Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

[Ridgetop Networks]

It moved from beta into general release pretty fast, like some other recent
firmwares have. I think there are other motivations like security patches
and high priority bug fixes, when it moves fast like that - making
important updates available to people who aren't beta testers.

I haven't had any problems yet with v6.0.4 beta, for what it's worth... On
the other hand, I had been running 6.0.3 beta for weeks before I saw
problems.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:07 PM Jan-OOLLC  wrote:

> So, we can assume v6.0.4 is beta and we are the test subjects?  Can we
> expect a report from whoever is daring enough to deploy?
>
> Jan V
>
> On 05/08/2017 10:52 AM, Ridgetop Networks wrote:
>
> There were issues with stations refusing to reassociate until the AP was
> rebooted up to 6.0.3. So far so good with 6.0.4 for me, but it was
> infrequent enough in 6.0.3 that I can't confidently say it's fixed in 6.0.4.
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:59 AM Jan-OOLLC 
> wrote:
>
>> was the report of an 18dBm drop in RX an error with v6.0.3?
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> On 05/08/2017 08:47 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>
>> 6.0 was a double edge sword, it did improve some PtMs, but was dropping
>> clients randomly. Not seeing that with 6.0.3.
>>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net <
>> t...@byhalia.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I am on 5.6.15 for both XM and XW.  So far working well.  Waiting on
>>> feedback from others on final version 6 updates to use as I did not see
>>> good results when I tested 6.0 so staying clear for now.
>>>
>>> Troy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>>
>>>  Original message 
>>> From: Jan-OOLLC 
>>> Date: 5/8/17 11:22 AM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0
>>>
>>> What is the safest best release to use as of right now?
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2017 05:33 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>> v6.0.4 is out... have not switch yet here
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Scott Lambert 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just checking, did you also note a drop in modulation to match the drop
>>>> in modulation? Just want to make sure the RSSI drop you've observed is not
>>>> purely cosmetic.
>>>>
>>>> We are late adopters here, so no experience.
>>>>
>>>> On May 7, 2017 4:57:42 PM CDT, Nick Bright 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> v6.0 is said to have disassociation problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested v6.0.3 on several sites with a mix of XM/XW (mostly XM)
>>>>> 2.4GHz hardware. Mostly RM2 AP units, some BulletM2 units. Mostly AirGrid
>>>>> and PowerBeam SMs.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was stable, with no disassociation issues, but we had a non-trivial
>>>>> number of SM units exhibit a *significant* drop in RX signal strength - 
>>>>> but
>>>>> it was not consistent across the AP. We also showed experimentally that
>>>>> restoring that one SM unit back to 5.6.15 (leaving the AP unit at 6.0.3)
>>>>> restored the signal strength to the previous level. Some clients lost as
>>>>> much as 18dBm RX strength.
>>>>>
>>>>> We chose to go back to 5.6.15 at that point.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/6/2017 5:49 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I sent him XW and XM, if anyone else has other versions, send them
>>>>> over.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Daniel Peoples*
>>>>> Resonance Broadband
>>>>> *Resonancebroadband.com* <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
>>>>> 918-429-3620
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Eduardo  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We have currently using v5.6.6 and want to try v6.0.3, was told that
>>>>>> v6.0 was more stable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does someone have the v6.0 firmware?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

[Ridgetop Networks]

gt;
>>>> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of 
>>>> the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain 
>>>> information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure 
>>>> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>>>> message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, 
>>>> distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you 
>>>> have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by 
>>>> reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Armored Cat6

[Ridgetop Networks]

Local electrical supply house.

