[U2] [OT]FW: [Autoreply] Re: [UV] PORT.STATUS questions.
Haydon Bishop, eat your heart out. From: gl...@glennsallis.de To: dangf...@hotmail.com Subject: [Autoreply] Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions. Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:22:49 +0100 Guten Tag, ich bin zur Zeit in den Ferien und kann Ihre Email nicht beantworten. Am 4. Januar 2011 bin ich wieder verfügbar und werde sobald wie möglich an diesem Tag auf Ihre Email reagieren. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Hello, I am currently on vacation and am unable to respond to your Email. I will be back at work on 4th January 2011 and will respond to your Email as soon as possible on this date. Kind regards Glenn Sallis Glenn Sallis Softwareentwicklung und Beratung 47608 Geldern · Deutschland Tel: + 49 2831 9104220 Mob: +49 151 55714743 · Email: gl...@glennsallis.de Web: www.glennsallis.de Ihr "Zuhause" für unabhängige MultiValue Beratung in Deutschland und Benelux --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: dangf...@hotmail.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:22:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions. Did real estate prices also cause you to stop putting [ad] in your advertisements? > From: fft2...@aol.com > Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:19:17 -0500 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions. > > In a message dated 12/30/2010 8:46:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, > donr_w...@yahoo.com writes: > > > > I use PORT.STATUS for several function within programs by capturing the > > output > > and parsing it. I have a couple of problems with this. > > > > First, only one user at a time can run the command and this causes random > > failure of the programs. > > Second, the output can vary depending on options and success or failure of > > the > > command. > > > > So, is there a callable routine to get the same info in a cleaner way? > > > > Yes. If you have a budget. > The solution is rather elegant, but also proprietary... to me. > You have to buy a license. I stopped giving away free software when real > estate went South :) > > Will Johnson > Fast Forward Technologies > 831 477 7125 > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions.
Did real estate prices also cause you to stop putting [ad] in your advertisements? > From: fft2...@aol.com > Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:19:17 -0500 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions. > > In a message dated 12/30/2010 8:46:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, > donr_w...@yahoo.com writes: > > > > I use PORT.STATUS for several function within programs by capturing the > > output > > and parsing it. I have a couple of problems with this. > > > > First, only one user at a time can run the command and this causes random > > failure of the programs. > > Second, the output can vary depending on options and success or failure of > > the > > command. > > > > So, is there a callable routine to get the same info in a cleaner way? > > > > Yes. If you have a budget. > The solution is rather elegant, but also proprietary... to me. > You have to buy a license. I stopped giving away free software when real > estate went South :) > > Will Johnson > Fast Forward Technologies > 831 477 7125 > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions.
In a message dated 12/30/2010 8:46:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, donr_w...@yahoo.com writes: > I use PORT.STATUS for several function within programs by capturing the > output > and parsing it. I have a couple of problems with this. > > First, only one user at a time can run the command and this causes random > failure of the programs. > Second, the output can vary depending on options and success or failure of > the > command. > > So, is there a callable routine to get the same info in a cleaner way? > Yes. If you have a budget. The solution is rather elegant, but also proprietary... to me. You have to buy a license. I stopped giving away free software when real estate went South :) Will Johnson Fast Forward Technologies 831 477 7125 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions.
Hi Don, It may be easier simply to add a program to the LOGIN and ON.EXIT paragraphs to maintain a file with the specific details that you want available. Also, PORT.STATUS from within Universe gives an error for options like PID and FILEMAP but works ok from the AIX prompt, why? These options are normally only present in the UV account VOC but there is no reason why they cannot be copied to other VOC files. Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems Ltd 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB, England +44 (0)1604-709200 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] [UV] PORT.STATUS questions.
Hello all, We are running Universe 11.1.17 on Aix 5.3. I use PORT.STATUS for several function within programs by capturing the output and parsing it. I have a couple of problems with this. First, only one user at a time can run the command and this causes random failure of the programs. Second, the output can vary depending on options and success or failure of the command. So, is there a callable routine to get the same info in a cleaner way? I need things like "is port ### logged in" or a list of ports logged in with a specific login id, etc. In others words, the same info but in a more usable format. Also, PORT.STATUS from within Universe gives an error for options like PID and FILEMAP but works ok from the AIX prompt, why? Thanks in advance, Don Robinson ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Viewpoint Emulation
Hi Marc The solution is quite simple:- The following example uses /u1/uv for the UniVerse home directory and vt100 as the terminal type. Substitute in the correct information for your system. cd /u1/uv/sample /u1/uv/bin/uvtidc vt100 > myvt100 vi myvt100 within vi, search for the string ( /$<5> ) and delete all ocurrances. /u1/uv/bin/uvtic -a myvt100 HTH Caminiti, Marc wrote: > > We currently run viewpoint emulation, but there have been some requests > to be able to connect to our system via an iPad. I see that there is an > software package out there called iSSH that will allow the connection to > our system, but it does not have the viewpoint emulation. > > > > If I connect to our system with a vt100 emulation, and issue a TERM > vt100 from TCL, our menu options work fine, but it seems like any > programs where we use the @(#,#) to position the cursor a $<5> appears > on the screen then the text. > > > > This little program > > CRT @(0,0):@(-1):"HELLO" > > CRT @(5,5):"GOOD BYE" > > > > Clears the screen, puts HELLO at the upper left, but then in position > 5,5 it displays $<5>GOOD BYE > > > > Is there a termcap definition that I need to change, or a TERM value I > need to change? > > > > We run RHEL 5.3, UV 10.2.7 > > > > Thanks in Advance > > marc > > > > Marc Caminiti > > IS Manager > > Nashbar Direct, Inc > > 6103 State Route 446 > > Canfield, OH 44406 > > 330.533.1989, ext 336 > > 330.702.9733, fax > > > > Law of Logical Argument - Anything is possible if you don't know what > you are talking about. > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain > confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is > solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return > e-mail and delete this message. > > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Viewpoint-Emulation-tp30483549p30558323.html Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] ViaDuct problem
