read in the Bible, but your standard framework of thinking pushes
the preaching of repentance away from being up front and center like it 
was

in the ministry of Jesus and his apostles.  You gave some cultural reasons
why you think this ought to be so, but I have a little different 
perspective

that I would like to share below.

Bill wrote:

When repentance is preached as the introduction to
the good news of Jesus Christ to people whose
background is not rooted and grounded in the grammar
of God's correspondence with humanity, which is
inclusive of most people in the western world today,
the bottom line is this: it is being preached out of context.


I think we view society very differently.  About 85% of those in the 
United
States profess to be Christian.  One would be hard pressed to find anyone 
in

our society who has not heard of Jesus Christ.  Furthermore, I do not find
much question about what we mean when we use the word repentance.  Oh, you
can be sure that when I preach I explain it.  I want to be sure they
understand exactly what I mean, but most people seem to have a good idea
about the word before I even start.  My preaching style is one where I 
tend
to ask questions before making a point.  For example, I will ask the 
crowd,

how many of you know what repentance is.  I let them answer.  That tells
me what my audience knows and what they don't know.  I do the same thing 
in

the Sunday School class that I teach.

Do you want to know what word it was that gave students the most trouble
this week?  It was the word worldliness.  I have had this come up before
too.  Just as the word gay has changed in meaning over the last 50 
years,
so this word is shifting in primary usage.  The word has more general 
usage

nowadays to describe someone well traveled and educated in the different
cultures of the world.  So when they read a sign with it listed as a sin, 
it

provokes dialogue.  What could possibly be wrong with worldliness?  Isn't
worldliness a good thing?

Bill wrote:

There is no repentance apart from Jesus Christ and
to expect people to repent who do not know him is
to demand of them the impossible. Repent? What
the hell for? and What does that even mean?


Perhaps you are talking about total repentance of all sins.  In regards to
specific sins, many people repent without it being any kind of response to
the gospel of Jesus Christ.  People regret sins and stop doing them all 
the

time, in many religions, and even atheists will do this.  It really is not
as foreign a concept as you seem to make it.  In fact, I think one of the
reasons that repentance forms the foundation for preaching the gospel is
because it is probably the term people can most relate toward.  Faith is
much more difficult to understand and practice by someone in sin.  Faith 
is

something they do automatically when they repent after realizing that they
are completely helpless and lost and in need of a Savior.  That 
realization
comes from the message that they need to repent, and in attempting to 
comply

with that message, they are led into faith in their Savior, Jesus Christ.

Bill wrote:

The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance,
is based in a failure on the part of most Christians to realize
that repentance, when it was preached in the New Testament,
was directed almost exclusively (I am inclined to leave off the
almost but have not fully research it) to people who were
already people of God: it was preached to God's people,
the Jews; or to people who knew Christ -- relationally, if
not also via personal encounter -- and had put their faith
in him.


Aw, Bill, the message was primarily to the sinners, not to the theologians
and scholars who explained things away with their minds.  In my 
experience,
the problem has nothing at all to do with confusion.  It has to do with 
the

fact that people love their sin.  They follow the prince of this world.
Their loyalty is not to God.

This week a man attempted to mock me while I was preaching.  He had a
science fiction work called, The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide, by Douglas
Adams.  He held it up

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread David Miller
I'm not sure what you are trying to say, Lance, but I did not wish for Bill 
to say yes.  I am simply asking him to tell me whether or not repentance is 
part of the gospel because his post seemed to juxtapose repentance with the 
gospel.  Bill rightfully acknowledged that repentance is part of the gospel. 
Why are you saying that Bill does not believe that repentance is part of the 
gospel?

David Miller.

- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


The interloper speaks: NO DAVID, IT DID NOT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. You saw
the 'yes' and, harkening back the days of olde (yes/no) it made you think
that it answered the question. (remember those days?) You wished for him
(Bill) to say YES so, you read him to say yes.


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 12, 2006 12:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


 Bill wrote:
 Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes

 This answered my question, Bill, thank you.  It was nice icing on the cake
 to read the rest of your thoughts.  Nevertheless, I'm not sure that your
 standard framework of thinking readily sees repentance as part of the
 gospel.  What I mean is that it seems to me that you are kind of being
 pushed toward admitting that repentance is part of the gospel because of
 what you read in the Bible, but your standard framework of thinking pushes
 the preaching of repentance away from being up front and center like it
 was
 in the ministry of Jesus and his apostles.  You gave some cultural reasons
 why you think this ought to be so, but I have a little different
 perspective
 that I would like to share below.

