Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core?
Hi, I'm in the middle of integrating databinding framework with core/spi and it's time to make a decision on the packaging. There are two options for the databinding-framework. 1) Merge with core/spi: Move the interfaces/base classes into spi and implementation into core. 2) Keep databinding-framework as an extension. Individual databinding technology modules will stay as extensions. Please let me know your opions. Thanks, Raymond
Re: Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core?
If there are no external dependencies on databinding, my preference would be for the extension pieces to be merged with SPI and the impl to be placed in core under /services. Before that happens, though, I'd also like to see a lot more test coverage in place, particularly unit testing. Integration testing could be done whenever we get to an integration build. Jim On Sep 6, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I'm in the middle of integrating databinding framework with core/ spi and it's time to make a decision on the packaging. There are two options for the databinding-framework. 1) Merge with core/spi: Move the interfaces/base classes into spi and implementation into core. 2) Keep databinding-framework as an extension. Individual databinding technology modules will stay as extensions. Please let me know your opions. Thanks, Raymond - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core?
Hi, I think I'm going to leave databinding-framework as an extension for now. It won't impact the integration effort this stage. When the code becomes more mature (in terms of test coverage and functions), I'll merge it into the core/spi and the work should be very trivial. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:22 AM Subject: Re: Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core? If there are no external dependencies on databinding, my preference would be for the extension pieces to be merged with SPI and the impl to be placed in core under /services. Before that happens, though, I'd also like to see a lot more test coverage in place, particularly unit testing. Integration testing could be done whenever we get to an integration build. Jim On Sep 6, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I'm in the middle of integrating databinding framework with core/ spi and it's time to make a decision on the packaging. There are two options for the databinding-framework. 1) Merge with core/spi: Move the interfaces/base classes into spi and implementation into core. 2) Keep databinding-framework as an extension. Individual databinding technology modules will stay as extensions. Please let me know your opions. Thanks, Raymond - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core?
On Sep 6, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I think I'm going to leave databinding-framework as an extension for now. It won't impact the integration effort this stage. When the code becomes more mature (in terms of test coverage and functions), I'll merge it into the core/spi and the work should be very trivial. O.K let me know if I can help with anything. Jim Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:22 AM Subject: Re: Should we merge the databinding-framework into spi/core? If there are no external dependencies on databinding, my preference would be for the extension pieces to be merged with SPI and the impl to be placed in core under /services. Before that happens, though, I'd also like to see a lot more test coverage in place, particularly unit testing. Integration testing could be done whenever we get to an integration build. Jim On Sep 6, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I'm in the middle of integrating databinding framework with core/ spi and it's time to make a decision on the packaging. There are two options for the databinding-framework. 1) Merge with core/spi: Move the interfaces/base classes into spi and implementation into core. 2) Keep databinding-framework as an extension. Individual databinding technology modules will stay as extensions. Please let me know your opions. Thanks, Raymond - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
