Re: Name Resolution
You could add gethostbyname() as a GCI subroutine. Take a look at getpid() as a template (in the UV account, LIST GCI). - Original Message - From: Craig Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:34:06 +1000 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Name Resolution Hi All, does anyone currently do name resolution from within UV? I have a need to determine the dns name corresponding to an IP address under UV 10.0 on AIX, Linux and NT. I would prefer not execute an external utility and cannot use GCI. My current thoughts are to create a sockets client to query a DNS server, but I did wonder if there was a better way to do this. ICONV(203.42.18.135, DNSPTR) ;) thanks, Craig -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] B-TREE INDEX
Ah, the well-known helpful error message. Not. What happens when you use these commands? LIST.INDEX filename LIST.INDEX filename STATS LIST.INDEX filename DETAIL Can you examine the INDEX.000 file (assuming it's that one) with uvfixfile or blook? - Original Message - From: Björn Behr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:01:13 +0200 To: U2 User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [UV] B-TREE INDEX We keep having a problem with our B-TREE INDEX that says ERROR IN B-TREE INDEX Can anybody help me out. Windows 2000, Universe 10.0 Regards Björn Behr Programmer HYFLO Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd Tel : +27 11 386 5800 Fax : +27 11 444 5391 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : http://www.hyflo.co.za In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad idea. - Douglas Noel Adams (b. 1952), British author -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Differences
DB2 is the original, proprietary IBM first normal form database product. IBM now prefers to call it DB2 UDB, where the UDB stands for universal database. Since acquiring all of the databases, including UniVerse and UniData, from Informix in 2001, IBM have also used the term DB2 to refer generically to all its database products, no doubt to confuse the world into believing that DB2 is the only database (personal opinion). UniVerse and UniData are very similar (to end users), non first normal form database products, based on a model that pre-dates SQL. While each supports SQL, it is not currently the principal query language used. The data model, while relational, incorporates nesting, which DB2 UDB does not. That is, conceptually, a cell (row/column intersection) can have a data type of table. IBM acquired these, along with six other database products, from Informix. Administration of UniVerse is radically different from UniData, and both even more radically different from DB2 UDB. Further, there is no such thing as a course. There's one for the query language, one for the programmer, one (or more) for the administrator in each case. Try linking to IBM's web site, going to www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2 as your start point. You can get to the library (manuals, tech bulletins, etc.) and training and certification from this page. Sometimes you will end up on a DB2 page while following these links. The U2 (UniVerse/UniData) information is usually in tiny print at the bottom or somewhere else obscure on these pages. Good luck! - Original Message - From: Trevor McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:26:15 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Differences Hey, Can someone please answer some questions as i am unsure on some database types. Whats the difference between DB2 and UniVerse/UniData? Are they the same sort of structure? Can you do a DB2 course and be qualified enough to use UniVerse? Any other information or websites on this sort of thing (Newbie questions:) ) would be much appreciated. Thanks Trev _ Find love today with ninemsn personals. Click here: http://ninemsn.match.com?referrer=hotmailtagline -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: VOC corruption
Another thought from left field. I wonder whether the rotating file pool may be implicated? There was a brief time when, for a single Dynamic file, opening OVER.30 rotated DATA.30 out and vice versa (!). VOC is supposed to be exempt from rotating (it and its dictionary are two of the reserved eight file units for sizing MFILES), but it might be worth checking with support about your particular exact release - explicitly request that they check the source code. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: FATAL : Cannot create transaction cache file
Is this UniVerse or UniData? My guess is either that you've hit some limit (disk full?, max number of transaction cache files?), or that there's a permissions issue in the directory where the transaction cache file needs to be created. - Original Message - From: Ang Suan Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:33:56 +0800 To: U2-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FATAL : Cannot create transaction cache file Dear All, Do any one having facing the below problem before where the program run half way it prompt Cannot create transaction cache file . When such a problem occur, what we do is just rerun the program and is working well. Is it possible that this is due to hitting the maximun record lock ? Program UPD.SUB: Line 45, FATAL: Cannot create transactio n cache file. Rolling back uncommitted transactions begun within this execution environment. Thanks and Regards DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. Thank you. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: VOC corruption
Are you using UniVerse error message logging (enabled by creating the error message file in the UV account) and, if so, does it tell you anything? -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] Problem reactivating select list
Have you thought of using trigger subroutines to keep the audit trail? Much easier, and the before- and after-records and keys are available for you right there in the arguments. :D -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: How far can U2 scale?