 Bill wrote:
 When repentance is preached as the introduction to
 the good news of Jesus Christ to people whose
 background is not rooted and grounded in the grammar
 of God's correspondence with humanity, which is
 inclusive of most people in the western world today,
 the bottom line is this: it is being preached out of context.

 I think we view society very differently.  About 85% of those in the
 United
 States profess to be Christian.  One would be hard pressed to find anyone
 in
 our society who has not heard of Jesus Christ.  Furthermore, I do not find
 much question about what we mean when we use the word repentance.  Oh, you
 can be sure that when I preach I explain it.  I want to be sure they
 understand exactly what I mean, but most people seem to have a good idea
 about the word before I even start.  My preaching style is one where I
 tend
 to ask questions before making a point.  For example, I will ask the
 crowd,
 how many of you know what repentance is.  I let them answer.  That tells
 me what my audience knows and what they don't know.  I do the same thing
 in
 the Sunday School class that I teach.

 Do you want to know what word it was that gave students the most trouble
 this week?  It was the word worldliness.  I have had this come up before
 too.  Just as the word gay has changed in meaning over the last 50
 years,
 so this word is shifting in primary usage.  The word has more general
 usage
 nowadays to describe someone well traveled and educated in the different
 cultures of the world.  So when they read a sign with it listed as a sin,
 it
 provokes dialogue.  What could possibly be wrong with worldliness?  Isn't
 worldliness a good thing?

 Bill wrote:
 There is no repentance apart from Jesus Christ and
 to expect people to repent who do not know him is
 to demand of them the impossible. Repent? What
 the hell for? and What does that even mean?

 Perhaps you are talking about total repentance of all sins.  In regards to
 specific sins, many people repent without it being any kind of response to
 the gospel of Jesus Christ.  People regret sins and stop doing them all
 the
 time, in many religions, and even atheists will do this.  It really is not
 as foreign a concept as you seem to make it.  In fact, I think one of the
 reasons that repentance forms the foundation for preaching the gospel is
 because it is probably the term people can most relate toward.  Faith is
 much more difficult to understand and practice by someone in sin.  Faith
 is
 something they do automatically when they repent after realizing that they
 are completely helpless and lost and in need of a Savior.  That
 realization
 comes from the message that they need to repent, and in attempting to
 comply
 with that message, they are led into faith in their Savior, Jesus Christ.

 Bill wrote:
 The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance,
 is based in a failure on the part of most Christians to realize
 that repentance, when it was preached in the New Testament,
 was directed almost exclusively (I am inclined to leave off the
 almost but have not fully research it) to people who were
 already people of God: it was preached to God's

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread David Miller
Bill wrote:
 And so, to those people, repentance was firstly
 a change of mind, a turning away from old beliefs
 and a turning to a new way of thinking about God.
 The task of repentance for them entailed a restructuring
 of their thinking about who this God was in whom they
 had believed. Theirs was to begin to think of God in a
 way which placed Jesus at the heart of God's identity.
 It was thus a first order paradigm shift. Repent for what?
 Repent about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth.
 Change your mind about him. He is your Messiah.

Upon further reflection of your words here, I am starting to wonder what 
relationship there is in your mind between sin and repentance.  You seem to 
think of repentance as a theological paradigm shift about one's 
philosophical understanding of the Godhead, particularly concerning Jesus' 
position therein, rather than a changing of one's mind about his 
participation in sin.  Would you care to clarify?  I bet Judy smells a rat 
here.  :-)

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread Lance Muir

The interloper says 'horsefeathers'!!


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 12, 2006 17:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



Bill wrote:

And so, to those people, repentance was firstly
a change of mind, a turning away from old beliefs
and a turning to a new way of thinking about God.
The task of repentance for them entailed a restructuring
of their thinking about who this God was in whom they
had believed. Theirs was to begin to think of God in a
way which placed Jesus at the heart of God's identity.
It was thus a first order paradigm shift. Repent for what?
Repent about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth.
Change your mind about him. He is your Messiah.


Upon further reflection of your words here, I am starting to wonder what
relationship there is in your mind between sin and repentance.  You seem 
to

think of repentance as a theological paradigm shift about one's
philosophical understanding of the Godhead, particularly concerning Jesus'
position therein, rather than a changing of one's mind about his
participation in sin.  Would you care to clarify?  I bet Judy smells a rat
here.  :-)

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread Lance Muir
You already know why, David. If you claim not to then,  you don't know 
yourself (there's an ol 'saw')
- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 12, 2006 17:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


I'm not sure what you are trying to say, Lance, but I did not wish for 
Bill
to say yes.  I am simply asking him to tell me whether or not repentance 
is
part of the gospel because his post seemed to juxtapose repentance with 
the
gospel.  Bill rightfully acknowledged that repentance is part of the 
gospel.
Why are you saying that Bill does not believe that repentance is part of 
the

gospel?

David Miller.

- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


The interloper speaks: NO DAVID, IT DID NOT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. You saw
the 'yes' and, harkening back the days of olde (yes/no) it made you think
that it answered the question. (remember those days?) You wished for him
(Bill) to say YES so, you read him to say yes.


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 12, 2006 12:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?



Bill wrote:

Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes


This answered my question, Bill, thank you.  It was nice icing on the 
cake

to read the rest of your thoughts.  Nevertheless, I'm not sure that your
standard framework of thinking readily sees repentance as part of the
gospel.  What I mean is that it seems to me that you are kind of being
pushed toward admitting that repentance is part of the gospel because of
what you read in the Bible, but your standard framework of thinking 
pushes

the preaching of repentance away from being up front and center like it
was
in the ministry of Jesus and his apostles.  You gave some cultural 
reasons

why you think this ought to be so, but I have a little different
perspective
that I would like to share below.

Bill wrote:

When repentance is preached as the introduction to
the good news of Jesus Christ to people whose
background is not rooted and grounded in the grammar
of God's correspondence with humanity, which is
inclusive of most people in the western world today,
the bottom line is this: it is being preached out of context.


I think we view society very differently.  About 85% of those in the
United
States profess to be Christian.  One would be hard pressed to find anyone
in
our society who has not heard of Jesus Christ.  Furthermore, I do not 
find
much question about what we mean when we use the word repentance.  Oh, 
you

can be sure that when I preach I explain it.  I want to be sure they
understand exactly what I mean, but most people seem to have a good idea
about the word before I even start.  My preaching style is one where I
tend
to ask questions before making a point.  For example, I will ask the
crowd,
how many of you know what repentance is.  I let them answer.  That 
tells

me what my audience knows and what they don't know.  I do the same thing
in
the Sunday School class that I teach.

Do you want to know what word it was that gave students the most trouble
this week?  It was the word worldliness.  I have had this come up 
before

too.  Just as the word gay has changed in meaning over the last 50
years,
so this word is shifting in primary usage.  The word has more general
usage
nowadays to describe someone well traveled and educated in the different
cultures of the world.  So when they read a sign with it listed as a sin,
it
provokes dialogue.  What could possibly be wrong with worldliness?  Isn't
worldliness a good thing?

Bill wrote:

There is no repentance apart from Jesus Christ and
to expect people to repent who do not know him is
to demand of them the impossible. Repent? What
the hell for? and What does that even mean?


Perhaps you are talking about total repentance of all sins.  In regards 
to
specific sins, many people repent without it being any kind of response 
to

the gospel of Jesus Christ.  People regret sins and stop doing them all
the
time, in many religions, and even atheists will do this.  It really is 
not

as foreign a concept as you seem to make it.  In fact, I think one of the
reasons that repentance forms the foundation for preaching the gospel is
because it is probably the term people can most relate toward.  Faith is
much more difficult to understand and practice by someone in sin.  Faith
is
something they do automatically when they repent after realizing that 
they

are completely helpless and lost and in need of a Savior.  That
realization
comes from the message that they need to repent, and in attempting to
comply
with that message, they are led into faith in their Savior, Jesus Christ.

Bill wrote:

The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance,
is based in a failure on the part of most Christians

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-12 Thread Taylor
David, I started a response to this and my computer locked up and I lost it.
And so I'm writing to let you know that a response will be coming, but not
tonight.  Sorry about the delay.