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Jon Langeler 
wrote:

> You will want something closer to BBDN6 I'm thinking
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Jim Egan  wrote:
>
> Where are you guys buying the Superior Essex Armored Cat6 from?  I believe
> it's called Interlock?  Having trouble finding a vendor.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Jim Egan
>
> *VP - Technical Operations*
> m: (888) 631-9666 ext. 3 <(888)%20631-9666>
> a: 229 W Pine St. Eagle River, WI 54521
> w: sonicnet.us  e: j...@sonicnet.us
>
> <https://facebook.com/SonicNetWisconsin>
> <https://twitter.com/SonicNetWisc>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jim-egan-2833066a>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Armored Cat6

[Ridgetop Networks]

Essex BBDN/BBDG is sturdy, but conduit is sturdier.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:01 AM,  wrote:

> We used some Shireen Cat6 and was not very happy.  Had a really hard time
> getting the ends on it even after re ordering specific ends for it.  But I
> dont thing changing to cat 6 will help with an animal problem though.  Id
> put conduit on it if possible.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Armored Cat6
> From: "Jim Egan" 
> Date: 3/27/17 11:55 am
> To: Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> What are you guys using for armored Cat6 on sites where cables have a
> tendency of being damaged by wildlife?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Egan
>
> *VP - Technical Operations*
> m: (888) 631-9666 ext. 3 <(888)%20631-9666>
> a: 229 W Pine St. Eagle River, WI 54521
> w: sonicnet.us  e: j...@sonicnet.us
> <https://facebook.com/SonicNetWisconsin>
> <https://twitter.com/SonicNetWisc>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jim-egan-2833066a>
>
> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT new Firmware

[Ridgetop Networks]

Agreed! I'm sorely missing browser form field history in v8.

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Kees H  wrote:

> Please can we get usability over looks.  PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
>
> We use to be able to program the radios fast in the shop.  Enter the first
> character of the IP and click on the full IP bang. done.
> Now with the “new and not improved” firmware, the browser no longer keeps
> the information for the fields.  We have to enter each and every setting
> over and over and over.
>
> Some with the name on the activation code.
>
> Please allow the keeping of the information as you had it in the v.5 etc.
>
> We program all are radios to a default setting and once the radios are
> install assign an individual setting.
>
> Also what ever happened to the customized firmware.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PBE-AC5-400 shortage

[Ridgetop Networks]

ISPSupplies is showing 20 in stock.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> Where are they all???  Everyone I've checked with is out.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ac2 and commands

[Ridgetop Networks]

That works fine for wireless settings, but settings from the Network tab
can't be configured in AC2. I believe some guys use Ansible to script it?

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:14 PM, David Jones 
wrote:

> Configure section. then schedule it if needed. I have no experience with
> scripting it.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you scripting it or just using the configure section?
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> 480-287-9960 <(480)%20287-9960> Fax
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:11 AM, David Jones  wrote:
>>
>> Yes. We did Mass Wireless password changes, Chanel width etc.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone successfully used aircontrol to send mass configuration
>>> changes like firewall changes to stations?
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>> 480-287-9960 Fax
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Jones
>> NGL Connection
>> 307-288-5491 ext 702 <(307)%20288-5491>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> David Jones
> NGL Connection
> 307-288-5491 ext 702 <(307)%20288-5491>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Https:

[Ridgetop Networks]

Maybe an ssl cert would survive reboot with -cs firmware?
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airOS-Software-Configuration/airOS-5-6-with-Custom-Script-Support/m-p/1624488#U1624488
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:18 AM Sam Tetherow  wrote:

> Have you done this post 5.6.4+ firmware?  I just did a quick look through
> the interface and didn't see any place to change the certificate and local
> modifications are wiped on reboot now.
>
> On 02/03/2017 10:02 AM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
>
> To truly do away with the warning, you'd need:
>
> 1) a wildcard cert (say, "*.cpe.pcswin.com")
> 2) that cert installed on every CPE
> 3) a DNS record for every CPE management IP (i.e. "
> 10-2-3-100.cpe.pcswin.com")
> 4) always access the CPE using the DNS record
>
> If you access the CPE via IP directly even with the above cert on it, the
> browser will still throw the cert warning because the FQDN you went to
> (which was just the IP) doesn't match the host name on the cert, which
> would be "*.cpe.pcswin.com".
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 2/3/17 8:04 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
> Having several thousand UBNT devices that use HTTPS, is there any way to get 
> around the: Your Connection is not private, then clicking advanced and then 
> Proceed to 10.0.0.1 (unsafe).
>
> Some I have turned the HTTPS off but would like the extra security when doing 
> updates and the like.
>
> I have 6 techs and 10 systems that access all these and wanted to know if 
> there was a work around.
>
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> New Lisbon BroadbandNLBC.COMPCSWIN.COM
> 765-584-2288 ext:1101
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Random users keep dropping off with 6.0

[Ridgetop Networks]

I have mixed XM and XW clients on XM and XW aps. I had them all on almost
half the beta v6 releases, and never had this problem with clients dropping.