There are quite a few sites running upwards of 2000 users in my region (Asia Pacific). The model is many small users (such as insurance brokers, accountants, tax agents, etc.) having dial-in access. One site is licensed for 3300 users, and sustains a load over 3000 users most of the day with acceptable response metrics. Strictly two tier (one tier really). -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: PI Open is going away
I don't remember seeing any three comments! - Original Message - From: Clifton Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:12:35 -0700 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PI Open is going away That would be John 60,000 lines of PMA assemby code and only 3 comments Drumheller. -- Regards, Clif -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: PI Open is going away
One of the reasons PI/open could not advance was that its source control system was written in MIDASPLUS. D'oh! -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: UniObjects
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: UV: How do I determine whether a file is using 64 bit or 32 bitaddressing
The STATUS statement (not the same as the STATUS function) returns a dynamic array of information about an open file. According to the BASIC manual, there are 30 fields. A little research has revealed that there are, in fact, 32 fields returned. Field 31 is the magic number, for example ACEF010B. Field 32 is an indicator of addressing mode. 1 = 32-bit old format, 3 = 32-bit new format, 5 = 64-bit. Code: OpenPath hashedfilepath To FileVariable Then Status FileStuff From FileVariable Then If FileStuff32 = 5 Then * file uses 64-bit addressing End Else * file uses 32-bit addressing End End End -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise) was that Sara's original post had a constraint with a LEADING wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION'). The argument that has been raging since has used examples with TRAILING wildcards (WHERE name LIKE 'Sara%'). Apples and oranges, folks, especially if B-tree indexes are involved. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Joe, The example you specified (below) is case-SENSITIVE. It will only return rows where the value begins with the four upper-case letters designated. In particular, it will not produce the results you showed (and could never select the row with SARRA). Your query is identical to the SQL: SELECT fieldname FROM filename WHERE fieldname LIKE 'SARA%'; My techniques showed how to render this into a case-insensitive search by performing on-the-fly conversion to upper-case. It would be just as valid to perform on-the-fly conversion to lower case. However, this conversion is done in the WHERE clause, not in the SELECT clause (or in the RetrieVe equivalents), so that the data values are displayed in whatever case they are stored. Regards Ray - Original Message - From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:37:54 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) Ray, I see you are doing a few things here, am not quite sure i understand. The only way i have OUR UV Programmers using BASIC/PICK do this is like SELECT [FILENAME] WITH [FIELDNAME] LIKE 'SARA]' (NOTE **]* - Syntax might a bit OFF) Something like the above produces a CASE-INSENSITIVE Search and returns all the below Sara sarra saRraA etc. The UPCASE and LOWCASE only Returns those results right? So in your Experience, would you say SQL Interface is Faster than any other Interface within UV? Thanks, Joe Eugene -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:57 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) On this basis here are the RetrieVe equivalents for my earlier post. The main difference is that there's more than one verb (for different query result formats) and the selection criterion begins with the keyword WITH rather than WHERE. And the pattern matching specifiers are different (for example ... rather than % for multi-character wildcard). verb PEOPLE NAME WITH NAME CONV MCU LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL UPCASE(NAME) LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL OCONV(NAME) LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL UPCASE(LEFT(NAME)) = SARA where verb can be any of: LIST SORTcolumnar report SELECTSSELECT Select List LIST.ITEM SORT.ITEM raw format LIST.LABELSORT.LABEL mailing labels REFORMAT SREFORMAT target is second file/table COUNT SUM not really relevant for NAME HTH - Original Message - From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:33:20 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) Tim, My apologies... Yes, i know UV has a SQL Interface but i didnt think many UV Programmers used this Interface... As a matter of Fact, i like the UV SQL Interface. I have a PE Edition of UV on all my machines and i have only used the SQL Interface within UV. In our UV Shop, UV Guys are NOT supposed to use this SQL Interface as they claim its very slow than using the Native SELECT WITH . I have read the UV Manual that reflects RDBMS, this manual explains you can setup Tables Exactly like any RDBMS using Data Types (Varchar, char, Int etc) All the the testing i have done does NOT involve using the SQL Interface in UV, Our UV Shop uses FILE Types, NOT RDBMS Tables and