Re: [twitter-dev] What is the expected behavoir of Retweeting a retweet

[Abraham Williams]

Makes sense. On the web interface you only ever see update1 to manually
retweet.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 04:16, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'll give you an unofficial yes.  This is exactly the way I understand it
 will work.  If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars
 too.


 On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Hwee-Boon Yar hweeb...@gmail.com wrote:

 I did an experiment.

 user1 tweets update1
 user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded)
 user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of
 update2.

 I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir?

 --
 Hwee-Boon





-- 
Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
Project | Awesome Lists | http://twitterli.st
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, WI, United States

[twitter-dev] What is the expected behavoir of Retweeting a retweet

[Hwee-Boon Yar]

I did an experiment.

user1 tweets update1
user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded)
user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of
update2.

I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir?

--
Hwee-Boon

Re: [twitter-dev] What is the expected behavoir of Retweeting a retweet

[Tim Haines]

I'll give you an unofficial yes.  This is exactly the way I understand it
will work.  If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars
too.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Hwee-Boon Yar hweeb...@gmail.com wrote:

 I did an experiment.

 user1 tweets update1
 user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded)
 user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of
 update2.

 I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir?

 --
 Hwee-Boon