Re: [C++] Changes to tuscany::sca::model
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Hi, I'm going to leave the SupplyChain scenario alone for a day or two, to leave people time to take a look at it, comment and see if/how the SCDL artifacts can be simplified or done better before integrating the actual implementation logic of the supplychain management components. In the meantime, I'm starting to make changes to the SCDL model in tuscany::sca::model to match the logical model for the 0.95 recursive composition SCDL. This will bring the model classes closer to the diagram I had posted a while back: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/cpp/diagrams/service.jpg. This will include the following changes: - finish aligning the model classes with the 0.95 terminology - separate component and component type - support multiple instances of a type configured differently - refactor subsystem/module into composite - support for includes I'll adjust the rest of the runtime as necessary to keep it building and working, but I'll try to minimize the changes, and will leave TODO comments where I feel that more work is required later. I should be able to start checking in some of the changes at the end of the day or tomorrow. The model classes have been updated and merged with Pete's changes to introduce an extensibility mechanism. It took me a little longer than I expected as most model changes required adjustments in the code in the tuscany::sca namespace. I also changed the structure of the model a little: - renamed CompositeServiceType / CompositeReferenceType to CompositeService / CompositeReference - removed any requirement for multiple inheritance in these two classes. They now only extend Component, instead of extensing both Component and ServiceType / ReferenceType. The updated class diagram documenting the model is there: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/cpp/diagrams/service.jpg and here's some info on how to read such a class diagram: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_diagram CPP components and WS references now work on the new model (Calculator and BigBank work as well). WS services (server side) are not working yet as I need to make a few more changes to the WS service support code. The next update should bring WS services back to life. -- Jean-Sebastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[C++] Changes to tuscany::sca::model
Hi, I'm going to leave the SupplyChain scenario alone for a day or two, to leave people time to take a look at it, comment and see if/how the SCDL artifacts can be simplified or done better before integrating the actual implementation logic of the supplychain management components. In the meantime, I'm starting to make changes to the SCDL model in tuscany::sca::model to match the logical model for the 0.95 recursive composition SCDL. This will bring the model classes closer to the diagram I had posted a while back: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/cpp/diagrams/service.jpg. This will include the following changes: - finish aligning the model classes with the 0.95 terminology - separate component and component type - support multiple instances of a type configured differently - refactor subsystem/module into composite - support for includes I'll adjust the rest of the runtime as necessary to keep it building and working, but I'll try to minimize the changes, and will leave TODO comments where I feel that more work is required later. I should be able to start checking in some of the changes at the end of the day or tomorrow. -- Jean-Sebastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [C++] Changes to tuscany::sca::model
Excellent stuff... another thing that we haven't got around to yet. I'm still playing around with different ways of making pluggable extensions so I'll just merge what you check in with what I'm looking at. Cheers, On 24/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm going to leave the SupplyChain scenario alone for a day or two, to leave people time to take a look at it, comment and see if/how the SCDL artifacts can be simplified or done better before integrating the actual implementation logic of the supplychain management components. In the meantime, I'm starting to make changes to the SCDL model in tuscany::sca::model to match the logical model for the 0.95 recursive composition SCDL. This will bring the model classes closer to the diagram I had posted a while back: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/cpp/diagrams/service.jpg. This will include the following changes: - finish aligning the model classes with the 0.95 terminology - separate component and component type - support multiple instances of a type configured differently - refactor subsystem/module into composite - support for includes I'll adjust the rest of the runtime as necessary to keep it building and working, but I'll try to minimize the changes, and will leave TODO comments where I feel that more work is required later. I should be able to start checking in some of the changes at the end of the day or tomorrow. -- Jean-Sebastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