we use PICK/BASIC/REDBACK to Interfact with these FILES. Perhaps the problem might be our UV Shop using PICK/BASIC... Maybe the SQL Interface on UV is much faster. I dont know. Thanks, Joe Eugene From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Timothy Snyder Sent: Wed 3/31/2004 3:12 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) Joe Eugene wrote on 03/31/2004 02:59:29 PM: Please post your PICK/BASIC and SQL Query.. so we i can learn the magic you did on the PICK Side. Joe, Unless I'm missing something, Sara used the SQL statement against the UniVerse database. Perhaps you weren't aware that UniVerse supports SQL statements to query the database. I don't think she used any magic. Therefore, in her original post, she provided all the information you need to do a comparison. Also, you keep referencing PICK/BASIC. BASIC is the programming language, not the query language. There is also a native query language, but that's only one of many ways to access the database. I hope this helps to clarify your expectations. Tim Snyder IBM Data Management Solutions Consulting I/T Specialist , U2 Professional Services Office (717) 545-6403 (rolls to cell phone) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing
RE: [UV] Consult about SQL
The first thing to notice is that a file scan is being performed on the LINFAC table. This could be speeded with an index on each of the constraining columns LINFAC.EMP and LINFAC.TIPFAC. The inner joins are being performed via hash lookups, the fastest available method. There are 23469 matches between tables LINFAC and GCMCL and 131 matches between GCML and GCAREPRE, based on the join conditions specified. There may be some gain to be had by indexing the foreign key columns LINFAC.CODCLI and GCML.CODREP1. - Original Message - From: Cesar Riba [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:37:21 +0200 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [UV] Consult about SQL Hello, Another question Because a SQL query executed in Universe it take 20 seconds and the same query in MSAccess take 3 seconds. This is the result of EXPLAIN of this query SELECT LINFAC.GRUPART, SUM(LINFAC.BASPP * LINFAC.CAN) As SUMCANT, GCAREPRE.NOMBRE AS NOMREPRE, SQL+GCAREPRE.CODIGO AS CODREPRE SQL+FROM SQL+GCAREPRE INNER JOIN GCMCL ON GCAREPRE.CODIGO = GCMCL.CODREP1 SQL+INNER JOIN LINFAC ON [EMAIL PROTECTED] = LINFAC.CODCLI SQL+WHERE LINFAC.EMP = 1 AND SQL+(LINFAC.TIPFAC='01' OR LINFAC.TIPFAC='03' OR LINFAC.TIPFAC='05' OR LINFAC.TIPFAC='06' OR LINFAC.TIPFAC='10') SQL+GROUP BY LINFAC.GRUPART, GCAREPRE.CODIGO, GCAREPRE.NOMBRE HAVING SUM(LINFAC.BASPP*LINFAC.CAN) IS NOT NULL SQL+EXPLAIN; Optimizing query block 0 Table restriction: LINFAC.EMP = 1 AND (LINFAC.TIPFAC = '10' OR (((LINFAC.TIPFAC= '01' OR LINFAC.TIPFAC = '03') ORLINFAC.TIPFAC = '05') OR LINFAC.TIPFAC = '06')) Driver source: LINFAC Access method: file scan 1st join primary: LINFAC est. cost: 30445 secondary: GCMCL est. cost: 23469 type: hashed join (primary key) 2nd join primary: GCMCL est. cost: 23469 secondary: GCAREPRE est. cost: 131 type: hashed join (primary key) Grouped by: GRUPARTCODIGONOMBRE Thanks, -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Ray Wurlod Enviado el: jueves, 01 de abril de 2004 22:44 Para: U2 Users Discussion List Asunto: Re: [UV] Consult about SQL The best way to speed inner joins is to index the column that is the foreign key. For example, if your join is of the form: SELECT T1.ORDERNO, T2.CUSTNO, T2.CUSTNAME FROM ORDERS T1, CUSTOMERS T2 WHERE T1.CUSTNO = T2.CUSTNO ; then you need an index on ORDERS.CUSTNO In other cases, depending on exactly what the query is, you can also sometimes obtain benefit by rewriting the SQL to use sub-queries, unions, and other techniques. - Original Message - From: Cesar Riba [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:10:18 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Consult about SQL Hello, I'm a problem when use a SQL query that have one or various INNER JOIN this is very very slow. How I can accelerate this tipus of query. Thanks. César -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] Case-Insensitive Comparison (was Modern Universe (TESTING))
I haven't been following this thread very intensely. However, a case insensitive pattern match is straightforward in UniVerse by specifying an on-the-fly conversion to upper case or lower case. As normal there are several ways to accomplish this. I will constrain examples to UniVerse SQL, but remember that the same techniques are available in UniVerse's other query language (RetrieVe). SELECT NAME FROM PEOPLE WHERE NAME CONV 'MCU' LIKE 'SARA%'; SELECT NAME FROM PEOPLE WHERE EVAL UPCASE(NAME) LIKE 'SARA%'; SELECT NAME FROM PEOPLE WHERE EVAL OCONV(NAME,'MCU') LIKE 'SARA%'; -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
