RE: [U2] Unidebugger
Chuck, Nope, forgot about that one. You're right, triggers cannot be used on directory type files. We did ask IBM for that at the U2UG meeting in Las Vegas last September. Their chief argument against them was that you can get to those directory files from outside U2 anyway. But I likened that argument to let's leave the front door wide-open because the back one won't lock. If we had triggers for all file types then we could certainly put tracking on Unidebugger, couldn't we? And that's worth something even if we have still left those program directories exposed from UNIX. Because note this -- by NOT putting in those triggers we have NOT done anything about the fact that the files can be edited from outside U2. And that protection can be worked out another way -- or the weakness documented and other mechanisms used to validate. To me the most significant argument in its favor is the fact that we want to allow this on our development machines or accounts. The live directories can be locked up tight with UNIX permissions and writes only allowed by regular software deployment using a librarian login, etc. The fact that its wide-open on the development machines is not as big an issue if we control what gets to the live machine. Something is better than nothing -- and I'll say again what I've said at least a thousand times. SOX didn't come into being to protect against the kind of folk who can make UNIX edits using vi. If anyone knows of any case anywhere, where financial fraud has occurred this way - by a legitimate employee user (not a hacker, that's a whole different conversation) then I would love to hear about it. I'm not saying it should be discounted as a possibility, just that we shouldn't spend too much time on that -- its like focusing on a crack in the pavement while the bus is screaming down on us. I hope that IBM is listening -- and if anyone agrees with me that triggers are critical in today's IT, please put your two cents in. (For all file types, with an efficiency that makes them usable.) Just full of long stories, Susan Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:34:57 -0500 From: Stevenson, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger From: Susan Joslyn [snip] Gordon, I would think that you could address it with file triggers... any reason why you can't? triggers wont work on type 19 files. Programs have to be type 19 files. Can PRC work around that one? cds --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [AD] Unidebugger
Or there's always PRC -- manages data, software, dict -- any -- mods. Delivers a complete framework as required by SOX. Handles the software life-cycle from request to deployment with a single thread. Nearly 13 years mature and over 1000 installations. The work is already done and SJ+ makes it their full-time occupation to keep up with requirements and features so that your IT staff can get back to their real job. Only it will be easier than it was before because of the tools and information provided by PRC at the programmer level. :) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:26:32 - From: Adrian Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger We use EditPlus with SourceSafe which works well as no-one can change a program from within Universe or without unless it's been checked out first. We developed an add-in (as have others) to make the links to SourceSafe an integral part of EditPlus so checking status, checking in/out, promoting to test/pre-prod/prod is all done via a menu/single keystroke. Before we started using EditPlus we used the command line facilities of SourceSafe to link into the Universe shell. Of course, maintaining version control over dictionaries and property records is a bit trickier as SourceSafe will only work for type 1/19. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UniBasic Program with arguments
Savita, You do not say whether you are running UniVerse or UniData. The following will work for UniVerse: PROGRAM CallingProgram $OPTIONS PICK Get(Arg.) FirstArg Else FirstArg = End Get(Arg.) SecondArg Else SecondArg = End Call YourSubroutine(FirstArg, SecondArg) This has the advantage that it will take quoted arguments that contain spaces. This should work for UniData (from memory - I don't have access to a copy here): PROGRAM CallingProgram TCL = @SENTENCE Ix = INDEX(TCL, CallingProgram,1) ;* skip over RUN and other invocation types TCL = TRIM(TCL[Ix + LEN(CallingProgram)+1, LEN(TCL)]) CONVERT TO @FM IN TCL CALL YourSubroutine(TCL1,TCL2) Brian --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE?
Is there a download version of UOJ for Udt 6.0PE? -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments
Here it is, pretty quickly. Create a Databasic Program, I call mine PRINT (losing regard for PRINT being there). That is a simple program that takes the @COMMAND or PROCREAD or TCLREAD line you just typed as the first line in a Basic program, throw an END at the end, compile and run itself. Thus, you can have this or virtually any single line program run from TCL. This is the absolutely best and simplest method. I use this 100's of time a day for testing the OCONV's, simple math, anything. Its only limitation is multiple line IF statements or anything with an ELSE. PRINT ; CALL MY.SUB(ARG1, ARG2, WHATEVER) ; PRINT WHATEVER PRINT 5+5 PRINT OCONV(12345,DMA) PRINT ; OPEN MD THEN READ X FROM YOUR.ID THEN WRITEV A ON SOMETHING, 2 PRINT ; FOR I=1 TO 15 STEP 2 ; PRINT I,I*11 ; NEXT I ED MD PRINT 001 PQN 002 HRUN BP PRINT.PROG 003 P ED BP PRINT.PROG 001 PROCREAD TEST ELSE STOP OR 001 TCLREAD TEST OR 001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 001+ CONVERT CHAR(254) TO IN TEST 002 OPEN BP TO F.BP ELSE STOP 003 TEST2=END 004 ID=PRINTTT 005 WRITE TEST ON F.BP, ID 006 EXECUTE DECATALOG BP :ID 007 EXECUTE BASIC BP :ID 008 EXECUTE RUN BP :ID That's it. I created this in 1978 and have written 2 articles about it, one in Datastream and the other for Spectrum. It should be part of the MV OS. My 3 cents. - Original Message - From: Chauhan, Savita [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 5:48 PM Subject: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments Hi, I am trying to run a unibasic program (external subroutine) that takes two arguments. I don't know how do I pass it the arguments if I run it directly from shel prompt instead of calling it from another program. I have gone through the manual, but can't find anything. Pls help. Thanks Savita. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Unidebugger
And also make them work for replicated files as well -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: 02 February 2005 13:47 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Unidebugger Susan Joslyn wrote... You're right, triggers cannot be used on directory type files. We did ask IBM for that at the U2UG meeting in Las Vegas last September. Their chief argument against them was that you can get to those directory files from outside U2 anyway. I would imagine that that's more of a sales-and-marketing argument. There's also the engineering problem of directory files having no header block to store the trigger definition in. I hope that IBM is listening -- and if anyone agrees with me that triggers are critical in today's IT, please put your two cents in. (For all file types, with an efficiency that makes them usable.) But I agree wholeheartedly with this - consider my two cents added. Simon. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Talking of debuggers, is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements in a dynamic array :: D.CHART10/ STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124 5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000' :: D.CHART10,1/ STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559' This is really cool, something I requested from microdata 25 years ago. Mel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Mike, I look forward to hearing your solution!! I never took time to specifically diagnose this, but when I have like 10 includes, when in the debugger the line being shown could be actually 10 lines off from the actual line being run at that point. Not really consistent tho, as when I have only 1 include it isn't off. I have just learned to live with this and to use crts when needed to 'debug' the program when it has lots of includes in it. When I reported it, of course the answer was to upgrade, which we aren't prepared to do at this time. Thanks, Marilyn A. Hilb Value Part, Inc Direct: 847-918-6099 Fax: 847-367-1892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.valuepart.com -Original Message- From: Mike Farrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:[U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE?
Is there a download version of UOJ for Udt 6.0PE? The UniObjects for Java libraries are included with the Personal Edition, but there isn't a separate version. Look for an 'asjava.zip' file (and then immediately rename it to asjava.jar like it should have been to begin with.) Partial javadocs are in there somewhere too, I think. There's some information about UOJ on the wiki: http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?JavaSource -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
What version of Universe allows this? Brenda -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh, Mel Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:20 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements in a dynamic array :: D.CHART10/ STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124 5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000' :: D.CHART10,1/ STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559' This is really cool, something I requested from microdata 25 years ago. Mel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE?
I'm not finding an asjava anything... Was there an earliest release where this was included? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:46 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE? Is there a download version of UOJ for Udt 6.0PE? The UniObjects for Java libraries are included with the Personal Edition, but there isn't a separate version. Look for an 'asjava.zip' file (and then immediately rename it to asjava.jar like it should have been to begin with.) Partial javadocs are in there somewhere too, I think. There's some information about UOJ on the wiki: http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?JavaSource -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
we're on 10.1.4 and I just accidentally discovered it, I think it was introduced at 10.0. It was kept rather quiet. As Dr. Strangelove said, What good is a doomsday machine if you don't tell anyone about it? Mel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brenda Price Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:19 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger What version of Universe allows this? Brenda -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh, Mel Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:20 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements in a dynamic array :: D.CHART10/ STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124 5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000' :: D.CHART10,1/ STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559' This is really cool, something I requested from microdata 25 years ago. Mel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE?
