Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-16 Thread Stelian Pop
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:

 Hello,

Hi,

 
 2009/1/14 Paal Bakken pabak...@online.no:
  I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
  We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same 
  problems on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick 
  works fine in linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follows an 
  edited screendump of some usb commands with a u-boot snapshot version from 
  13.01.2009.
 
 The current version should work, indeed a lot has been done in that
 area for these cores. However, IIRC there were some problems with the
 bootstrap code not initialising the PLLB correctly, which resulted in
 similar errors. I thought that Stelian got it to work finally on this
 particular core as well, so maybe he can confirm this. (I concentrated
 the patches on the sam9261)

I do reproduce exactly the same kind of problems here. As I originally said
in my October 9 mail (Message-Id: 1223564465.6130.20.ca...@galileo),
correcting the bootstrap PLLB settings made USB work, but USB storage
did work only with one of my three USB sticks.

I suspect the rest of the issues to be USB specific and not hardware
specific at this point, but I haven't looked closer into it.

Stelian.
-- 
Stelian Pop stel...@popies.net
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-15 Thread Paal Bakken
More testing

It seems like I have one stick that generates the reported error. And this is 
of course THE one I have been testing with (Murphy is never resting...)

I have tried with four devices now
USB 1.0 128MB : Had to repartition
USB 2.0 512MB : Gives the reported problems (fine in linux and windows)
USB 2.0 2GB : Works without partitioning
USB 2.0 16GB: Works without partitioning

The response is the same on our own at91sam9263 board with 18.432MHz ocillator 
and the original at91sam9263ek with 16.36766MHz

So - I'm willing to rest my case :-) BUT there is something strange, since the 
bad stick works fine in Linux and Windows... 
-Any ideas about possible reasons for the difference? 
-Is there any specific known requirements for the sticks (except for FAT)


Best regards
Pål Bakken


 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [plagn...@jcrosoft.com]
 Sent: 2009-01-14 22:24:22 CET
 To: Paal Bakken [pabak...@online.no]
 Cc: Remy Bohmer [li...@bohmer.net], u-boot@lists.denx.de
 Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263
 
 On 22:30 Wed 14 Jan , Paal Bakken wrote:
  I have testet a lot more and have found the following:
  
  1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result...
  
  2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with 
  linux fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant 
  worked without any problems in u-boot. (the multiple partitions seems to be 
  typical from the vendors)
  
  3. Then I took the USB 2.0 stick (from the trace in my first mail) and did 
  the same repartioning with fdisk. But this stick still gives the same bad 
  result :-(
  
  So
  
  Are there any known limitations/requirements to the u-boot USB 
  implementation?
  -USB1.0 vs USB2.0
  -How to partition the stick (if the original partition can't be used)
  -Other
  
  ...and once more: the USB 2.0 stick works fine in linux
 I'll take a look on my 9263ek
 
 but I've test recently a 4GB usb 2.0 key on the at91rm9200ek with any problem
 
 btw please limit your mail at 80chars per line
 
 Best Regards,
 J.
 
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-15 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello,

 So - I'm willing to rest my case :-) BUT there is something strange, since 
 the bad stick works fine in Linux and Windows...
 -Any ideas about possible reasons for the difference?

There has been many improvements to the USB stack lately that at least
it works nowadays on these cores.
However, there are still a number of bugs to solve, so we are not there yet.
Besides, the USB stack only supports a single device at a time, and
does not really support hotplug, it is a completely different USB
stick than Linux is currently using.
The FAT driver also only supports read-only.

So, you cannot really compare the U-boot USB stack with the Linux/Windows stack.
It shows, however, that there are still bugs in the U-boot USB/FAT code.

 -Is there any specific known requirements for the sticks (except for FAT)

FAT32 and VFAT should also work, but if I knew the exact
'requirements', I also knew how to solve the bugs...


Kind Regards,

Remy
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-15 Thread Paal Bakken
I also found another non-working stick This one was also a first generation 
USB 2.0 stick.

But anyway - It seems like you guys has done a great job and made usb mass 
storage useful! A few non-working sticks is good enough for me :-)

Best regards

Pål Bakken



 From: Remy Bohmer [li...@bohmer.net]
 Sent: 2009-01-15 13:03:20 CET
 To: Paal Bakken [pabak...@online.no]
 Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [plagn...@jcrosoft.com], 
 u-boot@lists.denx.de
 Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263
 
 Hello,
 
  So - I'm willing to rest my case :-) BUT there is something strange, since 
  the bad stick works fine in Linux and Windows...
  -Any ideas about possible reasons for the difference?
 
