Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Adair Winter]

We noticed the Jirous 2' antenna is not that good and will be further off
than the UBNT dishes.

the Jirous 3' and 4' dishes seem to be much better.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net> wrote:

> Ah yeah, that makes sense... I forget about the duplexer. Not that it
> really changes anything anyway with these, it'll just throw the signal
> calculations off a bit. For licensing purposes, I figure you're generally
> better off erring on the side of higher output power. The AF11 link we have
> up has always been off by about 5db, and I haven't been able to get it any
> better after trying to tune it several times, but I think we may have some
> trees poking a bit into the fresnel zone somewhere in the middle...
> --
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
> behalf of Adair Winter [ada...@amarillowireless.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2018 2:45 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>
> It's actually not excessive.
> If you read the manual it says the duplexer is = to 1db loss and you're
> going to have at least that in the jumpers as well.
> I however always set the cable loss to zero and do the math for my max
> EIRP or 18dbm. It's just easier when looking at it to know that there isn't
> 2 being subtracted somewhere.
> Even with the losses, we usually are within 1-2db of target and sometimes
> beat it.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to
>> me...
>>
>> But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some
>> obstructions... you should have better signal than that, at that distance.
>>
>> 
>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
>> behalf of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 12:55 PM
>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Adair Winter
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>>
>> Why is that?  They are 35dB antennas.
>>
>> 17 + 35 - 2 = 50, which is right where we are.
>>
>> On 3/26/18 1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>> > And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work
>> > on the alignment, Matt.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
>> > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm
>> > Tx Power.
>> >
>> > 
>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Matt Hoppes
>> > [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
>> > <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>> >
>> > I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going on
>> this
>> > link (see picture)
>> >
>> > On 3/26/18 11:48 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>> >  > Alex,
>> >  >
>> >  > Frequency coordinators are supposed to find you spectrum but at
>> > the end
>> >  > of the day, it's up to your company to engineer/design the link
>> > to meet
>> >  > your required signal and bandwidth needs. The manual for the
>> AF11fx
>> >  > clearly spells out the required signal levels and power levels
>> > needed to
>> >  > achieve 6x, 8x, 10x modulation schemes. 18db is MAX power that
>> can be
>> >  > used to achieve 10x for example and then whatever the required
>> signal
>> >  > level is listed but I don't have it memorized.
>> >  >
>> >  > Sorry to put you on the spot and I don't mean any disrespect but
>> you
>> >  > guys kind of messed up. Don't rely on frequency coordinators to
>> > design
>> >  > your links. Only use them to find you spectrum.
>> >  >
>> >  > A 17 mile link in 11ghz should definitely have minimum 3 foot
>> > antennas
>> >  > on each end but I would plan on using 4 foot antennas to be safe
>> > if the
>> &g

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Adair Winter]

It's actually not excessive.
If you read the manual it says the duplexer is = to 1db loss and you're
going to have at least that in the jumpers as well.
I however always set the cable loss to zero and do the math for my max EIRP
or 18dbm. It's just easier when looking at it to know that there isn't 2
being subtracted somewhere.
Even with the losses, we usually are within 1-2db of target and sometimes
beat it.


On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net> wrote:

> Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to me...
>
> But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some
> obstructions... you should have better signal than that, at that distance.
>
> 
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
> behalf of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 12:55 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Adair Winter
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
>
> Why is that?  They are 35dB antennas.
>
> 17 + 35 - 2 = 50, which is right where we are.
>
> On 3/26/18 1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
> > And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work
> > on the alignment, Matt.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
> > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but you have a much stronger link - you're at -48 with 17dbm
> > Tx Power.
> >
> > 
> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> > <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Matt Hoppes
> > [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
> > <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>]
> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:26 AM
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group; Darin Steffl
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x
> >
> > I'm not sure what has been discussed here, but we have 10x going on
> this
> > link (see picture)
> >
> > On 3/26/18 11:48 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
> >  > Alex,
> >  >
> >  > Frequency coordinators are supposed to find you spectrum but at
> > the end
> >  > of the day, it's up to your company to engineer/design the link
> > to meet
> >  > your required signal and bandwidth needs. The manual for the
> AF11fx
> >  > clearly spells out the required signal levels and power levels
> > needed to
> >  > achieve 6x, 8x, 10x modulation schemes. 18db is MAX power that
> can be
> >  > used to achieve 10x for example and then whatever the required
> signal
> >  > level is listed but I don't have it memorized.
> >  >
> >  > Sorry to put you on the spot and I don't mean any disrespect but
> you
> >  > guys kind of messed up. Don't rely on frequency coordinators to
> > design
> >  > your links. Only use them to find you spectrum.
> >  >
> >  > A 17 mile link in 11ghz should definitely have minimum 3 foot
> > antennas
> >  > on each end but I would plan on using 4 foot antennas to be safe
> > if the
> >  > link is important to you and you want max bandwidth.
> >  >
> >  > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM, alex phillips
> > <highspeedl...@gmail.com <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>
> >  > <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Yes, this is what I Am concluding as well.  I have spoken
> with my
> >  > freq coordinator about making changes to their software that
> >  > estimates these links to account for this.
> >  >
> >  > /*Alex Phillips*/
> >  > CEO and General Manager
> >  > RBNS.net
> >  > HighSpeedLink.net
> >  > *540-908-3993 <tel:(540)%20908-3993>*
> >  > Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> >  > September 6-8th 2018
> >  > #AMP18
> >  > @PriorityConf Twitter
> >  >
> >  > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Mathew Howard
> > <mat...@litewire.net <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>
> >  > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net <mailto:mat...@li

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Adair Winter]

This is
v4.1.0-beta2.31968


On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:38 AM, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Adair, what f/w ver are you using.  your display says 8x 9x 10x mine does
> not have a 9x
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitter
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Adair Winter <
> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote:
>
>> Turn all that off and set the conducted power to where the main gui says
>> 18dbm. See if it still goes to 10x or not.
>>
>> See how far if any you are off from the target signal.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:34 AM alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Like this?
>>>
>>> https://i.imgur.com/I23ggVX.png
>>>
>>>
>>> That's how we've had it set, and we're still only seeing 8x.
>>>
>>> https://i.imgur.com/18JUkVz.png
>>>
>>>
>>> *Alex Phillips*
>>> CEO and General Manager
>>> RBNS.net
>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
>>> September 6-8th 2018
>>> #AMP18
>>> @PriorityConf Twitter
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Adair Winter <
>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is your conducted power set to?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:29 AM alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have it set like the lic says but it wont hit 10x.  Ubnt support
>>>>> suggested reducing power and that did not help.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Alex Phillips*
>>>>> CEO and General Manager
>>>>> RBNS.net
>>>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>>>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>>>> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
>>>>> September 6-8th 2018
>>>>> #AMP18
>>>>> @PriorityConf Twitter
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/23/18 7:03 AM, alex phillips wrote:
>>>>>> > Can those who use AF11 and are able to establish a link a 10x
>>>>>> reliably
>>>>>> > please share your link information?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Distance,  Dish and power settings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Match your license. Don't randomly increase power, 11GHz travels a
>>>>>> long
>>>>>> way and you can easily interfere with another licensee.
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Adair Winter]

Turn all that off and set the conducted power to where the main gui says
18dbm. See if it still goes to 10x or not.

See how far if any you are off from the target signal.


On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:34 AM alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Like this?
>
> https://i.imgur.com/I23ggVX.png
>
>
> That's how we've had it set, and we're still only seeing 8x.
>
> https://i.imgur.com/18JUkVz.png
>
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993*
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitter
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Adair Winter <
> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote:
>
>> What is your conducted power set to?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:29 AM alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have it set like the lic says but it wont hit 10x.  Ubnt support
>>> suggested reducing power and that did not help.
>>>
>>> *Alex Phillips*
>>> CEO and General Manager
>>> RBNS.net
>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
>>> September 6-8th 2018
>>> #AMP18
>>> @PriorityConf Twitter
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/23/18 7:03 AM, alex phillips wrote:
>>>> > Can those who use AF11 and are able to establish a link a 10x reliably
>>>> > please share your link information?
>>>> >
>>>> > Distance,  Dish and power settings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Match your license. Don't randomly increase power, 11GHz travels a long
>>>> way and you can easily interfere with another licensee.
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

[Adair Winter]

What is your conducted power set to?

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:29 AM alex phillips  wrote:

> I have it set like the lic says but it wont hit 10x.  Ubnt support
> suggested reducing power and that did not help.
>
> *Alex Phillips*
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993*
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitter
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Seth Mattinen 
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/23/18 7:03 AM, alex phillips wrote:
>> > Can those who use AF11 and are able to establish a link a 10x reliably
>> > please share your link information?
>> >
>> > Distance,  Dish and power settings.
>>
>>
>> Match your license. Don't randomly increase power, 11GHz travels a long
>> way and you can easily interfere with another licensee.
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Memory leak bug AF5x Version:v3.2-debug.28630

[Adair Winter]

That's old firmware..

