Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
My only minor comment is whether we are still going to use incubating on the release name/artifacts. Other then that, all looks ok, and here is my +1. On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.2.1 maintenance release. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging repository, and eclipse update site. The SVN tag for the release is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2.1 The _only_ code change in this over the 1.2 release is in r657526 [1], all other changes are just version updates and doc changes for the release. +1 to release from me. ...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-commits/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
Thanks for the vote. It seemed safer for this maintenance release to keep incubating in the artifact names just to minimize changes. It probably is as easy as the change to the release number but who know where problems may hide. I thought we could use the up coming SDO 1.1.1 release as a test of removing the suffix to see if the are any places that we need to be careful with. ...ant On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My only minor comment is whether we are still going to use incubating on the release name/artifacts. Other then that, all looks ok, and here is my +1. On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.2.1 maintenance release. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging repository, and eclipse update site. The SVN tag for the release is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2.1 The _only_ code change in this over the 1.2 release is in r657526 [1], all other changes are just version updates and doc changes for the release. +1 to release from me. ...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-commits/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
+1 from me Thanks to every one who contributed! :) Dave. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:21 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the vote. It seemed safer for this maintenance release to keep incubating in the artifact names just to minimize changes. It probably is as easy as the change to the release number but who know where problems may hide. I thought we could use the up coming SDO 1.1.1 release as a test of removing the suffix to see if the are any places that we need to be careful with. ...ant On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My only minor comment is whether we are still going to use incubating on the release name/artifacts. Other then that, all looks ok, and here is my +1. On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.2.1 maintenance release. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging repository, and eclipse update site. The SVN tag for the release is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2.1 The _only_ code change in this over the 1.2 release is in r657526 [1], all other changes are just version updates and doc changes for the release. +1 to release from me. ...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-commits/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ -- Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
+1 ++Vamsi On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:40 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.2.1 maintenance release. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.2.1-RC1/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging repository, and eclipse update site. The SVN tag for the release is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2.1 The _only_ code change in this over the 1.2 release is in r657526 [1], all other changes are just version updates and doc changes for the release. +1 to release from me. ...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-commits/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
Luciano Resende wrote: My only minor comment is whether we are still going to use incubating on the release name/artifacts. Other then that, all looks ok, and here is my +1. +1 from me. I agree with Luciano. It would be nice to move off the incubating affix as soon as possible. It tends to lengthen the directory names, sometime causing delete problems on some operating systems. -- Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.2.1 (RC1)
Hi, I ran calculator*, helloworld*, implementation*, simple* and store sucessfully. Haleh On 6/3/08, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: My only minor comment is whether we are still going to use incubating on the release name/artifacts. Other then that, all looks ok, and here is my +1. +1 from me. I agree with Luciano. It would be nice to move off the incubating affix as soon as possible. It tends to lengthen the directory names, sometime causing delete problems on some operating systems. -- Thanks, Dan Becker
