RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Problem solved! Thanks to all who replied.
I had installed UV as the administrator, but edited the odbc.config file
as myself. A uvregen at the command prompt and then stopping and
starting UV services sorted out UV and it is now passing my login ID to
the UV.lOGINS file in upper case.
I had stopped and started UV as part of my trouble shooting of this
problem but not with a uvregen, which seems to be the key here.
Cheers,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 10:28 a.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
> Pflugfelder
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 6:30 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
>
snip
> Apparently, windows is case-insensitive when checking to see if
> the login is valid, but when it returns the login to Universe, it
> returns it in the original case that was entered
That's been our experience as well. We authenticate our linux UV logins
against Active Directory, and our UV user names have always been all
uppercase. Users can log in using either case (or mixed case), but the
user name in UV as returned by @WHO is exactly how the user name was
entered when it was created in AD.
When new users are inadvertently created with the wrong case, we delete
them from AD and re-create them correctly.
-John
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
Thanks Charles, I already have my head around the UV XML webservice side of things, and I are reasonable familiar with Microsoft Reporting Services so I am happy with those two bits as is. It is just knowing what the connection strings should be for the webservice when defining the XML data source which I am having trouble with. Cheers, Phil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 3:16 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET Phil, I did something somewhat like this recently. This was my formula: I wrote a web service in Delphi, had it drop files and requests to UniVerse asynchronously via Type 19s. Then I hired Lee Burstien to do the first cut at the UniVerse programming (I had the budget available and I hate working alone). The end result is collecting massive URLs and parsing them to produce output to a Type 18 file, some flatfiles for UPS and another database, some e-mails, and XML, and SQL (query & update). I've done the UniObjects route before and abhor .net, so I developed this approach. The throughput tests at better than 20 *serviced* requests per second. I don't know how much better because the process is being bottlenecked by other network activity. You might want to consider skipping the connections and just have a simple program on the MS side trawl for new files. That way you can Type 19 your XML output and let UniVerse function more like an engine. - Chuck phil walker wrote: > John > > Drag the service in from where? > > Also, I am trying to create a report in MS Reporting Services, using UV > webservice as an XML source, but cannot work out what the correct > connection details should be. Is anyone else attempting to do such a > thing? > > Cheers, > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins > Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 12:00 p.m. > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET > > > The easiest way to create a Web Service is to use Visual Studio .NET > 2005 > and drag your published service into VS - it will create the template > for > you :-) > <<< > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > > -- - Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consulting --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
Phil, I did something somewhat like this recently. This was my formula: I wrote a web service in Delphi, had it drop files and requests to UniVerse asynchronously via Type 19s. Then I hired Lee Burstien to do the first cut at the UniVerse programming (I had the budget available and I hate working alone). The end result is collecting massive URLs and parsing them to produce output to a Type 18 file, some flatfiles for UPS and another database, some e-mails, and XML, and SQL (query & update). I've done the UniObjects route before and abhor .net, so I developed this approach. The throughput tests at better than 20 *serviced* requests per second. I don't know how much better because the process is being bottlenecked by other network activity. You might want to consider skipping the connections and just have a simple program on the MS side trawl for new files. That way you can Type 19 your XML output and let UniVerse function more like an engine. - Chuck phil walker wrote: John Drag the service in from where? Also, I am trying to create a report in MS Reporting Services, using UV webservice as an XML source, but cannot work out what the correct connection details should be. Is anyone else attempting to do such a thing? Cheers, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 12:00 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET The easiest way to create a Web Service is to use Visual Studio .NET 2005 and drag your published service into VS - it will create the template for you :-) <<< --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- - Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consulting --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] SQL query locks