I was still on RC2 when the 6.0 final came out and people started reporting
their clients were dropping and M900 radios were getting bricked. I'm
hanging out on RC2 until these things get resolved.

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 1:55 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have never had any issues with official releases from ubnt.  Call me
> lucky.
>
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Jan 15, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Tommy Adams  wrote:
>
> I am shocked how many people keep installing new firmwares from UBNT and
> expecting them to work. Before installing any new firmware from any
> manufacturer check the forums. We use Mikrotik, UBNT, Mimosa, and Cambium.
> Never do I apply a newly released "upgrade" without a quick perusal all of
> the forums. We are all network admins here and should remember never test
> on a live network.
>
> Everyone is acting all shocked a UBNT firmware is not working. From my
> experience over the last five years that is modus operandi for them. Please
> stop acting shocked when you receive the same weird results as 100's of
> others. And why in gods name does UBNT not pull the firmware when they find
> issues. UBNT uses its purchasers to find the bugs. Drives me nuts.
>
> Not trying to enrage people and I am not picking on anyone really except
> UBNT.
>
> We are all in this together,
>
> Tommy
>
>
> 
> Tommy A.
> Digitex.com
>
> 817.558.6230 V
> 817.558.1204 F
>
> On Jan 15, 2017, at 1:30 PM, RickG  wrote:
>
> I'd like to think fork lifting for anything would help but looking at the
> forums it appears any brand has it's own share of issues.
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Peoples  wrote:
>
> One of many reasons to fork lift for mimosa.
>
> On Jan 15, 2017 10:58 AM, "Rory Conaway"  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just had to replace 3 Nanostation Locos because 6.0 wouldn’t connect
> between them for some unknown reason.  Throwing in a Nanobeam-19 didn’t
> help.  Now I have 30 users that randomly dropped off a Rocket 5M although
> 10 people are still connected.
>
> Frequency doesn’t matter.  On the NSM Locos, going back to 5.5.9 didn’t
> help.  Trying that now but this sucks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway**• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
>
> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net *
>
>
> *www.triadwireless.net *
>
>
>
>
>
> “Baseball - we do not stop playing because we grow old, we grow old
> because we stop playing”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -RickG KyWiFi
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
>
> Ubnt_users mailing list
>
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] armored cat6 outdoor cable

[Ridgetop Networks]

I like Essex BBDN, too; foil inner shield instead of copper-clad steel.
Haven't tested it against raccoons though.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brendle <
mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Take a look at Superior Essex BBDG6
>
> On 1/11/2017 4:34 PM, Terry Darst wrote:
>
> http://www.homedepot.com/p/AFC-Cable-Systems-1-2-in-x-
> 100-ft-Flexible-Steel-Conduit-5203-30-00/206741568?cm_mmc=
> Shopping%7cTHD%7cG%7c0%7cG-VF-PLA-D27E-Electrical%7c&gclid=
> CJC5rcOFu9ECFZaFswoduy8DpA&gclsrc=aw.ds
> <http://www.homedepot.com/p/AFC-Cable-Systems-1-2-in-x-100-ft-Flexible-Steel-Conduit-5203-30-00/206741568?cm_mmc=Shopping%7CTHD%7CG%7C0%7CG-VF-PLA-D27E-Electrical%7C&gclid=CJC5rcOFu9ECFZaFswoduy8DpA&gclsrc=aw.ds>
>
> Cut short sections to shield where’re you are having issues.
>
>
> Terry Darst
> President
> ANTS-Technology Inc.
> 1105 E. Moore Ave
> Terrell, TX 75160
> te...@ants-technology.com
> Office: (972) 524-2145 Ext. 2145 <(972)%20524-2145>
> Cell: (214) 878-2145
> www.ANTS-Technology.com
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Kevin Lamothe  wrote:
>
> Has anyone here used any armored cat6 cable?
>
> I'm having problems at one grain elevator where raccoons are living on
> the platforms. Gone through 3 rounds of shielded cat6 runs.
>
> The landlord doesn't want conduit ran is my other problem.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Radios Trying To Contact Decommissioned AC1 Server