On Mar 2, 2018 9:26 PM, "Josh Luthman"  wrote:

> Had a major backhaul that runs a lot of traffic start going ape shit about
> 10 minutes ago.  Signals were just fine but the modulation would bounce.
> The throughput graph would drop to 0 and start climbing over and over.
> Same frequency for months.
>
> Looking at SNMP, it quit responding 3 days ago.  A simple reboot of both
> sides fixed my problem.
>
> Anyone seen this before?  Known issue?  Any recommendations on safe
> firmware to use?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU

[Adair Winter]

unless you are passing VLAN's MPLS/VPLS or PPPoE over the AP's everything
else looks fine.

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote:

> I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet.  Most towers have
> a MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and
> Rockets or Prism for AP’s.  Sometimes seeing some slow downs I cant account
> for.  Wondering if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted.
>
>
>
> The MTU settings are as follows:
>
> MikroTik MTU: 1500  L2 MTU: 1598 Flow Disabled
>
> Netonix MTU: 1528   Both
>
> AF5x Up to 9600 Auto  Flow Disabled
>
> Rocket MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled
>
> Prism MTU: 1500   Flow Disabled
>
>
>
> In your experience should any of these be adjusted?
>
>
>
> *Steve Barnes*
>
> Wireless Operations Manager
>
> *New Lisbon Broadband*
>
> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>*
>
> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>*
>
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288>
>
>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber 11X

[Adair Winter]

No.

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Kees H. <wispau...@calbb.net> wrote:

> Can the 11x have different frequencies for H & V?
> Also can they do 2x80?
>
> TIA
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes

[Adair Winter]

We have about 40 af5x links and all of them perform as they should. You
have two small of antennas for a shot that long. Need at least 3' antennas
and good fresnel clearance. With proper alignment and tuning,  they will
kick just about any  backhauls ass.

On Oct 21, 2017 5:27 PM, "Mitch"  wrote:

> I am kinda nervous to spend more on the AF line even for the AF11x
>
> After three types of AF have failed and costs so far are over 6000.00 in
> dishes
>
> R5C, AFx, AF units, and AF unit shipping to return replacements that
> failed (2)
>
> with in a few days ???
>
> Kinda tired of spending and not working you know?
>
> Mitch
>
> On 10/21/2017 5:18 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
>
> Had a 12 mile AF5 link that was very marginal because of distance, plus it
> was a bitch to align.  Replaced with AF11FX on 35dB dishes and it works
> like a champ.  Dropped them right into the AF5 mount and they linked right
> up and only need a tweak in alignment.  I'm guessing about a 5-7 mile link
> is about max for an AF5 to get 8x modulation.  Also, have an AF5X link at 8
> miles with a 34db at the Slave end and a 30dB at the Master end and it to
> works great.
>
> Phil
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>
>> We aligned them no side lobe here
>>
>> used alignment scope and borrowed a laser aligner from a
>>
>> Verizon friend just to make sure
>>
>> Loved that laser one but 12,000 is a little more than I can spend right
>> now LOL
>>
>> On 10/21/2017 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> I had a 2 and 3 foot dish working with Rockets for years.  Tried swapping
>> to af5x and couldn't even associate!
>>
>> After so much hassle back and forth etc we discovered the dishes were
>> misaligned.  Rockets did 60 megs where af5x wouldn't associate.
>>
>> Af5x works a LOT better aligned than Rockets side lobed.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2017 4:52 PM, "Mitch"  wrote:
>>
>>> Plain old UBNT 2 foot dishes have had for years
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2017 3:49 PM, Ben Moore via Ubnt_users wrote:
>>>
>>> What antenna do you have with the AC?  That really is the difference.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Mitch  wrote:
>>>
>>> Yet Support says it's "Thermal Ducting" Hmm
>>>
>>> Thank Mike I finally came to the same conclusion . atleast for the
>>> 19 mile link
>>>
>>> Now just got to figure out why the 9 mile link sucks as well
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2017 3:07 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>
>>> The AF5 only has 23 dBi antenna. There's no way it'll work well at that
>>> distance.
>>>
>>> Also, you're comparing 23 dBi antennas to 29 - 31 dBi antennas. That 12
>>> - 16 dB difference is most of what you're missing when comparing to the
>>> other link.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Brothers WISP 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Mitch"  
>>> *To: *"Mike Hammett" 
>>> 
>>> *Sent: *Saturday, October 21, 2017 3:05:56 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x radio on dishes
>>>
>>> We have installed a 22.6 mile link in Missouri that works very well the
>>> AF5
>>>
>>> tried a AF5U at it never even linked up
>>>
>>> This link has been up and running for almost 3 years
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2017 2:56 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>
>>> The AF5 just isn't meant for distance. Look at the antenna gain
>>> differences.
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Brothers WISP 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Mitch" 

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF 11x

[Adair Winter]

My bad

On Sep 13, 2017 6:03 PM, "Jeremy Smith" <jsm...@bluespring.me> wrote:

Jirious also has a 1' dish now for the AF11X JRMC-380

--
*From: *"Adair Winter" <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
*To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, September 13, 2017 4:50:27 PM
*Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF 11x

2' to 4' with jirous.
2' to 6' with radio waves.
The ubnt dish is big for its gain. Dunno why. Maybe everyone is lying.
Comsearch does our coordination

On Sep 13, 2017 4:48 PM, "Kees H." <wispau...@calbroadband.net> wrote:

Who does frequency coordination for the AF 11x?
What size is the dish?


TIA
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF 11x

[Adair Winter]

Nothing against Liz but Comsearch has gotten us stuff that other
coordinators said couldn't be done.

On Sep 13, 2017 4:52 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

> Liz at Intelpath is great for coordination
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sep 13, 2017 6:50 PM, "Adair Winter" <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
>
>> 2' to 4' with jirous.
>> 2' to 6' with radio waves.
>> The ubnt dish is big for its gain. Dunno why. Maybe everyone is lying.
>> Comsearch does our coordination
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2017 4:48 PM, "Kees H." <wispau...@calbroadband.net> wrote:
>>
>> Who does frequency coordination for the AF 11x?
>> What size is the dish?
>>
>>
>> TIA
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF 11x

[Adair Winter]

Nothing against Liz but Comsearch has gotten us stuff that other
coordinators said couldn't be done.

On Sep 13, 2017 4:52 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

> Liz at Intelpath is great for coordination
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sep 13, 2017 6:50 PM, "Adair Winter" <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
>
>> 2' to 4' with jirous.
>> 2' to 6' with radio waves.
>> The ubnt dish is big for its gain. Dunno why. Maybe everyone is lying.
>> Comsearch does our coordination
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2017 4:48 PM, "Kees H." <wispau...@calbroadband.net> wrote:
>>
>> Who does frequency coordination for the AF 11x?
>> What size is the dish?
>>
>>
>> TIA
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF 11x

[Adair Winter]

2' to 4' with jirous.
2' to 6' with radio waves.
The ubnt dish is big for its gain. Dunno why. Maybe everyone is lying.
Comsearch does our coordination

On Sep 13, 2017 4:48 PM, "Kees H."  wrote:

Who does frequency coordination for the AF 11x?
What size is the dish?


TIA
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

[Adair Winter]

er,... ip addresses

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
wrote:

> discovery tool (ubnt) did not find it, Dude discovery tool, ditto.  I had
> to guess which device one of them might be, change the ip and then voila,
> discovery with dude found a new device which was another nsm2 with same
> ip.  I need something that works without having to guess.
>
> Jan V
>
> On 08/18/2017 02:35 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Discovery tool?
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
> wrote:
>
>> ubnt specific.  What can be done to locate duplicate IP addresses.  Are
>> there any applications that do this?
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> On 08/18/2017 12:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Like Ubnt specific?  Not sure what the question is.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2017 3:21 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" <j.vank...@oregononline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone ever dealt with this?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

[Adair Winter]

should probably start by not double assigning mac addresses. (:



On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
wrote:

> discovery tool (ubnt) did not find it, Dude discovery tool, ditto.  I had
> to guess which device one of them might be, change the ip and then voila,
> discovery with dude found a new device which was another nsm2 with same
> ip.  I need something that works without having to guess.
>
> Jan V
>
> On 08/18/2017 02:35 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Discovery tool?
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
> wrote:
>
>> ubnt specific.  What can be done to locate duplicate IP addresses.  Are
>> there any applications that do this?
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> On 08/18/2017 12:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Like Ubnt specific?  Not sure what the question is.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2017 3:21 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" <j.vank...@oregononline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone ever dealt with this?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] duplicate IPs

[Adair Winter]

Discovery tool?