Excellent. What about UniVerse? I've hit it...No: It's hit me there, too. cds -Original Message- From: Wally Terhune Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] SQL query locks If this is UniData, we fixed a problem in this area at 6.1.7 (released 3/18/05): Issue 6917 - Problem Description UniData -- A lock release in SQL UPDATE failed, causing SQL to hold the locks for records that were excluded from the query with a WHERE clause. A fix to the lock checking utility corrected this issue. Hi, We have a Cold Fusion app that is using SQL queries. It's locking records, unfortunately as many as 100 at a time. Is there a way to do the query without locking records? We're not updating anything. Pam -- Pamela J Robbins New Bolton Center Senior Programmer AnalystSchool of Veterinary Medicine [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Pennsylvania 610-925-6438 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
John Drag the service in from where? Also, I am trying to create a report in MS Reporting Services, using UV webservice as an XML source, but cannot work out what the correct connection details should be. Is anyone else attempting to do such a thing? Cheers, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 12:00 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET >> The easiest way to create a Web Service is to use Visual Studio .NET 2005 and drag your published service into VS - it will create the template for you :-) <<< --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
UniVerse supports Connection Pooling and you can code C# (or VB.NET, or ASP.NET or J#) applications using UniObjects.NET or you can use Web Services. The easiest way to create a Web Service is to use Visual Studio .NET 2005 and drag your published service into VS - it will create the template for you :-) There are some examples around in the IBM Knowledgebase on the WWW. If you are attending U2University you can take advantage of the Technical sessions and meet up with others whoa re using .NET. Check out the Connection Pooling and Web Services documentation and examples. http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/ http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/library/ http://www-306.ibm.com/software/info/u2/university/index.jsp Hope this helps Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lienhoop Sent: 27 August 2007 20:38 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET I am new to .NET and uniobjects for .net and have been given the task of writing a web based program that can pull data out of our universe database. I am running AIX 5.2 Universe 10.1.7. My question is to make sure I'm using session's and files appropriately. 1st - Is there anyway to implement something like connection pooling in a C# .NET 2005 web application?? So far I have read that it only works in a windows application. I want to have some way of calling a connection to the DB once, perform many read operations and then close the session. I don't have enough licenses, to maintain an open session for each user that accesses my program. 2nd - After I read a file, is there anything I need to do (like closing the file)? If not, when do I need to close the file? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
> Pflugfelder
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 6:30 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
>
snip
> Apparently, windows is case-insensitive when checking to see if
> the login is valid, but when it returns the login to Universe, it
> returns it in the original case that was entered
That's been our experience as well. We authenticate our linux UV logins
against Active Directory, and our UV user names have always been all
uppercase. Users can log in using either case (or mixed case), but the
user name in UV as returned by @WHO is exactly how the user name was
entered when it was created in AD.
When new users are inadvertently created with the wrong case, we delete
them from AD and re-create them correctly.
-John
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
I am new to .NET and uniobjects for .net and have been given the task of writing a web based program that can pull data out of our universe database. I am running AIX 5.2 Universe 10.1.7. My question is to make sure I'm using session's and files appropriately. 1st - Is there anyway to implement something like connection pooling in a C# .NET 2005 web application?? So far I have read that it only works in a windows application. I want to have some way of calling a connection to the DB once, perform many read operations and then close the session. I don't have enough licenses, to maintain an open session for each user that accesses my program. 2nd - After I read a file, is there anything I need to do (like closing the file)? If not, when do I need to close the file? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Help learning Uniobjects.NET
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Jonathan Lienhoop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bounce Notice:If you read this list through Indexfocus, Nabble, or any other replicator - and you would like to be able to participate - sign up directly with us. Here's all you need to know: To subscribe or resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. I am new to .NET and uniobjects for .net and have been given the task of writing a web based program that can pull data out of our universe database. I am running AIX 5.2 Universe 10.1.7. My question is to make sure I'm using session's and files appropriately. 1st - Is there anyway to implement something like connection pooling in a C# .NET 2005 web application?? So far I have read that it only works in a windows application. I want to have some way of calling a connection to the DB once, perform many read operations and then close the session. I don't have enough licenses, to maintain an open session for each user that accesses my program. 2nd - After I read a file, is there anything I need to do (like closing the file)? If not, when do I need to close the file? Jonathan Lienhoop Marvin Johnson & Associates, Inc. 1.800.457.5255 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Tlnet error 1067
Brenda, Certainly worth a look see. - Chuck Brenda Price wrote: My only glimmer of an idea is that it worked before I installed my software for dialup internet access (i.e.: EarthLink). Maybe it does something that messed it up. Could be something similar. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
jjuser ud2 wrote: > Somebody try timing it with 10K names and let us know the speed differences :) Thanks for volunteering, jjuser! But seriously, David's email said he had 500 names, 1/20th of your suggested test sample. My point was that the user probably wouldn't perceive the difference either way he decides to implement it. And at 500 names, I'm assuming that he's not inserting a new name every minute of every day (of course, we all know what happens when we "assume".) rex --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] SQL query locks
If this is UniData, we fixed a problem in this area at 6.1.7 (released 3/18/05): Issue 6917 - Problem Description UniData -- A lock release in SQL UPDATE failed, causing SQL to hold the locks for records that were excluded from the query with a WHERE clause. A fix to the lock checking utility corrected this issue. Wally Terhune SWG Client Support - Information Management Software U2 Support Architect b IBM U2 Client Support Team 4700 S. Syracuse St., Denver, CO 80237 Tel: (303) 773-7969 T/L 656-7969 Mobile: (303) 807-6222 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Register today for the premier U2 technical event! Pamela J Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] nn.edu>To Sent by: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Cattanea, Tom" stserver.u2ug.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc 08/27/2007 09:32 AMSubject [U2] SQL query locks Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] er.u2ug.org Hi, We have a Cold Fusion app that is using SQL queries. It's locking records, unfortunately as many as 100 at a time. Is there a way to do the query without locking records? We're not updating anything. Pam -- Pamela J Robbins New Bolton Center Senior Programmer AnalystSchool of Veterinary Medicine [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Pennsylvania 610-925-6438 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 11186367.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 11145374.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic29259.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
Somebody try timing it with 10K names and let us know the speed differences :) On 8/27/07, Rex Gozar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, > > In terms of "which is better" for sorting inside a program, working with > in-memory strings should be faster than writing to disk. And with less > than a thousand names, it probably won't be noticeably faster whether > you UPCASE() each time you insert, or maintain a separate UPCASE'd variable. > > I'm guessing that you'll also have an ID value associated with the name; > that means LOCATE'ing on values. Field-marks in Universe (and I'm > guessing in Unidata too) are optimized for traversing back and forth. > Value-marks aren't, so when you INSERT a value after a LOCATE, the > run-machine has to start at character one and find each value until it > hits the specific value mark count. Ideally, you should be using > field-mark delimited lists, but practically I don't think it would be > noticeable. > > rex > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
Larry Hiscock wrote: > My guess is that your email address has been harvested from > IndexFocus, Nabble, or one of the other archives. This is correct, spam is not coming through the listserver. While it is a subscription only list, anyone who has posted to this forum has their address in plain view for a harvester to send mail directly, so the net effect is roughly the same. The 'user-at-domain' notation is not adequate to deter unprincipled mass mailers. T --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] SQL query locks
Just a guess, but this migh have to do with your transaction isolation level. Which DB are you using? UniVerse or UniData? I assume that the ColdFusion app is using ODBC to connect to the DB? Pamela J Robbins wrote: Hi, We have a Cold Fusion app that is using SQL queries. It's locking records, unfortunately as many as 100 at a time. Is there a way to do the query without locking records? We're not updating anything. Pam -- Geoffrey Mitchell Programmer/Analyst Home Decorator's Collection 314-684-1062 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [ud] makeudt shot in the dark...
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone's had success in doing a makeudt with Unidata 7.1.10-64 on AIX 5.3-06 using gcc 4.0.0. Thanks, -- John Solie -- Professional Hospital Supply -- 951-296-2600 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
This is exactly my point. I have good filtering too on servers and local
workstations, but I still get some spam. If they don't have your real
email address they can't send you spam. The spam volume directly resulting
from my postings to this forum suddenly shot up a couple weeks ago. After
unsubscribing from this forum and then re-subscribing with this new
address, I just deleted the old address and now I'm getting zero spam from
that particular "attack vector". That doesn't eliminate spam entirely but
every little bit helps. Sneakemail.com also runs through filters (which
serves as a pre-filter to your own) and optionally does greylisting, which
challenges sending servers to re-send mail - a legitimate server will
re-send but a spammer will not.
So anyway, I don't want to belabor this thread, just share some info that
might be of use since this forum was specifically targeted.
Since we're here, note that version 4 of my Outlook macros for Subject
cleanup is available on our freeware site (download macro4, all info is in
there):
remove.this.part.pleaseNebula-RnD.com/freeware/
It removes text like "{unclassified}", redundant tokens like
"re:[U2][UD]re:re:[UD][UD]" and the funky text inserted by other people's
email processors that we see in this forum. It's free, safe, open source,
and I use it all the time so I know it works.
Regards,
Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remote.thisNebula-RnD.com
Jerry Banker wrote:
> Well, let's see now, I get approximately 150 over the weekend and they
> end up in my junk folder. About 99% are filtered out. That's the
> number that got through our network filter.
> From: Allen E. Elwood
> I get about 10 a day, but 95% of those end up in my ZoneAlarm junk
> mail or challenged mail folders.
> From Ray Wurlod
> Nice idea, though I believe my heavy-duty spam filters must be
> working - I get very few.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] SQL query locks
Take a look at the "nolock" query hint. On 8/27/07, Pamela J Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > We have a Cold Fusion app that is using SQL queries. It's locking > records, unfortunately as many as 100 at a time. Is there a way to do > the query without locking records? We're not updating anything. > Pam > > -- > Pamela J Robbins New Bolton Center > Senior Programmer AnalystSchool of Veterinary Medicine > [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Pennsylvania > 610-925-6438 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- Don Kibbey --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
All, Larry is right. He and I get to see the stuff that gets caught. You'd be amazed how many classmates of U2-Users are looking to get back in touch. How many Nigerian relatives U2-Users has lost in the last year, the number exceeds the number of people in Nigeria. Fortunately, U2-Users has won several British and International Lotteries... - Chuck Larry Hiscock wrote: If you check the headers of the junk mail, you'll see that they're not coming from the list. The lists are setup so that only subscribers can post, and email addresses must be validated before they are subscribed. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] SQL query locks
Hi, We have a Cold Fusion app that is using SQL queries. It's locking records, unfortunately as many as 100 at a time. Is there a way to do the query without locking records? We're not updating anything. Pam -- Pamela J Robbins New Bolton Center Senior Programmer AnalystSchool of Veterinary Medicine [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Pennsylvania 610-925-6438 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
If you check the headers of the junk mail, you'll see that they're not coming from the list. The lists are setup so that only subscribers can post, and email addresses must be validated before they are subscribed. My guess is that your email address has been harvested from IndexFocus, Nabble, or one of the other archives. Larry Hiscock Moderator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 6:08 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution Well, let's see now, I get approximately 150 over the weekend and they end up in my junk folder. About 99% are filtered out. That's the number that got through our network filter. -Original Message- From: Allen E. Elwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:33 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution I get about 10 a day, but 95% of those end up in my ZoneAlarm junk mail or challenged mail folders. -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Nice idea, though I believe my heavy-duty spam filters must be working - I get very few. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Tlnet error 1067
If it's not a port conflict, then I'd recommend checking that gawd-aweful Windows firewall. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
David, In terms of "which is better" for sorting inside a program, working with in-memory strings should be faster than writing to disk. And with less than a thousand names, it probably won't be noticeably faster whether you UPCASE() each time you insert, or maintain a separate UPCASE'd variable. I'm guessing that you'll also have an ID value associated with the name; that means LOCATE'ing on values. Field-marks in Universe (and I'm guessing in Unidata too) are optimized for traversing back and forth. Value-marks aren't, so when you INSERT a value after a LOCATE, the run-machine has to start at character one and find each value until it hits the specific value mark count. Ideally, you should be using field-mark delimited lists, but practically I don't think it would be noticeable. rex --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting...
