Re: [tryton] Revisiting product's type

2015-01-01 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Albert Cervera i Areny: " [tryton] Revisiting product's type" (Fri, 2 Jan
  2015 00:20:16 +0100):

> Currently product's type can be one of:
> 
> - Assets
> - Goods
> - Service
> 
> However, I don't think it's correct to have the distinction between Assets
> and Goods/Service. For example, if my company is dedicated to selling cars
> and I have the product "Kia Sportage Emotion" I may have it in stock for
> selling but I may also purchase the car to be used by one of our employees.
> In this case, currently we'd need to create two separate products for what
> it actually is the same product.

Agreed.
 
> I think that just like we moved "Consumable" out of the "Type" field into a
> boolean we should do the same with Assets. Add a new check box "Asset" that
> when true it would allow to fill in the asset-related accounts.

I don't even think, that a new checkbox is needed, because the Boolean
'Depreciable' already exists.

> I think the checkbox should always be available (no matter if type is Goods
> or Service) because a patent is not a good but it is an asset.
> 
> Comments?



-- 

Mathias Behrle
MBSolutions
Gilgenmatten 10 A
D-79114 Freiburg

Tel: +49(761)471023
Fax: +49(761)4770816
http://www.m9s.biz
UStIdNr: DE 142009020
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6


pgp7iYUEvLMEP.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP


[tryton] Revisiting product's type

2015-01-01 Thread Albert Cervera i Areny
Currently product's type can be one of:

- Assets
- Goods
- Service

However, I don't think it's correct to have the distinction between Assets
and Goods/Service. For example, if my company is dedicated to selling cars
and I have the product "Kia Sportage Emotion" I may have it in stock for
selling but I may also purchase the car to be used by one of our employees.
In this case, currently we'd need to create two separate products for what
it actually is the same product.

I think that just like we moved "Consumable" out of the "Type" field into a
boolean we should do the same with Assets. Add a new check box "Asset" that
when true it would allow to fill in the asset-related accounts.

I think the checkbox should always be available (no matter if type is Goods
or Service) because a patent is not a good but it is an asset.

Comments?
-- 
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com