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Jan-OOLLC <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
wrote:

> ubnt specific.  What can be done to locate duplicate IP addresses.  Are
> there any applications that do this?
>
> Jan V
>
> On 08/18/2017 12:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Like Ubnt specific?  Not sure what the question is.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 18, 2017 3:21 PM, "Jan-OOLLC" <j.vank...@oregononline.net> wrote:
>
>> Anyone ever dealt with this?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS Sync in AC Gen 2

[Adair Winter]

Makes me want to send more and more email, now.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 8:13 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> It isn't spam, regardless of how many times you decide to parrot the word.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:05 PM, p...@pliinc.com <pazzaglin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I fucking did you asshole. .. take me off this spam shit list.
>> On Aug 6, 2017 9:03 PM, "Mike Hammett" <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>
>>> A) It isn't SPAM.
>>> B) You should be able to stop it yourself by logging into your WISPA
>>> account.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"p...@pliinc.com" <pazzaglin...@gmail.com>
>>> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>> *Sent: *Sunday, August 6, 2017 8:01:34 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS Sync in AC Gen 2
>>>
>>> Stop this spam shitI have told this list manager to stop sending to
>>> this email. ...stop!
>>> On Aug 6, 2017 8:57 PM, "RickG" <rgunder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Email-Lists
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:56 PM, p...@pliinc.com <pazzaglin...@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Remove from list
>>>>> On Jul 18, 2017 11:44 AM, "alex phillips" <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anyone had any experience running GPS sync yet in UBNT  Gen2 AC
>>>>>> products?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please share if you have information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> *Alex Phillips*
>>>>>> CEO and General Manager
>>>>>> RBNS.net
>>>>>> HighSpeedLink.net
>>>>>> *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)*
>>>>>> *WISPA President (2015-2017)*
>>>>>> *540-908-3993 <(540)%20908-3993>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -RickG
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

Thanks?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Put not but
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 11:56 PM, "Adair Winter" <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
> different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
> works. but it's mostly a non-issue.
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore <
> tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
>> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>>
>> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
>> sectors and forces it up stream
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" <videodirectwispal...@gmail.co
>> m> wrote:
>>
>>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
>>> it on.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>>>
>>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge
>>> the customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue
>>> but try it and you should have it on anyways.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
>>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
>>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
>>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>>
>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

right. and 99.999% of internet users don't need to connect directly do each
other. It's just not that big of a deal. Plus, I don't ever want customers
to be able to pass traffic between each other at a point that I can't
capture it. (read: CALEA).
In our network, we have 11 public subnets (a combination of /24's and
/22's), customers obtain a public IP from their assigned subnet and all
traffic is forced to the core and out to the world.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Never, there is always a solution.
>>
>
> The purist in me (yeah, somewhere down there) bridles at a manual
> solution, but the pragmatist accepts it. My advertising could read
> "99.99% of Internet reachability!" ;)
>
> --
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

Never, there is always a solution.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Jeremy Austin <jhaus...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've often wondered about this — particularly when combined with DHCP and
> public IPs. Are they just Sadly Out of Luck?
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Tim Densmore <tdensmore@tarpit.cybermesa.
> com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
>> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>
>> --
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
works. but it's mostly a non-issue.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore <
tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:

> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
> sectors and forces it up stream
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" <videodirectwispal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
>> it on.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>>
>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>>
>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the
>> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue but
>> try it and you should have it on anyways.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Air fiber 24 real world experiences feedback please

[Adair Winter]

Any amount of rain will take it down at that distance. Have a back link or
be ok with it being down. Here in the Texas Panhandle we have some 1.5 -
2.7 mile links that fade completely out in anything other than a light
rain.

On Jun 6, 2017 10:31 AM, "Eric Williams SDWISP"  wrote:

>
>
> Hello my flow Ubiquitiens.  I’m looking at installing an Air fiber 24 {non
> HD} on an 8 mile link in south west California with a good line of sight.
> I’m looking for some feedback on real world experiences. I’m limited in
> space on the AP side so I’m looking at the non HD as it is smaller and
> cheaper than HD. Shooting for 500 Megs of true internet traffics download
> and 100 Megs up. Air link is showing signal of -68, 4X 16 QUM at 500 plus
> Megs
>
> I’m on the Daily digest list. Thanks for the feedback
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Eric Williams W7EMW
>
> Network Administrator
>
> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>
> 619-922-6001 <(619)%20922-6001> Support Hot Line
>
>
>
> 9740 Campo Road #211
>
> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>
>
>
> WWW.SDWISP.COM
>
> SDWISP Begins Where Fiber Ends
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

[Adair Winter]

That's what he said

On Apr 16, 2017 6:47 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> You lost me here.. ...
>
> My understanding on today FDD is that the High side should not affect
> another High side, and similarly low side should not affect another low
> side..
>
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Seth Mattinen" 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 11:50:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> > On 4/15/17 12:46 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> >> Can we do that today with FDD ? or the other party is going to get
> their panties
> >> in tbe bunch because their radio can hear your radio ?
> >
> >
> > Yes. Their radio CAN NOT hear your radio, even if they were pointed
> > facing into each other. It's impossible. Frequency division.
> >
> > ~Seth
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

[Adair Winter]

If B11 is so revolutionary, tell me why on one site I could license a
AF11x, and two SIAE 80mhz links (one XPIC) but B11 would only be allowed
40Mhz.

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
wrote:

> not trying to be anal even in your statement there is a 'as long
> as'
>
> There is no such 'as long as' requirement with the B11 sync.
> While it is nothing new in concept, but their implementation is unique (at
> least for the moment !)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, April 15, 2017 3:50:36 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> As far as I know, any FDD radio can share frequencies with any other radio
> on the tower, regardless of owner or manufacturer. 16 QAM or 4096 QAM. As
> long as they're all Rx or all Tx and sufficient azimuth\elevation
> separation.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:46:23 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> I am confused.. your earlier explanation had a number of conditions
> implied before one can reuse the same channel ? unless I am
> miss-understanding...
>
> with Mimosa, you can have two radios back to back or next to each other,
> belonging to two different providers, and re-use the channel.
>
> Can we do that today with FDD ? or the other party is going to get their
> panties in tbe bunch because their radio can hear your radio ?
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us>
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 12:21:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
>
> > On 4/15/17 7:17 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> >> In case of Mimosa, you are actually getting something that has not
> existed
> >> before in the Licensed Radio world...
> >> Their radios don't care if they can hear each other.. and they will
> still
> >> operate, co-exist
> >> exactly how gps sync, channel reuse works in the TDD world...
> >
> >
> >
> > But I don't need TDD or GPS sync to point take a channel pair I'm using
> > in one direction and reuse it in a different direction, so I'm not clear
> > what has been improved. The argument is I can do something I can already
> > do, but with higher latency.
> >
> > ~Seth
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

[Adair Winter]

> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> What does the capacity show?
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
>
> Video Direct
>
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
> wrote:
>
> Just noticed airlink at 33db says 500
>
> At 38 db says 728
>
>
>
> The airfiber maximum power is 33db
>
>
>
> Can this power be increased on the airfiber?
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:48 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> If the capacity graph says 760Mb, that's what he's got. and the only
> channel option is 100Mhz.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Adam Greene <maill...@webjogger.net>
> wrote:
>
> How much spectrum (channel width) did you allocate to the link?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:26 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> Same here, with the AF24 line, always see full throughput.  Is it possible
> the routers on the ends can't handle the throughput?  Especially if they
> are generating the traffic for the Bandwidth test.
>
> On 4/13/2017 7:22 AM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are you testing?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
> wrote:
>
> Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles
>
>
>
> DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model
>
> We have them set at full duplex
>
> All indications are a 764-759 meg link
>
>
>
> Yet our TCP-IP throughput is 300-330meg
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on why?
>
>
>
> The signal have solid colors for each chain on both sides
>
>
>
> What are your experiences
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon>
>
> Virus-free. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

[Adair Winter]

Af24 will do 90% of whatever the capacity graph shows. So if it's not
moving that much you have some issue generating that much traffic or
ethernet issues.