On this basis here are the RetrieVe equivalents for my earlier post. The main difference is that there's more than one verb (for different query result formats) and the selection criterion begins with the keyword WITH rather than WHERE. And the pattern matching specifiers are different (for example ... rather than % for multi-character wildcard). verb PEOPLE NAME WITH NAME CONV MCU LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL UPCASE(NAME) LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL OCONV(NAME) LIKE SARA... verb PEOPLE NAME WITH EVAL UPCASE(LEFT(NAME)) = SARA where verb can be any of: LIST SORTcolumnar report SELECTSSELECT Select List LIST.ITEM SORT.ITEM raw format LIST.LABELSORT.LABEL mailing labels REFORMAT SREFORMAT target is second file/table COUNT SUM not really relevant for NAME HTH - Original Message - From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:33:20 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) Tim, My apologies... Yes, i know UV has a SQL Interface but i didnt think many UV Programmers used this Interface... As a matter of Fact, i like the UV SQL Interface. I have a PE Edition of UV on all my machines and i have only used the SQL Interface within UV. In our UV Shop, UV Guys are NOT supposed to use this SQL Interface as they claim its very slow than using the Native SELECT WITH . I have read the UV Manual that reflects RDBMS, this manual explains you can setup Tables Exactly like any RDBMS using Data Types (Varchar, char, Int etc) All the the testing i have done does NOT involve using the SQL Interface in UV, Our UV Shop uses FILE Types, NOT RDBMS Tables and we use PICK/BASIC/REDBACK to Interfact with these FILES. Perhaps the problem might be our UV Shop using PICK/BASIC... Maybe the SQL Interface on UV is much faster. I dont know. Thanks, Joe Eugene From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Timothy Snyder Sent: Wed 3/31/2004 3:12 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING) Joe Eugene wrote on 03/31/2004 02:59:29 PM: Please post your PICK/BASIC and SQL Query.. so we i can learn the magic you did on the PICK Side. Joe, Unless I'm missing something, Sara used the SQL statement against the UniVerse database. Perhaps you weren't aware that UniVerse supports SQL statements to query the database. I don't think she used any magic. Therefore, in her original post, she provided all the information you need to do a comparison. Also, you keep referencing PICK/BASIC. BASIC is the programming language, not the query language. There is also a native query language, but that's only one of many ways to access the database. I hope this helps to clarify your expectations. Tim Snyder IBM Data Management Solutions Consulting I/T Specialist , U2 Professional Services Office (717) 545-6403 (rolls to cell phone) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: U2UG Contract
US copyright law doesn't help me in Australia. Maybe applicable copyright law is a better term. Then, Unless explicitly forbidden postings can be copied... is my preferred wording on that issue. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:50:00 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (U2 Users Discussion List) Subject: Re: U2UG Contract All postings to this forum remain the sole property of the poster. Postings however can be copied, observing US copyright law, for non-profit purposes. U2ug does not take any responsbility for any postings to this forum. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Setting up SQL step 1
Manuals, etc., for UniVerse 9.5, 9.6 and 10.0 are all on the IBM website. Also UniData 5.2 and 6.0. Start at http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/library/ - Original Message - From: Anthony Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:07:03 - To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up SQL step 1 Why might I have the 9.5 docu? Because we're still running it :-( It's all very well, but there is some truth in the old adage if it aint broke, don't fix it. Cheers, Wol -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] SP.EDIT SP.ASSIGN HS
SP.ASSIGN (HS sends the file to the spooler, with HOLD and RETAIN attributes asserted. It does not send files to the HOLD file. You will find your files in the directory referred to by your UVSPOOL configuration parameter. You can use the SPOOL -LIST command to see that they are held from printing. You can use the SP.EDIT command to print them and manage them (for example kill (de-queue) them). If you want to send output to HOLD the correct command to use is SETPTR with the sixth argument set to 3. For example: SETPTR 0,132,2,0,0,3,BANNER MYFILE,BRIEF (this command directs the default print channel to a record called MYFILE in the HOLD file. If you examine the SP.ASSIGN verb in the VOC file, and trace it back to source, you will find that SP.ASSIGN (HS actually ends up invoking the SETPTR command, but in mode 1 (spooler), for example SETPTR 0,132,60,3,3,1,HOLD,RETAIN - Original Message - From: Cyndi Calvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:39:19 -0800 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SP.EDIT SP.ASSIGN HS Hi, I'm trying to use the 'SP.ASSIGN HS' to send the output to file under UNIX HOLD directory. I'm doing and seeing the following -- but no file ever shows up under HOLD directory. Any clues or thoughts? It gets to the queue? But I don't know what to answer to get it to file. Thanks!!! All these Ready to Output should be deleted but I can't SP.EDIT before I run the SP.ASSIGN SP.EDIT Entry # 01200 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01201 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01202 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01203 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01211 