Bill

- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


 Bill wrote:
  And so, to those people, repentance was firstly
  a change of mind, a turning away from old beliefs
  and a turning to a new way of thinking about God.
  The task of repentance for them entailed a restructuring
  of their thinking about who this God was in whom they
  had believed. Theirs was to begin to think of God in a
  way which placed Jesus at the heart of God's identity.
  It was thus a first order paradigm shift. Repent for what?
  Repent about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth.
  Change your mind about him. He is your Messiah.

 Upon further reflection of your words here, I am starting to wonder what
 relationship there is in your mind between sin and repentance.  You seem
to
 think of repentance as a theological paradigm shift about one's
 philosophical understanding of the Godhead, particularly concerning Jesus'
 position therein, rather than a changing of one's mind about his
 participation in sin.  Would you care to clarify?  I bet Judy smells a rat
 here.  :-)

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
 believed to be clean.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-11 Thread Dean Moore
cd: Do a word search on Grace and note how often Paul uses that word in
the New Testament-and you have your reply Bro as it must be part of the
message -We are to preach Jesus Christ and Him Crucified an absolute must-
I Cor. 1:23, 1 Cor 2:2.


 [Original Message]
 From: Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Date: 1/10/2006 11:32:39 PM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

 Good questions, David. I am working on a reply.

 Bill

 - Original Message -
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4:38 AM
 Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


  Bill wrote:
   no, it didn't seem to me that they ever really
   got to the Gospel. Christ, it seemed, was
   but a segue to the soul of their message:
   Repent, or be damn!
 
  I have seen a few street preachers that focus on this message too, and
  others who seem to speak of nothing but abortion.  Right now I am
focused
 on
  preaching against an official state sanctioned department of immorality
at
  the University of Florida called the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
  Transgendered) Affairs department.  Sometimes students ask me why don't
I
  address some other sins or other issues.  Well, the Lord sent me on this
  mission and right now I am focused upon one thing, at least up through
 March
  of this year.  They should talk to the Lord about why if they have a
 problem
  with it.  I will for a minute or two address some other pressing issue,
 but
  I am always pressed in my spirit not to turn aside from the mission God
 has
  put on my heart.  As I engage the students in dialogue and debate, I am
  always saying, let's get back to why I'm here today...
 
  My question to you is this.  The message, Repent or be damned, is this
 not
  part of the gospel that Jesus preached?  Is it not a part of the gospel
 that
  most ministers neglect greatly?  You seem to speak about this message as
  being excluded from the gospel when you say, they never really got to
the
  gospel.
 
  I realize that you might want to go to definitions about the word gospel
  meaning good news, but good news is always in a context.  If people do
 not
  know they are damned by their sins, which is prevelant in this culture
of
  lawlessness, then an emphasis of salvation is not a message of good
news.
  It is simply a message of an archaic religion that most people find
  unnecessary for life.
 
  Considering the actual record we have of what was preached, starting
with
  John the Baptist, moving to Jesus, and then to his apostles, is the
 message,
  Repent or be damned really not part of the gospel?  What do you think?
 
  Peace be with you.
  David Miller.
 
  --
  Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
 
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
 
  --
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
  believed to be clean.
 
 

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-11 Thread Taylor



Hi David, 

I want to begin by apologizing to you, but I am not going to 
be able to give your questions the attention they deserve. I wrote most of last 
night (in between short posts to others), thinking I was approximating what I 
needed to say in order present a satisfactory response; however, upon reading my 
reply, I realized that I was still leaving much unsaid. Nevertheless the problem 
boils down to this: eitheran appropriate answeris going to take more 
time than I have to offer, or I am going to have tocondense my thoughts, 
knowing that they will not fully -- or perhaps even adequately -- address your 
inquiry. I'll attempt to do the best I can with thelatter.

I think Dean said quite well one of the points I would like to 
make: If one is going to preach the condemnation of the law 
of sin, then he or she must give the sinner a way out, which is Christ; for to 
fail to do so is to leave a soul in torment, andnot in a state of grace 
(thanks Dean). This it seems to me is the locus of failure in most of the 
preaching on repentance whichI have encountered. It is certainly at the 
center of my concerns against "street preaching."


