Re: I reported a caret navigation related issue with checkbox application

2012-04-05 Thread Hammer Attila

Hy Peter,

I absolute agree your comment, and reported following bug in GTK+:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673557

Hopefuly will be general fixing GTK developers this issue.

Attila

--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: I reported a caret navigation related issue with checkbox application

2012-04-05 Thread Peter Vágner

Hello,
Isn't there a hope for a more universal fix to this?
I know empathy and pidgin and possibly other apps also feature read-only 
edit boxes.

If this solution is accepted then it has to be done for all the application.
Shouldn't there be a feature in gtk+ it-self or other library where it's 
more appropriate which enables AT's to read the content eventhough the 
caret is not visually shown on the screen?


Greetings

Peter


On 5.4.2012 7:16, Hammer Attila  wrote:

Hy Krishnakant,

You don't need a daily build if you have an installed Ubuntu 12.04 system.
Launch simple the check box application in terminal the checkbox
command, and try read the read-only textview content with down arrow key.
If you would like trying the gtk interface, install checkbox-gtk
package, launch the checkbox-gtk application in terminal and try equals
test.
Default my system both two interface down arrow key press Orca not
speaking the selected line, because the caret navigation default is not
enabled. The GTK interface absolute sure, because if I press F7 key,
caret navigation again works right.

Attila




--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: I reported a caret navigation related issue with checkbox application

2012-04-04 Thread Hammer Attila

Hy Krishnakant,

You don't need a daily build if you have an installed Ubuntu 12.04 system.
Launch simple the check box application in terminal the checkbox 
command, and try read the read-only textview content with down arrow key.
If you would like trying the gtk interface, install checkbox-gtk 
package, launch the checkbox-gtk application in terminal and try equals 
test.
Default my system both two interface down arrow key press Orca not 
speaking the selected line, because the caret navigation default is not 
enabled. The GTK interface absolute sure, because if I press F7 key, 
caret navigation again works right.


Attila

--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: I reported a caret navigation related issue with checkbox application

2012-04-04 Thread Krishnakant Mane

Hi,
Which daily build contains this bug?
I think since all major things are working pritty fine, this would be 
quite easy to sort out.
I will have some good internet connection tomorrow so would download the 
daily build for sure.

Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.

On 04/04/12 20:24, Hammer Attila wrote:

Hy,

Nnow in Ubuntu Precise the checkbox-qt package are default installed.
Both the QT interface and the old GTK interface the readonly textview 
widgets the caret navigation are disabled, Orca doesn't speak selected 
lines with arrow key movements.
I reported this issue in Launchpad, and attached a beginning patch 
with the GTK interface:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/973430

In the GTK interface the caret navigation already work, but the new 
textview widget the cursor lands default with end of the textview 
content.


In QT interface I not have ydea how can possible resolving the caret 
navigation related issue. In Ubuntu 12.04 with qt-at-spi 
0.2.0-0ubuntu1 version are packaged.
Not this is the latest upstream stable version with are fixed text 
entryes related issues (for example spokening deleted characters, etc)?


Attila




--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility