Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
Hi Tom, On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > soon. > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > blackfin: + ip04 >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash > cm_t3517 >powerpc: + kmcoge4 taishan kmlion1 dlvision > > And I'd really like to see those sorted out, one way or another for > -rc2. > For both kmcoge4 and kmlion1, the error is fixed by [1]. Hopefully York will be able to review this, also with the 2 patches for the migration of the keymile powerpc board to generic board, for -rc2. Best Regards Valentin [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/403232/ ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:16:42PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:10:06PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:04:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should
> > > > > exist
> > > > > soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the
> > > > > follow
> > > > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging
> > > > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement
> > > > > about
> > > > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see:
> > > > > blackfin: + ip04
> > > > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate
> > > > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt
> > > > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517
> > > >
> > > > there must be something wrong:
> > >
> > > Compiler fun! With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the
> > > limit on SPL. With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit.
> > > What I think I had been thinking was that you could move
> > > CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on
> > > CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and
> > > that'd be a bigger size savings).
> > >
> > > Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain
> > > for 4.7.x testing.
> >
> > ... ELDK 5.5.x also has a similar slight size overflow and is 4.8.x. I
> > guess for now I'll default to use ELDK 5.4 for ARM but people may need
> > to consider a something-something for newer toolchains sooner rather
> > than later.
>
> ... I'm actually running into that issue where buildman grabs things
> from $PATH sometimes rather than the toolchain it found, re-running some
> tests.
OK, purging the Ubuntu toolchain packages so that buildman really uses
what I tell it, I'm getting the best (build time) results with ELDK
5.5.2 for ARM. After some patches that I'm about to push:
Summary of current source for 1166 boards (6 threads, 1 job per thread)
arm: + maxbcm odroid db-mv784mp-gp
+(maxbcm) u16 reg;
+(maxbcm,maxbcm) ^
+(maxbcm) u16 devadr = CONFIG_PHY_BASE_ADDR;
+(maxbcm,maxbcm) Didn't find the file 'board/maxbcm/binary.0' in
'arm/current/.bm-work/
03/build' which is mandatory to generate the image
+(maxbcm,maxbcm,db-mv784mp-gp,db-mv784mp-gp) This file generally contains the
DDR3 training code, and should be extracted from an existing bootable
+(maxbcm,maxbcm,db-mv784mp-gp,db-mv784mp-gp) image for your board. See
'kwbimage -x' to extract it from an existing image.
+(maxbcm,db-mv784mp-gp) Could not create image
+(maxbcm,db-mv784mp-gp) make[1]: *** [u-boot.kwb] Error 1
+(maxbcm,db-mv784mp-gp) make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
+(odroid,odroid)addr = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE + (i * SDRAM_BANK_SIZE);
+(odroid,odroid) ^
+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c:94:2: note: containing loop
+(odroid,odroid) for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; i++) {
+(odroid,odroid) ^
+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c:106:2: note: containing loop
+(db-mv784mp-gp,db-mv784mp-gp) Didn't find the file
'board/Marvell/db-mv784mp-gp/binary.0' in 'arm/current/.bm-work/03/build' which
is mandatory to generate the image
w+(maxbcm) board/maxbcm/maxbcm.c: In function 'reset_phy':
w+(maxbcm) board/maxbcm/maxbcm.c:68:6: warning: unused variable 'reg'
[-Wunused-variable]
w+(maxbcm) board/maxbcm/maxbcm.c:66:6: warning: unused variable 'devadr'
[-Wunused-variable]
w+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c: In function 'dram_init':
w+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c:95:32: warning: iteration 4u invokes
undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
w+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c: In function 'dram_init_banksize':
w+(odroid) board/samsung/common/board.c:107:32: warning: iteration 4u invokes
undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
Hey Tom, 2014-11-10 22:29 GMT+01:00 Tom Rini : > ... > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > blackfin: + ip04 >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash > cm_t3517 >powerpc: + kmcoge4 taishan kmlion1 dlvision > > And I'd really like to see those sorted out, one way or another for > -rc2. dlvision should be fixed with the "Update gdsys board support" series that is already under review by Stefan Roese and Kim Phillips. Cheers Dirk ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 at 10:46:16 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 10/11/2014 22:29, Tom Rini wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > > soon. > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > blackfin: + ip04 > > > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > >openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > >tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > I confirm the issue with novena after pulling mainline into u-boot-imx. > It looks like that CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT is somewhere unset (I do not why, > gw_ventana is built fine). > > Marek, can you take a look at it ? Yes, you have an email fixing this. Best regards, Marek Vasut ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
Hi Marek, On 10/11/2014 22:29, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > soon. > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > blackfin: + ip04 >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash > cm_t3517 I confirm the issue with novena after pulling mainline into u-boot-imx. It looks like that CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT is somewhere unset (I do not why, gw_ventana is built fine). Marek, can you take a look at it ? Thanks ! Stefano -- = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:10:06PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:04:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > > > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > > > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > > > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > > > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > > > blackfin: + ip04 > > > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > > > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > > > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > > > > > there must be something wrong: > > > > Compiler fun! With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the > > limit on SPL. With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit. > > What I think I had been thinking was that you could move > > CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on > > CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and > > that'd be a bigger size savings). > > > > Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain > > for 4.7.x testing. > > ... ELDK 5.5.x also has a similar slight size overflow and is 4.8.x. I > guess for now I'll default to use ELDK 5.4 for ARM but people may need > to consider a something-something for newer toolchains sooner rather > than later. ... I'm actually running into that issue where buildman grabs things from $PATH sometimes rather than the toolchain it found, re-running some tests. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:04:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > > > soon. > > > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > > blackfin: + ip04 > > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > > > there must be something wrong: > > Compiler fun! With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the > limit on SPL. With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit. > What I think I had been thinking was that you could move > CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on > CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and > that'd be a bigger size savings). > > Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain > for 4.7.x testing. ... ELDK 5.5.x also has a similar slight size overflow and is 4.8.x. I guess for now I'll default to use ELDK 5.4 for ARM but people may need to consider a something-something for newer toolchains sooner rather than later. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 08:24:47PM +0200, Nikita Kiryanov wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >Hey all, > > > >I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > >soon. > > > >The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > >up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > >groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > >what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > >When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > blackfin: + ip04 > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > I am able to build cm_t3517 without any problems. OK, that failure was a race condition, sorry for the noise! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
Hi Tom, On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist soon. The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. When I do a buildman of most things I see: blackfin: + ip04 arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash cm_t3517 I am able to build cm_t3517 without any problems. -- Regards, Nikita Kiryanov ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > > soon. > > > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > > blackfin: + ip04 > >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt > > tricorder_flash cm_t3517 > > there must be something wrong: Compiler fun! With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the limit on SPL. With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit. What I think I had been thinking was that you could move CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and that'd be a bigger size savings). Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain for 4.7.x testing. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
Hi Tom, On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > soon. > > The merge window is now closed. Per both the min-summit and the follow > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging > groove. And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me. > > When I do a buildman of most things I see: > blackfin: + ip04 >arm: + Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate > openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash > cm_t3517 there must be something wrong: ---8<--- abiessmann@punisher % git describe v2015.01-rc1-14-g63f7af9 abiessmann@punisher % PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make O=/tmp/build-tricorder CROSS_COMPILE=arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi- -s -j16 tricorder_defconfig In file included from scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c:2537:0: /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c: In function ‘get_symbol_str’: /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c:590:18: warning: ‘jump’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] jump->offset = strlen(r->s); ^ /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c:551:19: note: ‘jump’ was declared here struct jump_key *jump; ^ # # configuration written to .config # # # configuration written to spl/.config # abiessmann@punisher % PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make O=/tmp/build-tricorder CROSS_COMPILE=arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi- -s -j16 PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make36.56s user 1.68s system 404% cpu 9.463 total abiessmann@punisher % rm -rf /tmp/build-tricorder abiessmann@punisher % PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make O=/tmp/build-tricorder CROSS_COMPILE=arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi- -s -j16 tricorder_flash_defconfig In file included from scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c:2537:0: /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c: In function ‘get_symbol_str’: /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c:590:18: warning: ‘jump’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] jump->offset = strlen(r->s); ^ /home/abiessmann/src/u-boot/scripts/kconfig/menu.c:551:19: note: ‘jump’ was declared here struct jump_key *jump; ^ # # configuration written to .config # # # configuration written to spl/.config # abiessmann@punisher % PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make O=/tmp/build-tricorder CROSS_COMPILE=arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi- -s -j16 PATH=/opt/CS.Toolchain-0.3.0-rc1/arm-arm926ejs-linux-gnueabi/bin:$PATH make35.62s user 1.58s system 526% cpu 7.063 total abiessmann@punisher % abiessmann@punisher % ./tools/buildman/buildman -o /tmp/testbuild -c 1 -b master tricorder boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. Building 1 commit for 2 boards (2 threads, 4 jobs per thread) Cloning repo for thread 0 Cloning repo for thread 1 200 /2 0:00:10 : tricorder ./tools/buildman/buildman -o /tmp/testbuild -c 1 -b master tricorder 73.72s user 4.00s system 338% cpu 22.986 total abiessmann@punisher % --->8--- Best regards Andreas Bießmann ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:29:38 -0500 Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > soon. Half a day has passed since Tom's "I've pushed v2015.rc-rc1" mail, but I still don't see it. I have been often wondering why we can see the release much lator of Tom's announce mail. When I push my u-boot-uniphier repo, I can see the update on the public repo. Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