On Apr 13, 2017 9:43 AM, "Tim-GM" <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com> wrote:

> UDP around 653meg
>
>
>
> But that has NO value.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Shawn C. Peppers
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:36 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> Must be something else messing with it.  How are you bandwidth testing?
> Try a UDP test.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
>
> Video Direct
>
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Shawn C. Peppers
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:16 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> What does the capacity show?
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
>
> Video Direct
>
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
> wrote:
>
> Just noticed airlink at 33db says 500
>
> At 38 db says 728
>
>
>
> The airfiber maximum power is 33db
>
>
>
> Can this power be increased on the airfiber?
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:48 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> If the capacity graph says 760Mb, that's what he's got. and the only
> channel option is 100Mhz.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Adam Greene <maill...@webjogger.net>
> wrote:
>
> How much spectrum (channel width) did you allocate to the link?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:26 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber
>
>
>
> Same here, with the AF24 line, always see full throughput.  Is it possible
> the routers on the ends can't handle the throughput?  Especially if they
> are generating the traffic for the Bandwidth test.
>
> On 4/13/2017 7:22 AM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are you testing?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
> wrote:
>
> Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles
>
>
>
> DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model
>
> We have them set at full duplex
>
> All indications are a 764-759 meg link
>
>
>
> Yet our TCP-IP throughput is 300-330meg
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on why?
>
>
>
> The signal have solid colors for each chain on both sides
>
>
>
> What are your experiences
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon>
>
> Virus-free. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

[Adair Winter]

we move 700+Mb easily over our air fibers. how are you testing?

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Tim-GM <t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>
wrote:

> Installed our first AirFiber link 3.62 miles
>
>
>
> DB numbers 65-66 match the airlink model
>
> We have them set at full duplex
>
> All indications are a 764-759 meg link
>
>
>
> Yet our TCP-IP throughput is 300-330meg
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on why?
>
>
>
> The signal have solid colors for each chain on both sides
>
>
>
> What are your experiences
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon>
>  Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link>
> <#m_6758399250567478192_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 6mile link

[Adair Winter]

Ditto

On Feb 27, 2017 7:51 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Links in our area (ITU rain zone K) still drop in the rain at 1.5 miles.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
>
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Jose Maria Salazar Garcia" 
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> *Sent: *Monday, February 27, 2017 7:02:49 AM
> *Subject: *[Ubnt_users]  AF24 6mile link
>
>
> Anyone have experience with this link (or AF24HD) with this distance?
>
> I'm plan to replace one AF5 in 5GHz High noise level enviroment with this
> devices.
>
> Experiences?
>
> thanks to all in advance,
> --
> Jose Maria Salazar Garcia
> *Network Operations Manager*
> *NetCan Technologies S.L.*
> re...@netcan.es
> M:+34 697 50 20 10 <+34%20697%2050%2020%2010>
> skype id: jmsalazargarcia
> [image: logo]
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] auto disconnect

[Adair Winter]

Powercode preforms a NAT redirect of the users specific IP tied to there
account.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Duane Cox <wi...@coxcomm.net> wrote:

> What are the behind the scene secrets that powercode is performing when it
> disables a user?
>
>
>
> Do you have each user landing on a vlan using Q-in-Q and then disabling
> the vlan?  Or is it blocking or re-routing a static IP from network?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 02, 2017 2:34 PM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] auto disconnect
>
>
>
> I solve this with Powercode.
>
>
>
> There are many other platforms that would do this, among many other
> features.  Wispmon, Visp, etc
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Duane Cox <wi...@coxcomm.net> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> Is anyone running a script or batch process to auto disconnect your
> ubiquiti subscribers for non-pay?
>
> I assume another a better way to do this would be through a payment
> portal; we aren't setup for that yet.
>
>
>
> We authenticate the CPE via RADIUS at the AP, but if the user fails to
> pay, they will not fail the RADIUS authentication unless the CPE becomes
> dis-associated in some way.
>
>
>
> Is there an authentication refresh interval or encryption key
> expiration/renewal feature that would force a refresh of the RADIUS
> attributes and then kick the CPE for failure?
>
>
>
> Generally, I would use SNMP to write to the CPE to either reboot it or
> down an interface.  My understanding is that UBNT doesn't support SNMP
> write, or am I incorrect?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Duane Cox
>
> Cox Wireless
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgepoint16 and AF5x issues

[Adair Winter]

It's both current and late models.
Maybe slightly worse with newer ones.
But we have some that are a year or so old doing it and brand new ones
doing it.
Ubnt has acknowledged the issue and is trying to track it down.

On Jan 22, 2017 10:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" <videodirectwispal...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Adair
>
> Are you seeing that with latest af5x radios in the distribution channels?
> Im just wondering if i should be trying to get my distributor to scrub
> which ones i want before sending them to me.
>
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 <(480)%20287-9960> Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 9:07 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> https://m.facebook.com/groups/249134358750920?view=
> permalink=417929191871435
>
> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/AF5X-Ethernet-
> Problems/td-p/1669612/highlight/false
>
> On Jan 22, 2017 6:17 AM, "Shawn C. Peppers" <videodirectwispalist@gmail.
> com> wrote:
>
>> Anyone else having issues with compatibility on the Ethernet links
>> between the edgepoint16 and the af5x?  I have a few of these setups out
>> there but one tower in specific, i am direct dc powering the edgepoint and
>> for some reason i will randomly loose the ethernet link for random amounts
>> of time to two different AF5xs.  Sometimes the interface will flap and
>> sometimes it just goes down and stays down.  The devices stays powered and
>> the wireless link stays active.  This does not happen at the same time to
>> both radios and I  have swapped the cables out which are about 15foot
>> long.  I have zero issues with the mimosa b11, any of the 6 ubnt rocket ac
>> prism radios, or any of the powerbeams hooked to this edgepoint also.  I
>> was thinking maybe it was the af5x radios but we pulled it down one of them
>> and bench tested it and its fine.  Voltage when under load is 52v and i am
>> powering with a meanwell se-48-600.  Using a #10 wire at 300 footso i
>> feel confident its not a power related issue.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> 480-287-9960 <(480)%20287-9960> Fax
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber 5x power consumption

[Adair Winter]

We run them at 24 and 48 volts no problem. never tried them on less than 24
though.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Spec sheet says they'll take an input voltage between 19-29v and draw up
> to 12watts.  Anyone able to tell me how true this is?  Looking to bolt
> something onto a solar site, and I was under the impression the airfiber
> line was *power hungry*.  Plus, I could have sworn they were af802.3
> compliant so 48 volt.  This isn't a case of someone copy pasting spec
> sheets from airmax radios, is it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Steve
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PTMP

[Adair Winter]

We are running Prisim's if that's what you mean by PTMP.
Or are you actually running the PTMP model?


On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:43 PM, <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anyone using the R5AC-PTMP with regular R5s running XW and XM?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] slow speeds issue

[Adair Winter]

Chrome works fine in recent firmwares. If you have something old or old
java it can be a problem in any browser.
If I ever start an air view and the jnlp failed to download you can simply
append /airview.jnlp to the end of the url to download and run.

On Oct 9, 2016 5:36 PM, "James Wilson"  wrote:

> I had to switch to Firefox from Chrome for Airviews.  I'm just unable to
> get it to work in Chrome any more.
>
> On Oct 9, 2016 6:32 PM, "Josh Luthman" 
> wrote:
>
>> Save the JNLP and make sure you have the JRE installed.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2016 6:17 PM, "Jan-OOLLC"  wrote:
>>
>>> cannot get airview to run, java version installed is 1.7.0_111.  Keep
>>> getting message: Java Runtime Environment  1.6 (or above) required  any
>>> idea how to solve this?
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>> On 10/09/2016 02:24 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> Airview will see nearly all noise, that would be a good first step.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jan-OOLLC 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I'm having a slow speed test issue (along with unusually slow speed
 overall).  I replaced the 900Mhz CPE with a 2.4 point to a different
 tower and the speed is about the same, crappy!  I don't detect any wifi
 on or near same channels.  Is there other types of noise sources that
 can't be detected via site survey and other brand wifi detectors?  Also,
 could a pump-motor on same power circuit cause trouble?
 --

 Jan V

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Mounting Rocketdish to 6" pole / mast

[Adair Winter]

Sitepro pipe to pipe clamps.

On Oct 6, 2016 8:34 PM, "David"  wrote:

> I am looking for the simplest and most robust way to mount a rocket dish
> to a 6" tower leg. The rocketdish can mount up to a 4" pole I believe.
>
> In the past we have welded up stand off's with a smaller pole on one end,
> but I am sure there are better ideas out there, or places we can just order
> them and be done with it. Maybe there is an easier way I am not thinking
> of...
>
> Photos?
>
>
> Something like this but for larger pipe leg: http://www.mccowntech.
> com/24-inch-large-pipe-standoff/
>
> Tessco seems to have 3.5" and 2-5"OD stuff
>
> http://www.martinrfsupply.com/Comtelco-BSSMNT20-6-BR-Tower-
> Side-Mount-Standoff-Bracket-_p_678.html Can be used with straps
>
> http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=product_list=633 has a very
> large one that could work. Bit too big.
>
> http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/product_details.aspx?id=2250
> could work
>
> --
> David Kunat
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC2 and AF24

[Adair Winter]

Infrastructure should never be exposed no matter what.
Your customers and the internet have no business anywhere near the ability
to access infrastructure.

