[U2] UODOTNET.dll
Hi - i am after a bit of advice from the group - i know it has been said before to use the latest uniobjects .net dll but is that true regardless of what udt version you have i.e. i have one customer on udt 7.1.0 and they are using a dll at version 2.1.0.7137, I have another machine on the latest 7.1 - 7.1.15 and the clients cd for this has the dll at version 2.1.2.7232, is it a good idea to use this dll for the uo.net connections that go into the 7.1.0 machine ? Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] UODOTNET.dll
Symeon: I ran into this problem with multiple version of UD and mv.NET. I don't think it mattered which version off the .dll was used for mv.NET. Our current production is on UD 7.1.9 and our development is on UD 7.2.5. We use 2.1.1.7211 on our UD 7.1.9 server. We do, however, make dbms connections with several other UD servers running 7.1.9 - 7.1.20. Our new development environment uses 2.2.0.7276 running on Windows 2K8 R2, connecting to a UD 7.2.5. This was the latest non-2K8R2 release (I think). There should be a new 7.2A client, with a new uodotnet.dll but I haven't been able to get it yet. I've heard that there's a new UD 7.2.7-9 that resolves some issues with Win 2K8-R2. I don't have that yet either. HTH, Bill Symeon Breen said the following on 8/6/2010 1:31 AM: Hi - i am after a bit of advice from the group - i know it has been said before to use the latest uniobjects .net dll but is that true regardless of what udt version you have i.e. i have one customer on udt 7.1.0 and they are using a dll at version 2.1.0.7137, I have another machine on the latest 7.1 - 7.1.15 and the clients cd for this has the dll at version 2.1.2.7232, is it a good idea to use this dll for the uo.net connections that go into the 7.1.0 machine ? Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] UODOTNET.dll
Hi - i am after a bit of advice from the group - i know it has been said before to use the latest uniobjects .net dll but is that true regardless of what udt version you have i.e. i have one customer on udt 7.1.0 and they are using a dll at version 2.1.0.7137, I have another machine on the latest 7.1 - 7.1.15 and the clients cd for this has the dll at version 2.1.2.7232, is it a good idea to use this dll for the uo.net connections that go into the 7.1.0 machine ? Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Hello, Anyone here know what causes this error ? System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array. at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.ReadHeaderLength() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.Receive(BinaryReader aDataIn) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.ReadPacketInternal() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.Call(Byte anEncryptionType) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniSubroutine.Call() The System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array error, when it happens is difficult to get rid of. We sometimes stop and restart the unirpc daemon and it sometimes goes away. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Jacques Is there any chance you are passing a null reference to/from the call? I've seen various errors if one of the subroutine arguments is never assigned. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacques G. Sent: 13 July 2006 16:53 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL Hello, Anyone here know what causes this error ? System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array. at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.ReadHeaderLength() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.Receive(BinaryReader aDataIn) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.ReadPacketInternal() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.Call(Byte anEncryptionType) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniSubroutine.Call() The System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array error, when it happens is difficult to get rid of. We sometimes stop and restart the unirpc daemon and it sometimes goes away. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
I'm using a program I used to test all of my web services on a different server yesterday. On this new server all I changed was the server address, the login password and UV account. For passing the parameters, I use my test XML files which contain the neccessary information. On this particular server all of the web services are giving me the same error message. --- Brian Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jacques Is there any chance you are passing a null reference to/from the call? I've seen various errors if one of the subroutine arguments is never assigned. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacques G. Sent: 13 July 2006 16:53 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL Hello, Anyone here know what causes this error ? System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array. at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.ReadHeaderLength() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCPMessage.Receive(BinaryReader aDataIn) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.ReadPacketInternal() at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniRPCConnection.Call(Byte anEncryptionType) at IBMU2.UODOTNET.UniSubroutine.Call() The System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array error, when it happens is difficult to get rid of. We sometimes stop and restart the unirpc daemon and it sometimes goes away. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