 There has been many improvements to the USB stack lately that at least
 it works nowadays on these cores.
 However, there are still a number of bugs to solve, so we are not there yet.
 Besides, the USB stack only supports a single device at a time, and
 does not really support hotplug, it is a completely different USB
 stick than Linux is currently using.
 The FAT driver also only supports read-only.
 
 So, you cannot really compare the U-boot USB stack with the Linux/Windows 
 stack.
 It shows, however, that there are still bugs in the U-boot USB/FAT code.
 
  -Is there any specific known requirements for the sticks (except for FAT)
 
 FAT32 and VFAT should also work, but if I knew the exact
 'requirements', I also knew how to solve the bugs...
 
 
 Kind Regards,
 
 Remy
 
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-14 Thread Paal Bakken
I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.

We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same problems 
on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick works fine in 
linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follows an edited screendump of 
some usb commands with a u-boot snapshot version from 13.01.2009.

I have seen that there has been done a lot of work on the usb code in the last 
months, but it seems to have calmed down. Is the 2009-01-rc1 and/or the current 
snapshot supposed to work? Is there anything I can do to avoid this problem?


Best regards,

Pål Bakken



And the edited screen-dump:

-


U-Boot 2009.01-rc1 (jan. 13 2009 - 14:42:22)


DRAM:  64 MB
NAND:  256 MiB
In:serial
Out:   serial
Err:   serial
Hit any key to stop autoboot:  1


DUnf-Boot2009 usb start

(Re)start USB...
USB:   scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
   scanning bus for storage devices... ERROR:  USB-error: STALL: TD was 
moved to the Done Queue because the endpoint returned a STALL PID (4)
ERROR: USB-error: STALL: TD was moved to the Done Queue because the endpoint 
returned a STALL PID (4)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
:
225 more of the same error? :-)
:
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5) Device NOT ready
   Request Sense returned 00 00 00
1 Storage Device(s) found

DUnf-Boot2009 usb tree

Device Tree:
  1  Hub (12MBit/s, 0mA)
  |   OHCI Root Hub
  |
  |?-2  Mass Storage (12MBit/s, 100mA)
   TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068

DUnf-Boot2009 usb info

1: Hub,  USB Revision 1.10
 -  OHCI Root Hub
 - Class: Hub
 - PacketSize: 8  Configurations: 1
 - Vendor: 0x  Product 0x Version 0.0
   Configuration: 1
   - Interfaces: 1 Self Powered 0mA
 Interface: 0
 - Alternate Setting 0, Endpoints: 1
 - Class Hub
 - Endpoint 1 In Interrupt MaxPacket 2 Interval 255ms

2: Mass Storage,  USB Revision 2.0
 - TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068
 - Class: (from Interface) Mass Storage
 - PacketSize: 64  Configurations: 1
 - Vendor: 0x126f  Product 0x1325 Version 1.0
   Configuration: 1
   - Interfaces: 1 Bus Powered 100mA
   - ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
(IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)

 Interface: 0
 - Alternate Setting 0, Endpoints: 3
 - Class Mass Storage, Transp. SCSI, Bulk only
 - ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
(IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) or 
did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
ERROR:  USB-error: 

Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-14 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello,

2009/1/14 Paal Bakken pabak...@online.no:
 I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
 We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same problems 
 on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick works fine 
 in linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follows an edited screendump 
 of some usb commands with a u-boot snapshot version from 13.01.2009.

The current version should work, indeed a lot has been done in that
area for these cores. However, IIRC there were some problems with the
bootstrap code not initialising the PLLB correctly, which resulted in
similar errors. I thought that Stelian got it to work finally on this
particular core as well, so maybe he can confirm this. (I concentrated
the patches on the sam9261)

Kind Regards,

Remy

 (Re)start USB...
 USB:   scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
   scanning bus for storage devices... ERROR:  USB-error: STALL: TD was 
 moved to the Done Queue because the endpoint returned a STALL PID (4)
 ERROR: USB-error: STALL: TD was moved to the Done Queue because the endpoint 
 returned a STALL PID (4)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 :
225 more of the same error? :-)
 :
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5) Device NOT ready
   Request Sense returned 00 00 00
 1 Storage Device(s) found

 DUnf-Boot2009 usb tree

 Device Tree:
  1  Hub (12MBit/s, 0mA)
  |   OHCI Root Hub
  |
  |?-2  Mass Storage (12MBit/s, 100mA)
   TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068

 DUnf-Boot2009 usb info

 1: Hub,  USB Revision 1.10
  -  OHCI Root Hub
  - Class: Hub
  - PacketSize: 8  Configurations: 1
  - Vendor: 0x  Product 0x Version 0.0
   Configuration: 1
   - Interfaces: 1 Self Powered 0mA
 Interface: 0
 - Alternate Setting 0, Endpoints: 1
 - Class Hub
 - Endpoint 1 In Interrupt MaxPacket 2 Interval 255ms

 2: Mass Storage,  USB Revision 2.0
  - TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068
  - Class: (from Interface) Mass Storage
  - PacketSize: 64  Configurations: 1
  - Vendor: 0x126f  Product 0x1325 Version 1.0
   Configuration: 1
   - Interfaces: 1 Bus Powered 100mA
   - ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
 (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)

 Interface: 0
 - Alternate Setting 0, Endpoints: 3
 - Class Mass Storage, Transp. SCSI, Bulk only
 - ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
 (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
 or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
 ERROR:  USB-error: 

Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-14 Thread Paal Bakken
I have testet a lot more and have found the following:

1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result...