On Oct 1, 2016 9:33 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> If it doesn't accept at least 100 random characters, it simply shouldn't
> be exposed to anything.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
>
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Seth Mattinen" 
> *To: *"ubnt users" 
> *Sent: *Friday, September 30, 2016 10:58:58 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AC2 and AF24
>
> On 9/30/16 6:22 PM, Scotty Rice wrote:
> >  If you are trying to use a password longer than eight character try
> > using just the first  eight characters. The af24 only uses up to eight
> > characters
>
>
> What year are we in again?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU Size Changes Itself on Rocket M2

[Adair Winter]

are you running aircontrol?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com> wrote:

> Have any of you ever known the MTU setting in the Network Tab on a
> Rocket M2 (AP) to change itself? I started getting calls Sunday morning
> (primarily from Mac users) saying some of their websites wouldn't load.
> To make too long of a story short, I found that the MTU size was set to
> 1492 on the AP. (We do use PPPoE, and the MTU on the CPEs is set to
> 1492.) It should have been 1500. Changing it back to 1500 fixed all the
> issues.
>
> My question is this: Other than me, no one has the password to get into
> the AP. I hadn't been into it in many days (or weeks). Yet somehow the
> MTU size changed and it obviously happened sometime between Saturday
> (when things for my users were fine) and Sunday morning (when things
> became hinky). There were some storms in the area, however I don't
> believe there was a lightning strike (as if that would only change the
> MTU setting and not affect anything else on the radio, or the other 11
> radios on the same tower). There *was* a bad port on the Netonix switch
> it was plugged into, however as with a lightning strike, I wouldn't
> think even a shorted port on the switch would change only that one
> setting - I could see it defaulting the entire radio, but not one
> setting like that.
>
> Anyone ever seen anything like that?
>
> Thanks
> Sam
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Adair Winter]

As others have said you need to use at least 24vh (ports 1-4) or even
better 48vh (ports 1-4).
I did have some on short cable runs at 24v but they have all been changed.

On Jul 25, 2016 7:22 AM, "Jerry Head"  wrote:

> 24v. I don't see the option for 24vh
>
> On 7/24/2016 8:57 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> > Are you running it at:
> > 24V
> > 24VH
> > 48V
> > Or
> > 48VH?
> >
> > Which netonix model?  Which port number?
> >
> >> On Jul 24, 2016, at 21:26, Jerry Head 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> So I have been looking at a new AF5x connection on a Netonix switch. The
> >> Netonix is providing power. I see the AF5x power draw jump up to around
> >> 19.2 watts periodically, it seems the Netonix only goes up to 18 watts.
> >> What is the deal here? Is the AF5x under powered now? Is it affecting
> >> performance? Is the Netonix confused?
> >> What? Opinions are welcome.
> >> ___
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

[Adair Winter]

What voltage are you powering them with? We have no trouble powering over
40 of the

On Jul 24, 2016 8:27 PM, "Jerry Head"  wrote:

> So I have been looking at a new AF5x connection on a Netonix switch. The
> Netonix is providing power. I see the AF5x power draw jump up to around
> 19.2 watts periodically, it seems the Netonix only goes up to 18 watts.
> What is the deal here? Is the AF5x under powered now? Is it affecting
> performance? Is the Netonix confused?
> What? Opinions are welcome.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

[Adair Winter]

The MAC address of the CPA will be visible either way. What won't be
visible is the MAC address of devices behind to CP if WDS is off.
On Jun 24, 2016 10:00 AM, "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
wrote:

> Right but in my experience turning on WDS resolves this problem.
>
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 10:45, Ken Patrick <patr...@my9ja.com> wrote:
>
> The discussion is on 5.6.5 loosing connection like I stated a few weeks
> back.not about wds.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:30 PM Matt Hoppes <
> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>
>> What?  Turning on wds makes the Mac of the CPE properly visible.
>>
>> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 09:54, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Turning on WDS is not an answer to all the worlds woes.  WDS can cause
>> issue if you are using MAC authentication from the CPE.  Since the maces
>> the CPE MAC transparent.
>> >
>> > Steve Barnes
>> > Wireless Operations Manager
>> > PCSWIN.COM
>> > NLBC.COM
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 8:55 AM
>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>> >
>> > Make sure WDS is enabled on every client and the AP.
>> >
>> >> On Jun 24, 2016, at 07:36, Jeff Evans <jev...@pennwisp.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We're seeing the same thing, not passing packets, but everything else
>> >> looks normal.
>> >> A reboot of the AP cures it, but no way of knowing until the customer
>> calls.
>> >>
>> >> Jeff
>> >>
>> >> Quoting Kevin Sullivan <kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net>:
>> >>
>> >>> We're seeing something similar. All the stations show associated at
>> >>> normal RSSI levels, but we lose 90% packets or more. A reboot brings
>> >>> the users back online. Seeing the issue on 5.6.6 as well as 6.0beta8
>> >>> (figured it was worth a try). The AP I'm looking at that did this ten
>> >>> minutes ago is an XW.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd roll back to 5.5.x, but can't because of the vulnerability.
>> >>> Anyone know of a stable 5.6.x firmware that works on DFS frequencies?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Kevin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
>> >>> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:16 AM
>> >>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
>> >>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here. Either all stations are dropped until reboot or all RX
>> >>> rates crash to 6.5 until the station is kicked or AP is rebooted.
>> >>> Maddening. I have them all stable but it took different FW
>> >>> combinations each time.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ty
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ty
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Tekwav Lists <tekwavli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here.  I show that the STA's are connected, but no data passing
>> >>> nor can I get in the STA's GUI.  This was a major issue a month or
>> >>> so ago for me but it's been quiet with no recent issues once I moved
>> >>> the offending AP's to non-DFS bands.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> JJ
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Rory Conaway
>> >>> <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We haven’t nailed it down to DFS but yes and it’s very random.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> 

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

[Adair Winter]

You know.. I never thought about not using WDS for the reason you stated..
that's interesting...

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote:

> Turning on WDS is not an answer to all the worlds woes.  WDS can cause
> issue if you are using MAC authentication from the CPE.  Since the maces
> the CPE MAC transparent.
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> PCSWIN.COM
> NLBC.COM
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 8:55 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
>
> Make sure WDS is enabled on every client and the AP.
>
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 07:36, Jeff Evans <jev...@pennwisp.com> wrote:
> >
> > We're seeing the same thing, not passing packets, but everything else
> > looks normal.
> > A reboot of the AP cures it, but no way of knowing until the customer
> calls.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > Quoting Kevin Sullivan <kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net>:
> >
> >> We're seeing something similar. All the stations show associated at
> >> normal RSSI levels, but we lose 90% packets or more. A reboot brings
> >> the users back online. Seeing the issue on 5.6.6 as well as 6.0beta8
> >> (figured it was worth a try). The AP I'm looking at that did this ten
> >> minutes ago is an XW.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd roll back to 5.5.x, but can't because of the vulnerability.
> >> Anyone know of a stable 5.6.x firmware that works on DFS frequencies?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:16 AM
> >> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Same here. Either all stations are dropped until reboot or all RX
> >> rates crash to 6.5 until the station is kicked or AP is rebooted.
> >> Maddening. I have them all stable but it took different FW
> >> combinations each time.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Ty
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Ty
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Tekwav Lists <tekwavli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Same here.  I show that the STA's are connected, but no data passing
> >> nor can I get in the STA's GUI.  This was a major issue a month or
> >> so ago for me but it's been quiet with no recent issues once I moved
> >> the offending AP's to non-DFS bands.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> JJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Rory Conaway
> >> <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> We haven’t nailed it down to DFS but yes and it’s very random.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rory
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Darin Steffl
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 9:16 AM
> >> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We see that happen until the AP is rebooted but only if running a
> >> dfs channel. Any other time it never happens.
> >>
> >> Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos.
> >>
> >> On Jun 23, 2016 11:03 AM, <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Having that problem too...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 23, 2016, at 08:59, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> We keep having problems with the station showing their connected but
> >> no data is moving
> >>
> >> On Jun 23, 2016 10:57 AM, <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyone else seeing XW APs running 5.6.5 loose all of their connected
> >> STAs and then when you reboot the AP, they come back?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >> ___
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
&g

Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.6.5 APs loosing at STAs until reboot?

[Adair Winter]

We keep having problems with the station showing their connected but no
data is moving
On Jun 23, 2016 10:57 AM,  wrote:

> Anyone else seeing XW APs running 5.6.5 loose all of their connected STAs
> and then when you reboot the AP, they come back?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 rf-link drops

[Adair Winter]

Any surge protection on the ethernet line?

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Kevin Lamothe klamo...@vianet.ca wrote:

 We've been having problems with AF24 in winter, mostly with high winds
 and blowing snow. Other then that, the unit runs fine the rest of the year.

 I'm starting to think it's a static discharge problem. The RF side
 completely drops and a power cycle is required to bring it back online.
 This unit has already been RMA'd and ethernet run replaced, yes it's a
 ESD cable. There's about 8 other devices on this tower that don't have
 this problem.

 Has anyone seen anything like this before? or know a way to help with
 the static build up problems?

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Station connected and working but management UI won't respond

[Adair Winter]

Are you running WDS on both sides?

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I have seen this many times but I am wondering if anyone knows the cause
 or a remote solution. I am going to migrate an AP from 10mhz to 20mhz
 channel width. Before I do so I am making sure I can reach all associated
 radios so that I can migrate them as well of course. I have 2 different
 customers on this AP that are connected and online but the radio just will
 not respond via the web interface. One of them will respond via SSH but the
 other won't. I tried the reboot command on the one that did respond but any
 command I try to run just stalls the session. I call the two customers and
 of course neither is around to power cycle the units. Is there a known
 cause for this or a way to snap them out of their daze remotely?

 -Ty

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interface Usage Amounts

[Adair Winter]

I've never understood these number and generally just don't pay attention
to them myself. The only thing I've ever really looked at was under the AP
Information the values displayed in bytes and packets since it connected
seem to be right on.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:54 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 I imagine it might be helpful if I attached a graphic rather than pdf so
 here it is.

 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:37 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Referring to the attached graph: Why do the interfaces show such a
 difference in bytes transferred?
 --
 -RickG KyWiFi




 --
 -RickG KyWiFi

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Does Nanobeam AC have DFS?

[Adair Winter]

Yes, 5.8 only.
On Dec 25, 2014 10:08 AM, Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.com wrote:

 Need to upgrade a link, see these are in stock now, are they still 5.8ghz
 only? I'll need to check if I can free up 5.8ghz space if so.


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Fwd: ChangeDetection: Are NanoBeams DFS Approved Yet

[Adair Winter]

You have to take a real class just to register??
On Dec 25, 2014 11:20 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 Yeah, I got that too.

 I like the logging of it.

 If you want DFS on a NanoBeam, apparently you're supposed to take an exam
 first?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:36:37 AM
 *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] Fwd: ChangeDetection: Are NanoBeams DFS Approved
 Yet

 So they gave up on DFS? :(

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: ro...@alert.changedetection.com
 Date: Dec 25, 2014 11:34 AM
 Subject: ChangeDetection: Are NanoBeams DFS Approved Yet
 To: j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 Cc:

 Note: Do not reply to this email!
 This message was automatically generated by your
 ChangeDetection system. For help or to contact a human,
 see the information at the very end of this email. Thanks!
 __


 At your request we are sending you this alert to let you
 know that a page you have been monitoring has changed.

 The following monitored page has changed:

 http://arenanobeamsdfsapprovedyet.ubnt.com

 To see the details of the change, please click on the link below:


 http://www.changedetection.com/log/ubnt/arenanobeamsdfsapprovedyet/index_log.html


 To stop monitoring this page, or change your settings, log-in
 to your ChangeDetection account at:

 http://www.changedetection.com/login.html

 To stop monitoring this page:

 http://www.changedetection.com/u?d=4fsidrft0olscbna9u436h3504

 - ChangeDetection Help  Contact Information  -

 FAQ: http://www.changedetection.com/faq.html
 Contact: http://www.changedetection.com/contact.html

 ---


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Advice for a Strict NAT problem on a UBNT radio for Xbox

[Adair Winter]

What's your exact configuration? Sounds like radio is in router mode,
public ip?
On Dec 24, 2014 10:15 AM, alex phillips highspeedl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have UPNP turned on but the customer gets a strict nat issue plugged
 straight into the radio bypassing his router so the problem must be on my
 end right?

 Suggestions?

 --
 *Alex Phillips*
 CEO and General Manager
 RBNS.net
 HighSpeedLink.net
 *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2016)*
 *WISPA Vice President (2014-2015)*
 *FCC Committee Chairman*
 *540-908-3993 540-908-3993*

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] What in the world could be causing this?

[Adair Winter]

Looks like water is getting in your cable somewhere.


On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 We've had a couple rainstorms out here in Califirnia. Nothing too bad. A
 little windy...

 But anyways, i have come across about 6 customers who have a fried/burnt
 cat5e connector that is plugged into the PoE port of the UBNT injector. Has
 happened on cabling with and without the ESD drain wire, has happened both
 on gel-filled and non gel-filled cable, Has happened while plugged directly
 in wall power and on surge protectors. Has happened on Rockets and
 Nanostations. However, all were using the UBNT 24VDC/1A PoE injectors.

 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Mike

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirVision and AirCams

[Adair Winter]

Think you meant
http://www.wmwisp.net/cams.html

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:

 I have a bunch of AirCams running 1.1.5 firmware.  Due to the fact that
 they have some custom code pushing a .jpg file, (still image), to a
 webserver once a minuet, I don't want their firmware updated or
 changed.  You can see their pictures at www.wmwisp.net/cams

 Now, I want some extra capabilitys that AirVision should be able to
 supply... I want motion triggered recording and a seek capability.

 What is the latest version of AirVision that can use the cameras with
 1.1.5 on them and not update them?

 Thanks...

 --
 West Michigan Wireless ISP
 Allegan, Michigan  49010
 269-686-8648

 A Division of:
 Camp Communication Services, INC

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] dev.ubnt.com

[Adair Winter]

airCRM?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote:

 What is dev.ubnt.com and why are a lot of my radios trying to contact it?

 Phil

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Happy Green Friday!

[Adair Winter]

Yep, I removed some that looked just like that or worse (the foil was
starting to open up in spots)

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 The jacket is almost totally gone on the cable.  It was working 100 full
 on a Canopy radio right up until today when we replaced it.

 http://i.imgur.com/D9vJrsZ.jpg

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

I keep seeing people say this. but it doesn't make sense to me. it's on
+6dB more Tx power than DFS when using PTMP. PtP is 56dBm? makes more sense
to me to put PtP's there.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net
wrote:

 Thank god there not getting it. I'd like to keep that free for my ptmp
 products.
 On Dec 9, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 So would bigger dishes or connectors.  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:52:19 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

Of course. DFS is worthless for PtP on over about 4-6 miles. Most of our
shots are 6-14 miles.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 Ptp doesn't need the power unless you're doing super far shots.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Dec 9, 2014 11:21 AM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 I keep seeing people say this. but it doesn't make sense to me. it's on
 +6dB more Tx power than DFS when using PTMP. PtP is 56dBm? makes more sense
 to me to put PtP's there.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net
 wrote:

 Thank god there not getting it. I'd like to keep that free for my ptmp
 products.
 On Dec 9, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

 So would bigger dishes or connectors.  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:52:19 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

in DFS? 30dBm is 30dBm.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
wrote:

 Bigger dishes, though even the biggest dishes top out at 15 - 20 miles.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:30:56 AM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Of course. DFS is worthless for PtP on over about 4-6 miles. Most of our
 shots are 6-14 miles.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
  wrote:

 Ptp doesn't need the power unless you're doing super far shots.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Dec 9, 2014 11:21 AM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 I keep seeing people say this. but it doesn't make sense to me. it's on
 +6dB more Tx power than DFS when using PTMP. PtP is 56dBm? makes more sense
 to me to put PtP's there.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net
 wrote:

 Thank god there not getting it. I'd like to keep that free for my ptmp
 products.
 On Dec 9, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

 So would bigger dishes or connectors.  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:52:19 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

Here is an 8' dish
http://www.radiowaves.com/en/product/hp8-5-2

Bet it costs more $3-4k? and at 40dB gain, you'd have to run -10 tx on the
radio..
or use two antennas. one for TX and one for RX.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:

  I think you would need kind of large dishes to do that in DFS about
 20 footers might do :p
  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 10:41 AM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

   140*

 Not in DFS, though, I assume. Not sure DFS was available when he put those
 out.  :-p



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

  --
  *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:38:29 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Travis did 40 mile shots between mountains.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Dec 9, 2014 11:32 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

  Bigger dishes, though even the biggest dishes top out at 15 - 20 miles.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

  --
  *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:30:56 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Of course. DFS is worthless for PtP on over about 4-6 miles. Most of our
 shots are 6-14 miles.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 Ptp doesn't need the power unless you're doing super far shots.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
   On Dec 9, 2014 11:21 AM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 I keep seeing people say this. but it doesn't make sense to me. it's on
 +6dB more Tx power than DFS when using PTMP. PtP is 56dBm? makes more sense
 to me to put PtP's there.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net
 wrote:

 Thank god there not getting it. I'd like to keep that free for my ptmp
 products.
 On Dec 9, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

  So would bigger dishes or connectors.  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

  --
  *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:52:19 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
 wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

[Adair Winter]

OK.. I'm not really sure 4', 6'   8'+ dishes are in many peoples budget.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
wrote:

 Receive gain.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:36:23 AM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 in DFS? 30dBm is 30dBm.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

 Bigger dishes, though even the biggest dishes top out at 15 - 20 miles.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:30:56 AM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Of course. DFS is worthless for PtP on over about 4-6 miles. Most of our
 shots are 6-14 miles.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 Ptp doesn't need the power unless you're doing super far shots.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Dec 9, 2014 11:21 AM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 I keep seeing people say this. but it doesn't make sense to me. it's on
 +6dB more Tx power than DFS when using PTMP. PtP is 56dBm? makes more sense
 to me to put PtP's there.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net
 wrote:

 Thank god there not getting it. I'd like to keep that free for my ptmp
 products.
 On Dec 9, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

 So would bigger dishes or connectors.  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:52:19 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

 Nope. And really sucks also. It would be a great place for them.