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01227 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01230 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01231 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01234 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01236 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01238 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01239 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01259 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01260 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01264 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01267 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01277 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01282 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01364 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01370 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01371 : Is Ready to Output. SP.ASSIGN HS LIST.ITEM CUST (P Spooler Entry #2877 SP.EDIT Entry # 01200 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01201 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01202 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01203 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01211 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01227 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01230 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01231 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01234 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01236 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01238 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01239 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01259 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01260 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01264 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01267 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01277 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01282 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01364 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01370 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 01371 : Is Ready to Output. Entry # 02877Status : Hold*Size: 422305 Priority: 88 Copies : 1Delay : Pages : All Eject : Yes Delete : Yes Form: 1Printer : [Any]Options : None Display (Y/N/S/D/X/CR) ? N (if I say Y it does show on the screen) Spool (Y/N=CR) ? Y Pages to output : ALL -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Unable to read LOGS.DIR entry from D_UV_LOGS.
If you're not using transaction logging (TXMODE=0) you can safely ignore this message. It is the UniVerse transaction logging daemon trying to determine where it should keep its log files. If you ARE using transaction logging (TXMODE=1) make sure that you have configured the logs directory. - Original Message - From: Evgenios Charalambus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:26:17 -0800 (PST) To: Discussion Universe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unable to read LOGS.DIR entry from D_UV_LOGS. After installing universe 9.5.1 and run the command: bin/uv -admin -stop I got the following errors: Unable to read LOGS.DIR entry from D_UV_LOGS. Unable to open uvdrlogd Daemon info file. Unable to locate UVDR log directory. I tried again start and stop but the error remains. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: EVAL
The result of every EVAL is (deemed to be) a string. Try using both FMT and CONV field qualifiers. FMT for the right justification and CONV to try to convince the query engine that it's dealing with numbers - either the MD or the MR conversion should do it. LIST file EVAL expression CONV MD0 FMT 10R -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Parsing Pathname from Object Code
Yes, it will. Were you rolling your own, you would need to know that the address of the source code pathname is in the object record header. Usually it's right at the end, but this is not the case if you've used $COPYRIGHT or $* directives, as the text for these follows the pathname of the source code. And it's different again if the code was compiled with the -I option. SRS.UV.HEADER knows about these things. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vance Dailey) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:09:45 -0500 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Parsing Pathname from Object Code I may have posted too soon. With a little more searching I found Gyle Iversons SRS.UV.HEADER program. It looks like it will do the trick. Vance -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vance Dailey Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:55 PM To: U2-Users (E-mail) Subject: Parsing Pathname from Object Code I am attempting to parse out the original pathname of a cataloged program from the object code. I am looking for some guidance on how to interpret the symbol table at the end of the file. Prior to the Basic compiler release 6.2.2 it appears that the pathname could be stripped off the very end of the file, but now two additional char(0)s have been added on to the and. One appears to be for the $copyright notice and the other is unknown to me. In addition programs compiled with the -T do not contain the information which can cause confusion if I simply extract printable chars from the end of the file back to the last char(255). Does anyone have documentation on the object code symbol/line number table? Thanks, Vance -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Executing Basic Programs from UniObjects for Java