My answer to "Which is better" would be "it depends". If you're looking for run-time performance and disk is not an issue, go with the first. Although having duplicate data leaves a bad taste in most of our mouths, the purpose of the computer is to do the "grunt work" for us. Sometimes elegance has to take a back seat. If disk space and records sizes are more important, the latter is a better answer. My 2 cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... The issue for me is that I am using the list of employees within a program - so Virtual Dictionaries are not an option - displaying the data. I certainly don't want to sort it on use each time, which means I need to do an insert BY "AL" -- but in order to do that I have to have the list ready on read, but I insert names into the list one at a time -- hence I throught I would have to maintain two attributes -- one 'as keyed' and one in 'sort case' -- my other choice is to UPCASE the 'as keyed' each time I have to do an insert. I guess that's my question: Which is better Write a record with two sets of data, one 'as typed' one strictly for sorting, so that on the next insert, I just create a sort version of the new name, and insert it in both lists. The downside here is the record is larger. OR Use UPCASE on each need to insert to build the 'insert array' as needed, find the insert position in that array, then insert the 'AsTyped'. The downside to me was having to UPCASE each time an insert is needed. I'm trying to figure out the lesser of the evils! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:48 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] [ud] Question on Alpha Sorting... > > David: > > Create a virtual dictionary that upper cases the name. Then > you sort by the UCNAME but display the normal name. This > works for me. > > Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material not intended for Public use. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any and all computers or devices. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Have you tried looking at the way your username is stored in windows.
The easiest way I know to do this is run the "net user" command from
windows, or "net user /domain" if it's a domain login. All of our
network logins are in lower case, as is the same for most of our
customers. We did have one customer that entered their logins in mixed
case. Apparently, windows is case-insensitive when checking to see if
the login is valid, but when it returns the login to Universe, it
returns it in the original case that was entered, which for that
customer was mixed. UV.LOGINS would not work as we had expected.
Ultimately, checking "net user" showed that they were in mixed case.
The way that I knew of to clean this up was to delete and recreate the
login in windows, or possibly rename the user. Once the user is fixed
in windows, give Universe a reboot to clear it's user cache and it
should be fixed.
Good luck.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: ATLAS SA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:59 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}
Thanks Dave,
I tried it out but, unfortunately, the problem is occurring before the
UV LOGIN voc is invoked. And, to add insult to injury, it is only
happening to my login ID, not to the login ID of anyone else who has
access to the server.
If their UV.LOGINS record is AUSER10, they can enter any case
combination they like (AuSEr10) and UV passes AUSER10 to the UV.LOGINS
file. I use any case combination of my user ID and UV passes asuer14 to
the UV.LOGINS file. Somehow UV knows to upcase all telnet login IDs
except mine.
I suspect it may be because I installed something whilst logged onto the
server as myself, rather than as administrator. However, I did install
UV itself as administrator so it's not that. Possibly UVDK? However, I
have installed UV & UVDK on dozens of servers (Unix and Windows) and
have never had this occur before.
Also, I would rather not maintain separately formatted records for
myself throughout the DB. It would have further consequences in the
management of my records on what is the main payroll database.
Has anyone else encountered this problem before?
Cheers,
Andy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution
Well, let's see now, I get approximately 150 over the weekend and they end up in my junk folder. About 99% are filtered out. That's the number that got through our network filter. -Original Message- From: Allen E. Elwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:33 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Spam to forum addresses - Endorsement for a solution I get about 10 a day, but 95% of those end up in my ZoneAlarm junk mail or challenged mail folders. -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Nice idea, though I believe my heavy-duty spam filters must be working - I get very few. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Tlnet error 1067
I have the same problem. I had it when I first installed 10.1, so I never used 10.1. Then when my laptop bit the dust. I installed 10.2 after the CPU and hard drive were replaced and did not have the error, it worked great. A couple of months later I started to try some of the new features and found the problem reoccurred. I've tried tracking down to ports in use, nothing but telnet uses the port. Our network admin tried to figure it out with no success. My only glimmer of an idea is that it worked before I installed my software for dialup internet access (i.e.: EarthLink). Maybe it does something that messed it up. Could be something similar. Brenda Price -Original Message- From: Charles Barouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:49 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Tlnet error 1067 All, I have a client who is using UniVerse PE and cannot start telnet. I suspected that he had a port conflict, but he assures me that this is not the case. The error # is 1067. All help appreciated. -- - Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consulting --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