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
 wrote:

  Are the AF5 going to get the 5.1 GHz add-on?



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

[Adair Winter]

So I bought some early rocket AC's to test with and never got them deployed
due to the lack of airview. now I'm reading that my rockets might not
support it at all due to a hardware change? or was it just software??...
How can I verify this for sure? is there a particular series or something?
Or do I just need to fire them up and see?

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:

  Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I
 have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p

 So is the only difference with this new Rocket AirPrism, or are there
 other  changes as well?
  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Ben Moore [ben.mo...@ubnt.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:27 PM

 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

   ;-)  I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added
 (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with
 that).  Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;)

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 wrote:

  ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones.
 I guess I should actually read stuff. This is what happens when you don't
 make new stuff look different :p
  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:22 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

Oh, so the non-Lite Rocket. Sorry.

 The e-mail didn't really make it clear that there were new things, just
 the same platform hype we had 14 months ago. I didn't read it all, just
 skimmed it because it didn't look any different.

 Ohhh, so the PtMP works now with the new software?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

  --
  *From: *Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:20:19 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

 The 3 new products announced today:

  R5AC-PTP - Rocket w/AirPrism, PTP only
 NBE-5AC-19 - 19dB NanoBeam
 PBE-5AC-620 - 620mm PowerBeam

  Also, all of the software updates:

  http://www.ubnt.com/broadband/software/

  Some highlights:

  - Dedicated spectrum analysis (persistent)
 - CINR (Carrier to Interference and Noise Ratio - accurate assessment of
 channel conditions
 - New diagnostic tools (Ethernet Cabling test, RF Diagnostics, etc...)
 - PTMP enabled on R5AC-LITE

  The R5AC-PTMP (AirPrism AP) will be announced shortly.

  Thanks,
 Ben

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 wrote:

   We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems
 with them.

 I think the NanoBeam AC might be new... at least I hadn't seen it
 before, but otherwise, no, nothing new.

  --
 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:07 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

For those of you that have them...  are they working well?

 Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like
 it.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Will this crap never go away

[Adair Winter]

Been there!

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

  Green wire….  4 repairs last week and 1 already today.

 See the attached picture



 *Steven Barnes*

 GM

 PCSWIN.com

 Howard LLC.



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl

[Adair Winter]

Is this the new fools day? DECEMBER FOOLS!
I see nothing on the ubnt site... buuut maybe mike knows something we don't?

I just don't see how this can be true... Most people can't make a VPN work
as it is how the hell am I supposed to depend on this to work if it's not
INSIDE my network?

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 Us:  We want a working AirControl for our Ubnt gear!!!

 Ubnt:  Here is a solution to a problem you didn't have.

 Me:  *facepalm*


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 Wha? Are you serious?
 On Dec 1, 2014 3:09 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the
 cloud.

 How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only
 to fuck it up this badly?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working

[Adair Winter]

don't do that. run a test THROUGH the switch.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:43 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 No, IPerf directly on the TS8. That was after running speedtests from
 laptop. I could go back to the tower and run IPerf on the laptop to a
 server at my NOC?

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 Are you doing MT BW Tests?  Might be maxing out the CPU on the router.

 Regards,
 Chuck

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 I know but I actually get a touch above 100 - like 104-106...

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 A 100 meg limit sounds like a 100 BaseT problem to me, but who knows!


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem down!

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 You should be getting 770 megs on a test in either direction (even at
 the same time!)


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop
 was maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber?  Is it linked at
 gig?  Is your laptop's CPU maxed out?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 It might be the capacity but when I test I only get around 100Mbps.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett 
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it
 tells you the channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 --
 *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:48:52 PM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working

 Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber?

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter 
 ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote:

 I usually just SSH to the client radio/far side, run iperf -s
 then go to one of my servers in the data center and run iperf -c 
 (client
 IP) -P5
 works better than the web interface anyway


 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Peoples 
 dpe...@gmail.com wrote:

 For speedtests I actually have a 5 year old bullet m5 in my NOC
 with the wlan disabled on the latest firmware, it has to be 
 rebooted about
 once a month for it to work.

 Also, I don't know when they changed it, but for some reason
 the results of the speedtests(which I thought were UDP) are 
 actually what I
 can real world get with TCP on that same circuit. Anyone know 
 whats up with
 this? I have tested from several different points in our network 
 with a
 variety of backhauls to that bulletm5 and get real world TCP 
 speeds now a
 days.

 *Daniel Peoples*
 Resonance Broadband
 *Resonancebroadband.com* http://Resonancebroadband.com
 918-429-3620


 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Tim Kerns t...@cv-access.com
 wrote:

   Not so easy to doif you have, like me,some bullets or
 air grids then they can not have anything  above 5.3 because 
 you lose
 DFS.

 These were not re-certified by UBNT.

 :0


  *From:* Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 *Sent:* Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:02 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working


 Just get everything on 5.5.10.  No reason not to.



 Rory



 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:
 ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson
 (airCloud)
 *Sent:* Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:01 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working



 We have noticed that if the SW versions don't match it will
 not work.



 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Peoples 
 dpe...@gmail.com wrote:

 This is something that has been an issue since 5.5 as far as I
 know.

 On Nov 16, 2014 11:18 AM, Paul Conlin 
 pcon...@blazebroadband.com wrote:

 Is there a fix for this?  A workaround besides rebooting?  We
 are on 5.5.8.  Should we move up to 5.5.10?



 PC

 Blaze Broadband





 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:
 ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel and
 Regina Peoples
 *Sent:* Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:57 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working



 This is a Feature of 5.5+ IIRC 5.3.5 didn't have this issue.


   *Daniel Peoples*
 Resonance

Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working

[Adair Winter]

I'm excited. these are kick ass switches.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:

  Chris will be making 8 and 12 port versions, also DC SWITCHES :)

  josh reynolds :: chief information officer
 spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com

 On 12/01/2014 12:46 PM, RickG wrote:

 Those are nice but an expensive rack mount switch is a bit overkill for a
 remote tower. Need something smaller.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 Netonix.com !

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:40 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Confirmed. I just ran IPerf from one TS8 to another TS8 and just get
 around 100MBps! I'm going to move them to a tower with less traffic then.
 Now what do I use for a higher capacity switch? I hate to put a high dollar
 switch in a rough environment.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com
 wrote:

  Toughswitches are fundamentally broken and we have been pulling them
 off our network. If you need more info, there's like a 25 page thread on
 the Ubiquiti forum.

 Also, you can't use them to generate much traffic as everything will be
 done by the management cpu/interface, which is 100Mb.

 josh reynolds :: chief information officer
 spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com

  On 12/01/2014 12:11 PM, RickG wrote:

 Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem down!

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 You should be getting 770 megs on a test in either direction (even at
 the same time!)


  Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

   On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop
 was maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman 
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

 100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber?  Is it linked at
 gig?  Is your laptop's CPU maxed out?


  Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

   On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 It might be the capacity but when I test I only get around 100Mbps.

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett 
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

  iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it
 tells you the channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

  --
 *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:48:52 PM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working

 Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber?

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter 
 ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote:

 I usually just SSH to the client radio/far side, run iperf -s
 then go to one of my servers in the data center and run iperf -c 
 (client
 IP) -P5
 works better than the web interface anyway


 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Peoples dpe...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 For speedtests I actually have a 5 year old bullet m5 in my NOC
 with the wlan disabled on the latest firmware, it has to be 
 rebooted about
 once a month for it to work.

 Also, I don't know when they changed it, but for some reason the
 results of the speedtests(which I thought were UDP) are actually 
 what I can
 real world get with TCP on that same circuit. Anyone know whats up 
 with
 this? I have tested from several different points in our network 
 with a
 variety of backhauls to that bulletm5 and get real world TCP speeds 
 now a
 days.