When repentance is preached as the introduction to 
the good news of Jesus Christ to people whose background is not rooted and 
grounded in the grammar of God's correspondence with humanity, which is 
inclusive of most people in the western world today, the bottom line is 
this:it is being preached out of context. There is no repentance apart 
from Jesus Christ and to expect people to repent who do not know him is to 
demand of them the impossible. "Repent? What the hell for? and Whatdoes 
that even mean?"

The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance, is 
based in a failure on the part of most Christians to realize that repentance, 
when it was preached in the New Testament, was directed almost 
exclusively(I am inclined toleave off the 
"almost"buthavenot fully research it) to people who were 
already people of God: it was preached to God's people, the Jews; or 
topeople who knew Christ -- relationally, if not also via personal 
encounter -- and had put their faith in him. These were people to whom 
theutterance had meaning. It was meaningful because it was already 
contextualized in the language of God. To them, repentance meant not only a 
turning away from something -- as Dean puts it, "the law of sin" -- but a 
turning to the one whom they alreadyknew asGod.The great 
difficulty they had was in turning to Jesus Christ as the One who was that God. 
And as you know, many of them refused to do so.

And so, to those people, "repentance" was firstly 
achange of mind, a turning away from old beliefs and a turning to a new 
way of thinking about God. The task of repentance for them entailed a 
restructuring of their thinking about who this God was in whom they had 
believed. Theirs was to begin to think of God in a way which placed Jesus at the 
heart of God's identity. It was thus afirst order paradigm shift. Repent 
for what? Repent about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth. Change your mind 
about him. He is your Messiah.

To preach repentance to people who do not have this contextual 
backgroundis to place upon thema death sentence. It is to throw the 
whole weight of salvation upon their shoulders and to expect of them what no one 
apart from Christ has ever accomplished:"I have to do something in order 
to be saved, but I have not the will topull it off."Hence, if it is 
taken seriously at all, the weight of that decision will crush them -- if not 
today, then someday soon.

Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes, the NT is replete with 
directives to repent. But repentance is not a means by which or through which 
people are saved. It is Jesus Christ who is our Savior. Salvation is in him, 
complete with mediation on our behalf. Repentance is therefore our response to 
the greatest news the world has ever heard; it is our response to the good news 
of Jesus Christ. Amen.

I think I'll cut is off with that, David. To go further would 
be to get into things we have discussed many times in the past. I hope this 
begins to address your questions and to give you some indication as to my 
thoughts in relation to this subject. I am sorry that I do not have more time to 
spend on this, but I have dozens of papers to grade, on top of wanting to spend 
some time with Tanya and Andy, not to mention I'm over sixty posts behind in my 
ready :) Thanks DavidM. I hope you are not displeased with me.

Bill


- Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
 Bill wrote:  
no, it didn't seem to me that they ever really  got to the Gospel. 
"Christ," it seemed, was  but a segue to the soul of their 
message:  "Repent, or be damn!"  I have seen a few 
street preachers that focus on this message too, and  others who seem to 
speak of 

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-11 Thread knpraise

The context of the public ministry -- an excellent point. 

jd

-- Original message -- From: "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Hi David, 

I want to begin by apologizing to you, but I am not going to be able to give your questions the attention they deserve. I wrote most of last night (in between short posts to others), thinking I was approximating what I needed to say in order present a satisfactory response; however, upon reading my reply, I realized that I was still leaving much unsaid. Nevertheless the problem boils down to this: eitheran appropriate answeris going to take more time than I have to offer, or I am going to have tocondense my thoughts, knowing that they will not fully -- or perhaps even adequately -- address your inquiry. I'll attempt to do the best I can with thelatter.

I think Dean said quite well one of the points I would like to make: If one is going to preach the condemnation of the law of sin, then he or she must give the sinner a way out, which is Christ; for to fail to do so is to leave a soul in torment, andnot in a state of grace (thanks Dean). This it seems to me is the locus of failure in most of the preaching on repentance whichI have encountered. It is certainly at the center of my concerns against "street preaching."


When repentance is preached as the introduction to the good news of Jesus Christ to people whose background is not rooted and grounded in the grammar of God's correspondence with humanity, which is inclusive of most people in the western world today, the bottom line is this:it is being preached out of context. There is no repentance apart from Jesus Christ and to expect people to repent who do not know him is to demand of them the impossible. "Repent? What the hell for? and Whatdoes that even mean?"