Does the troublesome BASIC make any use of terminal driver capability, even perhaps the @ function to switch off the press any key prompt? Any SET.TERM.TYPE, GET.TERM.TYPE, TTYCTL() calls or the like? PRINT (or CRT or DISPLAY) statements? UniObjects connections do not, of course, have any terminal capabilities. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:12:55 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Executing Basic Programs from UniObjects for Java I am trying to execute a basic program using the UniSession and UniCommand classes. I have done this with other basic programs that are on the Universe system without any problems. For the one I am trying to use now I get back an error message from the response method that reads: TERMTYPE IS NOT SETUP FOR THIS USER PORT The only difference that I can see with this basic program vs the other basic programs that I have working with this method is that this one makes a call to a basic subroutine. My java code looks something like this: // session is the currently connected UniSession UniCommand unicom = session.command(); // COSTEST is the basic program on the host machine unicom.setCommand(RUN COSTEST); unicom.exec(); String resp = unicom.response(); Upon execution, the value of resp = TERMTYPE IS NOT SETUP FOR THIS USER PORT COSTEST is a cataloged basic program on the host system with this line in it: . CALL S0903(CO,FILE,PGM,SEL,INITS) . If I comment out this line the program runs OK but the data that it returns is not correct. Any suggestions? Thanks, Jim -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Converting UniVerse
Because UniVerse runs in a virtual machine (the run machine) that is customized to each of the platforms on which it runs, you'd be pleasantly surprised at how little difference switching hardware makes. I've certainly moved suites of programs, which ran without needing to be recompiled (the run machine itself detects byte order). The only problems I would foresee would be (a) 64-bit hashed files are (cannot be) supported on 32-bit platforms, so if you have any of these they will need to be converted to 32-bit, Distributed if too large (b) pathnames, particularly embedded pathnames (of secondary indices If you are using SQL capability, you should use FORMAT.CONV with its -export and -import capabilities. This is the recommended/approved mechanism for moving SQL schemas. - Original Message - From: Pritchard, Hugh (CSED) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:30:35 -0500 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Converting UniVerse 64-bit (say, an AlphaServer/Tru64 Unix platform) to 32-bit (say, a Wintel platform)??? I think the question should be about a switch in operating systems--that's of more immediate significance to the application. There are other 64-bit architectures out there besides Alphas. Put the OS of your choice on one of them. I bet the change in OS will break more things in the application than the change in hardware word size. Even a small change in OS (Tru64 Unix to some other flavor of Unix) will break some things. Alpha/Tru64 is owned by HP now; HP would probably love to talk to you about other HP platform solutions. Hugh ___ Hugh Pritchard (Tier), 202-546-3066, cell 301-467-1712 D.C. Ofc of Corporation Counsel, Child Support Enforcement Division 650 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20003 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Behalf Of Dale Young | Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:35 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Converting UniVerse | | Has any one converted a 64bit machine to a 32bit machine and | if so what kind of problems were encountered?? | | Thanks! -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Date-Time stamping
Are you sure it doesn't (press F5 to refresh the Explorer view?) If you're talking about a dynamic hashed file, it's DATA.30 (and/or OVER.30) that would be updated, not their parent directory. - Original Message - From: Marco Manyevere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:16:38 + (GMT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [UV] Date-Time stamping Hi All, When does universe update the OS level date time stamp ? On Windows XP UV9.6, if I make changes to a record (even create a new record) and commit it to disk, the date and time shown under the 'Date Modified' column in Windows explorer does not change. However, if I modify the same record using the ED command, the time stamp in explorer changes immediately. On Unix I remember relying on sorting files by the time stamp to determine which files were actively being updated by users and I used to get reasonable results. What do I need to change to get the same behaviour on XP? Regards, Marco - Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly...Ping your friends today! Download Messenger Now -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Change prompt?