2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux 
fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant worked 
without any problems in u-boot. (the multiple partitions seems to be typical 
from the vendors)

3. Then I took the USB 2.0 stick (from the trace in my first mail) and did the 
same repartioning with fdisk. But this stick still gives the same bad result :-(

So

Are there any known limitations/requirements to the u-boot USB implementation?
-USB1.0 vs USB2.0
-How to partition the stick (if the original partition can't be used)
-Other

...and once more: the USB 2.0 stick works fine in linux

Best regards 
Pål Bakken

 From: Remy Bohmer [li...@bohmer.net]
 Sent: 2009-01-14 19:53:29 CET
 To: Paal Bakken [pabak...@online.no]
 Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Stelian Pop [stel...@popies.net]
 Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263
 
 Hello,
 
 2009/1/14 Paal Bakken pabak...@online.no:
  I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
  We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same 
  problems on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick 
  works fine in linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follows an 
  edited screendump of some usb commands with a u-boot snapshot version from 
  13.01.2009.
 
 The current version should work, indeed a lot has been done in that
 area for these cores. However, IIRC there were some problems with the
 bootstrap code not initialising the PLLB correctly, which resulted in
 similar errors. I thought that Stelian got it to work finally on this
 particular core as well, so maybe he can confirm this. (I concentrated
 the patches on the sam9261)
 
 Kind Regards,
 
 Remy
 
  (Re)start USB...
  USB:   scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
scanning bus for storage devices... ERROR:  USB-error: STALL: TD was 
  moved to the Done Queue because the endpoint returned a STALL PID (4)
  ERROR: USB-error: STALL: TD was moved to the Done Queue because the 
  endpoint returned a STALL PID (4)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  :
 225 more of the same error? :-)
  :
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5) Device NOT ready
Request Sense returned 00 00 00
  1 Storage Device(s) found
 
  DUnf-Boot2009 usb tree
 
  Device Tree:
   1  Hub (12MBit/s, 0mA)
   |   OHCI Root Hub
   |
   |?-2  Mass Storage (12MBit/s, 100mA)
TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068
 
  DUnf-Boot2009 usb info
 
  1: Hub,  USB Revision 1.10
   -  OHCI Root Hub
   - Class: Hub
   - PacketSize: 8  Configurations: 1
   - Vendor: 0x  Product 0x Version 0.0
Configuration: 1
- Interfaces: 1 Self Powered 0mA
  Interface: 0
  - Alternate Setting 0, Endpoints: 1
  - Class Hub
  - Endpoint 1 In Interrupt MaxPacket 2 Interval 255ms
 
  2: Mass Storage,  USB Revision 2.0
   - TTI-MSA  USB 2.0 Mobile Disk FF04091900068
   - Class: (from Interface) Mass Storage
   - PacketSize: 64  Configurations: 1
   - Vendor: 0x126f  Product 0x1325 Version 1.0
Configuration: 1
- Interfaces: 1 Bus Powered 100mA
- ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR:  USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token 
  (IN) or did not provide a handshake (OUT) (5)
  ERROR: USB-error: DEVICENOTRESPONDING: Device did not respond to token (IN) 
  or did

Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263

2009-01-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:30 Wed 14 Jan , Paal Bakken wrote:
 I have testet a lot more and have found the following:
 
 1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result...
 
 2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux 
 fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant worked 
 without any problems in u-boot. (the multiple partitions seems to be typical 
 from the vendors)
 
 3. Then I took the USB 2.0 stick (from the trace in my first mail) and did 
 the same repartioning with fdisk. But this stick still gives the same bad 
 result :-(
 
 So
 
 Are there any known limitations/requirements to the u-boot USB implementation?
 -USB1.0 vs USB2.0
 -How to partition the stick (if the original partition can't be used)
 -Other
 
 ...and once more: the USB 2.0 stick works fine in linux
I'll take a look on my 9263ek

but I've test recently a 4GB usb 2.0 key on the at91rm9200ek with any problem

btw please limit your mail at 80chars per line

Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot