[twsocket] SMTPClient

2006-08-31 Thread lalin

  Hello,
  I use SMTPClient for sending a email since a server with default smtp 
server of IIS. The example program find this smtp server. But in my program, 
with this code:
Smtp1.Host := smtpserver;
Smtp1.port := 'smpt';
Smtp1.FromName := name;
Smtp1.HdrFrom  := mail1;
Smtp1.HdrTo:= mail2;
Smtp1.HdrSubject := title;
Smtp1.Connect;
Smtp1.Data;
Smtp1.quit;

  produces SMTP component not ready. Can you help me?

  Regards.
  Carlos.
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] SMTPClient

2006-08-31 Thread Bevan Edwards
Hi Carlos,

Is the Smtp1.port := 'smpt'; an error in your code or a typo?
It should be Smtp1.port := 'smtp';

Regards,

Bevan


lalin wrote:
   Hello,
   I use SMTPClient for sending a email since a server with default smtp 
 server of IIS. The example program find this smtp server. But in my program, 
 with this code:
 Smtp1.Host := smtpserver;
 Smtp1.port := 'smpt';
 Smtp1.FromName := name;
 Smtp1.HdrFrom  := mail1;
 Smtp1.HdrTo:= mail2;
 Smtp1.HdrSubject := title;
 Smtp1.Connect;
 Smtp1.Data;
 Smtp1.quit;
 
   produces SMTP component not ready. Can you help me?
 
   Regards.
   Carlos.

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] SMTPClient

2006-08-31 Thread Marcello Vezzelli
lalin ha scritto:
   Hello,
   I use SMTPClient for sending a email since a server with default smtp 
 server of IIS. The example program find this smtp server. But in my program, 
 with this code:
 Smtp1.Host := smtpserver;
 Smtp1.port := 'smpt';
 Smtp1.FromName := name;
 Smtp1.HdrFrom  := mail1;
 Smtp1.HdrTo:= mail2;
 Smtp1.HdrSubject := title;
 Smtp1.Connect;
 Smtp1.Data;
 Smtp1.quit;
 
   produces SMTP component not ready. Can you help me?

If you want to keep this code structure, use SMTPSync component and
check return for each step.

By the way, consider to switch to event driven architecture for best
performance and better structure.

Regards
-- 
Marcello Vezzelli
Software Development Department
E-Works s.r.l.
tel. +39 059 2929081
fax +39 059 2925035
Direzionale 70 - Via Giardini 456/c
41100 Modena - Italy

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


[twsocket] OnDataAvailable and reetrancy

2006-08-31 Thread Markus Humm
Hello,

I've a server and a client app. which communicate through a TCP based
protocoll I designed.

The server get's requests which in OnDataAvailable are received into a
1500 Byte sized array (most time the app. will run on a LAN) whose
contents is copied into a larger buffer then since the request could be
fragmented.

The larger buffer is processed within the context of OnDataAvailable.
If I send requests manually via clicking on a button in the client all
works well, but not if the client sends say 1.000 requests in a loop.

The server gets out of sync then because the buffer contains garbage
now. But where does it come? Can OnDataAvailable be called while it is
already running? And if yes, how to prevent this? Is using critical
sections a good idea here?

The processing of the larger puffer is to check validity of the request
and extract the real request out of my data format. The real request is
appended to a queue then which gets processed by a seperate thread.

Greetings

Markus
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


[twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Arno Garrels
Hello,

I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
by myself.  
TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed 
(although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
Size exists since D3)?  

What do you think?

---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Fastream Technologies
AFAIK, ICS v6 is only for D/BCB6+ and ICSv5 is going to get abondoned. So no 
need to worry! :))

Best Regards,

SZ

- Original Message - 
From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers


: Hello,
:
: I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
: fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
: 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
: by myself.
: TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
: to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
: sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
: in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
: (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
: Size exists since D3)?
:
: What do you think?
:
: ---
: Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
: http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
:
: -- 
: To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
: please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
: Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote:
 AFAIK, ICS v6 is only for D/BCB6+ and ICSv5 is going to get
 abondoned. So no need to worry! :))

Have you really read my question??

 
 Best Regards,
 
 SZ
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:27 PM
 Subject: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
 fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
 by myself.
 TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
 to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
 sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
 in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
 (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
 Size exists since D3)?
 
 What do you think?
 
 ---
 Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
 http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
 
 --
 To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
 please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
 Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Fastream Technologies
Yes, I believe you can safely set the Size property manually as a 
workaround. That's what I do!

Regards,

Sz

- Original Message - 
From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers


: Fastream Technologies wrote:
:  AFAIK, ICS v6 is only for D/BCB6+ and ICSv5 is going to get
:  abondoned. So no need to worry! :))
:
: Have you really read my question??
:
: 
:  Best Regards,
: 
:  SZ
: 
:  - Original Message -
:  From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:  To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
:  Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:27 PM
:  Subject: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers
: 
: 
:  Hello,
: 
:  I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
:  fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
:  64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
:  by myself.
:  TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
:  to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
:  sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
:  in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
:  (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
:  Size exists since D3)?
: 
:  What do you think?
: 
:  ---
:  Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
:  http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
: 
:  --
:  To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
:  please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
:  Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
: -- 
: To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
: please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
: Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] OnDataAvailable and reetrancy

2006-08-31 Thread Francois PIETTE
 Can OnDataAvailable be called while it is
 already running?
 And if yes, how to prevent this? Is using critical
 sections a good idea here?

You must avoid having the events reentered. To avoid this, you simply have 
to _not_ call any form of the message pump from the events. The message pump 
is ProcessMessages, any modal form, GetMessage/DispatchMessage and the 
likes.

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be



- Original Message - 
From: Markus Humm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:20 PM
Subject: [twsocket] OnDataAvailable and reetrancy


 Hello,

 I've a server and a client app. which communicate through a TCP based
 protocoll I designed.

 The server get's requests which in OnDataAvailable are received into a
 1500 Byte sized array (most time the app. will run on a LAN) whose
 contents is copied into a larger buffer then since the request could be
 fragmented.

 The larger buffer is processed within the context of OnDataAvailable.
 If I send requests manually via clicking on a button in the client all
 works well, but not if the client sends say 1.000 requests in a loop.

 The server gets out of sync then because the buffer contains garbage
 now. But where does it come? Can OnDataAvailable be called while it is
 already running? And if yes, how to prevent this? Is using critical
 sections a good idea here?

 The processing of the larger puffer is to check validity of the request
 and extract the real request out of my data format. The real request is
 appended to a queue then which gets processed by a seperate thread.

 Greetings

 Markus
 -- 
 To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
 please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
 Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Francois PIETTE
 I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
 fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
 by myself.
 TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
 to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
 sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
 in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
 (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
 Size exists since D3)?

 What do you think?

I think that I don't undestand why you have to set the size of the 
TFileStream when it is destroyed. Do you mean it could be smaller than his 
previous size when resuming a transfert ? I don't think so.

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be


-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


[twsocket] Where is best to ask general Delphi questions?

2006-08-31 Thread Info 2004
Hi,

The Delphi and Delphi-Talk elists seem rather quiet.

Where is the best place to ask general Delphi questions - along the 
lines of who has used a good SVG component etc?

Regards,

Andy
-- 
ASA Micros Ltd.
141 Wardle Road,
Wardle,
Rochdale.
OL12 9JA
UK

Tel: +44(0)1706 355057
Company No. 4722262
VAT No. 704044772

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Where is best to ask general Delphi questions?

2006-08-31 Thread Francois PIETTE
 The Delphi and Delphi-Talk elists seem rather quiet.

Delphi mailing list is still a very good place. A lot of users are still 
subscribers and wake up when needed.
Forget about Delphi-Talk which is unmoderated.

 Where is the best place to ask general Delphi questions - along the
 lines of who has used a good SVG component etc?

Try one of the news://news.borland.com newsgroups if you don't get correct 
answer in delphi mailing list.

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be


-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Arno Garrels
Francois PIETTE wrote:
 I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
 fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
 by myself.
 TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
 to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
 sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
 in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
 (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
 Size exists since D3)?
 
 What do you think?

 Do you mean it could be smaller than his previous size
 when resuming a transfert ? 

Yes, that's what I mean and the question :))

 I don't think so.
 
 --
 Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit
 http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.overbyte.be
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Where is best to ask general Delphi questions?

2006-08-31 Thread Info 2004
Francois,

Thanks. I'll take a look.

...Andy
Francois PIETTE wrote:
 The Delphi and Delphi-Talk elists seem rather quiet.
 
 Delphi mailing list is still a very good place. A lot of users are still 
 subscribers and wake up when needed.
 Forget about Delphi-Talk which is unmoderated.
 
 Where is the best place to ask general Delphi questions - along the
 lines of who has used a good SVG component etc?
 
 Try one of the news://news.borland.com newsgroups if you don't get correct 
 answer in delphi mailing list.
 
 --
 Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.overbyte.be
 
 


-- 
ASA Micros Ltd.
141 Wardle Road,
Wardle,
Rochdale.
OL12 9JA
UK

Tel: +44(0)1706 355057
Company No. 4722262
VAT No. 704044772

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers

2006-08-31 Thread Francois PIETTE
 Do you mean it could be smaller than his previous size
 when resuming a transfert ?

 Yes, that's what I mean and the question :))

If a resumed transfer is smaller than the existing file, then there is a 
problem ! It is likely that the start of the local file is no more the same 
as the copy on the server and the whole transfert is corrupted.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
http://www.overbyte.be


- Original Message - 
From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers


 Francois PIETTE wrote:
 I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
 fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
 by myself.
 TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
 to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
 sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
 in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
 (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
 Size exists since D3)?

 What do you think?

 Do you mean it could be smaller than his previous size
 when resuming a transfert ?

 Yes, that's what I mean and the question :))

 I don't think so.

 --
 Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit
 http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.overbyte.be
 -- 
 To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
 please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
 Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


[twsocket] OnDataAvailable and Reetrancy

2006-08-31 Thread Markus Humm
 Can OnDataAvailable be called while it is
  already running?
  And if yes, how to prevent this? Is using critical
  sections a good idea here?

 You must avoid having the events reentered. To avoid this, you simply
 have
 to _not_ call any form of the message pump from the events. The
 message pump
 is ProcessMessages, any modal form, GetMessage/DispatchMessage and the
 likes.

I don't call processmessages and the like directly in the event but
might output some lines on screen for debugging. Could the VCL maybe
call getmessage etc. behind my back in this scenario?

Other thing: what about critical sections. Would they be safe for
preventing this in my situation?

Greetings

Markus
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be