  *Daniel Peoples*
 Resonance Broadband
  *Resonancebroadband.com* http://Resonancebroadband.com
 918-429-3620


   On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Tim Kerns t...@cv-access.com
 wrote:

   Not so easy to doif you have, like me,some bullets or
 air grids then they can not have anything  above 5.3 because 
 you lose
 DFS.

 These were not re-certified by UBNT.

 :0


  *From:* Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 *Sent:* Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:02 PM
  *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working


 Just get everything on 5.5.10.  No reason not to.



 Rory



 *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:
 ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson
 (airCloud)
 *Sent:* Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:01 PM
 *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
 *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working



 We have noticed that if the SW versions don't match it will not
 work.



 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Peoples 
 dpe...@gmail.com wrote:

 This is something that has been an issue since 5.5 as far as I
 know.

 On Nov 16, 2014 11:18 AM, Paul Conlin 
 pcon...@blazebroadband.com wrote:

 Is there a fix

Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Backhauls [WAS] AF5 distance

[Adair Winter]

There are no G2's with an internal antenna. You either use 18, 24, 36,
48 or bigger antennas depending on the required reliability and distance.
I have a 13 mile 11Ghz link that drops is heavy rain. like 2+ hour rain.
but it's only happened once and it was along the ENTIRE path.

If you want to talk to someone about them Tee from WLANMall / Continental
Computers is the the man. t...@wlanmall.com

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Adair, Those look good too. Do you use the versions with internal or
 external antennas? What distances?

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
 wrote:

 We use Exalt ExtendAir G2

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:31 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, I'd like to do a budget and need to know what others are using
 besides just the manufacturer such as the model numbers, antenna size,
 etc...

 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
 wrote:

 You're just supposed to get someone else to do the math for you...

 really, just pick a brand and tell them what you want to do, and
 they'll tell you what you need... I like SAF too.

 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
 behalf of Seth Mattinen [se...@rollernet.us]
 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:44 PM
 To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance

 On 12/1/14, 12:34, Josh Luthman wrote:
  Waste of time in the licensed world.  They all perform as they
  advertise.  Modulation * channel size = megabits per second.  Price
  varies, GUI varies, support varies.  Go SAF!


 It was my understanding that there would be no math.

 ~Seth
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --
 -RickG KyWiFi

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --

 Adair Winter
 VP, Network Operations / Owner
 Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
 C: 806.231.7180
 http://www.amarillowireless.net


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




 --
 -RickG KyWiFi

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] RM5 V5.5.10

[Adair Winter]

Enable logging and see if it's taking DFS hits. if so the radio will jump
to a non-dfs freq no matter what.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com wrote:

  Any reason, I can't seem to hard code 5300DFS in a RM5  v.5.5.10?
 (Actually several of the upper channel DFS)
 It goes to another frequency set in the frequency list.  If I disable the
 frequency list, it still goes to another frequency.

 Now the RM5 in question is a backup AP ptp link and is not connected at
 this time.

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird site survey activity

[Adair Winter]

I've always noticed odd things when doing site survey's. Hitting refresh
rarely seems to actually do a new scan.
If you close it down and open it back up, what does it show?

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 I'm wondering how long the site survey page takes to refresh.  I've got a
 scan on it showing a backhaul that is/was 5660 but I've changed that to
 5765 about 20 minutes ago.  I manually scan and still see it on the wrong
 frequency...

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Default open/closed ports - [WAS] DMZ Management Ports, what are they?

[Adair Winter]

Upnp is worthless if there is another Nat router behind your cpe.
On Nov 29, 2014 12:30 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Adair, That's really interesting, I'll have to try that. So you don't use
 UPNP?

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net
  wrote:

 This is how we set our route mode CPE's and IF anyone has trouble we tell
 them to manually set their router to the DMZ IP (and give them gateway,
 netmask and dns info). If they don't know how to do that. We log in to the
 radio and set the DMZ IP to whatever their router pulled from our radio.
 This setup works perfectly and we never have any problems with any
 services and generally only need to have people set their router in the DMZ
 IF they need port forwarding.
 With this setup the WAN port of the radio (WAN.1201 in the image) is not
 pingable and can not be managed from the internet.
 The only way we can manage CPE's is from the internal network. IF you
 want to access from the internet you'd have to uncheck the Block
 Management Access alternatively you may also need to uncheck the DMZ
 management ports. I can't remember. I do NOT want my CPE's to be accessed
 from the outside world in anyway shape or form. With our setup IF they need
 access to something inside this allows that to happen without having to
 bridge the radio. SIP, VPN, Games all work fine.

 [image: Inline image 1]

 [image: Inline image 2]

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:58 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, I occasionally get complaints that the XBox network test shows
 ports closed and security cameras aren't viewable remotely. I'll try UPNP.
 Thanks!

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
  wrote:

 If there hasn't been an issue yet, then there's probably not a problem.

 Turn on uPNP, call it a day.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Friday, November 28, 2014 2:10:39 PM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Default open/closed ports - [WAS] DMZ
 Management Ports, what are they?

 Mainly be sure I'm not causing issues for customers. Such as XBox or
 security cameras not being able to function properly.

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Mike Hammett 
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 What problem are you having that you're trying to solve?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Friday, November 28, 2014 2:19:56 AM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Default open/closed ports - [WAS] DMZ
 Management Ports, what are they?

 True. Perhaps what I need to do on the CPE is set the DHCP range for 1
 IP addy and put that addy in the DMZ? Then the radio wouldn't 
 inadvertently
 block anything.

 On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Mike Hammett 
 wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 There's nothing to open or close.

 You couldn't set port forwards ahead of time without knowing what
 they want and where they want it. That's what uPNP is for.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:19:45 PM

 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Default open/closed ports - [WAS] DMZ
 Management Ports, what are they?

 That helps a lot! I have my customers in router mode with NAT enabled
 without opening any ports. I really dont get any complaints but I'm 
 trying
 to be sure I am not causing any undo issues for my customers, so, should 
 I
 open any ports or is default sufficient?

 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net
 wrote:

  I think there is some confusion.

 In router mode with NAT enabled and DMZ disabled the only thing it
 will pass to the customer is stuff that is set in the port forwarding
 section.  (iptables -t nat -L)

 In router mode with NAT enabled and DMZ enabled it will pass
 everything to the DMZ IP except management ports (unless DMZ management
 ports is checked)  (iptables -t nat -L  will show all ports not passed 
 to
 the router).  If DMZ management ports is checked then everything is 
 sent to
 the DMZ IP

Re: [Ubnt_users] DMZ Management Ports, what are they?

[Adair Winter]

I would assume that's it.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net
wrote:

 I assume 80, 22, 443. What others are there? I can't find it in any of
 the manuals.
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DMZ Management Ports, what are they?

[Adair Winter]

I thought about that. but. if so, that should be it.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:

  oops not 21, 23.

 possibly 23 for telnet

  On 11/14/2014 03:36 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:

 I assume 80, 22, 443. What others are there? I can't find it in any of
 the manuals.
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing 
 listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 --
 josh reynolds :: chief information officer
 spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

[Adair Winter]

WDS issues with non ubiquiti ap's?

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:

 Probably since the Nanobeams definitely have WDS issues.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 On Nov 9, 2014 7:19 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote:

 Any issues on the new hardware inside the old models?



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
 *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 *Sent: *Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:18:05 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

 Just had that happen on a RocketM5. I can't keep up.

 On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 wrote:

 Can I assume that all the NS5M Locos now have the same processors as the
 Nanobeams?  They are coming preloaded with XW firmware.  Very confusing.



 Rory Conaway
 Triad Wireless
 4226 S. 37th Street
 Phoenix, Az.  85040
 602-426-0542
 r...@triadwireless.net
 www.triadwireless.net



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400

[Adair Winter]

 ( lwei...@excel.net )
  Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/
  (920) 452-0455 %28920%29%20452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area
  (888) 489-9995 %2%29%20489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
  Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:56:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
 
  Tone down the hysteria guys.  The FCC certifies manufacturers in batch.
  When Ubiquiti had to pull a radio from the FCC for an issue, all their
  radios went to the back of the line.  That included the Powerbeam.
  That's the delay.  But yes, the PowerBridge not getting certified
  totally sucked.  I've got a bunch of them.
 
  Rory
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Paul
  Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 5:45 PM
  To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400
 
  So you are saying we take a risk every time we buy ubnt equipment of
  notting getting what was promised and expected unless it is already
  there? Maybe we shouldn't trust ubnt at their word?
  I have a lot invested in ubnt and they are not feeling very much like
  a partner anymore!
 
 
  On 11/2/2014 6:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
  On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote:
  So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought
  will not certify because of hardware problems?
 
  No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus
  a risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example.
 
  ~Seth
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing 
 listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users