Found it. False alarm. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:34 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE? I'm not finding an asjava anything... Was there an earliest release where this was included? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:46 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] UOJ for 6PE? Is there a download version of UOJ for Udt 6.0PE? The UniObjects for Java libraries are included with the Personal Edition, but there isn't a separate version. Look for an 'asjava.zip' file (and then immediately rename it to asjava.jar like it should have been to begin with.) Partial javadocs are in there somewhere too, I think. There's some information about UOJ on the wiki: http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?JavaSource -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Great! Now if only the runtime engine would tell me a little more about the Variable Not Assigned a Value, Zero Used (and other such) error(s); like what variable and what value! Seems this was requested from Microdata 25 years ago too. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maresh, Mel Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:20 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements in a dynamic array :: D.CHART10/ STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124 5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000' :: D.CHART10,1/ STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559' This is really cool, something I requested from microdata 25 years ago. Mel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
i think 10+ This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Unidebugger
All, I agree with Susan. The argument that you can get at the data anyway from the OS does not hold up as that is the nature of the environment. Users can mv, rm, cp files today. They can also use binary editors to 'fix' hashed files if they want to all, bypassing the traditional UV interface. To do this IBM would just have to add a .Type19 file to the directory, and modify the .Type1 - although why there is still a Type 1 file with its restrictions I do not know. The .Typex file would contain the header information which normally is in the header of the hashed file - where appropriate. Why we are at it, why restrict dictionaries to be hashed files - I cannot think of a reason why they have to be hashed - maybe someone from IBM can tell me. Cheers, Phil Walker +64 21 336294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gnosys Consulting Limited 11 Woodward Road, Mount Albert, Auckland 1003, New Zealand DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting limited. We use virus scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar in this email or any attachment -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 1:38 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger Chuck, Nope, forgot about that one. You're right, triggers cannot be used on directory type files. We did ask IBM for that at the U2UG meeting in Las Vegas last September. Their chief argument against them was that you can get to those directory files from outside U2 anyway. But I likened that argument to let's leave the front door wide-open because the back one won't lock. If we had triggers for all file types then we could certainly put tracking on Unidebugger, couldn't we? And that's worth something even if we have still left those program directories exposed from UNIX. Because note this -- by NOT putting in those triggers we have NOT done anything about the fact that the files can be edited from outside U2. And that protection can be worked out another way -- or the weakness documented and other mechanisms used to validate. To me the most significant argument in its favor is the fact that we want to allow this on our development machines or accounts. The live directories can be locked up tight with UNIX permissions and writes only allowed by regular software deployment using a librarian login, etc. The fact that its wide-open on the development machines is not as big an issue if we control what gets to the live machine. Something is better than nothing -- and I'll say again what I've said at least a thousand times. SOX didn't come into being to protect against the kind of folk who can make UNIX edits using vi. If anyone knows of any case anywhere, where financial fraud has occurred this way - by a legitimate employee user (not a hacker, that's a whole different conversation) then I would love to hear about it. I'm not saying it should be discounted as a possibility, just that we shouldn't spend too much time on that -- its like focusing on a crack in the pavement while the bus is screaming down on us. I hope that IBM is listening -- and if anyone agrees with me that triggers are critical in today's IT, please put your two cents in. (For all file types, with an efficiency that makes them usable.) Just full of long stories, Susan Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:34:57 -0500 From: Stevenson, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger From: Susan Joslyn [snip] Gordon, I would think that you could address it with file triggers... any reason why you can't? triggers wont work on type 19 files. Programs have to be type 19 files. Can PRC work around that one? cds --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect
We have a legacy Printronix P300 greenbar printer that we would like to LAN-connect to our new HP-Ux server via an external HP JetDirect print server. I took a stab at a few of the generic drivers that come bundled with HP-Ux... without luck. Comments would be appreciated. Regards, --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect
Don't treat it as HP Jetdirect, instead, use the printer server in lpd/lpr mode, and use rm=printername (with IP set in /etc/hosts), and rq=raw or print or LPT1 depending on the printer server. Ours works fine that way. George PR1|pr1:\ :ml=0:\ :mx=0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/PR1:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/PR1/PR1.acct:\ :sh:\ :rm=printfast1:\ :rp=PORT1: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 3:07 PM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: [U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect We have a legacy Printronix P300 greenbar printer that we would like to LAN-connect to our new HP-Ux server via an external HP JetDirect print server. I took a stab at a few of the generic drivers that come bundled with HP-Ux... without luck. Comments would be appreciated. Regards, --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect
Sorry, Bill, but I can't resist... Call HP comes to mind... You do have support on the HP-Ux system, don't you? BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 12:07 PM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: [U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect We have a legacy Printronix P300 greenbar printer that we would like to LAN-connect to our new HP-Ux server via an external HP JetDirect print server. I took a stab at a few of the generic drivers that come bundled with HP-Ux... without luck. Comments would be appreciated. Regards, --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Printronix + HP-Ux + JetDirect
use the dumb driver (no thats not a joke) it outputs just plain ol ascii which is what that printer will want to deal with. You can telnet to the jet direct and set it up from there. I've done a few of these and once the jetdirect is setup to only send ascii, and the HP-UX system see's it as a dumb printer then you'll be fine. Thanks, Don Kibbey Financial Systems Manager Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner LLP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/05 03:07PM We have a legacy Printronix P300 greenbar printer that we would like to LAN-connect to our new HP-Ux server via an external HP JetDirect print server. I took a stab at a few of the generic drivers that come bundled with HP-Ux... without luck. Comments would be appreciated. Regards, --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Mike, The line numbers get messed up in RAID if you have an inline comment after the include. This buggers the line numbers $INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER ;*In line comment and this doesn't $INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER Get rid of the in line comment and the line numbers will be correct. Regards, Stewart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 1:28 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete the original message and all copies. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Upgrade to the most current release for your platform and you'll find that is no longer a problem. Regards, LeRoy F. Dreyfuss Product Manager IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases IBM Information Management Software Tel: 303-672-1254 Fax: 303-294-4832 Mobile: 720-341-4317 Tie-line: 770-1254 External email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2 Mitchell, Stewart Stewart.Mitchell To @au.faulding.com 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Sent by: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc stserver.u2ug.org Subject RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger 02/02/2005 03:17 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.u2ug.org Mike, The line numbers get messed up in RAID if you have an inline comment after the include. This buggers the line numbers $INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER ;*In line comment and this doesn't $INCLUDE ARINCLUDE AR.MASTER Get rid of the in line comment and the line numbers will be correct. Regards, Stewart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Farrant Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 1:28 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete the original message and all copies. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic10855.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Spectrum - San Diego
Is anyone going to this event Feb 22-25?? We are moving away from our Web - Universe ODBC connection to a JAVA sockets or .NET interface for performance. It appears that there a quite a few sessions that deal with the technical issues we need to resolve to move forward with our project. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
is everyone aware that RAID will now display the values of individual elements in a dynamic array :: D.CHART10/ STRING: T r L=114 `34321035593806859869452618551232605421692343520675401124 5611372190936940279115843867302197542611598000' :: D.CHART10,1/ STRING: T r L=10 `3432103559' This is really cool, something I requested from microdata 25 years ago. Mel Great! Now if only the runtime engine would tell me a little more about the Variable Not Assigned a Value, Zero Used (and other such) error(s); like what variable and what value! Seems this was requested from Microdata 25 years ago too. :-) Bill Microdata had in internal design doc in the mid '80s for completely revamping the BASIC debugger. It included both the above as well as much more. Unfortunately never saw the light of day. Ah well... Stewart -- Stewart Leicester| http://www.ThreatFocus.com V.P. Engineering | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Threat Focus, Inc. | 925-551-0130 Voice Knowledge is your best defense | 509-695-1373 Fax --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger
Microdata dropped the ball on the INCLUDE 20 years ago which offers this solution that I use for all of my MCD clients today. Here's the source snippet *** * PROGRAM NAME * MARK JOHNSON 020205 *** GOSUB GET.INCLUDES OPEN CUSTOMER ETC snip everything else GET.INCLUDES:* INCLUDE THING1 INCLUDE THING2 INCLUDE THING3 RETURN END (of source code) Since MCD doesn't allow RUN and external SUBROUTINE programs to intermingle, I write my handy subs from other clients as INCLUDES and include them at the end. Just be careful of an imbedded RETURN on THING2 above preventing THING3 from executing. My 1 cent. - Original Message - From: Mike Farrant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:58 AM Subject: [U2] [UV] RAID debugger Talking of debuggers, can anyone remind me how the $INCLUDE s can mess up the line numbers displayed within the RAID debugger. I had a solution to this once which I seem to remember had something to do with the configuration or placement of the $INCLUDE lines in the source code. I look forward to any response Thanks Mike Farrant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments
In short - you can't. That is, you need to call it from another program... something like... 0001: CALL XYZ (ARG1, ARG2) 0002: END Depending upon how you have written this routine it may be possible to call it from a Dictionary item also but that is for another e-mail. Cheers Trevor Ockenden m: 0414 731 634 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chauhan, Savita Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2005 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments Hi, I am trying to run a unibasic program (external subroutine) that takes two arguments. I don't know how do I pass it the arguments if I run it directly from shel prompt instead of calling it from another program. I have gone through the manual, but can't find anything. Pls help. Thanks Savita. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005 __ ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Looking for ressource in Montreal, QC Canada
Hello, Someone I know is looking for an experienced Pick ressource to work in Montreal, QC Canada. (Preferably with experience in Universe). If there is there anyone on this list who lives in that general area and is looking for work ? Please PM me. Thanks - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments
Trevor: You gave up too easily. See my posts on PRINT that I've been using for over 20 years. My 1 cent - Original Message - From: Trevor Ockenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:51 PM Subject: RE: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments In short - you can't. That is, you need to call it from another program... something like... 0001: CALL XYZ (ARG1, ARG2) 0002: END Depending upon how you have written this routine it may be possible to call it from a Dictionary item also but that is for another e-mail. Cheers Trevor Ockenden m: 0414 731 634 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chauhan, Savita Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2005 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments Hi, I am trying to run a unibasic program (external subroutine) that takes two arguments. I don't know how do I pass it the arguments if I run it directly from shel prompt instead of calling it from another program. I have gone through the manual, but can't find anything. Pls help. Thanks Savita. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005 __ ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UniData error
Hi ! After power crash we try to copy from crashed file to the new file and we get error messages for crashed groups, but then unusual error message showed up as well. Does anybody know what this error message actually mean: 1:blk check error in U_post_read for file 'IMP', key 'IO*MP 0222145*RDMS_13542_44368%13542%44183', number=147079 UPL error = 104 : Lock name not found Lockname (46597 22282252) RX -- 79872 upl unlock error(104). We are running UniData 6.09 on Solaris. -- Lembit Pirn 7+7 Software Tondi 1 Tallinn 11313 tel. +372 6566232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments
You can run a program with arguments from the command line as below RUN BP PROG ARG1 ARG2 ARG3 In the program use SEEK(ARG.,..) or GET(ARG.,...) to get the arguments from the command line. Don't forget to quote the arguments if there are spaces in them. You can run the program with parameters from within a BASIC Program EXECUTE RUN BP PROG :arg1: :arg2: :arg3 Regards David Jordan Founding U2UG Board Member -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chauhan, Savita Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 1:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [AD] UniBasic Program with arguments Thanks all you guys for all your replies. This list has come to my rescue so many times. I have so much more to learn. I realized that I can run my program (with args) only as one of the following (without any external utitlity) : 1. as a subroutine (with no args, but can use @COMMAND to read the command line) 2. as an external subroutine (with args) If I make it a subroutine, then I cannot call it from another pgm and pass it args. If I make external subroutine, I cannot run it from TCL. Thanks again. Savita Chauhan, Programmer/Analyst x:1754 Central Texas College. --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