[Ridgetop Networks]

You need to SSH into the radios that are sending the SYN packets, and use
mca-provision-list and mca-provision-rm to find and remove the entries for
the old AC1 server.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Tim Densmore  wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm seeing a strange widespread issue on my network so I thought I'd run
> it by the group.  We had an AC1 server that was decommissioned several
> months ago when we moved to AC2.  AC2 is up and working fine in a
> totally different subnet in a totally different physical location - no
> issue with that.  However, we have multiple (a couple hundred?) radios
> on 5.6.x and even 6.0 that are periodically sending syn packets to TCP
> port 9080 on the old server's IP address.  I've grepped the config files
> on a few of these radios and can't find anything referencing the IP or
> host name of the old server.  This behavior persists through reboots and
> firmware upgrades.
>
> So far, looking at packet captures, I haven't been able to see any
> pattern that would indicate that these syn packets are in response to
> inbound traffic, but I could be missing something obvious since there's
> quite a bit of customer traffic to sift through and aside from a
> source/dest IP pair I'm not sure what to look for.
>
> Anyone ever seen a similar issue or know of a phone-home setting I'm
> missing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim Densmore
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp

[Ridgetop Networks]

 here's my favorite - a kid files a complaint against us with the
> > bbb -
> >
> > "If you can avoid doing business with this company, I would
> > STRONGLY suggest it. This company is very sneaky, and claims that
> > the incredibly poor service and frequent downtime is simply out of
> > their hand. They offer a "completely unlimited package" for x
> > in which they CLAIM "as much connectivity as your radio allows".
> > After compiling data from around 100+ bandwidth connections tests
> > over the course of 6 months, with the average speed being around
> > 7Mbits (896 kilobytes). The pricing is not even close to
> > reflecting the service, the cap on the xx  package is 10Mbits,
> > so I am not even reaching the average on that. I can only say that
> > the highest tier package is nothing short of a scam. Whenever I
> > called to complain about this outrageous service, I was told that
> > it was too bad, and that nothing will be done. xx is a
> > conman, relying on shady business tactics to further his greed."
> >
> > btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well,
> > i just love human beings.
> >
> > i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access
> > points?
> >
> > usage graphed -
> >
> > access point 1 -
> >
> >
> >
> > access point #2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his
> > parents barn (yes, i said barn) and has
> > his own connection separate from his parents.
> >
> > question - am i asking too much of these access points?
> >
> > yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our
> > two busiest 2.4 rockets - - but
> > i am also getting complaints on other parts of our network.
> >
> > ok - thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> --
> >
> >
> >   ___
> >   Ubnt_users mailing list
> >   Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >   ___
> >   Ubnt_users mailing list
> >   Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   --
> >
> >   -RickG KyWiFi
> >
> >
> > 
> --
> >
> >
> >   ___
> >   Ubnt_users mailing list
> >   Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases

[Ridgetop Networks]