If it helps, I can assert with certainty that there is nothing in UniVerse that allows this. It's easy enough to roll your own; a small BASIC program into which you trap your users. LOOP CRT myprompt INPUT command WHILE command 'QUIT' GOSUB processcommand REPEAT PERFORM QUIT - Original Message - From: Barry Brevik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:42:22 -0800 To: U2 list (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [UV] Change prompt? OK, I know about UVPROMPT, but it will only let you specify a single character. I work in numerous accounts, and it would be good if the LOGIN PA could change the prompt to have multiple characters so I can see which account I'm in. Believe me, all it takes is one mistake to leave a lasting impression. Anyone know of a way to use multiple chars for the prompt without writing my own shell? -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] multiplying totals
You need the TOTAL function to keep the running totals, and the CALC keyword to use them in the formula. CALC EVAL TOTAL(IF FIELDZ = X THEN COUNTER ELSE 0) * FIELD1 / TOTAL(1) - Original Message - From: Kevin Michaelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:55:33 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: multiplying totals I need help on the syntax when multiplying with an EVAL statement. I've tried simplify the statement. It goes something like this: AVERAGE FIELD1 * TOTAL EVAL IF(FIELDZ=X )THEN COUNTER ELSE 0 I basically want the average of FIELD1 (MULTIPLIED) BY COUNTER Any help would be appreciated. kevin -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse 10 :Network writes not allowed within a transacton.
I believe you will find that this is one of the things documented as being prohibited while a transaction is active. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Parameters
The good news is that each UniVerse process will demand only as much memory as it needs, there's not much you can do to force it to use more. You might, perhaps, double the small memory buffers like OPTMEM and TXMEM, but there's no guarantee that you'll use it; the amount used is a function of the complexity of the query or the size of transaction (respectively) in these cases. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Trigger FILE parameter
Hmm, looks like the SICA is preserved. You should tell IBM about this, and request a utility for dropping the SICA. In the meantime, you could (using the information in the file header, and in FILEINFO.H), zero the pointer to the SICA before creating the trigger anew. Not for the faint of heart; you can damage your file if you don't do it correctly. You need to write a four byte binary zero into the correct location (using WRITEBLK). - Original Message - From: gerry simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:39:55 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UV] Trigger FILE parameter Hi Ray , this does not work. LIST.SICA always lists the file name as it was when the 1st trigger was created even if the triggers are dropped and recreated. - Original Message - From: Ray Wurlod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [UV] Trigger FILE parameter The only way to modify the SICA after a CNAME is to drop the trigger and create it afresh. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Trigger FILE parameter
The only way to modify the SICA after a CNAME is to drop the trigger and create it afresh. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] PORT.SATUS error message
There are some known issues with what ANALYZE.SHM reports. There was one truly infamous case where one of the reports got the byte order wrong in one of the number of waiters count! (Can't remember exact details.) - Original Message - From: Stuart Boydell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:08:07 +1100 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [UV] PORT.SATUS error message Try using UNLOCK PSTATLOCK SEMAPHORE from TCL in the UV account. Perhaps smat -s shows a PORT.STATUS lock in a state of 1? Thanks for answers everyone. UNLOCK PSTATLOCK SEMAPHORE worked. The strange thing was that SEMAPHORE.STATUS/smat etc wasn't showing any locks against PORT.STATUS. Regards, Stuart ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] paragraph labels
1. also documented means that it's in the UniVerse manuals, but I don't have access to them right now. 2. I did not refer to non-existant labels earlier in the paragraph. Check my words again. 3. Try it and see! - Original Message - From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:46:25 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UV] paragraph labels What does the 'also documented' sentence mean. How would a non-existant label appear before the GO in a paragraph. Regarding paragraphs: Do they behave like procs whereby you can accidentally have the same label twice and the proc goes to the first occurrence (starting at the beginning). This is a downside of procs due to not needing to be compiled. my 1 cent. - Original Message - From: Ray Wurlod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 5:03 AM Subject: RE: [UV] paragraph labels It's documented behaviour that GO to a label that does not exist in a paragraph will cause the process to exit from the paragraph. From memory it's in the UniVerse System Description somewhere. There's no default label. It's also documented that the same behaviour will occur if you attempt to GO to a label that is earlier in the paragraph than the GO command. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] paragraph labels