The confusion I see over the topic of preaching repentance, is based in a failure on the part of most Christians to realize that repentance, when it was preached in the New Testament, was directed almost exclusively(I am inclined toleave off the "almost"buthavenot fully research it) to people who were already people of God: it was preached to God's people, the Jews; or topeople who knew Christ -- relationally, if not also via personal encounter -- and had put their faith in him. These were people to whom theutterance had meaning. It was meaningful because it was already contextualized in the language of God. To them, repentance meant not only a turning away from something -- as Dean puts it, "the law of sin" -- but a turning to the one whom they alreadyknew asGod.The great difficulty they had was in turning to Jesus Christ as the One who was that God. And as you know, many of them refused to do so.

And so, to those people, "repentance" was firstly achange of mind, a turning away from old beliefs and a turning to a new way of thinking about God. The task of repentance for them entailed a restructuring of their thinking about who this God was in whom they had believed. Theirs was to begin to think of God in a way which placed Jesus at the heart of God's identity. It was thus afirst order paradigm shift. Repent for what? Repent about this man you know as Jesus of Nazareth. Change your mind about him. He is your Messiah.

To preach repentance to people who do not have this contextual backgroundis to place upon thema death sentence. It is to throw the whole weight of salvation upon their shoulders and to expect of them what no one apart from Christ has ever accomplished:"I have to do something in order to be saved, but I have not the will topull it off."Hence, if it is taken seriously at all, the weight of that decision will crush them -- if not today, then someday soon.

Is repentance part of the Gospel? Yes, the NT is replete with directives to repent. But repentance is not a means by which or through which people are saved. It is Jesus Christ who is our Savior. Salvation is in him, complete with mediation on our behalf. Repentance is therefore our response to the greatest news the world has ever heard; it is our response to the good news of Jesus Christ. Amen.

I think I'll cut is off with that, David. To go further would be to get into things we have discussed many times in the past. I hope this begins to address your questions and to give you some indication as to my thoughts in relation to this subject. I am sorry that I do not have more time to spend on this, but I have dozens of papers to grade, on top of wanting to spend some time with Tanya and Andy, not to mention I'm over sixty posts behind in my ready :) Thanks DavidM. I hope you are not displeased with me.

Bill


- Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
 Bill wrote:  no, it didn't seem to me that they ever really  got to the Gospel. "Christ," it seemed, was  but a segue to the soul of their message:  "Repent, or be damn!"  I have seen a few 

Re: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?

2006-01-10 Thread Taylor
Good questions, David. I am working on a reply.

Bill

- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?


 Bill wrote:
  no, it didn't seem to me that they ever really
  got to the Gospel. Christ, it seemed, was
  but a segue to the soul of their message:
  Repent, or be damn!

 I have seen a few street preachers that focus on this message too, and
 others who seem to speak of nothing but abortion.  Right now I am focused
on
 preaching against an official state sanctioned department of immorality at
 the University of Florida called the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
 Transgendered) Affairs department.  Sometimes students ask me why don't I
 address some other sins or other issues.  Well, the Lord sent me on this
 mission and right now I am focused upon one thing, at least up through
March
 of this year.  They should talk to the Lord about why if they have a
problem
 with it.  I will for a minute or two address some other pressing issue,
but
 I am always pressed in my spirit not to turn aside from the mission God
has
 put on my heart.  As I engage the students in dialogue and debate, I am
 always saying, let's get back to why I'm here today...

 My question to you is this.  The message, Repent or be damned, is this
not
 part of the gospel that Jesus preached?  Is it not a part of the gospel
that
 most ministers neglect greatly?  You seem to speak about this message as
 being excluded from the gospel when you say, they never really got to the
 gospel.

 I realize that you might want to go to definitions about the word gospel
 meaning good news, but good news is always in a context.  If people do
not
 know they are damned by their sins, which is prevelant in this culture of
 lawlessness, then an emphasis of salvation is not a message of good news.
 It is simply a message of an archaic religion that most people find
 unnecessary for life.

 Considering the actual record we have of what was preached, starting with
 John the Baptist, moving to Jesus, and then to his apostles, is the
message,
 Repent or be damned really not part of the gospel?  What do you think?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
 believed to be clean.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.