0]
> [11] [12]
>
> -
>
> FROM: "Rory Conaway" 
> TO: "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> SENT: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 2:08:38 PM
>
> SUBJECT: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>
> I just test it with an XM Rocket 5M. All clients on beta 15. 41
> users online. After installation, 18 users came up. Went back to
> Beta, 41 users online again. I'm not sure if I have to make all the
> clients 6.0 first but I do know that this is exactly what we saw
> with RC3 and we had to go to a lot of houses to unload it when they
> wouldn't reconnect. We refer to that as hell week.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] On
> Behalf Of Nick Bright
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 10:08 AM
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>
> On 12/20/2016 9:43 AM, Kevin Lamothe wrote:
>
> My experiences so far:
>
> 8.0 is stable
>
> 6.0 is stable running on 5GHz only. 2.4GHz and 900MHz AP/cpes will
>
>
> randomly disconnect or goto sleep. Downgrading it back to 5.6.9
>
> fixed
>
> it for us.
>
> Ubiquiti is reviewing some support files I sent em.
>
> Remember kids: Just say no to dot-oh. :D
>
> --
> ---
> - Nick Bright -
> - Vice President of Technology -
> - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
> - Tel 888-332-1616 <(888)%20332-1616> x 315 [13] / Fax 620-331-0789
> <(620)%20331-0789> [14] -
> - Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe? -
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault [15] -
> ---
>
> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the
> use of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may
> contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading,
> disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise
> using this transmission. If you have received this message in error,
> please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately
> delete this message from your system.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>
>
>
> Links:
> --
> [1] http://www.ics-il.com/
> [2] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
> [3] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
> [4] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
> [5] https://twitter.com/ICSIL
> [6] http://www.midwest-ix.com/
> [7] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
> [8] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
> [9] https://twitter.com/mdwestix
> [10] http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/
> [11] https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp
> [12] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg
> [13] tel:(888)%20332-1616
> [14] tel:(620)%20331-0789
> [15] http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault
> [16] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Off site Backup

[Ridgetop Networks]

Oops, I missed the "offsite" aspect. I'd run away from Cobian.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Sam Morris  wrote:

> Shawn, have you looked into maybe using rsync? It's much more efficient
> than ftp. I believe there is a Windows port, though I've only ever used
> it on Linux.
>
> Sam
>
> On 11/30/2016 6:34 AM, Shawn Burgei wrote:
> > We need to create a small offsite backup for a few clients. They don't
> want to pay the money for carbonite. Has anyone use Cobian and sent user
> backup via ftp to a windows server? Is there better options? (I am sure
> there is!) any suggestions would be great!
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shawn
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>



-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] Off site Backup

[Ridgetop Networks]

I've used Cobian to back up home PCs to external disks and/or mapped drives
on a NAS. It's always worked well for me. It only reports errors with a
system tray icon and small alert, so if the users aren't hands-on with
verifying their backups on a schedule, you should probably set up email
logs.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Tykwinski 
wrote:

> Veeam Endpoint works well, just need to FTP the files or send to a Veeam
> server if you are running one.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Eric Tykwinski
>
> TrueNet, Inc.
>
> P: 610-429-8300
>
>
>
> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 7:36 AM
> *To:* memb...@wispa.org
> *Cc:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] Off site Backup
>
>
>
> I tried that for a while.  Regretted it.
>
> I like SOS online backup.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2016 7:34 AM, "Shawn Burgei"  wrote:
>
> We need to create a small offsite backup for a few clients. They don't
> want to pay the money for carbonite. Has anyone use Cobian and sent user
> backup via ftp to a windows server? Is there better options? (I am sure
> there is!) any suggestions would be great!
>
> Thanks
> Shawn
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> Members mailing list
> memb...@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] airControl v2.1 has a web GUI now, what??

[Ridgetop Networks]

I've been playing with it a little bit this morning, and I really like it!
A year ago I never guessed things would turn out this well, but I'm liking
it way better than the direction U-CRM was going, and it's nice to have the
Java client too. It looks like you guys knocked it out of the park with
this one. Thanks for the notice, Matt!

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> I thought this was only possible in Java ;)
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Matt Hardy via Ubnt_users <
> ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> I know, I know ... it's in Beta ;)
>>
>> But if you want to check out the new Web UI, it was just released today:
>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airControl-v2-Beta/airControl-
>> 2-1-Beta-released/m-p/1696387
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> _______
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirControl2 V22

[Ridgetop Networks]

Yep, I started seeing them sometime in the past few versions as well.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Jones 
wrote:

> yup... we see the gaps as well.
>
> Not sure what is causing it but I think we saw them since they changed how
> they do the database.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Shawn Burgei 
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the
>> bandwidth charts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Shawn
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> David Jones
> NGL Connection
> 307-288-5491 ext 702
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

[Ridgetop Networks]

I'm remote logging into Splunk. On AirMax M radios, it seemed to be using
the timestamp from the device.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Jesse DuPont  wrote:

> Do you log to a remote syslog server or just the local syslog? I use a
> remote syslog server and it has it's own date/time stamp on the log entries
> it applies as it receives them. Obviously I'll only see log entries if the
> radios are linked (if the link is required to reach the remote syslog
> server). This way, I can sort by the syslog server's time stamp and at
> least have solid order of events to look at.
>
> *Jesse DuPont*
>
> Network Architect
> email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
> Celerity Networks LLC
>
> Celerity Broadband LLC
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
>
> Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
> On 7/12/16 9:22 AM, Ridgetop Networks wrote:
>
> I noticed my UBNT radios didn't seem to know about DST, and it was making
> it hard to find things in syslog, so now I've got all my devices set to
> GMT. Is there a better way?
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Jon Auer  wrote:
>
>> 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org should work, but it's not one consistent host.
>> There's a chance that the host you are given could be down (there's a small
>> amount of time between health checks and servers being pulled from the
>> pool).
>> The addresses returned by N.vendor.pool.ntp.org vary for load balancing.
>> You might get a different host every time you make a DNS query.
>>
>> If you have your own stratum 1 or stratum 2 server you should look at
>> contributing to the NTP pool: http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/
>> We have a GPS-based stratum 1 feeding some stratum 2 servers that
>> participate in the pool. Traffic is minimal.
>>
>> We switched to a purpose-built NTP appliance combined with a stratum-2
>> cluster after we noticed that the time from LMG CTMs and Cambium CMMs was
>> somewhat inconsistent.
>> At least on the LMG side we were told that their NTP was intended only
>> for rough tower-local NTP services (we saw +/- 5 second variance).
>>
>> We're currently using the $300 TM1000A (make sure you are on latest
>> firmware) for stratum 1.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>>
>>> Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working.  I have lots of stuff
>>> pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but
>>> still off an hour.
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve Barnes
>>> Wireless Operations Manager
>>> PCSWIN.COM
>>> NLBC.COM
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Kaiser
> Ridgetop Networks, LLC
> 417-543-5513
> www.ridgetopnetworks.com
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

[Ridgetop Networks]

I noticed my UBNT radios didn't seem to know about DST, and it was making
it hard to find things in syslog, so now I've got all my devices set to
GMT. Is there a better way?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Jon Auer  wrote:

> 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org should work, but it's not one consistent host.
> There's a chance that the host you are given could be down (there's a small
> amount of time between health checks and servers being pulled from the
> pool).
> The addresses returned by N.vendor.pool.ntp.org vary for load balancing.
> You might get a different host every time you make a DNS query.
>
> If you have your own stratum 1 or stratum 2 server you should look at
> contributing to the NTP pool: http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/
> We have a GPS-based stratum 1 feeding some stratum 2 servers that
> participate in the pool. Traffic is minimal.
>
> We switched to a purpose-built NTP appliance combined with a stratum-2
> cluster after we noticed that the time from LMG CTMs and Cambium CMMs was
> somewhat inconsistent.
> At least on the LMG side we were told that their NTP was intended only for
> rough tower-local NTP services (we saw +/- 5 second variance).
>
> We're currently using the $300 TM1000A (make sure you are on latest
> firmware) for stratum 1.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steve Barnes  wrote:
>
>> Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working.  I have lots of stuff
>> pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but
>> still off an hour.
>>
>>
>> Steve Barnes
>> Wireless Operations Manager
>> PCSWIN.COM
>> NLBC.COM
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 
Andrew Kaiser
Ridgetop Networks, LLC
417-543-5513
www.ridgetopnetworks.com
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users