Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-20 Thread K.M. Richards
On Friday, December 19, 2014 9:17:15 AM UTC-8, PGage wrote:

 ... but the Washington Niggers or Washington Kikes would be just fine.


To tell the family secret, my grandmother was Dutch ... 

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-19 Thread PGage
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Bob Jersey bob.in.jer...@juno.com wrote:

 A George Wa(r)shington U. professor challenged the licence of WWXX, the
 Snyder-owned FM which is one of the NFL team's outlets, over whether it
 was. He failed.

 This Bloomberg piece
 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-18/redskins-name-ruled-not-obscene-as-fcc-declines-to-deny-license.html
 (link) said he's also got a complaint against Fox-13 in LA. For what, use
 of it by Terry, Howie, Jimmy et al.?


Somebody failed here, but not sure it was Banzhaf.

the FCC said Redskins doesn’t fit definitions for obscene or profane words
because it isn’t sexual or excretory in nature.

So, I guess the Washington Motherfuckers (a name which no doubt would be
chosen to honor those who love their mothers) and the Washington
Pants-Shitters would not be acceptable, but the Washington Niggers or
Washington Kikes would be just fine.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-19 Thread Tom Wolper
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:17 PM, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Bob Jersey bob.in.jer...@juno.com
 wrote:

 A George Wa(r)shington U. professor challenged the licence of WWXX, the
 Snyder-owned FM which is one of the NFL team's outlets, over whether it
 was. He failed.

 This Bloomberg piece
 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-18/redskins-name-ruled-not-obscene-as-fcc-declines-to-deny-license.html
 (link) said he's also got a complaint against Fox-13 in LA. For what, use
 of it by Terry, Howie, Jimmy et al.?


 Somebody failed here, but not sure it was Banzhaf.

 the FCC said Redskins doesn’t fit definitions for obscene or profane
 words because it isn’t sexual or excretory in nature.

 So, I guess the Washington Motherfuckers (a name which no doubt would be
 chosen to honor those who love their mothers) and the Washington
 Pants-Shitters would not be acceptable, but the Washington Niggers or
 Washington Kikes would be just fine.


By the rules the FCC got from Congress that's right. If you complain to the
FCC they'll tell you that those are the rules they work under and if you're
not happy convince Congress to give them new rules.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-19 Thread PGage
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Tom Wolper twol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:17 PM, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:

 Somebody failed here, but not sure it was Banzhaf.

 the FCC said Redskins doesn’t fit definitions for obscene or profane
 words because it isn’t sexual or excretory in nature.

 So, I guess the Washington Motherfuckers (a name which no doubt would
 be chosen to honor those who love their mothers) and the Washington
 Pants-Shitters would not be acceptable, but the Washington Niggers or
 Washington Kikes would be just fine.


 By the rules the FCC got from Congress that's right. If you complain to
 the FCC they'll tell you that those are the rules they work under and if
 you're not happy convince Congress to give them new rules.


And yet, if there was an NFL team called the Washington Kikes, I suspect
most television stations would not say it very often over their air.

As I say, somebody has failed here, but I am not sure it was Banzhaf...

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-19 Thread Tom Wolper
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Tom Wolper twol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:17 PM, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:

 Somebody failed here, but not sure it was Banzhaf.

 the FCC said Redskins doesn’t fit definitions for obscene or profane
 words because it isn’t sexual or excretory in nature.

 So, I guess the Washington Motherfuckers (a name which no doubt would
 be chosen to honor those who love their mothers) and the Washington
 Pants-Shitters would not be acceptable, but the Washington Niggers or
 Washington Kikes would be just fine.


 By the rules the FCC got from Congress that's right. If you complain to
 the FCC they'll tell you that those are the rules they work under and if
 you're not happy convince Congress to give them new rules.


 And yet, if there was an NFL team called the Washington Kikes, I suspect
 most television stations would not say it very often over their air.

 As I say, somebody has failed here, but I am not sure it was Banzhaf...


Banzhaf probably has a longer term strategy. The first and most obvious
step is to get a ruling from the FCC and he has done that. I doubt he was
surprised by the ruling and he's going to move on to his next steps.

Since the FCC is being asked to suppress speech we want them to have
guidelines that are specific as possible. Asking them to suppress based on
perceived offensiveness is just too vague.

Trying to come up with an analogous offensive nickname doesn't work because
Washington has had that nickname for decades without a major challenge. If
they went to change it to another slur they would be stopped by the NFL and
the team's  advertisers/local business community long before it got to the
FCC. The day will come when Washington will change the name of their team
since the problems with the name will not disappear even if the current
pressure abates.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-19 Thread PGage
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Tom Wolper twol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:



 As I say, somebody has failed here, but I am not sure it was Banzhaf...


 Banzhaf probably has a longer term strategy. The first and most obvious
 step is to get a ruling from the FCC and he has done that. I doubt he was
 surprised by the ruling and he's going to move on to his next steps.

 Since the FCC is being asked to suppress speech we want them to have
 guidelines that are specific as possible. Asking them to suppress based on
 perceived offensiveness is just too vague.

 Trying to come up with an analogous offensive nickname doesn't work
 because Washington has had that nickname for decades without a major
 challenge. If they went to change it to another slur they would be stopped
 by the NFL and the team's  advertisers/local business community long before
 it got to the FCC. The day will come when Washington will change the name
 of their team since the problems with the name will not disappear even if
 the current pressure abates.


My point is not that the FCC Ruling is in error here - indeed, I would
rather they allow stations to broadcast motherfucker than that they fine
them for broadcasting Redskins.

My point is that somebody has failed here, but I am not sure it was
Banzhaf...it is the idiot who owns the Washington DC NFL franchise, and the
idiots who run the NFL.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-18 Thread Bob Jersey
A George Wa(r)shington U. professor challenged the licence of WWXX, the 
Snyder-owned FM which is one of the NFL team's outlets, over whether it 
was. He failed.

This Bloomberg piece 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-18/redskins-name-ruled-not-obscene-as-fcc-declines-to-deny-license.html
 
(link) said he's also got a complaint against Fox-13 in LA. For what, use 
of it by Terry, Howie, Jimmy et al.?

B

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TV orNotTV] FCC: Redskins not a 'dirty' word

2014-12-18 Thread Mark Jeffries
Fox 11.  KCOP is My13.

Mark Jeffries
Saints Spotlight Editor
spotligh...@gmail.com

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Bob Jersey bob.in.jer...@juno.com wrote:

 A George Wa(r)shington U. professor challenged the licence of WWXX, the
 Snyder-owned FM which is one of the NFL team's outlets, over whether it
 was. He failed.

 This Bloomberg piece
 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-18/redskins-name-ruled-not-obscene-as-fcc-declines-to-deny-license.html
 (link) said he's also got a complaint against Fox-13 in LA. For what, use
 of it by Terry, Howie, Jimmy et al.?

 B

  --
 --
 TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups TV or Not TV group.
 To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 TVorNotTV group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV  The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
TVorNotTV group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.