David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
The driver has been renamed dm644x_emac.c
Let me suggest davinci_emac.c ... the same controller
is in some non-dm644x DaVinci silicon (like dm365), and
a gigabit flavor is in the dm6467 chip.
OK. I named it this because the top of the file mentioned it was ripped
off from 'dm644x_emac.c' (not Linux)
-COBJS = timer.o ether.o lxt972.o dp83848.o
+COBJS = timer.o lxt972.o dp83848.o
SOBJS = lowlevel_init.o reset.o
Given the recent cleanups in cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile,
that won't quite apply. I suggest you pull some of the
changes from arm-next.
OK, I'll look into that.
Procedure note: this is exactly why Linux now has a
shared -next tree ... to make sure interdependencies
between development branches can be sorted out before
the next merge window, so the merge window can be spent
addressing more substantive issues (if any).
Sounds good. I believe there is a 'next' branch on the U-boot mainline,
and quite often we do use it, but probably should do so earlier in the
process.
Thanks for the help and advice!
Ben
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