You just need to add UODOTNET.dll into the GAC on each workstation/system that uses UniObjects.NET. I'm not sure why IBM don't do this as part of their SDK install... I guess because using GAC is a pain in the backside if you want to use one-click publishing and automatic updates: yes I know you can fiddle about with the prerequisites. But requiring a separate install into the GAC rather pushes against the whole 'publish-and-forget' update model, which is one of the most useful things in .net. You should be able to quite happily distribute the uodotnet.dll as a copy local file: that works for me. I've spent too many hours trying to fix one-click references that have gone wrong. Regards Brian --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then might there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are loaded/running on the same system? I was under the impression that the UO.NET dll is a native .net dll, not a wrapper. There is no registration or COM components required when using the UO.NET dll. I've run projects on a system that has nothing but the UO.NET dll just sitting in the application directory without problems. DLL Hell is nowhere to be found. :) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Tony, As far as the two versions co-existing goes, it is possible, even in the same application (not simply however). If this is for different applications, then just make sure the correct assembly is in the bin directory. And finally, UO.NET is not a wrapper around the COM components; it is 100% managed code. Cheers KP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:57 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL Please forgive a quick post being made without appropriate prior investigation. I'm hoping someone will have a quick answer for what might otherwise take several hours of research. I'm told there are two versions of UODOTNET.dll: 2.1.0.7137 and 2.1.0.7149 Where can we get the new build? We may need this file for use with another project that was built with it. If UO.NET is managed code, can the two versions co-exist? I would assume so since this is one of the big benefits of .NET. If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then might there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are loaded/running on the same system? Thanks! Tony, TG@ remove.thisNebula-RnD.com http:// we.really.dislike.spamNebula-RnD.com New blog postings: http:// remove.this.partNebula-RnD.com/blog --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Thank you all for your responses. I was hoping to avoid downloading the entire Clients package just for this DLL, which as I recall was something over 100MB, but it's time for me to get updated anyway. :) For me this is OK but I'm always hesitent to recommend that an end-user upgrade the clients package because it contains other non-.NET components (.NOT Dawn?). Since some MV vendors build around the older components and not the newer ones this is where someone is subject to DLL Hell if they upgrade the entire package just to get one file. Kendrew and Peter, my note about UO.NET as a wrapper stems from an experience I had where UO.NET threw an exception from a P/Invoke to UO. I trust it's different now and look forward to taking another look. Regards, Tony Nebula RD --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Please forgive a quick post being made without appropriate prior investigation. I'm hoping someone will have a quick answer for what might otherwise take several hours of research. I'm told there are two versions of UODOTNET.dll: 2.1.0.7137 and 2.1.0.7149 Where can we get the new build? We may need this file for use with another project that was built with it. If UO.NET is managed code, can the two versions co-exist? I would assume so since this is one of the big benefits of .NET. If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then might there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are loaded/running on the same system? Thanks! Tony, TG@ remove.thisNebula-RnD.com http:// we.really.dislike.spamNebula-RnD.com New blog postings: http:// remove.this.partNebula-RnD.com/blog --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL
Currently I only have 7149 in the GAC but you should be able to have another version alongside. This build came with Clients for UniVerse 10.1B, which is downloadable from IBM U2 - trials betas. http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/preconfig.jsp?id=2005-03 -31+14%3A19%3A42.178111RS_TACT=104CBW71S_CMP=s= Open your dot net framework config and load it into the assembly cache. (Thanks to David Cooper from Bluefinity for this tip) You just need to add UODOTNET.dll into the GAC on each workstation/system that uses UniObjects.NET. I'm not sure why IBM don't do this as part of their SDK install... Cheers, Stuart Boydell __ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 12 July 2006 10:57 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UODOTNET.DLL Please forgive a quick post being made without appropriate prior investigation. I'm hoping someone will have a quick answer for what might otherwise take several hours of research. I'm told there are two versions of UODOTNET.dll: 2.1.0.7137 and 2.1.0.7149 Where can we get the new build? We may need this file for use with another project that was built with it. If UO.NET is managed code, can the two versions co-exist? I would assume so since this is one of the big benefits of .NET. If UO.NET is a big wrapper around COM (which I believe it is), then might there be a registration issue (DLL Hell) if the two cuts are loaded/running on the same system? Thanks! Tony, TG@ remove.thisNebula-RnD.com http:// we.really.dislike.spamNebula-RnD.com New blog postings: http:// remove.this.partNebula-RnD.com/blog --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (+61 3 9269 7555) immediately, who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer related viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/