It's documented behaviour that GO to a label that does not exist in a paragraph will cause the process to exit from the paragraph. From memory it's in the UniVerse System Description somewhere. There's no default label. It's also documented that the same behaviour will occur if you attempt to GO to a label that is earlier in the paragraph than the GO command. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UV - NLS
The shared segment key is 0xaceea000 for version 10.x for any x. The xMEMOFF parameters are tuneable in DataStage, but not in UniVerse. You may have to ask IBM support to escalate this to ATS (advanced technical support) where someone like Leroy (sometime participant here) will be able to look at it. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] Enabling ODBC for non-SQL file
HS_FILE_ACCESS may be edited manually. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Hashing Algorithm
It might be interesting if someone were to publish the Ardent hashing algorithms, then. ;) Not something I'm prepared to risk doing, however. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:45:45 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hashing Algorithm I have to say that in general IMHO a company cannot retroactively seize control of something that at one time was freely available. Something in the US about seizure without a warrant? Bill of rights or something? Will I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet Johnson -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Hashing Algorithm
It's not one, it's all 19 of them (types 2 through 18 and two for type 30). The Type 18 algorithm is closest to the Pick hashing algorithm. - Original Message - From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:00:26 -0500 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hashing Algorithm Is that one similiar to the 'only' one available to native systems, which many people have known for years? -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UV write fatal error
Permissions? All the preceding steps (Open, BSCAN) can be done without write permission. Write, needless to add, cannot. -Original Message- From: Jimi DeRouen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am attempting to write a record to a type 25 file and apparently getting a fatal error. The platform is UV 9.5.1.1b Pick flavor on W2K SP4. I have constructed the WRITE statement to include all possible (I think) branching, yet the program goes to the command prompt when the WRITE is executed without following any of the branches. The WRITE statement is as follows: [SNIP] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] escaping temp in dos diectory
TEMP can't be guaranteed to exist. It's created if, during an upgrade, items are found in VOC that are different in type to the replacement that's to be installed in VOC as part of the upgrade. If an account has never been upgraded, there won't be a TEMP file. You'd be better off choosing SAVEDLISTS, which does always exist, but which doesn't help you get over your escaping problem. You *should* be able to use double quotes around the pathname. For example: execute 'dos /c cscript temp/myscript.vbs' capturing cap But this has two pieces of grief. One is that the entire command must also be quoted (for the DOS /C command) if the command contains white space. For example: execute 'dos /C cscript temp/myscript.vbs' capturing cap You can probably fiddle around with the third quote character, for example: execute \dos /C 'cscript temp/myscript.vbs'\ capturing cap The other is that EXECUTE - under what circumstances I can't quite remember - has a tendency to strip a level of quotes. Anyway, try some of those variations. If that doesn't work, create a Type 19 file as part of the command. For example: execute 'DOS /C mkdir mytmp; cscript mytmp/myscript.vbs' capturing cap or even execute 'DOS /C mkdir mytmp; cscript mytmp/myscript.vbs; del /S mytmp' capturing cap - Original Message - From: Stuart Boydell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:25:33 +1100 To: U2-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: escaping temp in dos diectory Just a quick curly one, UV 10 Windows. I need to run a script in a temp directory because that's the only one that is generally going to be a type 1/19 in any given account. The ampersands are causing me grief, does anyone know how to escape them? If it's not possible, I'll just write it to a path but I would prefer it to be there for houskeeping. execute 'dos /c cscript temp/myscript.vbs' capturing cap Regards, Stuart Boydell ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] ANALYZE.OBJECT
The information from $COPYRIGHT is right at the end, except that if there are any $* directives, those comments are also in the object code, and follow the $COPYRIGHT notice. - Original Message - From: Ray Daignault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:15:32 -0800 To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UV] ANALYZE.OBJECT Try using VList on the program. I'm sure copyright info is displayed even if source code is not available. Ray D - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:21 AM Subject: [UV] ANALYZE.OBJECT In the good old days of Prime INFORMATION, there existed an ANALYZE.OBJECT command. snippet book=programming with info/basic The object code header is displayed using the ANALYZE.OBJECT command. /snippet I cannot find such a command in UniVerse 10.x (for Windows). Specifically, does anyone know how to view text inserted into object code by the $COPYRIGHT compiler directive (assuming that ANALYZE.OBJECT no longer exists)? Thanks, John Appleyard. ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
