Re: Can composite namespace equal in different contribution?
Mike Edwards wrote: Wang Feng wrote: Hi all I have a scenario like this.There are two contributions and each one contribution contains one composite which has the same namespace. The namespace has been imported and exported on every contribution. I am not sure this scenario is right or wrong,can anybody give me an advice? Contribution metadata like below: Contribution A http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; targetNamespace="http://hello"; xmlns:hello="http://hello";> http://hello"/> http://hello"/> Contribution B http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; targetNamespace="http://hello"; xmlns:hello="http://hello";> http://hello"/> http://hello"/> -- Wang Feng 2008-04-15 Wang Feng, It is perfectly acceptable to use the same namespace for artifacts such as composites in multiple contributions. Your example is just fine. What you should not do is to have the same name for the same type of artifact in the same namespace, whereever they are placed - that is to invite trouble. So names "composite1" and "composite2" are OK, but to have two composites named "composite1" is not wise, even if they are in separate contributions. Yours, Mike. For examples of contributions that share a namespace, see the folders under sca/java/tutorial, many of the contributions in the tutorial share the same http://store namespace. Hope this helps. -- Jean-Sebastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Can composite namespace equal in different contribution?
Yes, I'd expect the stack overflow as we would keep delegating back and forth for the import/export model resolvers. Please file a jira, and let's work together to find a solution for this issue. On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Wang Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Luciano > > Thank you for your quick response. > > When a contribution metadata contains a deployable composite but the > composite is not exist, > there will be recursive resolve the composite and will stack overflow. > > I will create a jira and put my testcase. > > Thanks, > Wang Feng > > > > > On 2008-04-15,Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I'd say that the scenario is valid, but as mentioned in [1], we were > >not handling cycles very well in our import/export model resolvers. > >Are you experiencing a specific issue that I could try helping ? > > > > > >[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28147.html > > > >On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Wang Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> I have a scenario like this.There are two contributions and each one > contribution > >> contains one composite which has the same namespace. The namespace has > been > >> imported and exported on every contribution. > >> I am not sure this scenario is right or wrong,can anybody give me an > advice? > >> > >> Contribution metadata like below: > >> Contribution A > >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; > >> targetNamespace="http://hello"; > >> xmlns:hello="http://hello";> > >> > >>http://hello"/> > >>http://hello"/> > >> > >> > >> Contribution B > >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; > >> targetNamespace="http://hello"; > >> xmlns:hello="http://hello";> > >> > >>http://hello"/> > >>http://hello"/> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Wang Feng > >> 2008-04-15 > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Luciano Resende > >Apache Tuscany Committer > >http://people.apache.org/~lresende > >http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can composite namespace equal in different contribution?
Wang Feng wrote: Hi all I have a scenario like this.There are two contributions and each one contribution contains one composite which has the same namespace. The namespace has been imported and exported on every contribution. I am not sure this scenario is right or wrong,can anybody give me an advice? Contribution metadata like below: Contribution A http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; targetNamespace="http://hello"; xmlns:hello="http://hello";> http://hello"/> http://hello"/> Contribution B http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; targetNamespace="http://hello"; xmlns:hello="http://hello";> http://hello"/> http://hello"/> -- Wang Feng 2008-04-15 Wang Feng, It is perfectly acceptable to use the same namespace for artifacts such as composites in multiple contributions. Your example is just fine. What you should not do is to have the same name for the same type of artifact in the same namespace, whereever they are placed - that is to invite trouble. So names "composite1" and "composite2" are OK, but to have two composites named "composite1" is not wise, even if they are in separate contributions. Yours, Mike. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Can composite namespace equal in different contribution?
Hi Luciano Thank you for your quick response. When a contribution metadata contains a deployable composite but the composite is not exist, there will be recursive resolve the composite and will stack overflow. I will create a jira and put my testcase. Thanks, Wang Feng On 2008-04-15,Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'd say that the scenario is valid, but as mentioned in [1], we were >not handling cycles very well in our import/export model resolvers. >Are you experiencing a specific issue that I could try helping ? > > >[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28147.html > >On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Wang Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all >> I have a scenario like this.There are two contributions and each one >> contribution >> contains one composite which has the same namespace. The namespace has been >> imported and exported on every contribution. >> I am not sure this scenario is right or wrong,can anybody give me an advice? >> >> Contribution metadata like below: >> Contribution A >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; >> targetNamespace="http://hello"; >> xmlns:hello="http://hello";> >> >>http://hello"/> >>http://hello"/> >> >> >> Contribution B >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; >> targetNamespace="http://hello"; >> xmlns:hello="http://hello";> >> >>http://hello"/> >>http://hello"/> >> >> >> -- >> Wang Feng >> 2008-04-15 >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > >-- >Luciano Resende >Apache Tuscany Committer >http://people.apache.org/~lresende >http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can composite namespace equal in different contribution?
I'd say that the scenario is valid, but as mentioned in [1], we were not handling cycles very well in our import/export model resolvers. Are you experiencing a specific issue that I could try helping ? [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28147.html On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Wang Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > I have a scenario like this.There are two contributions and each one > contribution > contains one composite which has the same namespace. The namespace has been > imported and exported on every contribution. > I am not sure this scenario is right or wrong,can anybody give me an advice? > > Contribution metadata like below: > Contribution A > http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; > targetNamespace="http://hello"; > xmlns:hello="http://hello";> > >http://hello"/> >http://hello"/> > > > Contribution B > http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0"; > targetNamespace="http://hello"; > xmlns:hello="http://hello";> > >http://hello"/> >http://hello"/> > > > -- > Wang Feng > 2008-04-15 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