Hi, in the UK it used to be ANJEC that supported ViaDuct, there used to be a nice man called Dick Chatter who knew it inside out, don't know if he's still there or if they still support it but it could be worth an Email. There web site is www.anjec.co.uk. How do I know this? I worked there for a short time... Cheers Les Sherlock Hewkin Senior Project Manager Finance & HR Systems, I.T. Department T 01604 592289, M 07917 856195 -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Oaks, Harold Sent: 28 December 2010 19:47 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] ViaDuct problem Tony, thanks for your insights. Thanks to others too. My end users are criminal justice folks, so indeed a pretty focused audience. Based on that and several other considerations, I'm going to take a hard look at AccuTerm. Thanks- Harold -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:10 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] ViaDuct problem It's sort of weird to see AccuTerm being investigated like it's a newcomer to be compared to SecureCRT. I hope this review will be helpful, by someone who has used them all. Back in the late 80's to early 90's I was a ViaDuct fan. Around 1994 I was introduced to wIntegrate and found it more capable. Around 1995 I was introduced to AccuTerm and I found a permanent home. AccuTerm is quite simply (IMHO) the best terminal emulator in the MV industry. It has a ton of features that every MV developer can appreciate. Just get it and start using it and you'll see what I mean. There is a helpful user forum, a lot of people who know it very well, excellent product support with rapid code changes if required, and you can get AccuTerm GUI training. No matter what you do, you're going to have to get away from ViaDuct, and if you go to anything else there is going to be a lot of conversion effort. This is the price that's paid for building so heavily into a specific product. For better or worse you'd do the same thing with AccuTerm but if you're going to "get in deep" with any product, this is a reasonable one. While I recommend AccuTerm GUI for a Pick developer who doesn't like to use mainstream tools, I personally don't think it's right business approach for a diverse end-user base. It's thick-client only and connects via Telnet or SSH. That is a fine solution for focused audiences. If you have any interest in an extranet or internet audience where a browser is used, then you may want to invest your time in mainstream tools. Personally I use AccuTerm all the time to get into all MV environments while I'm building browser GUI - these things are not in conflict. AccuTerm does have "AccuTerm for Internet Explorer" which is a plugin to allow browser users to access your system, but when people say they want a browser UI this isn't what they have in mind. Try it for yourself. I should also mention that the AnzioWin terminal emulator from Rasmussen Software (anzio.com) seems to be a more "apples to apples" competitor for SecureCRT. I wish I could take all the mainstream features of AnzioWin and mash them up with the MV-specific features of AccuTerm. I actually use both of these products, having used SecureCRT, Putty, and other mainstream options in the past. If you go to PickWiki you'll see other emulators documented, including Winnix which deserves a fair evaluation: http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?TerminalEmulators HTH Tony Gravagno Nebula Research and Development TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com Nebula R&D sells mv.NET worldwide and provides related development services remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com/blog Visit PickWiki.com! Contribute! http://Twitter.com/TonyGravagno > From: Harold.Oaks >I've always considered AccuTerm the 'other' main player in the MV >terminal emulator market, and thought about going to them but >conversion of the programs to use their forms would be a lot of >workwheras the code to run Viaduct forms is embedding subroutine calls >in >the Basic code. That is, they are quite different. >Do others have an opinion of AccuTerm versus SecureCRT? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to public disclosure under state law. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose the contents; please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. This message is attrib
Re: [U2] [UD] Killing a UO connection
We quite often get UO processes hanging on out udt box, deleteuser or kill -9 is what i usually do and they always hang around in listuser for atleast 5 mins - it is a real pain! From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: 29 December 2010 23:15 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] Killing a UO connection Kevin: Thanks. I don't shutdown UniData (the "-f" is unnecessary (used only for "stopud") and "stopudt pid [pidM... pidN]" will stop one or more unidata processes). When I use UniAdmin to "Logoff" a user there's approximately a 30 second pause between logging off the user/pid and the user disappearing from the "LISTUSER" command. I didn't realize doing this through UniAdmin could potentially corrupt files or interrupt writes! I'm not sure where I got the "udtkill.exe" information from but I substituted "deleteuser" for that executable. Only He knows if this will work properly! Thanks again, Bill Kevin King said the following on 12/29/2010 2:18 PM: > Two things come immediately to mind... First, to force people off you're > shutting down Unidata altogether? Seems a bit harsh, that's all I'm > saying. Second, what about deleteuser instead of udtkill? I'm not a fan of > deleteuser (because even the documentation says it can cause corruption) but > that's the command that I understand is supposed to be used in place of > UniAdmin to force a user down. > > > > Subject: [UD] Killing a UO connection > Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:48:48 -0800 > From: Bill Haskett > To: U2 Mail List > > > I'm running UO for most of the connectivity to our application. > Occasionally, a UO connection from DesignBais gets locked and I can only > get rid of it via UniAdmin. I have a BASIC program I run to delete > these connections and it mostly works. However, occasionally it > doesn't. Here's the code in use in BASIC: > > IF OptionNos NE "FORCE" THEN >PerformVerb = "stopudt -f " > END ELSE >PerformVerb = "udtkill.exe " > END > > Supposedly this was supposed to do the trick, but it doesn't. Does > anyone know what is used by UniAdmin to clear the connection so I can > program it into BASIC? > > Thanks, > > Bill Haskett > Advantos Systems, Inc. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3347 - Release Date: 12/29/10 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users